multimodal implementation plan multimodal implementation
play

Multimodal Implementation Plan Multimodal Implementation Plan - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bowling Green-Warren County MPOs Multimodal Implementation Plan Multimodal Implementation Plan OUTLINE Overview Planning Process Overview Non-Motorized Latent Demand Level of T raffjc Stress Pairwise


  1. Bowling Green-Warren County MPO’s Multimodal Implementation Plan

  2. Multimodal Implementation Plan • OUTLINE  Overview  Planning Process Overview • Non-Motorized Latent Demand • Level of T raffjc Stress • Pairwise Comparison • Facility T erminology  Lessons Learned & Implementation Successes

  3. Bowling Green-Warren County MPO Plum Bowling Springs Oakland Green IL IN O Smit Cincinnati H hs Louisville Grov Evansv e Lexington ille KY M Bowling Green n e r O y r a t Nashville n W TN u o C Woodbur

  4. Multimodal Implementation Plan 201 4 9 Planning Efgorts Relating to 201 Multimodal 5 Transportation in 4 201 Years 6 Consolidate. Identify. Refjne. Prioritize. 201 7

  5. Multimodal Implementation Plan • EMPHASIS ON CONNECTING:  T o Transit  Existing Bike-Ped Facilities  Parks & Schools FOCU S

  6. Multimodal Implementation Plan • NON-MOTORIZED LATENT DEMAND  Predicts latent (unrealized) demand for non-motorized infrastructure based on probability to walk/bike  Uses parcel-level population, employment, land use, & proximity data  Aggregated to 1/10 mile grid

  7. Multimodal Implementation Plan • NON-MOTORIZED LATENT DEMAND Total trips to school 0.75 mi = 0.32 generated= trip 0.32 + 0.71 + 0.17 = 1.2 trips 1.6 mi = 0.17 0.2 mi = 0.71 trip trip

  8. Multimodal Implementation Plan • NON-MOTORIZED LATENT DEMAND Transit Stop Greenway Sidewalk

  9. Multimodal Implementation Plan • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS (L TS)  Bicycle network planning methodology-2012  Basic scoring to: • understand stress levels of existing & proposed facilities • identify clusters of low-stress connectivity • identify improvements to overcome stressful barriers

  10. Multimodal Implementation Plan • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS (L TS) Highly Interested Somewhat but Confjdent Confjd ent Concerned Bicycl 51%- 5%-9% 4%-7% e 56% Desig n User Profjl High Stress Low Stress es: Tolerance Tolerance

  11. Multimodal Implementation Plan • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS (L TS) Low High Stress Stress Neighborhoo Major Neighborhoo d Boulevard Collector Arterial d Street L TS 1 L TS 3 L TS 4 L TS 2

  12. Multimodal Implementation Plan • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS (L TS) 1 SEGMENT 2-3 4-5 6+ 2 Street *Functiona LANES LANES LANES l Class Width 3 < 25 * mph 4 30 mph 35+ Speed mph Limit

  13. Multimodal Implementation Plan • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS (L TS) CROSSIN 1 Street < 3 4-5 6+ G Width 2 LANES LANES LANES (Crossin < 25 3 g) mph 4 30 mph Speed 35 mph Limit 40+ (Crossing mph )

  14. Multimodal Implementation Plan • LEVEL OF TRAFFIC STRESS L TS 1’s & (L TS) 2’s

  15. Multimodal Implementation Plan • PUBLIC & STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT • MPO T echnical Advisory Committee (TAC) • Steering Committee • Public  Survey  Focus Groups  Public Meeting  Wikimap

  16. Multimodal Implementation Plan • PAIRWISE COMPARISON  One-on-One Comparisons • Overall Strategy • Destinations • Facilities • Factors that Impact Walking/Biking OVERALL STRATEGY

  17. Multimodal Implementation Plan • PAIRWISE COMPARISON - RESUL TS  OVERALL STRATEGY  FACILITIES Address Neighborhood Gaps Streets  DESTINATIONS  FACTORS Connect Lack of Schools Bufger

  18. Multimodal Implementation Plan • FACILITY TERMINOLOGY

  19. Multimodal Implementation Plan • FACILITY TERMINOLOGY URBAN BIKEWAY GREENWAY GREEN GREENWAY FACILITIES STREET Roadway Shared Conventional Open ROW Roadway Space Bike Lane

  20. Multimodal Implementation Plan • LESSONS LEARNED  Competing interests  Similar mission, difgerent strategies  Collaboration & Communication  Perceived safety vs. access (neighborhood to store)  Need for maintenance plan  Safety & Education Gap

  21. Multimodal Implementation Plan • IMPLEMENTATION SUCCESSES

  22. Multimodal Implementation Plan • IMPLEMENTATION SUCCESSES  Direction for future bicycle and pedestrian projects  Formation of BikeWalkBG  Promotes biking and walking  Safety Initiative  City’s Sidewalk Prioritization Process Revamped  Use of Latent Demand Generation  Momentum for bicycle and pedestrian focus  Road projects & priorities  Community Involvement

  23. Bowling Green-Warren County MPO’s Multimodal Karissa Lemon Implementation Bowling Green & Warren County MPO Karissa.Lemon@bgky.org Plan Preston Elliott, AICP KCI T echnologies Preston.Elliott@kci.com Liesel Goether , AICP KCI T echnologies Liesel.Goethert@kci.com

Recommend


More recommend