mount auburn street corridor study
play

Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study July 21, 2016 Russell Youth - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study July 21, 2016 Russell Youth Community Center Commonwealth of Massachusetts Governor Charles D. Baker Lieutenant Governor Karyn E. Polito Energy and Environmental Secretary Matthew A. Beaton Department of


  1. Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study July 21, 2016 Russell Youth Community Center

  2. Commonwealth of Massachusetts Governor Charles D. Baker Lieutenant Governor Karyn E. Polito Energy and Environmental Secretary Matthew A. Beaton Department of Conservation and Recreation Commissioner Leo P. Roy Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  3. DCR Mission Statement To protect, promote and enhance our common wealth of natural, cultural and recreational resources for the well-being of all. Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  4. Schedule Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  5. Agenda • Welcome • Long-Term Solution Draft Alternative Concepts – Intersection of Fresh Pond Parkway and Mt. Auburn – Intersection of Brattle Street and Mt. Auburn • Feasibility of Transit and Bicycle Facilities along Mt Auburn • Design Charrette- If we have time! • Next Steps Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  6. PLEASE NOTE: The following concepts are drafts; works in progress shown only for the purpose of collecting public feedback for their improvement. Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  7. Overall Concept DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  8. Overall Concept DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  9. Mount Auburn Street at Fresh Pond Parkway Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  10. Mount Auburn Street at Fresh Pond Parkway DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  11. Goal # 1: Calm traffic, provide clarity, reduce crashes and severity of crashes. DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  12. Motor Vehicle Conflict Points Both vehicles high speed 1 One vehicle high speed 8 Both vehicles low speed 0 Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  13. Motor Vehicle Conflict Points DRAFT CONCEPT Both vehicles high speed 0 One vehicle high speed 7 Both vehicles low speed 1 Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  14. Pedestrian Conflict Points High speed crossing 2 Moderate speed crossing 1 Low speed crossing 8 Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  15. Pedestrian Conflict Points DRAFT CONCEPT High speed crossing 0 Moderate speed crossing 0 Low speed crossing 9 Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  16. Bike-Pedestrian Conflict Points Bike-Pedestrian Conflict Points 13 + All sidewalks on Fresh Pond Parkway Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  17. Bike-Pedestrian Conflict Points DRAFT CONCEPT Bike-Pedestrian Conflict Points 11 + Sidewalks to the north on Fresh Pond Parkway Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  18. Bike-Vehicle Conflict Points High Speed Vehicle and Bike Conflict Points 5 Low Speed Vehicle and Bike Conflict Points 6 Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  19. Bike-Vehicle Conflict Points DRAFT CONCEPT High Speed Vehicle and Bike Conflict Points 2 Low Speed Vehicle and Bike Conflict Points 9 Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  20. Crossing Distances 78 feet 53 feet 46 feet 19 feet 137 feet Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  21. Crossing Distances 22 feet 35 feet 34 feet 18 feet 64 feet DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  22. Stop Bar Distances 363 feet 376 feet Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  23. Crossing Distances 212 feet 295 feet DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  24. Coolidge Avenue Crossing Opportunity for Speed Table DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  25. Goal # 1: Calm traffic, provide clarity, reduce crashes and severity of crashes. DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  26. Goal # 2: Improve connectivity, air quality and expand mobility choices. a. Measuring people, not cars. b. Reducing transit delays. c. Improving safety, access, parking and comfort for bicycles. d. Maintaining mobility for motor vehicles. e. Improving safety, attractiveness, noise, and comfort for pedestrians and residents. DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  27. Stop Bar Distances 363 feet 376 feet Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  28. New bicycle connections DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  29. New Crosswalks DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  30. Sidewalk and buffer improvements DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  31. Reducing Transit Delay • Signals – Signal Retiming – Transit Signal Priority – Queue Jump • Physical – Bus-only Lane – Queue Bypass – Relocate Bus Stops from Near-side to Far-side • Transit – Schedule Adjustments – Multiple Door Boarding – Off-board Fare Collection Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  32. Bus-only lane and Transit Signal Priority DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  33. How it works • Bus generates request – Conditional or unconditional • Bus transmits request – Infrared, radio, wi-fi, or cellular • Signal receives and processes request • Signal reacts to request – Green extension, red truncation, or nothing Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  34. A Type of TSP Physical Architecture Bus Intersection – Priority Request Generator – Antenna Receiver (PRG) – Priority Request Server – Antenna Transmitter (PRS) • Processes TSP requests – TSP Enabled Signal Controller Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  35. Goal # 2: Improve connectivity, air quality and expand mobility choices. a. Measuring people, not cars. b. Reducing transit delays. c. Improving safety, access, parking and comfort for bicycles. d. Maintaining mobility for motor vehicles. e. Improving safety, attractiveness, noise, and comfort for pedestrians and residents. DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  36. Goal # 3: Address cut-through traffic in the Larchwood, Huron Village, and Coolidge Hill Neighborhoods. DRAFT CONCEPT DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  37. Goal # 4: Offer short-term and long-term solutions. DRAFT CONCEPT DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  38. Goal # 5: Acknowledge special uses by BB&N, Mt. Auburn Cemetery, Mt. Auburn Hospital, Shady Hill School, Tufts Health Plan and also police enforcement. DRAFT CONCEPT DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  39. Shady Hill School crossing improvements DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  40. Opportunity for police enforcement? DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  41. Goal # 5: Acknowledge special uses by BB&N, Mt. Auburn Cemetery, Mt. Auburn Hospital, Shady Hill School, Tufts Health Plan and also police enforcement. DRAFT CONCEPT DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  42. Mt Auburn Street at Brattle Street Today Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  43. Mt Auburn Street at Brattle Street DRAFT concept DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  44. Goal # 1: Calm traffic, provide clarity, reduce crashes and severity of crashes. DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  45. HSIP Crash Clusters (2011-13) Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  46. Motor Vehicle Conflict Points Both vehicles high speed 5 One vehicle high speed 3 Both vehicles low speed 0 Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  47. Motor Vehicle Conflict Points DRAFT CONCEPT Both vehicles high speed 4 New curves help One vehicle high speed 3 calm traffic overall. Both vehicles low speed 1 Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  48. Pedestrian Conflict Points High speed crossing 5 Moderate speed crossing 1 Low speed crossing 4 Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  49. Pedestrian Conflict Points High speed crossing 3 New curves help Moderate speed crossing 1 calm traffic overall. Low speed crossing 5 DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  50. Bike-Pedestrian Conflict Points Bike-Pedestrian Conflict Points 12 Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  51. Bike-Pedestrian Conflict Points DRAFT CONCEPT Bike-Pedestrian Conflict Points 8 Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  52. Bike-Vehicle Conflict Points High Speed Vehicle and Bike Conflict Points 16 Low Speed Vehicle and Bike Conflict Points 2 Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  53. Bike-Vehicle Conflict Points DRAFT CONCEPT High Speed Vehicle and Bike Conflict Points 9 Low Speed Vehicle and Bike Conflict Points 5 Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  54. Goal # 1: Calm traffic, provide clarity, reduce crashes and severity of crashes. DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  55. Goal # 2: Improve connectivity, air quality and expand mobility choices. a. Measuring people, not cars. b. Reducing transit delays. c. Improving safety, access, parking and comfort for bicycles. d. Maintaining mobility for motor vehicles. e. Improving safety, attractiveness, noise, and comfort for pedestrians and residents. Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  56. Pedestrian desire line now accommodated DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  57. Bicycle and pedestrian safety and comfort improved DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  58. Noise/Air Quality buffer opportunities for bikes and pedestrians DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  59. Improved bus stop opportunities? DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

  60. Goal # 2: Improve connectivity, air quality and expand mobility choices. DRAFT CONCEPT Mount Auburn Street Corridor Study

Recommend


More recommend