natural susy on trial
play

Natural SUSY On Trial: Status of Higgsino Searches at ATLAS Julia - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Natural SUSY On Trial: Status of Higgsino Searches at ATLAS Julia Gonski Harvard University 25 October 2018 US LHC Users Association Annual Meeting SUSY (The Defendant) Provides unification of forces, dark matter candidate, and solution


  1. Natural SUSY On Trial: Status of Higgsino Searches at ATLAS Julia Gonski Harvard University 25 October 2018 US LHC User’s Association Annual Meeting

  2. SUSY (The Defendant) • Provides unification of forces, dark matter candidate, and solution to hierarchy problem • Higgs mass quadratic corrections cancelled by new supersymmetric partners; higgsinos, stops and gluinos especially influential ➡ What do we search for first? � 2 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  3. SUSY Mass Spectrum (if we got to pick) • Naturalness = reduce fine ˜ L i , ˜ e i tuning ⟹ 10% ˜ B u 1 , 2 , ˜ ˜ Q 1 , 2 , ˜ d 1 , 2 ˜ W mass ˜ b R ˜ g • Dark matter candidate! ˜ Dominantly (but not purely ) ˜ t L t R ˜ higgsino b L ˜ H • Lightest three higgsinos are compressed ( Δ m ~ few GeV) � 3 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  4. SUSY Mass Spectrum (if we got to pick) • Naturalness = reduce fine ˜ L i , ˜ e i tuning ⟹ 10% ˜ B Gauginos ~ ~ u 1 , 2 , ˜ ˜ ~ Q 1 , 2 , ˜ d 1 , 2 ˜ B) ( W) ( H) ( W mass Mass Eigenstates ˜ 흌 20 ~ ~ 흌 1± ~ b R 흌 30 ~ ~ 흌 40 ~ 흌 2± 흌 10 ˜ g • Dark matter candidate! ˜ Dominantly (but not purely ) ˜ t L t R ˜ higgsino b L ˜ H weak scale • Lightest three higgsinos are ( < 400 GeV) compressed ( Δ m ~ few GeV) � 4 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  5. SUSY Mass Spectrum (if we got to pick) • Naturalness = reduce fine ˜ L i , ˜ e i tuning ⟹ 10% ˜ B u 1 , 2 , ˜ ˜ Q 1 , 2 , ˜ d 1 , 2 ˜ B ˜ ˜ W ˜ W H mass ˜ b R χ ± χ ± χ 0 χ 0 χ 0 χ 0 ˜ 2 ˜ ˜ 4 ˜ 3 ˜ 2 ˜ 1 1 ˜ g • Dark matter candidate! ˜ Dominantly (but not purely ) ˜ t L t R ˜ higgsino b L ˜ H weak scale • Lightest three higgsinos are ( < 400 GeV) compressed ( Δ m ~ few GeV) � 5 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  6. SUSY Mass Spectrum (if we got to pick) • Naturalness = reduce fine ˜ L i , ˜ e i tuning ⟹ 10% ˜ B u 1 , 2 , ˜ ˜ Q 1 , 2 , ˜ d 1 , 2 ˜ B ˜ ˜ W ˜ W H mass ˜ b R χ ± χ ± χ 0 χ 0 χ 0 χ 0 ˜ 2 ˜ ˜ 4 ˜ 3 ˜ 2 ˜ 1 1 ˜ g • Dark matter candidate! ˜ Dominantly (but not purely ) ˜ t L t R ˜ higgsino b L ˜ H weak scale • Lightest three higgsinos are ( < 400 GeV) compressed ( Δ m ~ few GeV) � 6 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  7. SUSY Mass Spectrum (if we got to pick) • Naturalness = reduce fine ˜ L i , ˜ e i tuning ⟹ 10% ˜ B u 1 , 2 , ˜ ˜ Q 1 , 2 , ˜ d 1 , 2 ˜ B ˜ ˜ W ˜ W H mass ˜ b R χ ± χ ± χ 0 χ 0 χ 0 χ 0 ˜ 2 ˜ ˜ 4 ˜ 3 ˜ 2 ˜ 1 1 ˜ g • Dark matter candidate! ˜ Dominantly (but not purely ) ˜ t L t R ˜ higgsino b L ˜ H weak scale • Lightest three ewkinos are ( < 400 GeV) compressed ( Δ m ~ few GeV) � 7 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  8. Higgsino Searches at ATLAS • Final state: 2 opposite sign same j q flavor soft leptons q p * W • Challenging! � ± ˜ 1 � 0 ˜ 1 • Low production � 0 ˜ cross section 1 � 0 ˜ 2 * Z p • Small Δ m → low ` ME T , very soft ` leptons � 8 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  9. Higgsino Searches at ATLAS • Final state: 2 opposite sign same j q flavor soft leptons q p * W • Challenging! � ± ˜ 1 � 0 ˜ 1 - Low production � 0 ˜ cross section 1 � 0 ˜ 2 * Z p - Small Δ m → low ` E Tmiss , very soft ` leptons � 9 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  10. Higgsino Searches at ATLAS ISR kick = • Final state: 2 E Tmiss trigger opposite sign same j q flavor soft leptons q p * W • Challenging! � ± ˜ 1 � 0 ˜ 1 - Low production � 0 ˜ cross section 1 � 0 ˜ 2 * Z p - Small Δ m → low ` E Tmiss , very soft ` leptons Low m ll ~ Δ m � 10 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  11. Current Exclusion [1] [1] ATLASSummaryPlots � 11 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  12. Current Exclusion LEP2 [1] [1] ATLASSummaryPlots � 12 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  13. Current Exclusion [1] 2L compressed [1] ATLASSummaryPlots � 13 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  