Natural Deduction Akim Demaille akim@lrde.epita.fr EPITA cole Pour - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Natural Deduction Akim Demaille akim@lrde.epita.fr EPITA — École Pour l’Informatique et les Techniques Avancées June 10, 2016

Define “logic” [fuc, ] A. Demaille Natural Deduction 2 / 49

Natural Deduction 1 Logical Formalisms Natural Deduction 2 Additional Material 3 A. Demaille Natural Deduction 3 / 49

Preamble The following slides are implicitly dedicated to classical logic. A. Demaille Natural Deduction 4 / 49

Logical Formalisms Logical Formalisms 1 Syntax Proof Types Proof Systems Natural Deduction 2 Additional Material 3 A. Demaille Natural Deduction 5 / 49

Syntax Logical Formalisms 1 Syntax Proof Types Proof Systems Natural Deduction 2 Additional Material 3 A. Demaille Natural Deduction 6 / 49

Terminal Symbols Propositional Calculus Constants a , b , c , . . . Propositional Variables A , B , C , . . . Unary Connective ¬ Binary Connectives ∧ , ∨ , ⇒ Punctuation ( , ) , [ , ] . A. Demaille Natural Deduction 7 / 49

Terminal Symbols Predicate calculus Individual Variables x , y , z , . . . Functions f , g , h , . . . , with a fixed arity Predicates P , Q , R , . . . , with a fixed arity Quantifiers ∀ , ∃ Punctuation · . A. Demaille Natural Deduction 8 / 49

Propositional Formulas � formula � � propositional variable � ::= | ¬� formula � | � formula � ∧ � formula � | � formula � ∨ � formula � | � formula � ⇒ � formula � A. Demaille Natural Deduction 9 / 49

Terms � term � ::= � constant � | � function � ( � term � , . . . ) With the proper arity. A. Demaille Natural Deduction 10 / 49

Syntactic Conventions Associativity ∧ , ∨ are left-associative (unimportant) ⇒ is right-associative (very important) Precedence (increasing) 1 ∀ , ∃ 2 ⇒ 3 ∨ 4 ∧ 5 ¬ A. Demaille Natural Deduction 12 / 49

Free Variables FV ( X ) = ∅ FV ( P ( x 1 , x 2 , · · · , x n )) = { x 1 , x 2 , · · · , x n } FV ( ¬ A ) = FV ( A ) FV ( A ∨ B ) = FV ( A ) ∪ FV ( B ) FV ( A ∧ B ) = FV ( A ) ∪ FV ( B ) FV ( A ⇒ B ) FV ( A ) ∪ FV ( B ) = FV ( ∀ x · A ) = FV ( A ) − { x } FV ( ∃ x · A ) FV ( A ) − { x } = A. Demaille Natural Deduction 13 / 49

Proof Types Logical Formalisms 1 Syntax Proof Types Proof Systems Natural Deduction 2 Additional Material 3 A. Demaille Natural Deduction 14 / 49

Different Proof Types A. Demaille Natural Deduction 15 / 49

Proof Systems Logical Formalisms 1 Syntax Proof Types Proof Systems Natural Deduction 2 Additional Material 3 A. Demaille Natural Deduction 17 / 49

Proof Systems Hilbertian Systems Natural Deduction Sequent Calculus Natural Deduction in Sequent Calculus A. Demaille Natural Deduction 18 / 49

Axioms Axioms are formulas that are considered true a priori ∀ x · x + 0 = x Axiom schemes use meta-variables (that range over a specific domain) X + Y = Y + X Axiom schemes are used when quantifiers are not welcome → XZ ( YZ ) SXYZ KXY → X Axiom schemes are used when quantifiers do not apply A ∨ ¬ A A. Demaille Natural Deduction 19 / 49

Inference Rules · · · H 1 H 2 H n Rule name C Axiom name A A. Demaille Natural Deduction 20 / 49

Logical Formalisms David Hilbert (1862–1943) A. Demaille Natural Deduction 21 / 49

Hilbertian System A single inference rule: the modus ponens A A ⇒ B modus ponens B Many axioms to define the connectives A ⇒ B ⇒ A ∧ B A ∧ B ⇒ A A ∧ B ⇒ B A ⇒ A ∨ B B ⇒ A ∨ B A ∨ B ⇒ ( A ⇒ C ) ⇒ ( B ⇒ C ) ⇒ C A ⇒ B ⇒ A ( A ⇒ ( B ⇒ C )) ⇒ ( A ⇒ B ) ⇒ A ⇒ C A ∨ ¬ A A ⇒ ¬ A ⇒ B A. Demaille Natural Deduction 22 / 49

