national association for state community services
play

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STATE COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS Eric - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STATE COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS Eric Behna, Communications and Policy Manager Amy Klusmeier, WAP State Assistance Director 1 WAP Orientation Part 1- Welcome What to Expect in Arlington NASCSP &


  1. NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR STATE COMMUNITY SERVICES PROGRAMS Eric Behna, Communications and Policy Manager Amy Klusmeier, WAP State Assistance Director 1

  2. WAP Orientation Part 1- Welcome •  What to Expect in Arlington  NASCSP & Partner Organizations Part 2- History & Background •  Terminology & Acronyms  Roles & Responsibilities Part 3- Funding and Legislation •  Statute  Regulations & Rules  WPN’s & Guidance 2 Part 4- Resources •

  3. What to Expect in Arlington • Arriving at the airport Navigating DC Metro • Conference agenda • • Monday – WAP Orientation Tuesday – WAP Manager’s Training • Wednesday – Core Conference Begins • • Thursday – WAP Core Sessions with DOE Friday – WAP Core Sessions • • What to wear & bring along Who will be at the Conference… •

  4. About NASCSP NASCSP provides research, analysis, training and technical assistance to State CSBG and WAP grantees , Community Action Agencies, and State Associations in order to increase their capacity to prevent and reduce poverty and build economic and energy security. @NASCSP https://nascsp.org/

  5. NASCSP Board of Directors  NASCSP Executive Board  Willie Fobbs, President  Beverly Buchanan, Vice-President  Melanie Sanford, Secretary  Matt Fitzgerald, Treasurer  Ditzah Wooden-Wade, CSBG Program Chair  Bruce Hagen, WAP Program Chair  Bill Brand, Past President 5

  6. WAP Regional Representatives & Alternates  Representatives  Alternates  Region 1 – Kiahnna Burney  Region 1 – Karen Brooks  Region 2 – Andrea Schroer  Region 2 – Susan Hill  Region 3 – Gwen Howe  Region 3 – Robert Garber  Region 4 – Jeffery Heino  Region 4 – Jake McAlpine  Region 5 – Amanda Rains  Region 5 – Brad Carpenter 6

  7. NASCSP Partners Community Action Partnership • • Denise Harlow NCAF (National Community Action Foundation) • • David Bradley CAPLAW (Community Action Program Legal Services) • • Eleanor Evans NEUAC (National Energy & Utility Affordability Coalition) • • Katrina Metzler NEADA (National Association of Energy Assistance Directors) • • Mark Wolfe NASEO (National Association of State Energy Officials) • • David Terry

  8. History and Background

  9. THE PURPOSE OF THE WAP • Mission Statement of the Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) Department of Energy • “To reduce energy costs for low-income families, particularly for the elderly, people with disabilities, and children, by improving the energy efficiency of their homes while ensuring their health and safety.” Grantees (States, Territories & Tribes) • 40+ Year Record of Success • Operating since 1976 • Over 7.4 million homes weatherized Local Providers (Sub-grantees) • Saves low-income families an average of $250 to $450 per year Low Income Households 9

  10. Legislative History • 1976 : Title IV of the Energy Conservation and Production Act • 1978 : National Energy Conservation Policy Act (NECPA) • 1980 : Energy Security Act (ESA) • 1982 : Job Training Partnership Act • 1984 : Human Services Reauthorization Act of 1984 • 1990 : State Energy Efficiency Programs Improvement Act (SEEPIA) • 2000 : Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPACT) • 2005 : Energy Policy Act (EPACT) • 2007 : Energy Independence and Security Act (EISA) • 2009 : American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (Recovery Act)

  11. Examples of Most Recent Changes (Recovery Act) 2009 – American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Increased Increased the eligibility to 200% average cost to of the poverty $6,500 per home*. rate. Changed the reweatherization date to Sept 30, 1994 .

