more rackham s mentoring com m ittee
play

MORE: Rackham s Mentoring Com m ittee MORE (Mentoring Others Results - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MORE: Rackham s Mentoring Com m ittee MORE (Mentoring Others Results in Excellence) is a faculty com m ittee that serves as a cam pus resource for graduate student m entoring by faculty MORE synthesizes academic literature on mentoring


  1. MORE: Rackham ’s Mentoring Com m ittee MORE (Mentoring Others Results in Excellence) is a faculty com m ittee that serves as a cam pus resource for graduate student m entoring by faculty MORE synthesizes academic literature on • mentoring with committee members’ personal and professional experiences in mentoring graduate students MORE engages with faculty and graduate students • to foster conversations about mentoring and to help identify norms for mentoring within graduate programs Today’s Presenters: Elisabeth Gerber – Professor of Public Policy (Ford School of Public Policy) and Political Science (LSA) Barbra Meek - Associate Professor of Anthropology and Linguistics (LSA) Larry Rowley - Rackham; Afroamerican & African Studies Mike Solomon - Chemical Eng; Macromolecular Sci & Eng (CoE)

  2. Introduction: Mentoring Plan Workshop May 11, 20 15 Rackham Graduate School

  3. Overview of schedule: 10:30-11:00 Welcome & Introduction – What is mentoring? 11:00-11:45 Breakout sessions Faculty mentors with Barb Meek & Mike Solomon Doctoral students with Larry Rowley & Liz Gerber 11:45-12:00 Reassemble for discussion of mentoring plans 12:00-12:30 Time for one-on-one work on mentoring plans (Lunch is available)

  4. What is Mentoring?  Mentoring is m ore than advising. A mentor actively works to integrate a mentee into a new professional role.  Mentoring is our responsibility . A mentor feels some ethical responsibility for the successful development of the student’s career.  Mentoring requires an interpersonal relationship . This relationship contributes to the student’s sense of competence, confidence, and effectiveness.  Mentoring is challenging . Effective mentoring involves understanding and acknowledging the student’s different identities and communities. Alvarez, A. N., et. al. (2009). Tapping the Wisdom Tradition: Essential Elements to Mentoring Students of Color. Paglis, L., et. al. (2006). Does Adviser Mentoring Add Value? Williams-Nickelson, C. (2009). Mentoring Women Graduate Students: A Model for Professional Psychology.

  5. Ca reful m entoring ca n help a v oid m a ny p itfa lls.

  6. What are the outcom es of effective m entoring for students?  Im proved academ ic perform ance  Increased productivity  Im proved professional skills  Higher self confidence  Expanded social and professional networks

  7. What are the outcom es of effective m entoring for faculty?  Satisfaction of seeing your students grow and succeed  Initial investm ent in the m entoring relationship can yield future gains in tim e and productivity  Mentees can develop into high-level collaborators which can produce dividends for the faculty m em ber’s scholarship  Satisfies faculty m em ber’s ethical responsibility to engage in the academ ic and professional developm ent of the students they train

  8. Challenges in m entoring relationships  Mism atch in goals & values  Unrealistic and/ or unclear expectations  Conflicting interpersonal & com m unication styles  Unpredictable support/ com m itm ent  Com peting responsibilities

  9. Overview of schedule: 10:30-11:00 Welcome & Introduction – What is mentoring? 11:00-11:45 Breakout sessions Faculty mentors with Barb Meek & Mike Solomon Doctoral students with Larry Rowley & Liz Gerber 11:45-12:00 Reassemble for discussion of mentoring plans 12:00-12:30 Time for one-on-one work on mentoring plans (Lunch is available)

  10. Mentoring is two-way street

  11. What is a m entoring plan? Agreem ent between m entor & student about training/ educational goals  Both short-term and long-term goals  Specifies am ount/ type of m entoring needed to accom plish goals  Modifiable (e.g. yearly)  Establishes process to evaluate whether goals are m et

  12. Mentoring Plans are about Mutual Expectations  For m entor: What help/ support/ guidance am I willing to provide? What do I need from the student?  For student: What help/ support/ guidance do I need? What does m y m entor expect of m e?

  13. Elem ents of Mentoring Plans  Long-term , career goals of student  Tim ing of academ ic and research m ilestones  Frequency and kinds of m eetings  Expectations for research progress  Availability of opportunities for publication, presentation, and funding  Mechanism s for feedback  Turnaround tim e for m entor feedback  How does student ask for m ore feedback?

  14. Tim e for Mentoring Plan Developm ent • Multiple tem plates available to fram e discussion • Feel welcom e to tailor the tem plates to your pair’s specific needs • The discussion itself is as im portant as the m entoring plan product • A m entoring plan is a dynam ic object – rem em ber to preserve, revisit, and update it as the m entee progresses Electronic v ersions of the tem p la tes in y our fold ers a re a t: http:/ / tinyurl.com / m qsdc4p

  15. Questions? MORE Mentoring Resources • MORE website offers downloads of m aterials: • http:/ / tinyurl.com / m qsdc4 p

Recommend


More recommend