new control schemes for bilateral teleoperation under
play

New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

May 19, 2023 •481 likes •1.67k views

New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels: Stabilization and Performance under Variable Time Delays Bo Zhang

  1. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels PRELIMINARIES Stability of Time Delay Systems Delay-Independent Stability : If a time-delay system is asymptotically stable for any delay values belonging to R + , the system is said to be delay-independent asymptotically stable. Delay-Dependent Stability : If a time-delay system is asymptotically stable for all delay values belonging to a compact subset D of R + , the system is said to be delay-dependent asymptotically stable. Rate-Independent Stability : For a delay-dependent asymptotically stable time delay system, if the stability does not depend on the variation rate of delays or on the time derivative of delays, the system is said to be rate-independent asymptotically stable. Rate-Dependent Stability : For a delay-dependent asymptotically stable time delay system, if the stability depends on the variation rate of delays or on the time derivative of delays, the system is said to be rate-dependent asymptotically stable. 18 / 102

  2. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels PRELIMINARIES Stability of Time Delay Systems Delay-Independent Stability : If a time-delay system is asymptotically stable for any delay values belonging to R + , the system is said to be delay-independent asymptotically stable. Delay-Dependent Stability : If a time-delay system is asymptotically stable for all delay values belonging to a compact subset D of R + , the system is said to be delay-dependent asymptotically stable. Rate-Independent Stability : For a delay-dependent asymptotically stable time delay system, if the stability does not depend on the variation rate of delays or on the time derivative of delays, the system is said to be rate-independent asymptotically stable. Rate-Dependent Stability : For a delay-dependent asymptotically stable time delay system, if the stability depends on the variation rate of delays or on the time derivative of delays, the system is said to be rate-dependent asymptotically stable. 18 / 102

  3. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels PRELIMINARIES Stability of Time Delay Systems General System with Piecewise Time-Varying Delays :  x ( t ) = f ( x ( t ) , x ( t − τ 1 ( t )) , u ( t ) , u ( t − τ 2 ( t ))) , ˙     x ( t 0 + θ ) = ˙ x ( t 0 + θ ) = φ ( θ ) , ˙ φ ( θ ) , (3)  u ( t 0 + θ ) = ζ ( θ ) ,    θ ∈ [ − h, 0] . Linear Case : � x ( t ) = A 0 x ( t ) + � n i =1 A i x ( t − τ 1 i ( t )) + B 0 u ( t ) + � m ˙ j =1 B j u ( t − τ 2 j ( t )) , x ( t 0 + θ ) = ˙ x ( t 0 + θ ) = φ ( θ ) , ˙ φ ( θ ) , θ ∈ [ − h, 0] . (4) 19 / 102

  4. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels PRELIMINARIES Stability of Time Delay Systems Lyapunov-Krasovskii Functionals (LKF) - Linear Case : � Search of suitable V ( x ( t ) , ˙ x ( t )) [E. Fridman, IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information, 2006] : � t � t x ( t )) = x ( t ) T Px ( t ) + x ( s ) T S a x ( s ) ds + x ( s ) T Sx ( s ) ds V ( x ( t ) , ˙ t − h 2 t − h 1 � 0 � t x ( s ) T R ˙ + h 1 ˙ x ( s ) dsdθ − h 1 t + θ � − h 1 � t q � x ( s ) T R ai ˙ + ( h 2 − h 1 ) ˙ x ( s ) dsdθ. − h 2 t + θ i =1 (5) � Asymptotical stability condition depending of the derivative of V ( x ( t ) , ˙ x ( t )) along the system trajectories : ˙ V ( x ( t ) , ˙ x ( t )) > 0 , V ( x ( t ) , ˙ x ( t )) < 0 , for any x t � = 0 , (6) ˙ and V ( x (0) , ˙ x (0)) = 0 , V ( x (0) , ˙ x (0)) = 0 . 20 / 102

  5. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES System Description & Assumptions 2. Novel Control Schemes � System Description & Assumptions; � Robust Stability Conditions; � Control Scheme 1 - Bilateral State Feedback Control Scheme [B. Zhang et al., CCDC, 2011] ; � Control Scheme 2 - Force-Reflecting Control Scheme ; � Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme [B. Zhang et al., ETFA, 2011] ; � Results and Analysis ; 21 / 102

  6. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES System Description & Assumptions General Teleoperation Structure : Our Master/Slave Controller Solution : � Lyapunov-Krasovskii functional (LKF) ; � H ∞ control ; � Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) optimization; 22 / 102

  7. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES System Description & Assumptions General Teleoperation Structure : From Property 1 - Assumption 1 : Linear master/slave systems = ⇒ x m ( t ) = ( A m − B m K m ˙ 0 ) x m ( t ) + B m ( F m ( t ) + F h ( t )) , (7) x s ( t ) = ( A s − B s K s ˙ 0 ) x s ( t ) + B s ( F s ( t ) + F e ( t )) , θ s ( t ) ∈ R n ; K m x m ( t ) = ˙ θ m ( t ) ∈ R n , x s ( t ) = ˙ 0 & K s 0 : supposed to be known; 23 / 102

  8. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES System Description & Assumptions General Teleoperation Structure : From Property 2 - Assumption 2 : Internet/Ethernet/Wifi... = ⇒ τ 1 ( t ) , τ 2 ( t ) ∈ [ h 1 , h 2 ] , h 1 ≥ 0 ; 24 / 102

  9. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES System Description & Assumptions General Teleoperation Structure : From Property 3 - Assumption 3 : Time-stamped data packets = ⇒ ˆ τ 1 ( t ) = τ 1 ( t ) , ˆ τ 2 ( t ) = τ 2 ( t ) ; 25 / 102

  10. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Robust Stability Conditions 2. Novel Control Schemes � System Description & Assumptions; � Robust Stability Conditions; � Control Scheme 1 - Bilateral State Feedback Control Scheme ; [B. Zhang et al., CCDC, 2011] ; � Control Scheme 2 - Force-Reflecting Control Scheme ; � Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme [B. Zhang et al., ETFA, 2011] ; � Results and Analysis ; 26 / 102

  11. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Robust Stability Conditions Linear Time Delay System : � x ( t ) = A 0 x ( t ) + � q ˙ i =1 A i x ( t − τ i ( t )) , (8) x ( t 0 + θ ) = ˙ x ( t 0 + θ ) = φ ( θ ) , ˙ φ ( θ ) , θ ∈ [ − h 2 , 0] . Asymptotical Stability Theorem [E. Fridman, IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information, 2006] : � P > 0 , R > 0 , S > 0 , S a > 0 , R ai > 0 , and P 2 , P 3 , Y 1 , Y 2 , i = 1 , 2 , ..., q ; � LMI condition is feasible ; � Rate-independent asymptotically stable for time-varying delays τ i ( t ) ∈ [ h 1 , h 2 ] , i = 1 , 2 , ..., q ; 27 / 102

  12. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Robust Stability Conditions Asymptotical Stability Theorem :   12 R + � q Γ1 11 Γ1 i =1 P T 2 Ai − qY T qY T − P T 2 A 1+ Y T ... − P T 2 Aq + Y T Y T Y T ... 1 1 1 1 1 1 � q   Γ1 i =1 P T 3 Ai − qY T qY T − P T 3 A 1+ Y T ... − P T 3 Aq + Y T Y T Y T  � ...  22 2 2 2 2 2 2    − S − R 0 0 0 0 0 0 0  � �   − Sa 0 0 0 0 0 0 � � � Γ 1 =    − Ra 1 0 0 0 0 0  < 0 , � � � �   � � � � � ... 0 0 0 0    − Raq 0 0 0  � � � � � �    � � � � � � � − Ra 1 0 0  0 � � � � � � � � ... � − Raq � � � � � � � � (9) Γ 1 11 = S + S a − R + A T 0 P 2 + P T Γ 1 12 = P − P T 2 + A T 2 A 0 , 0 P 3 , q � (10) Γ 1 22 = − P 3 − P T 3 + h 2 1 R + ( h 2 − h 1 ) 2 R ai . i =1 28 / 102