  12. Terminology & Acronyms  DOE – Department of Energy  EERE – Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy  WAP – Weatherization Assistance Program  WPN – Weatherization Program Notice  WAP Memorandum  HHS – Health & Human Services  LIHEAP- Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program 12

  13. Terminology & Acronyms  CFR – Code of Federal Regulations  WAPTAC – Weatherization Assistance Program Technical Assistance Center  CR – Continuing Resolution  Grantee – State or territory administering the WAP  Sub-grantee – Local entity providing Weatherization services  CAA’s/CAP’s- Community Action Agencies, Community Action Programs 13

  14. WAP Landscape Congress • Authorization • Presidents budget Appropriations • Department of Energy • Work of national partners • Funds received Grant guidance • • State Plans Grantees (States, Territories & Tribes) • Distribution of funds • State plans • Public Hearings Leveraging other • funds Grant Awards • Local Providers (Sub-grantees) • Client recruitment • Staffing • Contracting Deployment • Low Income Households • Customer service Client education • • Quality Control

  15. Roles & Responsibilities  Who is involved?  DOE  Federal funding source  WAP Grantee  Steward between DOE & Sub-grantee  WAP Sub-Grantee  Service delivery following rules of the two entities above

  16. DOE Role  Funds received  Funds distributed according to formula  Grant guidance  Incorporate updates  Issue to Grantees  State Plans  Provide guidance & instructions to Grantees  Review upon receipt  Move to next phase of approval process  Distribution of funds  Based upon formula  Based upon approved State Plan

  17. DOE Role  WAP Updates  Weatherization Program Notices (WPN)  WAP Memorandums  Standard Work Specification (SWS) update process  Healthy & Safety update process  Weatherization Certifications  Quality Assurance  Grantee Monitoring  Sub-grantee visits

  18. State Level – Grantees  Adherence to Federal Guidelines  Quality Assurance  Monitoring & Accountability  Sub-grantee Evaluation 19

  19. State Level - Grantees  State plans  Guidance posted by DOE  Establish timeline  Engage PAC  Engage Sub-grantees  Policy manual up to date?  Budget concerns?  Sub-grantee concerns?  RFP processes for coming year?  ACSI results & DOE expectations  Sub-grantee monitoring

  20. State Level - Grantees  Public Hearings  Proper notice  How publicize?  Official transcript  Issues raised during plan preparation?  Leveraging or blending other funds  Include in budget or not?  What type of funds?  How are they used

  21. State Level - Grantees  Distribution of Funds  Approval of State Plan [by DOE]  Receipt of funds  Run through formula or funding process  Prepare contracts

  22. State Level – Grantees  Training & Technical Assistance  Develop training plan  Part of State Plan preparation & submission  Review monitoring results  Consult DOE requirements  Examine WAP Network needs  Who provides the training?  Use of DOE T&TA funds  Feedback from technical committees, training center, Sub-grantees

  23. Funding and Legislation

  24. Authorization vs. Appropriations

  25. Authorization • Underlying statute creating the program • Lays out Congressional intent • Authorizes Congress to appropriate funds to the program for X amount of years • Authorizations expire -> Need reauthorization • Reauthorization • What can be changed/improved? • What should stay the same? • What is better addressed by DOE rather than legislation? • How can the program grow and innovate? • Often must be part of larger bill

  26. Appropriations • Yearly, regular process of funding government agencies and programs • 12 Appropriations bills that fund different areas of the government • Energy and Water Appropriations Bill • Funds WAP , rest of DOE, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, etc. • Labor- HHS Appropriations Bill • Funds LIHEAP , CSBG, Headstart, rest of HHS, Dept. of Education, Dept of Labor

  27. Appropriations Process…in Theory Fully Funded 12 President’s Government by Congressional Budget start of fiscal Appropriations year (Feb.) Bills (Oct. 1) *Hasn’t happened on time for all 12 since 1996

  28. Appropriations • President’s budget • Mostly a policy statement, non-binding because Congress makes final funding decisions • House and Senate Appropriations Committees pass their respective appropriations bills one by one • Then a conference committee reconciles differences • What usually happens… • Congress doesn’t get its work done in time, passes a “Continuing Resolution” to keep funding flat at past year levels • Omnibus- One large package of the 12 bills passed at once • Minibus- Smaller packages of maybe 3 or 4 bills passed at a time If nothing is passed  Government Shutdown •

  29. 2019 Funding Other $ LIHEAP $ WAP- $257 million ($6 million increase from • FY 2018 level of $251 million) $253.5 Million formula, $3 million TTA • DOE for DOE HQ, $500,000 vermiculite $ Additional $9 million in prior year funds • recovered from OMB LIHEAP- $3.69 Billion (Slight increase over • FY 2018 level of $3.64 billion) Department of Energy’s Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP)

Recommend


More recommend