muscatine high school goals c omprehensive s chool i
play

MUSCATINE HIGH SCHOOL GOALS (C omprehensive S chool I mprovement P - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MUSCATINE HIGH SCHOOL GOALS (C omprehensive S chool I mprovement P lan ) 1. Add rigor back into our system (50% increase in college readiness scores by 2016) 2. Reduce the number of Freshman Fs by 50% by 2016 Addressing Goal #1 RIGOR


  1. MUSCATINE HIGH SCHOOL

  2. GOALS (C omprehensive S chool I mprovement P lan ) 1. Add rigor back into our system (50% increase in college readiness scores by 2016) 2. Reduce the number of Freshman F’s by 50% by 2016

  3. Addressing Goal #1 RIGOR

  4. Addressing Goal #1 - RIGOR ● Adopted an ACT testing sequence (14-15) Aspire - 8-10 th grade students ○ ACT test prep course – 11 th grade students ○ ACT – all 11 th grade students ○ ● Adopted the following Course Sequences (14-15) Before: Now: Science Course Sequence: Physical Science Biology Science Elective Biology Chemistry Physics Math Course Sequence: 3 years of Math Algebra 1 Geometry Algebra 2

  5. Addressing Goal #1 - RIGOR ● Adopted weighted grading system for Pre-AP, AP & PLTW (14-15) ● Incorporated the Honors and Scholar Programs (14-15) ● Increased the number of Pre-AP/AP courses offered (14-15) 8 courses 18 courses ○ 2 new courses for 16-17 school year - AP Seminar, AP Computer Science Principles ○ 1 new course for 17-18 school year - AP Research ○

  6. Current Progress AP (Advanced Placement)

  7. Pre-AP & AP Enrollment Trends 472 460 148 142

  8. AP TESTING DATA 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 143 147 126 123 316 Total AP Students 178 186 150 143 475 Number of Exams Taken Number of students 60 69 56 57 168 with scores of 3+ % of Total AP Students 42.0% 46.9% 44.4% 46.3% 53.2% with scores of 3+ 2.30 2.41 2.496 2.57 2.497 Average

  9. Addressing Goal #2 STUDENT SUCCESS

  10. Addressing Goal #2 - Student Success (13-14) Assembled a comprehensive At-Risk Data Team and ● provided time for meetings Started using data to make weekly decisions for appropriate ● interventions of failing students Created a Lunch Success Center (working lunch daily for ● struggling students) Scheduled Success Center throughout the day ● Continued writing Guaranteed/Viable Curriculum ●

  11. Addressing Goal #2 - Student Success (14-15) Created comprehensive school approach to develop ● interventions to help our struggling students Continued At-Risk Data Team Meetings ● Adjusted Success Center/Component Recovery to focus on ● specific skill gaps & credit recovery Created building wide enrichment/lunch for all students ● Created a comprehensive Summer School Program ● PLCs - Allowed time for Curriculum/Assessment/Enrichment ● Alignment

  12. Addressing Goal #2 - Student Success (15-16) Continued At-Risk Data Team Meetings ● Streamline department & school leadership teams ● Curriculum/PLC Work ● Skill Placements for Enrichment ● Combined At-Risk Efforts through Success Center ● (ALC, Component Recovery, Guided Study Hall, Credit Recovery) 11th/ 12th grade Muskie Mentoring ● 10th grade focus in Success Center ● 9th Grade Academy ●

  13. Current Progress Failures

  14. Failures - Overview Since 2012-13 school year: ● we have reduced the number of 9th grade course failures by 54% ○ we have reduced the number of overall course failures by 41% ○ Since the 2012-13 school year: ● we have reduced the number of 9th grade students with a failure by 48% ○ we have reduced the number of overall students with a failure by 30% ○ we have reduced the percent of our population with a failure by 44% ○ If the trend continues, overall course failures will have been reduced by 50% ● at the end of the 2015-16 school year

  15. Current Progress Dropout/Graduation Rate

  16. Dropout Rate: 2013 2014 MHS 5.3% 3.85% State of Iowa 2.82% 2.70%

  17. Dropout Data: 41% decrease in number of students 104 81 61

  18. Graduation Rate 2013 2014 MHS 76.6% 81.79% State of Iowa 89.68% 90.05%

  19. Comparison of Graduation Rates (Subgroups) 2012-2013 2013-2014 Difference Overall 76.58% 81.79% 5.21% IEP 55.1% 70% 14.9% Free or Reduced 59.22% 71.88% 12.66% ELL 69.57% 80% 10.43% African American 72.73% 70% 2.73% Hispanic 67.39% 71.23% 3.84% White 80.08% 85.20% 5.12% Female 76.54% 83.71% 7.17% Male 76.61% 80% 3.39%

  20. Current Progress At-Risk Programming

  21. At-Risk Summary (14-15) 2015 MHS Summer School ● &7 15 additional graduates to the class of 2015 ○ 38 additional students are now on track to graduate ○ 154 credits earned ○ Through a combined effort (ALC, Component Recovery ● & Summer School) our students regained credit in 722 classes