  13. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Robust Stability Conditions H ∞ Performance - Delay-Free with Perturbation : � x ( t ) ˙ = Ax ( t ) + Bw ( t ) , (11) z ( t ) = Cx ( t ) . � ∞ ( z ( t ) T z ( t ) − γ 2 w ( t ) T w ( t )) dt < 0 , J ( w ) = 0 (12) ( sup w ( � z ( t ) � 2 ) < γ ) . � w ( t ) � 2 V ( x ( t )) + z ( t ) T z ( t ) − γ 2 w ( t ) T w ( t ) < 0 , V ( x ( t )) = x ( t ) T Px ( t ) . ˙ Robust Stability Theorem : � P > 0 , P 2 , P 3 , and a positive scalar γ > 0 ; � LMI condition is feasible (see manuscript) ; � Asymptotically stable with H ∞ performance J ( w ) < 0 ; 29 / 102

  14. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Robust Stability Conditions H ∞ Performance - Delay-Free with Perturbation : � x ( t ) ˙ = Ax ( t ) + Bw ( t ) , (11) z ( t ) = Cx ( t ) . � ∞ ( z ( t ) T z ( t ) − γ 2 w ( t ) T w ( t )) dt < 0 , J ( w ) = 0 (12) ( sup w ( � z ( t ) � 2 ) < γ ) . � w ( t ) � 2 V ( x ( t )) + z ( t ) T z ( t ) − γ 2 w ( t ) T w ( t ) < 0 , V ( x ( t )) = x ( t ) T Px ( t ) . ˙ Robust Stability Theorem : � P > 0 , P 2 , P 3 , and a positive scalar γ > 0 ; � LMI condition is feasible (see manuscript) ; � Asymptotically stable with H ∞ performance J ( w ) < 0 ; 29 / 102

  15. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Robust Stability Conditions H ∞ Performance - Delay-Free with Perturbation : � x ( t ) ˙ = Ax ( t ) + Bw ( t ) , (11) z ( t ) = Cx ( t ) . � ∞ ( z ( t ) T z ( t ) − γ 2 w ( t ) T w ( t )) dt < 0 , J ( w ) = 0 (12) ( sup w ( � z ( t ) � 2 ) < γ ) . � w ( t ) � 2 V ( x ( t )) + z ( t ) T z ( t ) − γ 2 w ( t ) T w ( t ) < 0 , V ( x ( t )) = x ( t ) T Px ( t ) . ˙ Robust Stability Theorem : � P > 0 , P 2 , P 3 , and a positive scalar γ > 0 ; � LMI condition is feasible (see manuscript) ; � Asymptotically stable with H ∞ performance J ( w ) < 0 ; 29 / 102

  16. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Robust Stability Conditions Robust Stability Condition - Teleoperation Case : � LKF asymptotical stability condition with several time-varying delays + � H ∞ performance improvement condition without time-varying delays but with the perturbation = � Robust stability condition with several time-varying delays and the perturbation :  x ( t ) = A 0 x ( t ) + � q  ˙ i =1 A i x ( t − τ i ( t )) + Bw ( t ) ,  z ( t ) = Cx ( t ) , (13)   x ( t 0 + θ ) = ˙ x ( t 0 + θ ) = φ ( θ ) , ˙ φ ( θ ) , θ ∈ [ − h 2 , 0] , x ( t )) + z ( t ) T z ( t ) − γ 2 w ( t ) T w ( t ) < 0 . ˙ V ( x ( t ) , ˙ 30 / 102

  17. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Robust Stability Conditions Robust Stability Condition - Teleoperation Case : � LKF asymptotical stability condition with several time-varying delays + � H ∞ performance improvement condition without time-varying delays but with the perturbation = � Robust stability condition with several time-varying delays and the perturbation :  x ( t ) = A 0 x ( t ) + � q  ˙ i =1 A i x ( t − τ i ( t )) + Bw ( t ) ,  z ( t ) = Cx ( t ) , (13)   x ( t 0 + θ ) = ˙ x ( t 0 + θ ) = φ ( θ ) , ˙ φ ( θ ) , θ ∈ [ − h 2 , 0] , x ( t )) + z ( t ) T z ( t ) − γ 2 w ( t ) T w ( t ) < 0 . ˙ V ( x ( t ) , ˙ 30 / 102

  18. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Robust Stability Conditions Robust Stability Condition - Teleoperation Case : � LKF asymptotical stability condition with several time-varying delays + � H ∞ performance improvement condition without time-varying delays but with the perturbation = � Robust stability condition with several time-varying delays and the perturbation :  x ( t ) = A 0 x ( t ) + � q  ˙ i =1 A i x ( t − τ i ( t )) + Bw ( t ) ,  z ( t ) = Cx ( t ) , (13)   x ( t 0 + θ ) = ˙ x ( t 0 + θ ) = φ ( θ ) , ˙ φ ( θ ) , θ ∈ [ − h 2 , 0] , x ( t )) + z ( t ) T z ( t ) − γ 2 w ( t ) T w ( t ) < 0 . ˙ V ( x ( t ) , ˙ 30 / 102

  19. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 1 - Bilateral State Feedback Control Scheme 2. Novel Control Schemes � System Description & Assumptions; � Robust Stability Conditions; � Control Scheme 1 - Bilateral State Feedback Control Scheme ; [B. Zhang et al., CCDC, 2011] ; � Control Scheme 2 - Force-Reflecting Control Scheme ; � Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme [B. Zhang et al., ETFA, 2011] ; � Results and Analysis ; 31 / 102

  20. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 1 - Bilateral State Feedback Control Scheme Control Scheme 1 - Bilateral State Feedback Control Scheme : � Delayed state feedback C 1 & C 2 : 1 ˙ 1 ˙ F s ( t ) = − K 1 τ 1 ( t )) − K 2 C 1 : θ s ( t − ˆ θ m ( t − τ 1 ( t )) − K 3 1 ( θ s ( t − ˆ τ 1 ( t ) − θ m ( t − τ 1 ( t ))) , (14) 2 ˙ 2 ˙ F m ( t ) = − K 1 θ s ( t − τ 2 ( t )) − K 2 C 2 : θ m ( t − ˆ τ 2 ( t )) − K 3 2 ( θ s ( t − τ 2 ( t ) − θ m ( t − ˆ τ 2 ( t ))) . � ˆ τ 1 ( t ) = τ 1 ( t ) and ˆ τ 2 ( t ) = τ 2 ( t ) from Assumption 3 ; 32 / 102

  21. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 1 - Bilateral State Feedback Control Scheme Control Scheme 1 - Master/Slave Controller Design :   x ms ( t ) ˙ = ( A ms − B ms K 0 ) x ms ( t ) + B ms u ms ( t ) + B ms w ms ( t ) ,  = − K 1 ms x ms ( t − τ 1 ( t )) − K 2 u ms ( t ) ms x ms ( t − τ 2 ( t )) ,   z ms ( t ) = C ms x ms ( t ) , (15) � � ˙ θs ( t ) � Fs ( t ) � � Fe ( t ) � x ms ( t ) = ˙ , u ms ( t ) = , w ms ( t ) = , θm ( t ) Fh ( t ) Fm ( t ) θs ( t ) − θm ( t ) (16) � � z ms ( t ) = , θs ( t ) − θm ( t ) � As � � Bs � � � 0 0 0 B 1 ms B 2 A ms = 0 Am 0 , B ms = = , 0 Bm ms 1 − 1 0 0 0 � � � � � � Ks 0 0 K 1 1 K 2 1 K 3 0 0 0 K 1 K 2 (17) 0 K 0 = ms = ms = , 1 , K 1 2 K 2 2 K 3 , Km 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 � � C ms = 0 0 1 . 33 / 102

