North Lake T ahoe Region T ra nsporta tion Upda te Jennifer Mercha nt Deputy Pla cer County Executive Officer
Discussion T opics 1. Projects Completed 2. T ra nsit Opera tions a nd Linka ges 3. Regiona l T ra il Network 4. Pla nning for the Future o Pla nning/ Projects o T ra nsit Opera tions o Funding
Where is Placer County?
T ransportation Investment Snow Creek Multi-Purpose T ra il
Planning for the Future KBCCIP , Pha se 1
Planning for the Future KBCCIP , Pha se 1
Planning for the Future KBCCIP , Pha se 1
T ransportation Investment Eight Sola r-Powered Shelters
T ahoe City T ransit Center
TART CNG Fueling Station
T ransit Operations a nd Linka ges • Tahoe Truckee Area Regional Transit – Annual Budget of $4.5 Million – 12 Buses 10 CNG & 2 Diesel – 23 to 30 Employees (depending on season) – 345,000 Ridership (2015) – 25,500 Vehicle Revenue Hours – 546,000 Vehicle Revenue Miles – 7.5 mile average passenger trip length
T ransit Operations a nd Linka ges • Service Partners – Town of Truckee – Washoe Regional Transportation Commission – Caltrans – NDOT – Truckee North Tahoe TMA – TRPA – PCTPA
T ransit Operations and Linkages TART Ba seline Routes
T ransit Operations and Linkages 437,063 434,022 450,000 370,644 363,372 357,828 400,000 344,740 345,158 342,876 338,116 338,536 301,396 350,000 295,116 289,080 277,611 285,781 300,000 245,269 245,032 239,563 229,077 235,850 233,692 222,080 224,690 212,574 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 1991/92 1993/94 1995/96 1997/98 1999/00 2001/02 2003/04 2005/06 2007/08 2009/10 2011/12 2013/14 TART Annua l Ridership
T ransit Operations and Linkages T ra nsient Occupa ncy T a x-Funded Services Transportation Service FY 2015-16 Budget Traffic Management- Summer and Winter $42,000 Peak Winter Connection- Truckee/S. Bowl 29,000 Winter Skier Shuttle- Lake to Resorts 30,000 Winter Hourly Nighttime 336,800 Summer Half-Hourly Daytime 171,900 Summer Hourly Nighttime 151,000 Reno Airport Shuttle 110,000 TART Baseline 530,100 TOTAL TOT COMMITMENT $1,400,800
T ransit Service Re -Bra nding
T ransit Service Re -Bra nding
Regional T rail Network 27 Miles on the Ground • La keside Tra il (19) • Pinedrop, Na t’l (5) • Squa w Va lley (2.5) • Ma rtis Va lley (< 1) 35 Miles to Go • T ruckee River (8) • T a hoe City La keside (0.3) • Ma rtis Va lley – USACE (2.5) • Ma rtis Va lley (8) • Ma rtis/ Ba sin Connector (2.5) • North T a hoe (6) • Dolla r Creek (2.2) • Homewood (0.65) • 267 to Sta teline (5)
Regional T rail Network T a hoe City T ra nsit Center T ra il Connections
Regional T rail Network La keside Tra il, T a hoe City
Regional T rail Network Ma rtis Va lley T ra il, Initia l Pha se
Planning for the Future • TRPA Regional Plan • TRPA Regional Transportation Plan • PCTPA Regional Transportation Plan • Placer County’s Tahoe Basin Area Plan • Placer County’s Multi-Year Capital Plan • Tourism Master Plan • North Lake Tahoe- Truckee Transit Vision Plan • Regional Trail Plan (2016)
Planning for the Future • Regional Trail System • Transit Vision • Electric Transit Vehicle System • Fanny Bridge (Spring 2016) • Dollar Creek Shared Use Trail (Spring 2016) • KBCCIP, Phase 2 (Spring 2016) • Smart Bus Shelters • Tahoe City Mobility • Kings Beach Gateway
Planning for the Future T ra il Network Trail Sections Not Yet Funded Miles Construction Cost Mid-Martis Valley to Northstar 7.3 $ 7.3 million Northstar to Basin Boundary 1.78 3.6 million Basin Boundary to NT Reg. Park 1.82 5.0 million NT Reg. Park to Fulton Crescent 6.0 12.0 million Commons Beach to Dam Outlet 0.3 1.0 million Sunnyside to Lower Sequoia 0.65 1.0 million Squaw to Town of Truckee 8.0 20.0 million NT Reg. Park to N. Stateline 5.0 14.0 million TOTAL: 30.85 $63.9 million Estima ted Tra il Costs, by Segment
Planning for the Future Ma rtis Va lley T ra il Connection to La ke T a hoe Ba sin
Planning for the Future KBCCIP , Pha se 2
Planning for the Future T wo New “Sma rt” Shelters in Kings Bea ch, Pha se 2
Planning for the Future T ra nsit Vision • Increase service frequency • Expand nighttime transit service • Coordinate transit brand and service delivery • Modernize passenger information technology • Enhance the visitor experience • Provide stable and reliable workforce transportation • Increase economic vitality • Reduce traffic congestion • Reduce parking problems • Reduce air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions
Planning for the Future T ra nsit Vision: Proposed Opera ting Hours
Planning for the Future T ra nsit Vision: Proposed Annua l Opera ting Cost $9,000,000 $8,000,000 $7,000,000 $6,000,000 Average Annual Capital Cost $5,000,000 Added Vision Operating Cost $4,000,000 Existing Operating Cost $3,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,000,000 $- All Transit Services
Keep Placer Moving Did Funding Outlook You Know? $ 1.25 billion $ 3.0 billion $1.75 billion Projected Need Deficit Funding Available Projected Funding Source Breakdown Federal - 10% State 22% Federal Highways Admin. Local Funding Federal Transit Admin. 68% SHOPP STIP Local Transportation Fund STA Regional Fees Developer Fees Transit Fares TOT
PCTPA Projects Will Keep Placer Moving • I-80/Highway 65 interchange • Local road maintenance • SR 49 Signal Synchronization • Ramp and Interchange Improvements on I-80, including SR 174, Horseshoe Bar Road and Rocklin Road • Highway 65 widening, Galleria Blvd to Lincoln Blvd • Local street, school, bike & pedestrian safety • Dial A Ride/Senior Transit • Transit projects including Capitol Corridor expansion and commuter bus service • Transit projects including Capitol Corridor expansion and commuter bus service • Partially implement proposed North Lake Tahoe Transit Vision • Trail gap construction and maintenance
Thank You For Helping To Keep Placer Moving Funding Outreach Strategic Plan 2014 Initial Transportation Plan Development Stakeholder & Community Outreach Updated Opinion Research 2015 Continued & Broadening Outreach Plan Development 2016 Plan Refinement Decision to Proceed Private Campaign (Not connected to PCTPA or other public entities)
Key T akeaways • TRPA Partnership key to success • $80 million local transportation funding investment since 2005 • Future transportation network improvements consistent with Regional Plan and Placer’s Area Plan • Seeking additional funding opportunities through grants and Cap and Trade • Environmental and economic efficiencies through projects with multiple benefits • Continuing current practice of developing systems with regional connectivity as a key objective
Questions?
Recommend
More recommend
