Nanocrafter Xylem vs. r pl r lv r pl r lv r pl r lv + d - d - d - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Nanocrafter Xylem

vs. r pl r lv r pl r lv r pl r lv + d - d - d + d

BLIND

BLIND RATINGS

BLIND RATINGS CHOICE

Compute desired win rate using player’s rating BLIND RATINGS

Compute desired win rate using player’s rating Compute player’s win expectancy versus each BLIND remaining level RATINGS

Compute desired win rate using player’s rating Compute player’s win expectancy versus each BLIND remaining level Serve level with win expectancy closest to desired vs. win rate RATINGS

Compute desired win Compute desired win Compute desired win rate using rate using rate using (player’s rating + 400) (player’s rating – 400) player’s rating CHOICE

Compute desired win Compute desired win Compute desired win rate using rate using rate using (player’s rating + 400) (player’s rating – 400) player’s rating Compute player’s Compute player’s Compute player’s win expectancy win expectancy win expectancy versus each versus each versus each remaining level remaining level remaining level CHOICE

Compute desired win Compute desired win Compute desired win rate using rate using rate using (player’s rating + 400) (player’s rating – 400) player’s rating Compute player’s Compute player’s Compute player’s win expectancy win expectancy win expectancy versus each versus each versus each remaining level remaining level remaining level CHOICE vs. EASY RECOMMENDED HARD

Variable BLIND RATINGS CHOICE Challenge Time 515 791 897 Levels Attempted 7 10 12 Levels Completed 5 7 8

Variable BLIND RATINGS CHOICE Interest/Enjoyment 63% 65% 63% Perceived Competence 57% 52% 57% Perceived Choice 78% 80% 82% Effort/Importance 83% 86% 83%

RATINGS

RATINGS

RATINGS

CHOICE

CHOICE

Previous Easy Recommen Hard Result ded Complete 40% 49% 11% (Win) Forfeit 41% 36% 23% (Loss) Skip 57% 32% 11%

Previous Easy Recommen Hard Result ded Complete 40% 11% 49% (Win) Forfeit 41% 36% 23% (Loss) Skip 57% 32% 11%

Previous Easy Recommen Hard Result ded Complete 40% 49% 11% (Win) Forfeit 41% 36% 23% (Loss) Skip 32% 11% 57%

Previous Easy Recommen Hard Result ded Complete 40% 49% 11% (Win) Forfeit 41% 36% 23% (Loss) Skip 57% 32% 11%

Anurag Sarkar Northeastern University sarkar.an@husky.neu.edu This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant no. 1652537. We would like to thank the University of Washington 's Center for Game Science for initial Paradox development.