  22. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 1 - Bilateral State Feedback Control Scheme Control Scheme 1 - Master/Slave Controller Design : � Transformation so to apply robust control condition :  = A 0 ms x ms ( t ) + A 1 ms x ms ( t − τ 1 ( t )) + A 2  x ms ( t ) ˙ ms x ms ( t − τ 2 ( t ))  + B ms w ms ( t ) ,   z ms ( t ) = C ms x ms ( t ) , (18) A 0 ms = A ms − B ms K 0 , A 1 ms = − B ms K 1 ms = − B 1 A 2 ms = − B ms K 2 ms = − B 2 ms K 1 , ms K 2 , (19) � � � � K 1 K 2 K 3 K 1 K 2 K 3 K 1 = , K 2 = . (20) 1 1 1 2 2 2 34 / 102

  23. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 1 - Bilateral State Feedback Control Scheme Control Scheme 1 - Control Objectives : � LKF : the system stability under the time-varying delays τ 1 ( t ) , τ 2 ( t ) ∈ [ h 1 , h 2 ] ; � H ∞ control : the impact γ of disturbances w ms ( t ) on z ms ( t ) ( θ s ( t ) − θ m ( t ) ) ; Control Scheme 1 - Master/Slave Controller Design Theorem : � P > 0 , R > 0 , S > 0 , S a > 0 , R a 1 > 0 , R a 2 > 0 , P 2 , W 1 , W 2 , Y 1 , Y 2 , and positive scalars γ and ξ ; � LMI condition is feasible (see manuscript) ; � Rate-independent asymptotically stable with H ∞ performance J ( w ) < 0 for time-varying delays τ 1 ( t ) , τ 2 ( t ) ∈ [ h 1 , h 2 ] : K 1 = W 1 P − 1 K 2 = W 2 P − 1 , . (21) 2 2 35 / 102

  24. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 2 - Force-Reflecting Control Scheme 2. Novel Control Schemes � System Description & Assumptions; � Robust Stability Conditions; � Control Scheme 1 - Bilateral State Feedback Control Scheme [B. Zhang et al., CCDC, 2011] ; � Control Scheme 2 - Force-Reflecting Control Scheme ; � Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme [B. Zhang et al., ETFA, 2011] ; � Results and Analysis ; 36 / 102

  25. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 2 - Force-Reflecting Control Scheme Control Scheme 2 - Force-Reflecting Control Scheme : � ˆ F e ( t ) : F m ( t ) = ˆ F e ( t − τ 2 ( t )) ; � C with controller gain K i , i = 1 , 2 , 3 : F s ( t ) = − K 1 ˙ τ 1 ( t )) − K 2 ˙ C : θ s ( t − ˆ θ m ( t − τ 1 ( t )) (22) − K 3 ( θ s ( t − ˆ τ 1 ( t ) − θ m ( t − τ 1 ( t ))) . 37 / 102

  26. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 2 - Force-Reflecting Control Scheme Control Scheme 2 - Slave Controller Design : � x ms ( t ) ˙ = ( A ms − B ms K 0 ) x ms ( t ) + B ms u ms ( t ) + B ms w ms ( t ) , u ms ( t ) = − K ms x ms ( t − τ 1 ( t )) , (23) � � K 1 K 2 K 3 K ms = . (24) 0 0 0 ⇓ � = A 0 ms x ms ( t ) + A 1 x ms ( t ) ˙ ms x ms ( t − τ 1 ( t )) + B ms w ms ( t ) , (25) z ms ( t ) = C ms x ms ( t ) , � � A 1 ms = − B ms K ms = − B 1 ms K, K = . (26) K 1 K 2 K 3 38 / 102

  27. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme 2. Novel Control Schemes � System Description & Assumptions; � Robust Stability Conditions; � Control Scheme 1 - Bilateral State Feedback Control Scheme ; [B. Zhang et al., CCDC, 2011] ; � Control Scheme 2 - Force-Reflecting Control Scheme ; � Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme [B. Zhang et al., ETFA, 2011] ; � Results and Analysis ; 39 / 102

  28. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme : � From master to slave : ˙ θ m ( t ) /θ m ( t ) / ˆ F h ( t ) , the position tracking ; � From slave to master : F m ( t ) = ˆ F e ( t − τ 2 ( t )) , the force tracking ; 40 / 102

  29. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme Control Scheme 3 - Slave Controller Description : � ’P’ : x p ( t ) = ( A m − B m K m ˙ 0 ) x p ( t ) − B m F p ( t ) (27) + B m ( ˆ τ 1 ( t )) + ˆ F e ( t − ˆ F h ( t − τ 1 ( t ))) , x p ( t ) = ˙ θ p ( t ) ∈ R n . 41 / 102

  30. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme Control Scheme 3 - Slave Controller Description : � � � L = = ⇒ θ p ( t ) → θ m ( t ) : L 1 L 2 L 3 � � ˙ θ p ( t − ˆ τ 1 ( t )) F p ( t ) = L . (27) ˙ θ m ( t − τ 1 ( t )) θ p ( t − ˆ τ 1 ( t )) − θ m ( t − τ 1 ( t )) 41 / 102

  31. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme Control Scheme 3 - Slave Controller Description : � � of the controller ¯ � K = K 1 K 2 K 3 C = ⇒ θ s ( t ) → θ p ( t ) : � � ˙ θ s ( t ) F s ( t ) = − K . (28) ˙ θ p ( t ) θ s ( t ) − θ p ( t ) 41 / 102

  32. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme Control Scheme 3 - Master-Proxy Synchronization : � = A 0 mp x mp ( t ) + A 1 x mp ( t ) ˙ mp x mp ( t − τ 1 ( t )) + B mp w mp ( t ) , (29) z mp ( t ) = C mp x mp ( t ) .   ˙ � ˆ � θp ( t ) τ 1( t ))+ ˆ Fe ( t − ˆ Fh ( t − τ 1( t ))   , x mp ( t ) = ˙ w mp ( t ) = , θm ( t ) Fm ( t )+ Fh ( t ) θp ( t ) − θm ( t ) (30) � � z mp ( t ) = . θp ( t ) − θm ( t ) 42 / 102

  33. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme Control Scheme 3 - Master-Proxy Synchronization : � A m − B m K m � � B m � � � 0 0 0 0 A 0 mp = , B mp = = , A m − B m K m B 1 mp B 2 0 0 0 B m 0 mp 0 0 1 − 1 0 � � C mp = , 0 0 1 � − B m L 1 − B m L 2 − B m L 3 � A 1 = − B 1 mp = mp L. 0 0 0 0 0 0 (31) 43 / 102

  34. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme Control Scheme 3 - Proxy-Slave Synchronization : � x ps ( t ) ˙ = A ps x ps ( t ) + B ps w ps ( t ) , (32) z ps ( t ) = C ps x ps ( t ) ,   ˙ θs ( t ) � �   , x ps ( t ) = ˙ z ps ( t ) = θs ( t ) − θp ( t ) , θp ( t ) θs ( t ) − θp ( t ) (33) � � F e ( t ) w ps ( t ) = . ˆ τ 1 ( t )) + ˆ F e ( t − ˆ F h ( t − τ 1 ( t )) − F p ( t ) 44 / 102

