mini tutorial on conflict driven clause learning solvers
play

Mini-tutorial on conflict-driven clause learning solvers Marijn J. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Feb 27, 2024 •517 likes •1.13k views

Mini-tutorial on conflict-driven clause learning solvers Marijn J. H. Heule The University of Texas at Austin 20/01/2014 @ BIRS Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 1 / 24 The Satisfiability (SAT) problem

  1. Mini-tutorial on conflict-driven clause learning solvers Marijn J. H. Heule The University of Texas at Austin 20/01/2014 @ BIRS Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 1 / 24

  2. The Satisfiability (SAT) problem ( x 5 ∨ x 8 ∨ ¯ x 2 ) ∧ ( x 2 ∨ ¯ x 1 ∨ ¯ x 3 ) ∧ (¯ x 8 ∨ ¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 7 ) ∧ (¯ x 5 ∨ x 3 ∨ x 8 ) ∧ x 6 ∨ ¯ x 1 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) ∧ ( x 8 ∨ ¯ x 9 ∨ x 3 ) ∧ ( x 2 ∨ x 1 ∨ x 3 ) ∧ (¯ x 1 ∨ x 8 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ (¯ x 9 ∨ ¯ x 6 ∨ x 8 ) ∧ ( x 8 ∨ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 9 ) ∧ ( x 9 ∨ ¯ x 3 ∨ x 8 ) ∧ ( x 6 ∨ ¯ x 9 ∨ x 5 ) ∧ (¯ ( x 2 ∨ ¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 8 ) ∧ ( x 8 ∨ ¯ x 6 ∨ ¯ x 3 ) ∧ ( x 8 ∨ ¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 1 ) ∧ (¯ x 8 ∨ x 6 ∨ ¯ x 2 ) ∧ ( x 7 ∨ x 9 ∨ ¯ x 2 ) ∧ ( x 8 ∨ ¯ x 9 ∨ x 2 ) ∧ (¯ x 1 ∨ ¯ x 9 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ ( x 8 ∨ x 1 ∨ ¯ x 2 ) ∧ ( x 3 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 6 ) ∧ (¯ x 1 ∨ ¯ x 7 ∨ x 5 ) ∧ (¯ x 7 ∨ x 1 ∨ x 6 ) ∧ (¯ x 5 ∨ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 6 ) ∧ (¯ x 4 ∨ x 9 ∨ ¯ x 8 ) ∧ ( x 2 ∨ x 9 ∨ x 1 ) ∧ ( x 5 ∨ ¯ x 7 ∨ x 1 ) ∧ (¯ x 7 ∨ ¯ x 9 ∨ ¯ x 6 ) ∧ ( x 2 ∨ x 5 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ ( x 8 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ x 5 ) ∧ ( x 5 ∨ x 9 ∨ x 3 ) ∧ (¯ x 5 ∨ ¯ x 7 ∨ x 9 ) ∧ ( x 2 ∨ ¯ x 8 ∨ x 1 ) ∧ (¯ x 7 ∨ x 1 ∨ x 5 ) ∧ ( x 1 ∨ x 4 ∨ x 3 ) ∧ ( x 1 ∨ ¯ x 9 ∨ ¯ x 4 ) ∧ ( x 3 ∨ x 5 ∨ x 6 ) ∧ (¯ x 6 ∨ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 9 ) ∧ (¯ x 7 ∨ x 5 ∨ x 9 ) ∧ ( x 7 ∨ ¯ x 5 ∨ ¯ x 2 ) ∧ ( x 4 ∨ x 7 ∨ x 3 ) ∧ ( x 4 ∨ ¯ x 9 ∨ ¯ x 7 ) ∧ ( x 5 ∨ ¯ x 1 ∨ x 7 ) ∧ ( x 5 ∨ ¯ x 1 ∨ x 7 ) ∧ ( x 6 ∨ x 7 ∨ ¯ x 3 ) ∧ (¯ x 8 ∨ ¯ x 6 ∨ ¯ x 7 ) ∧ ( x 6 ∨ x 2 ∨ x 3 ) ∧ (¯ x 8 ∨ x 2 ∨ x 5 ) Does there exist an assignment satisfying all clauses? Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 2 / 24

