mortgage backed securities an actuarial approach to cash
play

MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES AN ACTUARIAL APPROACH TO CASH FLOW - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES AN ACTUARIAL APPROACH TO CASH FLOW ANALYSIS Kyle S. Mrotek, FCAS, MAAA Neal Dihora, ASA, CFA CAS Spring Meeting May 5, 2009 1 May 5, 2009 Agenda What is a Mortgage Backed Security (MBS)? Background on the


  1. MORTGAGE BACKED SECURITIES AN ACTUARIAL APPROACH TO CASH FLOW ANALYSIS Kyle S. Mrotek, FCAS, MAAA Neal Dihora, ASA, CFA CAS Spring Meeting May 5, 2009 1 May 5, 2009

  2. Agenda  What is a Mortgage Backed Security (MBS)?  Background on the MBS market  Current situation  Actuarial model presentation 2 May 5, 2009

  3. What is a Mortgage Backed Security? Jack Jane John Sally Mortgage Servicer Jane & Originator A Originator B John’s (Retains Servicing) Payments MBS Issuer/ Trustee Investor B Investor A (XYZ Ins. Co.) (Pension Fund) 3 May 5, 2009

  4. MBS Valuation Flowchart CDO Capital Security Capital Models Structure Data Structure Principal & Principal & Interest Interest AAA AAA Prepay / Collateral Credit Models (Mortgage Loans) AA AA Prepay Cash Default Flow A A Interest Loss Severity Engine Rate and BBB BBB HPA BBB- BBB- Simulations Sub Sub Losses Losses Macro Factors & Assumptions 4 May 5, 2009

  5. Gross Issuance Gross MBS Issuance ($ millions) $3,000,000 Agency Total Non-Agency $2,500,000 Total MBS $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 $500,000 $0 Source: Inside MBS & ABS and UBS 5 May 5, 2009

  6. Agency vs. Non-Agency MBS Market Share 100% Agency 90% Total Non-Agency 80% 70% 60% Percent 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% Source: Inside MBS & ABS and UBS 6 May 5, 2009

  7. Non-Agency by Type Non-Agency Gross MBS Issuance ($ millions) 500,000 Alt-A 450,000 Jumbo 400,000 Subprime 350,000 300,000 Other 250,000 200,000 150,000 100,000 50,000 0 Source: Inside MBS & ABS and UBS 7 May 5, 2009

  8. Non-Agency by Type Non-Agency (% of Total MBS Issuance) 25% Alt-A Jumbo 20% Subprime 15% Other Percent 10% 5% 0% Source: Inside MBS & ABS and UBS 8 May 5, 2009

  9. Current Situation • What happened? Liquidity evaporated • Market values eroded • • Why is valuation needed? GAAP Accounting regulations still require a value (FAS 157) • Risk quantification • • Distribution of assumptions and valuations 9 May 5, 2009

  10. Liquidity Evaporated  Broker/Dealers of non-Agency MBS unwilling to provide liquidity 1  Forced liquidations of MBS set market prices 1  Pricing vendors find it difficult to obtain “real” prices  Bid - Ask spread is 10-30 points depending on collateral and the depth of distress 2 1 AD&Co's 16th Annual Conference: The Times They Are A-Changin‘ 2 ”Getting Out of the Mess” by Dave Hurt at the Loan Performance Symposium March 11, 2009 10 May 5, 2009

  11. Liquidity Evaporated Mortgage Spread (Conventional Mortgage Loan less 10-year Treasury) 300 280 260 240 220 200 180 160 140 120 100 1/9/04 3/9/04 5/9/04 7/9/04 9/9/04 11/9/04 1/9/05 3/9/05 5/9/05 7/9/05 9/9/05 11/9/05 1/9/06 3/9/06 5/9/06 7/9/06 9/9/06 11/9/06 1/9/07 3/9/07 5/9/07 7/9/07 9/9/07 11/9/07 1/9/08 3/9/08 5/9/08 7/9/08 9/9/08 11/9/08 1/9/09 3/9/09 Mortgage Spread Source: Federal Reserve Board 11 May 5, 2009

  12. Erosion of Market Values Real Home Price Index (1890-2008) 225 200 175 150 125 100 75 50 1890 1910 1930 1950 1970 1990 2010 Source: http://www.econ.yale.edu/~shiller/data.htm 12 May 5, 2009

  13. Erosion of Market Values Case-Shiller Home Price Index Since January 2000 220 Jul06: 206.5 200 180 Decline: -29% 160 Jan 09: 146.4 140 120 100 Jan-00 Apr-00 Jul-00 Oct-00 Jan-01 Apr-01 Jul-01 Oct-01 Jan-02 Apr-02 Jul-02 Oct-02 Jan-03 Apr-03 Jul-03 Oct-03 Jan-04 Apr-04 Jul-04 Oct-04 Jan-05 Apr-05 Jul-05 Oct-05 Jan-06 Apr-06 Jul-06 Oct-06 Jan-07 Apr-07 Jul-07 Oct-07 Jan-08 Apr-08 Jul-08 Oct-08 Jan-09 Source: Standardand Poor's 'Case Shiller 20 City Compsite' 13 May 5, 2009

