muon g 2
play

Muon g-2 Precision Precession Steve Maxfield University of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Muon g-2 Precision Precession Steve Maxfield University of Liverpool sjm@hep.ph.liv.ac.uk 1 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013 OUTLINE What is it? Why measure it (again)? How? Goals and how to achieve them:


  1. Muon g-2 Precision Precession Steve Maxfield University of Liverpool sjm@hep.ph.liv.ac.uk 1 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  2. OUTLINE • What is it? • Why measure it (again)? • How? • Goals and how to achieve them: • Brief recap of technique • Upgrades! • Beam, detectors, field • Status and Conclusions † The material for this talk has been shamelessly stolen from many including: B. Lee Roberts, Leah Welty-Reiger, Mark Lancaster, Thomas Teubner, Chris Polly, Andreas Kronfeld , Ruth Van de Water…… 2 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  3. Magnetic Moments • Magnetic moment of elementary particles related to their spin by the “g - factor” Qe       g S B S 2 m Larmor frequency A little history… 1924 Stern-Gerlach Magnetic moment of silver atom in it’s ground state is 1 Bohr magneton. (10%) …but not understood as spin 1/2 3 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  4. Spin ½? 1925/26 Uhlenbeck And Goldschmidt proposed electron spin to explain fine structure…. …but prediction off by factor of 2! Rescued by Thomas precession (1926) - relativistic kinematics effect (successive non-collinear boosts give rotation). 4 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  5. 1928 g=2            0 i ieA m   Non-relativistic reduction      2 p e          1 2 i L S B      t 2 m 2 m g  2 g  S 1 L 5 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  6. Greater Experimental Precision... …1947 ( Nafe , Nelson, Rabi)Hyperfine structure of H and D did not fit g=2…(It was a 5 sigma effect) 1948 Kusch and Foley : A precision measurement: g e =2(1 .00119 ± 0.00005 )  g 2  a An anomaly! Define 2 It takes QED to begin to explain the anomaly…    a 0.001161  e 2 6 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  7. More QED…   2  3  4  5           g                  1 C C C C C      1 2 3 4 5           2 Laporta,, Kinoshita et al. Rameddi Some very Even analytically… weird diagrams! 7 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  8. Status of electron g-2 Together with a succession of experiments     exp 12 a 1159652180.73(28) 10 e        12 a 1.05 0.82 10 Ultra-precise agreement e Gives best value of  E    thy 12 a 1159652181.78(77) 10 e 8 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  9. a  Standard Model Physics predicts electron magnetic moment anomaly at ppt level! But the story is different for the muon … It’s heavier More sensitive to more contributions… + … + + (Hadronic corrections only enter around 12 th decimal place in a e ) 9 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  10. QCD • QED well known • EW contributions also understood (only couple of loop accuracy needed) • Hadronic contributions are significant and the biggest source of uncertainty. Non-perturbative - cannot be calculated. Determined from experiment Low energy e + e -  hadrons. + some lattice QCD for L-by-L contribution 10 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  11. e + e -  hadrons new Older e + e - data     new PHIPSI13 K + K -  Rome, 2013 11 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  12. How the contributions stack up: Determination of hadronic contribution to muon g-2 has become an industry DHMZ HLMNT Paralleled by g- 2 measurements… 12 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  13. Experimental Determination of a  . A succession of improving measurements FNAL GOES HERE …Details to follow! 13 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  14. The current state of the art: Not same precision as the electron but compensated by higher mass. Muon anomalous magnetic moment is sensitive to most of the standard model… and to new physics. A tantalising but inconclusive 3.3-3.6 s discrepancy 14 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  15. There is no shortage of interest in this intriguing result! Were it to persist… • Strong indicator of BSM physics … Loop contributions sensitive to new particles running round loop… 2    m   better than e   40,000   m e 15 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  16. NP e.g. SUSY But broad spectrum of sensitivity in TeV mass range…  flavour-conserving, CP-conserving, chirality a  related to m  flipping, loop-induced highly model dependent C Generically: 2 2      NP m m         NP    a O 1      M m    NEW 16 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  17. NP a  provides discriminating power… 17 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  18. NP …also can inform, low mass, below LHC reach… e.g. Dark photons: 18 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  19. How do we measure g-2? 19 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  20. Fortunes of Nature First make your muons … … from pions . Fortune of nature number 1 Parity violation delivers conveniently polarised muons:  beam of polarised muons 20 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  21. Fortunes of Nature inject i nto a (very) uniform magnetic field… QeB    Muon momentum turns with cyclotron frequency  C m QeB QeB         g 1 Spin turns with frequency  S 2 m m Fortune of nature number 2:    Direct dependence on the anomaly: an g 2 QeB QeB            a immediate 3 orders of magnitude gain  a S C   over measuring  in at-rest 2 m m   experiments !  We need to measure and B a …and know very accurately? m  21 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  22. Actually measure: Normalise magnetic field to Larmor frequency of proton  a   p a      a   p p  Measured from hyperfine    structure of muonium:  currently known to 120ppb † p † JPARC expt. to reduce this to ppb level 22 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  23. E821 at BROOKHAVEN 23 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  24. E821 21 Experimental erimental Te Technique chnique x c ≈ 77 mm 25ns bunch of 5 X 10 12 protons q ≈ 10 mrad  π from AGS B·dl ≈ 0.1 Tm Pions Inflector  p=3.1GeV/c B (1.45T) Target Injection orbit • Muon polarization Central orbit • Muon storage ring Storage • injection & kicking ring Kicker • focus with Electric Quadrupoles Modules • 24 electron calorimeters R=711.2cm d=9cm R R q 24 Electric Quadrupoles x c Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  25. Magic  • Vertical magnetic field – need vertical focussing to stop muons spiralling out of ring • Achieve using electrostatic dipoles • The E-field modifies the precession frequency:     e 1         aB  a  E   a 2   mc  1  • Unwelcome source of additional systematics Can be made to vanish for ‘magic’ . Extremely lucky that size of a  makes • this possible! GeV     29.3 p  3.09 magic …but sadly, not every  will be magic! Method pioneered by 3 rd CERN g-2 25 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  26. But how to measure  a ? Parity violation again! • Highest energy e + emitted along direction of  + spin • Use calorimeters to count e + above an energy threshold vs. t 26 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  27. …an iconic plot E 821              t /  N t N e 1 A cos t   0 a “5 - parameter fit” 27 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  28. Measuring  a …some reality Simulated for E989 High frequency modulation because muon bunch initially  a doesn’t fill ring…decays as bunch spreads. This is good – can get p distribution of muons Expected for E989:  c 149ns Bunch length 120ns at injection            t /    N t N e 1 A cos t   0 a N,A depend on energy 28 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  29. Many sources of systematic error. Particularly insidious are ‘early -to- late’ errors      Example: Effect of pile up. a t               2 t t t t Time dependence in phase: 0 0              cos t t cos(( ) t ) a a 0 …but why should  change? Things which change early to late in the fill can lead to a phase change in the accepted events  direct bias to extracted  a . 29 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

  30. Higher energy positrons come from further away.  If we get the energy wrong, we get the phase wrong. spin If we have pile-up, two low energy positrons fake a high energy positron. More pile-up early in the fill. Beam relaxation Vertical breathing 3 CBO terms Muons lost from ring 30 Stephen Maxfield Seminar Birmingham Oct2013

Recommend


More recommend