multi city working group july 24 2018
play

Multi-city Working Group July 24, 2018 RICAPS technical assistance - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Multi-city Working Group July 24, 2018 RICAPS technical assistance is available through the San Mateo County Energy Watch program, which is funded by California utility customers, administered by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) under


  1. Multi-city Working Group July 24, 2018 RICAPS technical assistance is available through the San Mateo County Energy Watch program, which is funded by California utility customers, administered by Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) under the auspices of the California Public Utilities Commission and with matching funds provided by C/CAG.

  2. Agenda 1. Introductions 1:30 – 1:35 PM 2. Exploring next steps for BAAQMD funding awardees (4 of 17 SMC) 1:35 – 2:00 PM • Climate Corps Fellows reducing GHGs -community colleges • Commercial building ordinance • Regional market transformation - heat pump water heaters • Green accessory dwelling units 3. Title 24 and Reach Codes for Building Decarbonization 2:00 – 2:30 PM • Misti Bruceri, Principal, Misti Bruceri & Associates, LLC • Alice Zanmiller, Sustainability Planner, Marin County 4. Engaging with building officials and inspectors on Title 24 compliance 2:30 – 2:40 PM Rachael Londer, Sustainability Coordinator, San Mateo County 5. County of San Mateo’s disposable food service ware ordinance 2:40 – 2:50 PM Eun-Soo Lim, Sustainability Coordinator, San Mateo County 6. RICAPS Wrap Up & Next Steps 2:50 – 3:00 PM Denise Lin, Sustainability Coordinator, San Mateo County

  3. Betty Seto introducing: BAAQMD FUNDING AWARDEES

  4. CLIMATE CORPS FELLOWS REDUCING GHG - COMMUNITY COLLEGES Joe Fullerton, Energy and Sustainability Manager, San Mateo County Community College District

  5. Adrienne Etherton, Sustainability Management Analyst Comprehensive Commercial Building Efficiency Program • Ordinance to address energy and water use in existing commercial buildings • Extending benchmarking requirements to all commercial facilities, including most multi-family dwellings • Tiered auditing and retro-commissioning requirements that exclude the smallest buildings and high-performing facilities • Benchmarking, auditing and retro-commissioning would apply to both energy and water • Implement with extensive outreach, education and resources • Website/database for information-sharing, tracking compliance and public reporting • Resources on : auditing & commissioning programs, rebates & incentives, financing options, on-site renewable energy generation, fuel-switching, cleaner electricity, paybacks & other benefits • Partner with Brisbane Chamber on workshops, building owner trainings, audit demo event and outreach throughout the process • Share! • Present to RICAPS and other venues as requested/applicable • Toolkit of lessons learned and templates for other jurisdictions to replicate

  6. Regional market transformation for heat pump water heaters

  7. Green Additional Dwelling Unit Toolkit How can you support? • Participating on Steering Local Committee Develop jurisdiction Program Program Model Green review of • Community engagement Development promotion ADU designs model designs

  8. Misti Bruceri, Principal, Misti Bruceri & Associates TITLE 24 AND REACH CODES FOR DECARBONIZATION

  9. Title 24: Existing and New Policy Opportunities RICAPS Webinar July 24, 2018

  10. • Does your jurisdiction have local POLL QUESTION ordinances / reach codes as a strategy in your climate action plan?

  11. All-Electric Homes (S ingle Family)  Two 2016 studies featuring electricity-based designs:  All-Electric (and addendum)  PV plus Heat Pump Water Heating Climate Zone 3 Compliance Lifecycle Simple Analysis Results Margin Benefit-to- Payback Cost Ratio (yrs) All-Electric 23.6% 10.7 1.7 (No Natural Gas) PV plus HPWH 6.6% 15.2 1.2 (S td Eff) PV plus HPWH 8.3% 11.0 1.7 (NEEA Tier 3)  Natural Gas Availability  2019 provisions for heat pump water heating

  12. 2019 Title 24: Part 6  Nonresidential  Low-Rise Residential  Reduced Lighting Power  PV Allowances (LED baseline)  Energy Design Rating format  Controls  EE + PV  Ventilation  Electric water heating  Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs)  Healthcare facilities Reach Code Opportunities  Performance (reduce EDR score)  Performance (% reduction)  Batteries (depending on  PV economics)  Lighting  Existing Homes  HVAC, ventilation  Drain water heat recovery (DWHR)

  13. 2019 Title 24: Part 11 – Voluntary Energy Efficiency Tiers (proposed) Nonresidential Low-Rise Residential  Prerequisites  Prerequisites  Performance Requirements  EDR and QII  If lighting OR HVAC:  Prerequisite Options Tier 1: 5% , Tier 2: 10%  Performance Requirements  If lighting AND HVAC:  Tier 1: EDR < 14 Tier 1: 10% , Tier 2: 15%  Tier 2: EDR < 6