  35. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme Control Scheme 3 - Proxy-Slave Synchronization : � Bs � � � � � 0 B 1 ps B 2 B ps = = , C ps = , 0 Bm 0 0 1 ps 0 0 � As − BsKs � 0 − BsK 1 − BsK 2 − BsK 3 A ps = Am − BmKm 0 0 0 1 − 1 0 (34) � As − BsKs � � − BsK 1 − BsK 2 − BsK 3 � 0 0 0 Am − BmKm = + 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 − 1 0 = ( A 0 ps − B 1 ps K ) . . 45 / 102

  36. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme Control Scheme 3 - Global Performance Analysis : � = A 0 mps x mps ( t ) + A 1 x mps ( t ) ˙ mps x mps ( t − τ 1 ( t )) + B mps w mps ( t ) , z mps ( t ) = C mps x mps ( t ) , (35)   ˙ θs ( t ) � � � � ˙  θp ( t )  Fe ( t )   θs ( t ) − θp ( t ) x mps ( t ) = w mps ( t ) = ˆ τ 1( t ))+ ˆ z mps ( t ) =  ˙  ,  Fe ( t − ˆ Fh ( t − τ 1( t )) , . θm ( t ) θp ( t ) − θm ( t )  θs ( t ) − θp ( t ) Fm ( t )+ Fh ( t ) θp ( t ) − θm ( t ) (36)   As − BsKs 0 − BsK 1 − BsK 2 0 − BsK 3 0  Am − BmKm  0 0 0 0  0  A 0 mps =  Am − BmKm  ,  0 0 0 0  0 1 − 1 0 0 0 0 1 − 1 0 0     0 0 0 0 0 Bs 0 0 � � 0 − BmL 1 − BmL 2 0 − BmL 3 0 0  Bm  A 1   , 0 0 0 1 0 mps = B mps =   , C mps = . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Bm 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (37) 46 / 102

  37. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme Conclusions : � Control Scheme 1 - Bilateral state feedback control scheme ; � Control Scheme 2 - Force-reflecting control scheme ; � Control Scheme 3 - Force-reflecting proxy control scheme ; Time Delays Control Schema Position Tracking Force Tracking Constant Time-varying √ √ √ 1 √ √ √ √ 2 √ √ √ √ 3 � Force estimation/measure : 2 & 3 ; � Better performance, but additional computation load : 3 ; 47 / 102

  38. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Results and Analysis 2. Novel Control Schemes � System Description & Assumptions; � Robust Stability Conditions; � Control Scheme 1 - Bilateral State Feedback Control Scheme [ B. Zhang et al., CCDC, 2011 ]; [B. Zhang et al., CCDC, 2011] ; � Control Scheme 2 - Force-Reflecting Control Scheme ; � Control Scheme 3 - Force-Reflecting Proxy Control Scheme [B. Zhang et al., ETFA, 2011] ; � Results and Analysis ; 48 / 102

  39. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Results and Analysis Simulation Conditions : � Maximum amplitude of time-varying delays : 0 . 2 s ; � Master, proxy and slave models : 1 /s , 1 /s and 2 /s ; Poles : [ − 100 . 0] . K 0 m = 100 , K 0 s = 50 ; � � � K 1 = − 0 . 1870 − 0 . 0368 65 . 0846 , � � (38) γ C 1 /C 2 K 2 = 0 . 4419 0 . 0813 − 153 . 8704 , = 0 . 0123 . min � � � γ L L = − 1 . 4566 0 . 1420 282 . 482 , min = 0 . 0081 , � � (39) γ K K = − 29 . 9635 − 3 . 6393 618 . 536 , min = 0 . 0075 . Global stability of the system is verified with γ g min = 0 . 0062 ; 49 / 102

  40. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Results and Analysis Abrupt Tracking Motion : 50 / 102

  41. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Results and Analysis Abrupt Tracking Motion : 51 / 102

  42. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Results and Analysis Wall Contact Motion : � Hard wall : the stiffness K e = 30 kN/m , the position x = 1 . 0 m ; � Our aims : 1. When the slave robot reaches the wall, the master robot can stop as quickly as possible ; 2. When the slave robot returns after hitting the wall ( F e ( t ) = 0 ), the system must restore the position tracking between the master and the slave ; 3. When the slave contacts the wall, the force tracking from the slave to the master can be assured ; 52 / 102

  43. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Results and Analysis Wall Contact Motion : 53 / 102

  44. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Results and Analysis Wall Contact Motion : 54 / 102

  45. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Results and Analysis Wall Contact Motion : � Force response in wall contact motion ( F m ( t ) ; ˆ F e ( t ) ). 55 / 102

  46. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels CONTROL SCHEMES Results and Analysis Wall Contact Motion under Large Delays h 2 = 1 . 0 s : 56 / 102

  47. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach 3. Robustness Aspects � Discrete-Time System [B. Zhang et al., TDS, 2012] : ◮ Discrete-Time Approach ; ◮ Slave Controller Design ; ◮ Results and Analysis ; � Linear Parameter-Varying System (LPV) : ◮ Polytopic-type uncertainties [B. Zhang et al., TDS, 2012] ; ◮ Norm-bounded uncertainties [B. Zhang et al., ROCOND, 2012] ; ◮ Results and Analysis ; 57 / 102

  48. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach Discrete-Time System : � x ( k + 1) = � q i =0 A i x ( k − τ i ( k )) + Bw ( k ) , (40) z ( k ) = Cx ( k ) . Delay-Free Case : � x ( k + 1) = A 0 x ( k ) + Bw ( k ) , (41) z ( k ) = Cx ( k ) . 58 / 102

  49. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach Robust Stability Condition : � Discrete LKF, y ( k ) = x ( k + 1) − x ( k ) : k − 1 k − 1 � � V ( x ( k )) = x ( k ) T Px ( k ) + x ( i ) T S a x ( i ) + x ( i ) T Sx ( i ) i = k − h 2 i = k − h 1 q − 1 k − 1 − h 1 − 1 k − 1 � � � � � y ( j ) T Ry ( j ) + y ( l ) T R ai y ( l ) . + h 1 ( h 2 − h 1 ) i = − h 1 j = k + i i =1 j = − h 2 l = k + j (42) � H ∞ control : J ( w ) = � ∞ i =0 [ z ( k ) T z ( k ) − γ 2 w ( k ) T w ( k )] < 0 � △ V ( x ( k )) = V ( x ( k + 1)) − V ( x ( k )) : △ V ( x ( k )) + z ( k ) T z ( k ) − γ 2 w ( k ) T w ( k ) < 0 . (43) � LMI condition is feasible (see manuscript) ; � Rate-independent asymptotically stable and H ∞ performance J ( w ) < 0 for time-varying delays τ i ( k ) ∈ [ h 1 , h 2 ] , h 2 ≥ h 1 ≥ 0 , i = 1 , 2 , ..., q ; 59 / 102

  50. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach 3. Robustness Aspects � Discrete-Time System [B. Zhang et al., TDS, 2012] : ◮ Discrete-Time Approach ; ◮ Slave Controller Design ; ◮ Results and Analysis ; � Linear Parameter-Varying System (LPV) : ◮ Polytopic-type uncertainties [B. Zhang et al., TDS, 2012] ; ◮ Norm-bounded uncertainties [B. Zhang et al., ROCOND, 2012] ; ◮ Results and Analysis ; 60 / 102

  51. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach System Description : (Σ d x m ( k + 1) = ( A md − B md K 0 m ) md ) x m ( k ) + B md ( F m ( k ) + F h ( k )) , (Σ d x s ( k + 1) = ( A sd − B sd K 0 s ) sd ) x s ( k ) + B sd ( F s ( k ) + F e ( k )) , (Σ d x p ( k + 1) = ( A md − B md K 0 p ) md ) x p ( k ) − B md F p ( k ) + B md ( ˆ τ 1 ( k )) + ˆ F e ( k − ˆ F h ( k − τ 1 ( k ))) . (44) 61 / 102