Hilbertian System A single inference rule: the modus ponens A A ⇒ B modus ponens B Many axioms to define the connectives A ⇒ B ⇒ A ∧ B A ∧ B ⇒ A A ∧ B ⇒ B A ⇒ A ∨ B B ⇒ A ∨ B A ∨ B ⇒ ( A ⇒ C ) ⇒ ( B ⇒ C ) ⇒ C A ⇒ B ⇒ A ( A ⇒ ( B ⇒ C )) ⇒ ( A ⇒ B ) ⇒ A ⇒ C ⇒ A ∨ ¬ A A ⇒ ¬ A ⇒ B A. Demaille Natural Deduction 22 / 49

Hilbertian System: Prove A ⇒ A A. Demaille Natural Deduction 23 / 49

Hilbertian System: Prove A ⇒ A ( A ⇒ (( A ⇒ A ) ⇒ A )) ⇒ ( A ⇒ A ⇒ A ) ⇒ A ⇒ A A ⇒ ( A ⇒ A ) ⇒ A ( A ⇒ A ⇒ A ) ⇒ A ⇒ A A ⇒ A ⇒ A A ⇒ A A. Demaille Natural Deduction 23 / 49

Natural Deduction 1 Logical Formalisms 2 Natural Deduction Syntax Normalization 3 Additional Material A. Demaille Natural Deduction 24 / 49

Syntax 1 Logical Formalisms 2 Natural Deduction Syntax Normalization 3 Additional Material A. Demaille Natural Deduction 25 / 49

Natural Deduction Akim Demaille akim@lrde.epita.fr EPITA cole Pour - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Natural Deduction Akim Demaille akim@lrde.epita.fr EPITA cole Pour lInformatique et les Techniques Avances June 10, 2016 Define logic [fuc, ] A. Demaille Natural Deduction 2 / 49 Natural Deduction 1 Logical Formalisms

Computation and Deduction Lecture 15: Natural Deduction March 4, 1997 1. Natural Deduction 2.

Hyper Natural Deduction for Gdel Logic a natural deduction system for parallel reasoning 1

Natural Deduction for Classical Propositional Logic Valentin Goranko DTU Informatics September

Logic as a Tool Chapter 4: Deductive Reasoning in First-Order Logic 4.3 Natural Deduction for

Computation and Deduction Lecture 16: The Curry-Howard Isomorphism March 6, 1997 1. Natural

Semantic Entailment and Natural Deduction Alice Gao Lecture 6, September 26, 2017 Entailment

Logic as a Tool Chapter 2: Deductive Reasoning in Propositional Logic 2.4 Propositional Natural

Logic as a Tool Chapter 2: Deductive Reasoning in Propositional Logic 2.4 Propositional Natural

Logic for Computer Science 14 Natural deduction Wouter Swierstra University of Utrecht 1

Predicate Logic: Natural Deduction Alice Gao Lecture 15 Based on work by J. Buss, L. Kari, A.

Introduction to Natural Deduction Carl Pollard Department of Linguistics Ohio State University

Natural Deduction with Alternatives Greg Restall applied proof theory workshop 6 november 2020

Natural Deduction and Rule Induction Dr. Liam OConnor University of Edinburgh LFCS UNSW, Term

Proofs, upside down A functional correspondence between natural deduction and the sequent calculus

Decorating natural deduction Helmut Schwichtenberg (j.w.w. Diana Ratiu) Mathematisches Institut,

Forward vs. backward proof Consider the following Natural Deduction rule: Rule can be read in two

The natural deduction normal form and coherence General Proof Theory, 28 November 2015, T

1 Why ELSS? Deduction U/s 80C Deduction can be claimed by investing in ELSS funds along

Automated Reasoning Jacques Fleuriot September 30, 2013 1 / 26 Lecture 5 Natural Deduction in

G odel Logic: from Natural Deduction to Parallel Computation Federico Aschieri Agata

Parsing as Deduction Joseph K uhner March 24, 2007 Joseph K uhner Parsing as Deduction

Automated Reasoning Jacques Fleuriot September 14, 2013 1 / 127 Lecture 2 Natural Deduction in

The Duality of Construction Paul Downen Zena M. Ariola University of Oregon April 9, 2014 The

MA THEMA TICAL INDUCTION Induction and Deduction Mathematical Induction (its