14. ⇒ Current Exclusion [1] m~100 MeV Disappearing track Pure higgsino/wino state: Δ m~100 MeV ⇒ long lifetime ~10 -11 s [2] [2] ATL-PHYS-PUB-2017-19 [1] ATLASSummaryPlots � 14 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  15. Current Exclusion [1] Relic density disfavors pure higgsino LSP! (Well-Tempered Neutralino) [3] [3] arXiv:0601041 [1] ATLASSummaryPlots � 15 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  16. Areas of Improvement [1] New working point gives us muons down to 3 GeV (2019) [1] ATLASSummaryPlots � 16 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  17. Areas of Improvement [1] More luminosity New working point gives us muons down to 3 GeV (2019) [1] ATLASSummaryPlots � 17 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  18. What’s Next? • Natural SUSY is still well-motivated! (& experimental constraints are weakest in the electroweak sector) ˜ g ˜ t - Fine tuning < 10% possible for m( ) < 2.5 TeV and m( ) < 1.5 TeV • Next analysis: 1L + track, softer leptons, HL-LHC! (2026+) 200 400 � 18 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  19. What’s Next? • Natural SUSY is still well-motivated! (& experimental constraints are weakest in the electroweak sector) ˜ g ˜ t - Fine tuning < 10% possible for m( ) < 2.5 TeV and m( ) < 1.5 TeV [4] • Next analysis: 1L + track, softer leptons, HL-LHC! (2026+) 200 400 [4] arXiv:1611.05873 � 19 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  20. What’s Next? • Natural SUSY is still well-motivated! (& experimental constraints are weakest in the electroweak sector) ˜ g ˜ t - Fine tuning < 10% possible for m( ) < 2.5 TeV and m( ) < 1.5 TeV [4] • Up next: softer leptons, 1L + track, HL-LHC! (2026+) ? 200 400 [4] arXiv:1611.05873 � 20 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  21. Backup � 21 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  22. Precision Corrections to Fine Tuning Buckley, Monteux, Shih arXiv:1611.05873 Λ = �� ��� m 2 H = m 2 H,bare + ∆ m 2 − ∆ m 2 Δ m 2 = | μ | 2 (at tree level) ∆ ≡ 2 δ m 2 H ≤ 10 m 2 h μ ≤ 400 GeV Λ = �� � ��� � 22 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  23. Why Quasi-Degenerate? study we will take M 1 Depends on neutrino mass matrix in MSSM! Using ( e B 0 , f W 0 , ψ 0 d , ψ 0 u ) basis is is 0 1 0 M 1 � m W t θ W c β m W t θ W s β ✓ ◆ p B C 2 s β m W M 2 0 M 2 m W c β � m W s β B C N 0 = C = M ˜ p M ˜ @ A 0 � m W t θ W c β m W c β � µ 2 c β m W µ 0 m W t θ W s β � m W s β � µ ⇥ ⇤ ⇥ ⇤ f µ , the splittings between the mostly Higgsino states are � � � � � ⇡ m 2 W (1 ⌥ s 2 β ) � � � � � m χ ± � � � m χ 0 2( M 2 + | µ | ) 1 1 � � � � � � � � � ⇡ m 2 � ⇡ m 2 W (1 ± s 2 β ) W ( ±| µ | s 2 β + M 2 ) � � � � � � � � � m χ 0 � � � m χ ± 2( M 2 � | µ | ) , � m χ 0 � � � m χ 0 ( M 2 2 � | µ | 2 ) 2 2 1 1 Wino/bino as lightest electroweakino, # light states is different! • one neutral state for a light bino; • one neutral and one charged state for a light wino. arXiv:1401.1235 � 23 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  24. But we haven’t found anything yet! The Stop 1500 Limits up-to ~1 TeV in stop mass … but no limits if m(LSP) ≳ 400 GeV � 24 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  25. But we haven’t found anything yet! The Gluino 2500 � 25 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  26. ATLAS SUSY Summary � 26 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  27. 2L Higgsino Search • Met > 200 GeV → trigger • p T (jet1) >200 GeV → ISR • | 힓흓 (jet,Met)| > 1.0 → mis-measured Met • nJet(50 GeV) =1,2 → no jets expected from the signal • bJet veto → ttbar background • upper cut on lepton p T → soft leptons in the final state; • upper cut on m ll → small invariant masses expected; • Met/Ht → good discrimination as seen in the Run-2 analysis; • m 휏휏 → Z 휏휏 background; � 27 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

  28. Making E Tmiss with ISR • With no other final state objects, LSPs are back to back, no E Tmiss in event • Require ISR jet: collimate LSPs, generate measurable E Tmiss for trigger p TLSP1 = 100 GeV p TLSP1 = 100 GeV p TLSP2 = 100 GeV p TLSP2 = 100 GeV Total E Tmiss = 0 GeV Total E Tmiss = 200 GeV � 28 25 October 2018 J. Gonski

Recommend


More recommend