  52. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach Slave Controller Design - Master-Proxy Synchronization : � � � L d = L d 1 L d 2 L d 3 : � � ˙ θ p ( k − ˆ τ 1 ( k )) F p ( k ) = L d . (45) ˙ θ m ( k − τ 1 ( k )) θ p ( k − ˆ τ 1 ( k )) − θ m ( k − τ 1 ( k )) �  = A 0 mpd x mp ( k ) + A 1  x mp ( k + 1) mpd x mp ( k − τ 1 ( k ))  (Σ d mp ) (46) + B mpd w mp ( k ) ,   z mp ( k ) = C mpd x mp ( k ) , A 1 mpd = ⇒ L d ; 62 / 102

  53. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach Slave Controller Design - Proxy-Slave Synchronization : � � � K d = K d 1 K d 2 K d 3 : � � ˙ θ s ( k ) F s ( k ) = − K d ˙ . (47) θ p ( k ) θ s ( k ) − θ p ( k ) � � x ps ( k + 1) = A psd x ps ( k ) + B K F s ( k ) + B psd w ps ( k ) , (Σ d ps ) (48) z ps ( k ) = C psd x ps ( k ) , ⇓ � x ps ( k + 1) = ( A psd − B K K d ) x ps ( k ) + B psd w ps ( k ) , (¯ Σ d ps ) (49) z ps ( k ) = C psd x ps ( k ) . 63 / 102

  54. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach Slave Controller Design - Global Performance Analysis : � = A mpsd x ( k ) + B K mpsd F s ( k ) − B L x ( k + 1) mpsd F p ( k ) + B mpsd w ( k ) , (Σ d mps ) (50) = C mpsd x ( k ) , z ( k ) � � F s ( k ) = − ¯ K d x ( k ) = − x ( k ) , K d 1 K d 2 0 K d 3 0 � � F p ( k ) = ¯ L d x ( k − τ 1 ( k )) = x ( k − τ 1 ( k )) , 0 L d 1 L d 2 0 L d 3 (51) � B sd � � � 0 B md 0 B K B L mpsd = , mpsd = , 0 0 0 0 0 0 ⇓ � = A d 0 x ( k ) + A d x ( k + 1) 1 x ( k − τ 1 ( k )) + B mpsd w ( k ) , (¯ Σ d mps ) (52) = C mpsd x ( k ) , z ( k ) mpsd ¯ mpsd ¯ A d 0 = A mpsd − B K K d , A d 1 = − B L L d . 64 / 102

  55. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach 3. Robustness Aspects � Discrete-Time System [B. Zhang et al., TDS, 2012] : ◮ Discrete-Time Approach ; ◮ Slave Controller Design ; ◮ Results and Analysis ; � Linear Parameter-Varying System (LPV) : ◮ Polytopic-type uncertainties [B. Zhang et al., TDS, 2012] ; ◮ Norm-bounded uncertainties [B. Zhang et al., ROCOND, 2012] ; ◮ Results and Analysis ; 65 / 102

  56. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach Simulation Conditions : � T = 0 . 001 s , h 1 = 1 , h 2 = 100 (in continuous-time domain, h 1 = 0 . 001 s , h 2 = 0 . 1 s ) ; � � � γ L d L d = 4 . 6815 − 5 . 1390 540 . 7828 , min = 0 . 0051 , � � (53) γ K d min = 2 . 9568 × 10 − 4 , K d = 273 − 127 10961 , γ g min = 0 . 0327 . 66 / 102

  57. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach Abrupt Tracking Motion : ♥ ♥ 67 / 102

  58. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach Abrupt Tracking Motion : ♥ ♥ 67 / 102

  59. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach Abrupt Tracking Motion : 68 / 102

  60. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach Wall Contact Motion : 69 / 102

  61. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS Discrete-Time Approach Wall Contact Motion : 70 / 102

  62. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Polytopic-Type Uncertainties 3. Robustness Aspects � Discrete-Time System [B. Zhang et al., TDS, 2012] : ◮ Discrete-Time Approach ; ◮ Slave Controller Design ; ◮ Results and Analysis ; � Linear Parameter-Varying System (LPV) : ◮ Polytopic-type uncertainties [B. Zhang et al., TDS, 2012] ; ◮ Norm-bounded uncertainties [B. Zhang et al., ROCOND, 2012] ; ◮ Results and Analysis ; 71 / 102

  63. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Polytopic-Type Uncertainties System Description : x m ( t ) = ( A m ( ρ m ( t )) − B m ( ρ m ( t )) K 0 (Σ m ) ˙ m ) x m ( t ) + B m ( ρ m ( t ))( F m ( t ) + F h ( t )) , x s ( t ) = ( A s ( ρ s ( t )) − B s ( ρ s ( t )) K 0 (Σ s ) ˙ s ) x s ( t ) + B s ( ρ s ( t ))( F s ( t ) + F e ( t )) , x p ( t ) = ( A m ( ρ p ( t )) − B m ( ρ p ( t )) K 0 m ) x p ( t ) + B m ( ρ p ( t ))( ˆ τ 1 ( t )) + ˆ (Σ p ) ˙ F e ( t − ˆ F h ( t − τ 1 ( t )) − F p ( t )) , N N � � [ A m ( ρ m ( t )) , B m ( ρ m ( t ))] = ρ mj ( t )[ A mj , B mj ] , [ A s ( ρ s ( t )) , B s ( ρ s ( t ))] = ρ sj ( t )[ A sj , B sj ] , j =1 j =1 N � [ A m ( ρ p ( t )) , B m ( ρ p ( t ))] = ρ pj ( t )[ A mj , B mj ] . j =1 (54) 72 / 102

  64. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Polytopic-Type Uncertainties Controller Design - Problem 1 : K 0 m & K 0 s : robust stability w.r.t polytopic-type uncertainties ; Controller Design - Problem 2 : L & K : stability & position/force tracking w.r.t time-varying delays & polytopic-type uncertainties ; Robust Stability Theorem [E. Fridman, IMA Journal of Mathematical Control and Information, 2006] : � P > 0 , R > 0 , S > 0 , S a > 0 , R ai > 0 , P 2 , P 3 , Y 1 , Y 2 , i = 1 , 2 , ..., q , and a positive scalar γ > 0 ; � N LMI conditions are feasible (see manuscript) ; � Rate-independent asymptotically stable with H ∞ performance J ( w ) < 0 for time-varying delays τ i ( t ) ∈ [ h 1 , h 2 ] , i = 1 , 2 , ..., q ; 73 / 102

  65. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Polytopic-Type Uncertainties Problem 2 Slave Controller Design � Master-proxy synchronization : � = A 0 mp ( ρ mp ( t )) x mp ( t ) + A 1 x mp ( t ) ˙ mp ( ρ mp ( t )) x mp ( t − τ 1 ( t )) + B mp ( ρ mp ( t )) w mp ( t ) , z mp ( t ) = C mp x mp ( t ) , (55) K 0 m & K 0 ⇒ A 0 A 1 s = mp ( ρ mp ( t )) ; mp ( ρ mp ( t )) = ⇒ L ; � Proxy-slave synchronization : � x ps ( t ) ˙ = A ps ( ρ ps ( t )) x ps ( t ) + B ps ( ρ ps ( t )) w ps ( t ) , (56) z ps ( t ) = C ps x ps ( t ) , A ps ( ρ ps ( t )) = ⇒ K ; � Global performance analysis with K 0 m & K 0 s , L & K :  = A 0 mps ( ρ mps ( t )) x mps ( t ) + A 1  x mps ( t ) ˙ mps ( ρ mps ( t )) x mps ( t − τ 1 ( t ))  (57) + B mps ( ρ mps ( t )) w mps ( t ) ,   z mps ( t ) = C mps x mps ( t ) . 74 / 102

