modeling the electronic behavior of twisted bilayer
play

MODELING THE ELECTRONIC BEHAVIOR OF TWISTED BILAYER GRAPHENE M. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

MODELING THE ELECTRONIC BEHAVIOR OF TWISTED BILAYER GRAPHENE M. GOLLADAY SHILOH HIGH SCHOOL, SNELLVILLE, GA DR. MARKUS KINDERMANN 25 JULY 2014 FERMI SURFACES PREDICTS MATERIAL PROPERTIES ELECTRICAL , THERMAL, MAGNETIC, OPTICAL IN


  1. MODELING THE ELECTRONIC BEHAVIOR OF TWISTED BILAYER GRAPHENE M. GOLLADAY SHILOH HIGH SCHOOL, SNELLVILLE, GA DR. MARKUS KINDERMANN 25 JULY 2014

  2. FERMI SURFACES • PREDICTS MATERIAL PROPERTIES • ELECTRICAL , THERMAL, MAGNETIC, OPTICAL • IN GRAPHENE, FERMI SURFACE E SHAPE IMPLIES BALLISTIC TRANSPORT • DIRAC CONES 𝐹 𝑙 = ℏ𝑤 𝐺 𝑙 k

  3. Each point is a Dirac cone!

  4. WHAT ARE LIFSHITZ TRANSITIONS? • A TOPOLOGICAL SHIFT IN THE FERMI SURFACE • OLD JOKE… A TOPOLOGIST IS A MATHEMATICIAN WHO CAN’T TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A DONUT AND A COFFEE CUP!

  5. Why do we care? Lifshitz transitions correlate with drastic changes in electronic properties

  6. BUILDING A THEORY OF INTERLAYER INTERACTION • CONSIDER A GRAPHENE BILAYER WHERE ONE LAYER IS ROTATED AT A SMALL ANGLE WITH RESPECT TO THE OTHER

  7. Δ k 1 We’re leaving reciprocal space – let’s translate the Δ k vectors to a central point. Every Δ k is a ‘hop’ between layers! Δ k 3 Δ k 1 Δ k 2 Δ k 3 Δ k 2

  8. HOPPING THROUGH THE PROJECTION LATTICE T 1 T 1 T 1 T 1 † T 3 T 2 † T 3 T 2 † T 3 T 2 † T 3 T 2 T 1 T 1 T 1 T 3 † T 2 T 3 T 2 † T 3 T 2 † † † T 1 T 1 T 1 † T 3 T 2 T 3 T 2 † T 3 T 2 T 2 T 3

  9. We are most interested in the {1,1} and the {3,2} stars.

  10. SO… NOW WHAT?? • ADDING A HAMILTONIAN TERM ASSOCIATED WITH THIS “HOPPING” BEHAVIOR ALLOWS US TO ACCURATELY MODEL THE FERMI SURFACE • WE FURTHER ADD A “BIAS VOLTAGE” TERM • CERTAIN VOLTAGES CAUSE STARS TO RESONATE , ALTERING THE FERMI SURFACE

  11. CONCLUSIONS • WORK IS ONGOING • RICHNESS OF {3,2} STAR NEEDS TO BE EXPLORED • CONVERGENCE PROBLEM NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED • IMPLICATIONS OF THE PRESENCE OF LIFSHITZ TRANSITIONS REQUIRE FURTHER INVESTICATION

  12. IN THE CLASSROOM… • COMPUTATIONAL MODELING OF 2D MOTION • STUDENTS INTERACT WITH A COMPUTATIONAL PROJECTILE SIMULATION USING EXCEL MACROS • STUDENTS COMPARE SIMULATION DATA WITH EXPERIMENTAL PROJECTILE RANGE DATA

  13. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS • DR. LEYLA CONRAD AND DR. MARKUS KINDERMANN • STEVEN CARTER AND DR. HRIDIS PAL • THIS RESEARCH WAS MADE POSSIBLE BY FUNDING FROM THE NSF, AND THE STEP-UP PROGRAM AT GA TECH

Recommend


More recommend