  3. Search for a satisfying assignment (or proof none exists) ( x 5 ∨ x 8 ∨ ¯ x 2 ) ∧ ( x 2 ∨ ¯ x 1 ∨ ¯ x 3 ) ∧ (¯ x 8 ∨ ¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 7 ) ∧ (¯ x 5 ∨ x 3 ∨ x 8 ) ∧ (¯ x 6 ∨ ¯ x 1 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) ∧ ( x 8 ∨ ¯ x 9 ∨ x 3 ) ∧ ( x 2 ∨ x 1 ∨ x 3 ) ∧ (¯ x 1 ∨ x 8 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ (¯ x 9 ∨ ¯ x 6 ∨ x 8 ) ∧ ( x 8 ∨ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 9 ) ∧ ( x 9 ∨ ¯ x 3 ∨ x 8 ) ∧ ( x 6 ∨ ¯ x 9 ∨ x 5 ) ∧ ( x 2 ∨ ¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 8 ) ∧ ( x 8 ∨ ¯ x 6 ∨ ¯ x 3 ) ∧ ( x 8 ∨ ¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 1 ) ∧ (¯ x 8 ∨ x 6 ∨ ¯ x 2 ) ∧ ( x 7 ∨ x 9 ∨ ¯ x 2 ) ∧ ( x 8 ∨ ¯ x 9 ∨ x 2 ) ∧ (¯ x 1 ∨ ¯ x 9 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ ( x 8 ∨ x 1 ∨ ¯ x 2 ) ∧ ( x 3 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 6 ) ∧ (¯ x 1 ∨ ¯ x 7 ∨ x 5 ) ∧ (¯ x 7 ∨ x 1 ∨ x 6 ) ∧ (¯ x 5 ∨ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 6 ) ∧ (¯ x 4 ∨ x 9 ∨ ¯ x 8 ) ∧ ( x 2 ∨ x 9 ∨ x 1 ) ∧ ( x 5 ∨ ¯ x 7 ∨ x 1 ) ∧ (¯ x 7 ∨ ¯ x 9 ∨ ¯ x 6 ) ∧ ( x 2 ∨ x 5 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ ( x 8 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ x 5 ) ∧ ( x 5 ∨ x 9 ∨ x 3 ) ∧ (¯ x 5 ∨ ¯ x 7 ∨ x 9 ) ∧ ( x 2 ∨ ¯ x 8 ∨ x 1 ) ∧ (¯ x 7 ∨ x 1 ∨ x 5 ) ∧ ( x 1 ∨ x 4 ∨ x 3 ) ∧ ( x 1 ∨ ¯ x 9 ∨ ¯ x 4 ) ∧ ( x 3 ∨ x 5 ∨ x 6 ) ∧ (¯ x 6 ∨ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 9 ) ∧ (¯ x 7 ∨ x 5 ∨ x 9 ) ∧ ( x 7 ∨ ¯ x 5 ∨ ¯ x 2 ) ∧ ( x 4 ∨ x 7 ∨ x 3 ) ∧ ( x 4 ∨ ¯ x 9 ∨ ¯ x 7 ) ∧ ( x 5 ∨ ¯ x 1 ∨ x 7 ) ∧ ( x 5 ∨ ¯ x 1 ∨ x 7 ) ∧ ( x 6 ∨ x 7 ∨ ¯ x 3 ) ∧ (¯ x 8 ∨ ¯ x 6 ∨ ¯ x 7 ) ∧ ( x 6 ∨ x 2 ∨ x 3 ) ∧ (¯ x 8 ∨ x 2 ∨ x 5 ) Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 3 / 24

  4. Conflict-driven SAT solvers: Search and Analysis ( x 1 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ 0 ( x 3 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) ∧ (¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ) ∧ F extra Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 4 / 24

  5. Conflict-driven SAT solvers: Search and Analysis ( x 1 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ 0 ( x 3 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) ∧ x 5 = 1 (¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ) ∧ 1 F extra Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 4 / 24

  6. Conflict-driven SAT solvers: Search and Analysis ( x 1 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ 0 ( x 3 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) ∧ x 5 = 1 (¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ) ∧ 1 F extra x 2 = 1 2 Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 4 / 24

  7. Conflict-driven SAT solvers: Search and Analysis ( x 1 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ 0 ( x 3 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) ∧ x 5 = 1 (¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ) ∧ 1 F extra x 2 = 1 2 6 Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 4 / 24

  8. Conflict-driven SAT solvers: Search and Analysis ( x 1 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ 0 ( x 3 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) ∧ x 5 = 1 (¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ) ∧ 1 F extra x 2 = 1 2 6 x 1 = 0 7 Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 4 / 24

  9. Conflict-driven SAT solvers: Search and Analysis ( x 1 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ 0 ( x 3 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) ∧ x 5 = 1 (¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ) ∧ 1 F extra x 2 = 1 2 6 x 1 = 0 x 4 = 1 7 Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 4 / 24

  10. Conflict-driven SAT solvers: Search and Analysis ( x 1 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ 0 ( x 3 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) ∧ x 5 = 1 (¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ) ∧ 1 F extra x 2 = 1 2 6 x 1 = 0 x 4 = 1 x 3 = 1 x 3 = 0 7 Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 4 / 24