  66. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Polytopic-Type Uncertainties Remark - Nonlinear Systems : M m ( θ m )¨ θ m ( t ) + C m ( θ m , ˙ θ m ) ˙ (Σ m ) θ m ( t ) + g m ( θ m ) = F h ( t ) + F m ( t ) , M m ( θ p )¨ θ p ( t ) + C m ( θ p , ˙ θ p ) ˙ θ p ( t ) + g m ( θ p ) = ˆ τ 1 ( t )) + ˆ (Σ p ) F e ( t − ˆ F h ( t − τ 1 ( t )) − F p ( t ) , M s ( θ s )¨ θ s ( t ) + C s ( θ s , ˙ θ s ) ˙ (Σ s ) θ s ( t ) + g s ( θ s ) = F e ( t ) + F s ( t ) , (58) ⇓ (¯ ¨ θ m ( t ) = A m ( θ m , ˙ θ m ) ˙ Σ m ) θ m ( t ) + B m ( θ m )( F h ( t ) + F m ( t ) − g m ( θ m )) , (¯ θ p ( t ) = A m ( θ p , ˙ ¨ θ p ) ˙ θ p ( t ) + B m ( θ p )( ˆ τ 1 ( t )) + ˆ Σ p ) F e ( t − ˆ F h ( t − τ 1 ( t )) − F p ( t ) − g m ( θ p )) , (¯ θ s ( t ) = A s ( θ s , ˙ ¨ θ s ) ˙ Σ s ) θ s ( t ) + B s ( θ s )( F e ( t ) + F s ( t ) − g s ( θ s )) , (59) θ m ) = − M − 1 B m ( θ m ) = M − 1 A m ( θ m , ˙ m ( θ m ) C m ( θ m , ˙ θ m ) , m ( θ m ) , θ p ) = − M − 1 B m ( θ p ) = M − 1 A m ( θ p , ˙ m ( θ p ) C m ( θ p , ˙ (60) θ p ) , m ( θ p ) , A s ( θ s , ˙ θ s ) = − M − 1 ( θ s ) C s ( θ s , ˙ B s ( θ s ) = M − 1 θ s ) , ( θ s ) . s s 75 / 102

  67. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Norm-Bounded Model Uncertainties 3. Robustness Aspects � Discrete-Time System [B. Zhang et al., TDS, 2012] : ◮ Discrete-Time Approach ; ◮ Slave Controller Design ; ◮ Results and Analysis ; � Linear Parameter-Varying System (LPV) : ◮ Polytopic-type uncertainties [B. Zhang et al., TDS, 2012] ; ◮ Norm-bounded uncertainties [B. Zhang et al., ROCOND, 2012] ; ◮ Results and Analysis ; 76 / 102

  68. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Norm-Bounded Model Uncertainties System Description : x m ( t ) = (( A m + ∆ A m ( t )) − ( B m + ∆ B m ( t )) K 0 (Σ m ) ˙ m ) x m ( t ) + ( B m + ∆ B m ( t ))( F m ( t ) + F h ( t )) , x s ( t ) = (( A s + ∆ A s ( t )) − ( B s + ∆ B s ( t )) K 0 (Σ s ) ˙ s ) x s ( t ) + ( B s + ∆ B s ( t ))( F s ( t ) + F e ( t )) , (61) x p ( t ) = (( A m + ∆ A p ( t )) − ( B m + ∆ B p ( t )) K 0 (Σ p ) ˙ m ) x p ( t ) − ( B m + ∆ B p ( t )) F p ( t ) + ( B m + ∆ B p ( t ))( ˆ τ 1 ( t )) + ˆ F e ( t − ˆ F h ( t − τ 1 ( t ))) , ∆( t ) T ∆( t ) � I. (62) i = { m, s, p } : ∆ A i ( t ) = G i ∆( t ) D i , ∆ B i ( t ) = H i ∆( t ) E i , 77 / 102

  69. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Norm-Bounded Model Uncertainties System Description : x m ( t ) = (( A m + ∆ A m ( t )) − ( B m + ∆ B m ( t )) K 0 (Σ m ) ˙ m ) x m ( t ) + ( B m + ∆ B m ( t ))( F m ( t ) + F h ( t )) , x s ( t ) = (( A s + ∆ A s ( t )) − ( B s + ∆ B s ( t )) K 0 (Σ s ) ˙ s ) x s ( t ) + ( B s + ∆ B s ( t ))( F s ( t ) + F e ( t )) , (63) x p ( t ) = (( A m + ∆ A p ( t )) − ( B m + ∆ B p ( t )) K 0 (Σ p ) ˙ m ) x p ( t ) − ( B m + ∆ B p ( t )) F p ( t ) + ( B m + ∆ B p ( t ))( ˆ τ 1 ( t )) + ˆ F e ( t − ˆ F h ( t − τ 1 ( t ))) , ∆( t ) T ∆( t ) � I. (64) i = { m, s, p } : ∆ A i ( t ) = G i ∆( t ) D i , ∆ B i ( t ) = H i ∆( t ) E i , Slave Controller Design Solution : Transformation from norm-bounded uncertain system to linear time-delay system ; 78 / 102

  70. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Norm-Bounded Model Uncertainties Problem 2 Slave Controller Design - Master-Proxy Synchronization :  = ( A 0 mp + ∆ A 0 mp ( t )) x mp ( t ) + ( A 1 mp + ∆ A 1  x mp ( t ) ˙ mp ( t )) x mp ( t − τ 1 ( t ))  +( B mp + ∆ B mp ( t )) w mp ( t ) , (65)   z mp ( t ) = C mp x mp ( t ) , K 0 m & K 0 ⇒ A 0 mp + ∆ A 0 s = mp ( t ) ; ⇓ ϕ p ( t ) = (∆ A p ( t ) − ∆ B p ( t ) K 0 m ) ˙ θ p ( t ) + ∆ B p ( t )( ˆ τ 1 ( t )) + ˆ F e ( t − ˆ F h ( t − τ 1 ( t ))) , ϕ m ( t ) = (∆ A m ( t ) − ∆ B m ( t ) K 0 m ) ˙ (66) θ m ( t ) + ∆ B m ( t )( F m ( t ) + F h ( t )) , µ p ( t ) = − ∆ B p ( t ) Lx mp ( t − τ 1 ( t )) . � = A 0 mp x mp ( t ) + A 1 mp x mp ( t − τ 1 ( t )) + � x mp ( t ) ˙ B mp � w mp ( t ) , (67) z mp ( t ) = C mp x mp ( t ) , � � � 1 0 � Bm ˆ τ 1( t ))+ Bm ˆ Fe ( t − ˆ Fh ( t − τ 1( t ))+ ϕp ( t )+ µp ( t ) � w ( t ) = � , B mp = , (68) 0 1 BmFm ( t )+ BmFh ( t )+ ϕm ( t ) 0 0 A 1 mp = ⇒ L ; 79 / 102