  14. Additional Activities Water + Energy Nexus Existing Homes 2019 Studies Nonresidential PV Study Nonresidential Alterations

  15. POLL QUESTION • Is your jurisdiction inclined to pass a reach ordinance under the 2019 standards?

  16. Thank you! Misti Bruceri On behalf of the PG&E Codes and Standards Program Mistib@ comcast.net

  17. Alice Zanmiller, Sustainability Planner, Marin County TITLE 24 AND REACH CODES FOR DECARBONIZATION

  18. COUNTY OF MARIN GREEN BUILDING REACH CODE RICAPS Alice Zanmiller, Planner, County of Marin Sustainability Team June 24 th , 2018

  19. LOCAL HISTORY & TIMELINE • 2005: Single Family Dwelling Energy Efficiency Ordinance • 2010: Marin Green Building, Energy Retrofit, & Solar Transformation (BERST) process • November 2016: Adoption of 2016 Title 24 standards, including maintenance update of previous reach code • March 2018: County BOS adopts updated green building standards • April 2018: New green building code implementation begins • June 2018 ( anticipated ): Full implementation of energy efficiency standards begins (large single family ZNE, multifamily and commercial new construction)

  20. REASONS FOR UPDATE CLARITY FLEXIBILITY • • Project specific handouts Performance Standard • • Clearer language Multiple compliance options for • Fewer tiers, only square footage both EE and green building • • Updated website Agnostic towards rating system CONSISTENCY SUSTAINABILITY • Working with other jurisdictions to • Emphasis on all electric buildings adopt new standards ( ongoing ) • Near ZNE standards for new large homes >4,000 square feet

  21. ENERGY EFFICIENCY – Single Family • New Single Family <4,000 square feet: Kept Tier 1, but added additional compliance options to incentivize all-electric homes • New Single Family 4,000 square feet and greater: – Mixed Fuel: 35% beyond baseline and EDR of 20 or less; OR; – All-Electric: 20% beyond baseline and 2.5kW of solar; OR; – Passive House

  22. PV COMPLIANCE CREDIT CZ 2, Single Family Home No PV PV All Electric 0% 0% = CALGreen (State % More Energy Efficient than State Standards Baseline) -8.6% -5% -15% -10% -11.4% -15% -20% -25% % to be met through efficiency measures % met by PV Compliance Credit

  23. ENERGY EFFICIENCY – Multifamily • No existing energy efficiency requirement – these are still pending CEC approval (anticipated mid-June). • 3 Stories or Less – Mixed Fuel & 10% beyond baseline OR; – Mixed Fuel + Solar & 15% beyond baseline OR; – All-electric at baseline • 4 Stories or More – Mixed Fuel & 10% beyond baseline OR; – All-electric at baseline

  24. ENERGY EFFICIENCY – Commercial • No existing energy efficiency requirement – these are still pending CEC approval (anticipated mid-June). • All new commercial projects – Mixed Fuel & 10% beyond baseline OR; – All-electric at baseline

  25. GREEN BUILDING • Changed to center around CALGreen, rather than Green Point Rated or LEED (but kept both as options) • All new buildings require CALGreen Tier 1 or equivalent GPR/LEED achievement • Residential additions + remodels <750 square feet don’t trigger additional requirements beyond state • Commercial additions + remodels <3,000 square feet don’t trigger additional requirements beyond state • All projects above these size thresholds trigger CALGreen Tier 1 (minus additional energy efficiency requirements)

  26. ELECTRIC VEHICLES • Single family residential – all new projects & remodels altering the main service panel must comply with CALGreen EV Readiness requirements • Multifamily & Commercial New Construction: • Originally proposed 10% EV Ready and 10% EV Capable, but Board requested 100% EV Capable. • This proposal was accepted, but with a 20% cap on service panel capacity for parking spaces, and triggers for remodels that provide a nexus with the project scope.

  27. LESSONS LEARNED & NEXT STEPS • Stakeholder engagement • Existing buildings remain a challenge – BAAQMD Grant – Ongoing energy efficiency programs – “New” Construction thresholds • Working with other jurisdictions to encourage adoption. • Will begin to revisit reach codes for next cycle as cost-effectiveness studies become available.

  28. THANK YOU Alice Zanmiller azanmiller@marincounty.org (415) 473-2797

  29. Rachael Londer, Sustainability Coordinator, San Mateo County ENGAGING WITH BUILDING OFFICIALS AND INSPECTORS ON TITLE 24 COMPLIANCE

  30. BAY AREA REGIONAL ENERGY NETWORK CODES & STANDARDS PROGRAM October 4, 2018

Recommend


More recommend