  22. Semester 1 - At-Risk Interventions Data 9th Grade Academy, Success Center & Muskie 9th Grade Academy Mentoring are measured by the following: 73.2% improved Attendance % ● 78.05% improved D & F’s ● Improvement of GPA averaged 3.07 credits during 1st semester ● ● Improvement of Attendance % ● Success Center Improvement of # of D’s and F’s ● 71.9% improved GPA ● Credit attainment ● 71.9% improved Attendance % ● 65.6% improved D & F’s ● averaged 3.28 credits during 1st semester With the ultimate goal of increasing a student’ ● s chance of graduation with their cohort. Muskie Mentoring 58.3% improved GPA ● 50% improved Attendance % ● 50% improved D & F’s ● averaged 2.77 credits during 1st semester ●

  23. Semester 1 - At-Risk Interventions Data ALC: Accelerated Learning Center Enrichment: ALC is an opportunity for credits to be recovered Enrichment allows for all teachers to be available over through an online program titled OdysseyWare. the lunch hour to assist with students academic Students must show proficiency in all class standards success. This opportunity allows for all students to at 75% or higher. This semester we have worked on drop by and receive assistance with any course. In aligning curriculum to match the progression in addition students may be assigned. traditional core class rooms. ALC is designed to focus 802 unique students assigned to enrichment on 11th & 12th grade students. ● 637 skill requests for enrichment ● This semester an average 67.8% of students 4523 placements ● ● completed a course. That is 14% gain on the trend.

  24. Direct Comparison: Student Success Student Success: 2012-13 Student Success: Current Graduation Rate: 76.6% Graduation Rate: 81.79% ● ● Dropout Rate: 6.46% Dropout Rate: 3.85% ● ● Number of Dropouts: 104 Number of Dropouts: 61 ● ● 1 7 9th grade Failures: 668 classes 9th grade Failures: 308 classes ● ● 3 MHS Failures: 1738 classes MHS Failures: 1029 classes ● ● 6 8 9th grade students with Failures: 191 9th grade students with Failures: 100 ● ● 6 MHS Students with Failures: 462 8 MHS Students with Failures: 323 ● ●

  25. Current Progress Attendance

  26. 1st Semester - Comparison of Attendance (ALL Absences) Period 2014-2015 2015-2016 Difference 1st 12505 10804 13.6% 2nd 10945 9861 9.9% 3rd 10821 9214 14.85% 4th 10094 8997 10.87% 5th 10375 8989 13.36% 6th 10383 9605 7.49% 7th 11526 10568 8.31% Total 76649 68038 11.23%

  27. 1st Semester - Comparison of Attendance (Unexcused Absences) Period 2014-2015 2015-2016 Difference 1st 2390 1780 25.52% 2nd 1794 1461 18.56% 3rd 1801 1307 27.43% 4th 1854 1261 31.98% 5th 1976 1427 27.78% 6th 1758 1652 6.03% 7th 1936 1965 1.48% Total 13509 10853 19.66%

  28. Average Daily Attendance Trend 2013-2014 2014-2015 2015-2016

  29. Seat Time : Increased the seat time in academic courses through adoption of a ● traditional daily schedule and maintaining credits required. (14-15) 2013-14 2015-16 Graduation Requirements 25 credits 25 credits Daily Schedule Block Traditional MHS Average Seat Time (Days) 143.33 158.42 15.19 Senior Year Average Seat Time (Days) 112.74 141.24 28.50

  30. Current Progress Discipline

  31. Discipline Referrals: Discipline Code: Fall 2014 Fall 2015 100 - Tardy 2 1 102 - Unexcused Absence 502 175 105 - Classroom Behavior 138 75 Overall 107 - Insubordination/FTS 1138 746 114 - Conflict 47 39 122 - Fighting 28 17 44.93% 123 - Disrupting School Environment 130 43 132 - Weapons 3 3 144 - Drugs or Alcohol 4 5 146 - Tobacco 8 13 147 - Bus Behavior 11 2 158 - Dress Code 11 6 Bullying/Harassment 30 6

  32. Current Progress Iowa Assessment/Aspire/ACT

  33. 2015-16 Iowa Assessment Proficiency Advanced Proficient Not - Proficient 66.9% 78.3% 64.3% 75.6%

  34. 2015-16 Iowa Assessment Proficiency Advanced Proficient Not - Proficient 73.9% 77.5% 75.5% 73.7%

  35. 2015-16 Iowa Assessment Proficiency Advanced Proficient Not - Proficient 68.2% 71.0% 78.7% 72.0%

  36. Act Aspire/2-year Grade Comparisons Standard 8th 8th 9th 9th 10th 10th Score (14-15) (15-16) (14-15) (15-16) (14-15) (15-16) Comparisons English 425 426 424 425 427 426 Math 419 420 419 422 421 422 Reading 420 421 421 422 421 422 Science 421 422 423 423 425 423

  37. Act Aspire ACT Readiness ACT/College Percentage Percentage Readiness Grade Benchmark 2014-2015 2015-2016 Benchmark English 8 422 66% 65% 9 426 43.2% 41.7% 10 428 45.4% 45.5% Math 8 425 22.2% 19.3% 9 428 13% 21.6% 10 432 11.4% 14.2% Reading 8 424 29.3% 38.3% 9 425 33.7% 35.1% 10 428 24.6% 28.1% Science 8 427 22.1% 30.7% 9 430 23.1% 23% 10 432 22.8% 14.2%

Recommend


More recommend