  71. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Norm-Bounded Model Uncertainties Slave Controller Design - Proxy-Slave Synchronization : � x ps ( t ) ˙ = ( A ps + ∆ A ps ( t )) x ps ( t ) + ( B ps + ∆ B ps ( t )) w ps ( t ) , (69) z ps ( t ) = C ps x ps ( t ) , A ps + ∆ A ps ( t ) = ⇒ K ; ⇓ ϕ s ( t ) = (∆ A s ( t ) − ∆ B s ( t ) K 0 s ) ˙ θ s ( t ) + ∆ B s ( t ) F e ( t ) , (70) µ s ( t ) = − ∆ B 1 ps ( t ) Kx ps ( t ) . � = A ps x ps ( t ) + � x ps ( t ) ˙ B ps � w ps ( t ) , (71) z ps ( t ) = C ps x ps ( t ) , � � � 1 0 � BsFe ( t )+ ϕs ( t )+ µs ( t ) � w ps ( t ) = � , B ps = , 0 1 Bm ˆ τ 1( t ))+ Bm ˆ Fe ( t − ˆ Fh ( t − τ 1( t )) − BmFp ( t )+ ϕp ( t )+ µp ( t ) 0 0 (72) A ps = ⇒ K ; 80 / 102

  72. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Norm-Bounded Model Uncertainties Slave Controller Design - Global Performance Analysis :  = ( A 0 mps + ∆ A 0 mps ( t )) x mps ( t ) + ( A 1 mps + ∆ A 1  x mps ( t ) ˙ mps ( t )) x mps ( t − τ 1 ( t ))  (73) +( B mps + ∆ B mps ( t )) w mps ( t ) ,   z mps ( t ) = C mps x mps ( t ) . ⇓ � = A 0 mps x mps ( t ) + A 1 mps x mps ( t − τ 1 ( t )) + � x mps ( t ) ˙ B mps � w mps ( t ) , (74) z mps ( t ) = C mps x mps ( t ) ,   � � 1 0 0 BsFe ( t )+ ϕs ( t ) 0 1 0 Bm ˆ τ 1( t ))+ Bm ˆ �   . w mps ( t ) = � Fe ( t − ˆ Fh ( t − τ 1( t ))+ ϕp ( t ) , B mps = (75) 0 0 1 0 0 0 BmFm ( t )+ BmFh ( t )+ ϕm ( t ) 0 0 0 81 / 102

  73. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Norm-Bounded Model Uncertainties 3. Robustness Aspects � Discrete-Time System [B. Zhang et al., TDS, 2012] : ◮ Discrete-Time Approach ; ◮ Slave Controller Design ; ◮ Results and Analysis ; � Linear Parameter-Varying System (LPV) : ◮ Polytopic-type uncertainties [B. Zhang et al., TDS, 2012] ; ◮ Norm-bounded uncertainties [B. Zhang et al., ROCOND, 2012] ; ◮ Results and Analysis ; 82 / 102

  74. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Norm-Bounded Model Uncertainties Simulation Conditions : � polytopic − type : A m ( ρ m ( t )) = A s ( ρ s ( t )) = 0 , 1 B m ( ρ m ( t )) = B s ( ρ s ( t )) = , ρ ( t ) ∈ [0 . 5 , 1] , ρ ( t ) (76) norm − bounded − type : A m = A s = 0 , G i = D i = 0 , B m = B s = 1 . 5 , H i = 0 . 5 , E i = 1 , i = { m, p, s } . � K 0 K 0 polytopic − type : m = 2 . 6585 , s = 2 . 6585 , (77) K 0 K 0 norm − bounded − type : m = 9 . 5117 , s = 3 . 3812 . � � � γ L polytopic − type : L = 1 . 3218 − 1 . 3219 6 . 3602 , min = 0 . 4436 , � � γ K K = min = 0 . 0164 , 20 . 4799 − 21 . 2537 575 . 2051 , γ g min = 0 . 4595 , (78) � � γ L norm − bounded − type : L = 1 . 6218 − 1 . 6264 29 . 5012 , min = 0 . 05 , � � γ K K = 16 . 4993 − 12 . 0059 434 . 4988 , min = 0 . 0072 , γ g min = 0 . 0376 . 83 / 102

  75. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Norm-Bounded Model Uncertainties Abrupt Tracking Motion : 84 / 102

  76. New Control Schemes for Bilateral Teleoperation under Asymmetric Communication Channels ROBUSTNESS H ∞ Robust Teleoperation under Time-Varying Model Uncertainties - Norm-Bounded Model Uncertainties Wall Contact Motion : 85 / 102

Recommend

Robust Haptic Teleoperation of a Mobile Manipulation Platform Jaeheung Park, Oussama Khatib

Robust Haptic Teleoperation of a Mobile Manipulation Platform Jaeheung Park, Oussama Khatib

Robust Haptic Teleoperation of a Mobile Manipulation Platform Jaeheung Park, Oussama Khatib System Setup Stanford AI Lab, Stanford University Control of a Mobile . . . Teleoperation Force Control Stiffness Estimation Experimental Results

674 views • 24 slides
Remote Teleoperation Tejas Sathe The Matrix The Papers Usability Guidelines for the Design

Remote Teleoperation Tejas Sathe The Matrix The Papers Usability Guidelines for the Design

Remote Teleoperation Tejas Sathe The Matrix The Papers Usability Guidelines for the Design of Robot Teleoperation: A Taxonomy An Experimental Analysis of Cyber Security Threats Against Teleoperated Surgical Robotics Usability

967 views • 62 slides
Bilateral contracts Bilateral contracts are for a direct exchange of energy between a buyer and a

Bilateral contracts Bilateral contracts are for a direct exchange of energy between a buyer and a

Bilateral contracts Bilateral contracts are for a direct exchange of energy between a buyer and a seller, in a decentralized fashion They may both be producers and/or consumers Most likely a broker is involved... Eventually, the system operator

279 views • 12 slides
Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements 1 2 Bilateral &amp; Regional Trade Agreements 3

Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements 1 2 Bilateral &amp; Regional Trade Agreements 3

Arab Republic of Egypt Ministry of Trade and Industry Trade Agreements Sector Bilateral and Regional Trade Agreements 1 2 Bilateral &amp; Regional Trade Agreements 3 Bilateral &amp; Regional Trade Agreements: into force agreement Free

634 views • 50 slides
Cooperative Haptics for Humanoid Robot Teleoperation Master Thesis Presentation Jo ao O.

Cooperative Haptics for Humanoid Robot Teleoperation Master Thesis Presentation Jo ao O.

Cooperative Haptics for Humanoid Robot Teleoperation Master Thesis Presentation Jo ao O. Barros joaoobarros@ua.pt University of Aveiro Department of Mechanical Engineering Scientific supervision : Prof. Dr. V tor Manuel Ferreira dos

731 views • 39 slides
Agenda Bilateral Settlement Schedules Overview Bilateral Settlement Schedules Online GUI

Agenda Bilateral Settlement Schedules Overview Bilateral Settlement Schedules Online GUI

Agenda Bilateral Settlement Schedules Overview Bilateral Settlement Schedules Online GUI 2 BILATERAL SETTLEMENT SCHEDULES OVERVIEW 3 Common Acronyms AO Asset Owner API Application Programming Interface BSS

997 views • 19 slides
A Gentle Introduction A Gentle Introduction to Bilateral Filtering to Bilateral Filtering and

A Gentle Introduction A Gentle Introduction to Bilateral Filtering to Bilateral Filtering and

A Gentle Introduction A Gentle Introduction to Bilateral Filtering to Bilateral Filtering and its Applications and its Applications Sylvain Paris MIT CSAIL Pierre Kornprobst INRIA Odysse Jack Tumblin Northwestern University

421 views • 19 slides
Cloud Mediated Nature Observation - From Teleoperation to Cloud Robotics Dez Song Texas A&amp;M

Cloud Mediated Nature Observation - From Teleoperation to Cloud Robotics Dez Song Texas A&amp;M