  14. Erosion of Market Values ABX HE AAA 2007-2 Index 80 70 60 50 Price 40 30 20 10 0 Source: Bloomberg 14 May 5, 2009

  15. Erosion of Market Values  ABX HE AAA 2007-2 Index Components ACE Securities Corp. Home Equity Loan Trust, Series 2007-HE4 Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2007-HE3 Citigroup Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-AMC2 CWABS Asset-Backed Certificates Trust 2007-1 First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2007-FF1 GSAMP Trust 2007-NC1 Home Equity Asset Trust 2007-2 HSI Asset Securitization Corporation Trust 2007-NC1 J.P. MORGAN MORTGAGE ACQUISITION TRUST 2007-CH3 Merrill Lynch First Franklin Mortgage Loan Trust, Series 2007-2 MERRILL LYNCH MORTGAGE INVESTORS TRUST, SERIES 2007-MLN1 Morgan Stanley ABS Capital I Inc. Trust 2007-NC3 Nomura Home Equity Loan, Inc., Home Equity Loan Trust Series 2007-2 NovaStar Mortgage Funding Trust, Series 2007-2 OPTION ONE MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2007-5 RASC Series 2007-KS2 Trust Securitized Asset Backed Receivables LLC Trust 2007-BR4 Structured Asset Securities Corporation Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-BC1 SOUNDVIEW HOME LOAN TRUST 2007-OPT1 WaMu Asset-Backed Certificates WaMu Series 2007-HE2 15 Source: markit.com 3/16/09 May 5, 2009

  16. GAAP Valuation Still Needed  Mark to Market – FAS 157 required companies to value holdings • Level 1 – based on market price – Recent observed prices could be due to forced liquidation • Level 2 – based on related price (ex. spread to treasuries) – Spreads can reflect lots of different risks (credit, liquidity,…) • Level 3 – based on model price  Mark to Model pricing developed from loan level data – FASB relaxation of mark-to-market rules – FAS 157-4 and FAS 115-2 – Perhaps an ‘intrinsic value’ based on full range of scenarios 16 May 5, 2009

  17. GAAP Valuation Still Needed  FAS 157 –Level 3 assets as % of tangible common equity 17 May 5, 2009

  18. Risk Quantification  The following table has daily percent changes of DJIA under a Normal Distribution assumption and reality Percent Move Normal (1916-2003) Distribution Assumption Reality <>3.4% 58 1001 <>4.5% 6 366 <>7% 1 in 300,000 years 48 18 Source: Benoit Mandelbrot, Economist 1/24/2009 May 5, 2009

  19. MBS Valuation Flowchart CDO Capital Security Capital Models Structure Data Structure Principal & Principal & Interest Interest AAA AAA Prepay / Collateral Credit Models (Mortgage Loans) AA AA Prepay Cash Default Flow A A Interest Loss Severity Engine Rate and BBB BBB HPA BBB- BBB- Simulations Sub Sub Losses Losses Macro Factors & Assumptions 19 May 5, 2009

  20. MBS Valuation Process  Collateral – Extensive history – Utilize loan level experience  Macro factors – Home prices – Interest rates – Unemployment 20 May 5, 2009

  21. Model  General Characteristics – Transparent – Credit Focus  Prepay model – Willingness • Interest rate – Ability • Current LTV • Lending standards/policies • Federal government initiatives 21 May 5, 2009

  22. Credit Model  Collateral ‘loss’ projection – Amount and timing – ‘Loss’ is failure to pay timely P&I  Methods – ‘Paid’ Loss Development Factor (LDF) – ‘Incurred’ LDF – Adjusted ‘paid’ BF method – ‘Incurred’ BF – Non-exhaustive 22 May 5, 2009

  23. Ultimate Loss Rate ‘Paid’ LDF  Ultimate loss rate (ULR)  ‘Paid’ losses to date Can calculate from loan level data – Data aggregators –  Cumulative loss curve by age of loan Reciprocal of cumulative LDF – Examples on next slide – What % of the losses should we expect to see at a certain loan age –  Ultimate loss = ‘paid’ losses / % expected to be ‘paid’ 23 May 5, 2009

  24. Ultimate Loss Rate ‘Paid’ LDF Illustrative Loss Curves - Moody's and Fitch 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% Percent Moody's Alt-A FRM/ARM First Lien 50% Fitch Prime/Alt-A 40% Fitch Subprime Moody's Subprime FRM First Lien 30% 20% 10% 0% 0 3 6 9 12 15 18 21 24 27 30 33 36 39 42 45 48 51 54 57 60 63 66 69 72 75 78 81 84 87 90 93 96 99 102 105 108 111 114 117 120 Age (months) 24 May 5, 2009

  25. Ultimate Loss Rate “Incurred” LDF  Incurred losses = ‘paid’ losses + estimate of loss on inventory of delinquent loans  Roll rate model = Frequency/Severity method  Frequency = Pr( default | status of delinquency)  Severity (% of loan that is not recoverable)  Utilize incurred loss curves to calculate ultimate loss rate  Challenges/pitfalls 25 May 5, 2009

  26. Challenges/Pitfalls Source: Moody’s March 5, 2009 26 Source: Moody’s Subprime RMBS Loss Projection Update, March 5, 2009 May 5, 2009

  27. Challenges/Pitfalls Source: Moody’s January 22, 2009 27 Source: Moody’s Alt-A RMBS Loss Projection Update, January 22, 2009 May 5, 2009

  28. B/F Method • A Priori ULR Development • Frequency of default • Severity given default • Unadjusted a priori ultimate loss rate = frequency x severity • Critical considerations for loan level collateral Underwriting characteristics (FICO, LTV, documentation, etc.) • Economic factors • 28 May 5, 2009

  29. A Priori Development - Frequency Illustrative Loan Characteristics Amortization Loan Size FICO-LTV Prime Alt-A Subprime Documentation Interest Only Occupancy Loan Purpose Property Type 29 May 5, 2009

  30. A Priori Development - Frequency Source: “Negative equity and foreclosure: Theory and evidence”, Christopher L. Foote, Kristopher Gerardi, Paul S. Willen, 30 Journal of Urban Economics 64 (2008), pp. 234-345 May 5, 2009

Recommend


More recommend