numeric nutrient criteria in florida
play

Numeric Nutrient Criteria In Florida David Guest . 2005 Massive Algae - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Numeric Nutrient Criteria In Florida David Guest . 2005 Massive Algae Outbreak Algae Was Extremely Toxic Human Contact With St. Lucie River Was Unsafe Takings Case Against The Corps Of Engineers United States Court Of Claims Case Barred By Statute


  1. Numeric Nutrient Criteria In Florida David Guest

  2. . 2005 Massive Algae Outbreak

  3. Algae Was Extremely Toxic

  4. Human Contact With St. Lucie River Was Unsafe

  5. Takings Case Against The Corps Of Engineers

  6. United States Court Of Claims

  7. Case Barred By Statute Of Limitations

  8. Toxic Algae Is A Problem Throughout Florida

  9. Toxic Algae Poisons Drinking Water

  10. Algae Bloom Came From Lake Okeechobee

  11. Toxic Algae In The Little Wekiva River

  12. Algae Outbreaks Destroy Property Values

  13. Visit Florida? Red Tide Bloom Approaching Little Gasparilla Island

  14. Tourism Is Essential To Florida’s Economy

  15. Florida’s Narrative Standard: Green Slime = Too Much Nutrients

  16. Co ‐ operative Federalism: EPA Oversees Clean Water Act Implementation By States

  17. Clean Water Act Citizen Suit: • 1998 EPA Clean Water Action Plan = Determination That Numeric Nutrient Criteria are “Necessary” • Florida DEP Nine Years Late on Developing Numeric Limits On Sewage, Fertilizer, And Manure Pollution • EPA’s “Necessity” Determination Triggers a “Mandatory” Duty to Promptly Establish Numeric Nutrient Criteria

  18. January 14, 2009 Determination Ben Grumbles, EPA Assistant Administrator For Water In Bush Administration Narrative Standard Is Ineffective Numeric Limits Needed In Florida

  19. Florida DEP Secretary Endorsed Bush EPA’s Determination “The new numeric water quality standards will help Florida…” January 16, 2009 Press Release

  20. August 2009 Settlement

  21. If DEP Can’t Beat The Problem In 15 Months – EPA Will Need To Step In

  22. Reaction To The Proposed Consent Decree

  23. 2009 DEP Proposed Nitrogen And Phosphorus Limits for Dark Tannin Lakes

  24. 2009 DEP Proposed Limits For Clear Lakes

  25. 2009 DEP Proposed Limits for Streams

  26. DEP’s 2009 Watershed Regions For Streams

  27. 2009 DEP Proposed Limits for Springs

  28. Water Quality Standards Apply To The Water Body

  29. Effluent Limits Apply At End Of Pipe

  30. Summer 2009: DEP Balked Under Pressure From Polluting Industries

  31. So EPA Adopted DEP’s 2009 Proposed Rule

  32. Some Industries Were Not Satisfied

  33. Lake Worth Drainage District

  34. Reverse Osmosis For All Discharges?

  35. Legal Challenges To EPA’s Rules 1. Federal Takeover Of State’s Right To Set Pollution Limits

  36. 2. EPA’s Determination Of Necessity Did Not Consider Crucial Information

  37. 3. EPA’s Rule Is A “One Size Fits All” Standard

  38. 4. EPA’s Science Is Wrong

  39. 5. The Problem Is Already Solved Through The TMDL Program

  40. Polluting Industries Sought A Budget Rider

  41. DEP Recently Proposed An Extremely Complex Nutrients Rule

  42. And An Even More Complex Impaired Waters Rule

  43. Conservationists Challenged Both – DEP Rules Won’t Stop Toxic Algae

  44. Polluting Industries Intervened To Defend DEP’s Rule

  45. The Case Is Under Advisement

  46. Federal Rule Upheld – Will Take Effect Unless A Valid DEP Rule Is Approved

  47. Florida’s Waters: Are We Joining The Developing World?

Recommend


More recommend