Aug. 17, 2013, IEEE/NSF Workshop on Cloud Manufacturing and Automation, Madison, WI Cloud Mediated Nature Observation - From Teleoperation to Cloud Robotics Dez Song Texas A&amp;M University Thanks to: Ni Qin, Yiliang Xu, Wen Li, Chang Young

836 views • 49 slides
Network-on-Chip Switching strategies Routing algorithms (NoC) Flow control schemes NoC

Network-on-Chip Switching strategies Routing algorithms (NoC) Flow control schemes NoC

Advanced Digital IC Design Agenda Introduction NoC Concept NoC topology Network-on-Chip Switching strategies Routing algorithms (NoC) Flow control schemes NoC Architecture Examples Emerging NoC technologies Chenxin Zhang &amp; Xiaodong

376 views • 13 slides
BILATERAL/MULTILATERAL JOINT EFFORTS AND NETWORKING TO COPE WITH INFECTIOUS DISEASES FOR

BILATERAL/MULTILATERAL JOINT EFFORTS AND NETWORKING TO COPE WITH INFECTIOUS DISEASES FOR

3 rd Asian Science &amp; Technology Forum Issue for Discussion BILATERAL/MULTILATERAL JOINT EFFORTS AND NETWORKING TO COPE WITH INFECTIOUS DISEASES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN ASIA by DR. HASAN ABDUL RAHMAN Director, Disease Control

490 views • 12 slides
Numerical integration schemes for the equations of motion, constants of motion, control of

Numerical integration schemes for the equations of motion, constants of motion, control of

Numerical integration schemes for the equations of motion, constants of motion, control of stability, accuracy Ari Paavo Seitsonen cole Normale Suprieure CECAM QM/MM School, Lausanne April 8 th -12 th , 2019 apsi QM/MM 2019 1 / 53

575 views • 53 slides
Reliability-Enhanced Robots with Map- based Teleoperation and Semi- Autonomous Capabilities

Reliability-Enhanced Robots with Map- based Teleoperation and Semi- Autonomous Capabilities

Reliability-Enhanced Robots with Map- based Teleoperation and Semi- Autonomous Capabilities Tomonari Furukawa Virginia Center for Autonomous Systems (VaCAS) Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Virginia Tech) Gamini

348 views • 8 slides
Stacked-VLAN-Based Modeling of Hybrid ISP Tra ffi c Control Schemes and Service Plans Exploiting

Stacked-VLAN-Based Modeling of Hybrid ISP Tra ffi c Control Schemes and Service Plans Exploiting

Stacked-VLAN-Based Modeling of Hybrid ISP Tra ffi c Control Schemes and Service Plans Exploiting Excess Bandwidth in Shared Access Networks Dr Kyeong Soo (Joseph) Kim Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering Xian

219 views • 21 slides
Bilateral arrangements Bilateral arrangements Challenges and opportunities for Challenges and

Bilateral arrangements Bilateral arrangements Challenges and opportunities for Challenges and

Bilateral arrangements Bilateral arrangements Challenges and opportunities for Challenges and opportunities for Croatia Croatia Currently 3 arrangements 13-14 November 2008 EU/US FDA EU/Japan MHLW-PMDA Transatlantic

94 views • 5 slides
CASE STUDY #1 Mikayla was identified with profound bilateral SNHL at 3y0m and received bilateral

CASE STUDY #1 Mikayla was identified with profound bilateral SNHL at 3y0m and received bilateral

CASE STUDY #1 Mikayla was identified with profound bilateral SNHL at 3y0m and received bilateral CIs at 3y6m. Her local school districts TOD has no prior CI experience, but the school district will not approve an out-of-district placement at

591 views • 31 slides
A Dual-user Teleoperation System with Adaptive Authority Adjustment for Haptic Training Fei LIU*,

A Dual-user Teleoperation System with Adaptive Authority Adjustment for Haptic Training Fei LIU*,

A Dual-user Teleoperation System with Adaptive Authority Adjustment for Haptic Training Fei LIU*, Arnaud Lelev, Damien Eberard, Tanneguy Redarce fei.liu@insa-lyon.fr Laboratory Ampre University of Lyon, INSA de Lyon July 23, 2015 1 / 16

512 views • 28 slides
Validity of bilateral classical logic and Verificationist semantics its application Bilateral

Validity of bilateral classical logic and Verificationist semantics its application Bilateral

Validity of bilateral classical logic and its application Yoriyuki Yamagata Validity of bilateral classical logic and Verificationist semantics its application Bilateral classical logic Proof theoretical semantics of BCL Evidences and

585 views • 42 slides
Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults and Children B. Robert Peters MD Dallas Otolaryngology

Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults and Children B. Robert Peters MD Dallas Otolaryngology

Bilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults and Children B. Robert Peters MD Dallas Otolaryngology Cochlear Implant Program Dallas Hearing Foundation www.dallascochlear.com 2 Bilateral Cochlear Implantation Rationale for Bilateral

1.17k views • 79 slides
Simultaneous vs. Staged Bilateral TKR By: Reese Wilmoth Question For a 64 year old male

Simultaneous vs. Staged Bilateral TKR By: Reese Wilmoth Question For a 64 year old male

Simultaneous vs. Staged Bilateral TKR By: Reese Wilmoth Question For a 64 year old male patient, does simultaneous bilateral total knee replacement (Both knees replaced at the same time) or staged bilateral total knee replacement (surgeries

593 views • 29 slides
Introduction to the Council For Medical Schemes and the Medical Schemes Act Namaf Annual Trustee

Introduction to the Council For Medical Schemes and the Medical Schemes Act Namaf Annual Trustee

Introduction to the Council For Medical Schemes and the Medical Schemes Act Namaf Annual Trustee Training 2 August 2019 Presented by Craig Burton-Durham General Manager: Legal Services Unit ABOUT THE CMS The Council for Medical Schemes is a

580 views • 20 slides
Overview 1. Global Value Chains 2. Top UK trade markets &amp; bilateral UK-CH trade statistics

Overview 1. Global Value Chains 2. Top UK trade markets &amp; bilateral UK-CH trade statistics

Growing the 30+ + Bn Bn Swi wiss-UK Bilateral Trade Relationship? 04/09/2019 Purchasing Leadership and Business Impact 1 Overview 1. Global Value Chains 2. Top UK trade markets &amp; bilateral UK-CH trade statistics 3. Opportunities to

470 views • 22 slides
Section 1 Commitment Schemes Commitment Schemes Commitment Schemes Digital analogue of a safe.

Section 1 Commitment Schemes Commitment Schemes Commitment Schemes Digital analogue of a safe.

Commitment Schemes Section 1 Commitment Schemes Commitment Schemes Commitment Schemes Digital analogue of a safe. Commitment Schemes Commitment Schemes Digital analogue of a safe. Definition 1 (Commitment scheme) An efficient two-stage

605 views • 23 slides
10/10: Conclusions Jack Tumblin EECS, Northwestern University The Bilateral Filter The

10/10: Conclusions Jack Tumblin EECS, Northwestern University The Bilateral Filter The

A Gentle Introduction A Gentle Introduction to Bilateral Filtering to Bilateral Filtering and its Applications and its Applications 10/10: Conclusions Jack Tumblin EECS, Northwestern University The Bilateral Filter The Bilateral Filter

425 views • 20 slides
How does bilateral filter relates with other methods? Pierre Kornprobst (INRIA) 0:35 Many

How does bilateral filter relates with other methods? Pierre Kornprobst (INRIA) 0:35 Many

A Gentle Introduction A Gentle Introduction to Bilateral Filtering to Bilateral Filtering and its Applications and its Applications How does bilateral filter relates with other methods? Pierre Kornprobst (INRIA) 0:35 Many people worked

1.15k views • 51 slides

More recommend