  11. Conflict-driven SAT solvers: Search and Analysis ( x 1 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ 0 ( x 3 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) ∧ x 5 = 1 (¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ) ∧ 1 F extra x 2 = 1 2 x 3 = 1 1 7 x 5 = 1 6 x 1 = 0 7 7 x 4 = 1 x 1 = 0 x 4 = 1 x 3 = 1 7 x 3 = 0 2 x 3 = 0 7 x 2 = 1 Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 4 / 24

  12. Conflict-driven SAT solvers: Search and Analysis ( x 1 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ 0 ( x 3 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) ∧ x 5 = 1 (¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ) ∧ 1 F extra x 2 = 1 2 x 3 = 1 1 7 x 5 = 1 6 x 1 = 0 7 7 x 4 = 1 x 1 = 0 x 4 = 1 x 3 = 1 7 x 3 = 0 2 x 3 = 0 7 x 2 = 1 (¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 4 / 24

  13. Conflict-driven SAT solvers: Search and Analysis ( x 1 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ 0 ( x 3 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) ∧ x 5 = 1 (¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ) ∧ 1 F extra x 2 = 1 2 x 3 = 1 1 7 x 5 = 1 6 x 1 = 0 7 7 x 4 = 1 x 1 = 0 x 4 = 1 x 3 = 1 7 x 3 = 0 2 x 3 = 0 7 x 2 = 1 (¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 4 / 24

  14. Conflict-driven SAT solvers: Search and Analysis ( x 1 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ 0 ( x 3 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) ∧ x 5 = 1 (¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ) ∧ 1 F extra x 2 = 1 2 2 x 4 = 0 x 3 = 1 1 x 1 = 1 7 x 5 = 1 6 x 1 = 0 7 7 x 4 = 1 x 1 = 0 x 4 = 1 x 3 = 1 7 x 3 = 0 2 x 3 = 0 7 x 2 = 1 (¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 4 / 24

  15. Conflict-driven SAT solvers: Search and Analysis ( x 1 ∨ x 4 ) ∧ 0 ( x 3 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) ∧ x 5 = 1 (¯ x 3 ∨ ¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ) ∧ 1 F extra x 2 = 1 2 2 x 4 = 0 x 3 = 1 1 x 1 = 1 7 x 5 = 1 6 x 1 = 0 7 7 x 4 = 1 x 1 = 0 x 4 = 1 x 3 = 1 7 x 3 = 0 2 x 3 = 0 7 x 2 = 1 (¯ x 2 ∨ ¯ x 4 ∨ ¯ x 5 ) Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 4 / 24

  16. Conflict-driven SAT solvers: Pseudo-code 1: while TRUE do l decision := GetDecisionLiteral ( ) 2: If no l decision then return satisfiable 3: F := Simplify ( F ( l decision ← 1) ) 4: while F contains C falsified do 5: C conflict := AnalyzeConflict ( C falsified ) 6: If C conflict = ∅ then return unsatisfiable 7: BackTrack ( C conflict ) 8: F := Simplify ( F ∪ { C conflict } ) 9: end while 10: 11: end while Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 5 / 24

  17. Learning conflict clauses [Marques-SilvaSakallah’96] 1 5 x 4 =1 x 8 =1 x 17 =0 4 3 x 12 =0 7 x 6 =0 x 1 =1 7 7 x 18 =1 7 7 7 7 x 11 =1 x 2 =0 x 10 =0 x 3 =1 7 7 x 7 =1 7 x 18 =0 x 5 =0 6 x 13 =0 2 x 19 =1 Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 6 / 24

  18. Learning conflict clauses [Marques-SilvaSakallah’96] 1 5 x 4 =1 x 8 =1 x 17 =0 4 3 x 12 =0 7 x 6 =0 x 1 =1 7 7 x 18 =1 7 7 7 7 x 11 =1 x 2 =0 x 10 =0 x 3 =1 7 7 x 7 =1 7 x 18 =0 x 5 =0 6 x 13 =0 2 ( ¬ x 1 ∨ ¬ x 3 ∨ x 5 ∨ x 17 ∨ ¬ x 19 ) x 19 =1 tri-asserting clause Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 6 / 24

  19. Learning conflict clauses [Marques-SilvaSakallah’96] 1 5 x 4 =1 x 8 =1 x 17 =0 4 3 x 12 =0 7 x 6 =0 x 1 =1 7 7 x 18 =1 7 7 7 7 x 11 =1 x 2 =0 x 10 =0 x 3 =1 7 7 x 7 =1 7 x 18 =0 x 5 =0 6 x 13 =0 2 ( x 10 ∨ ¬ x 8 ∨ x 17 ∨ ¬ x 19 ) x 19 =1 first unique implication point Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 6 / 24

  20. Learning conflict clauses [Marques-SilvaSakallah’96] 1 5 x 4 =1 x 8 =1 x 17 =0 4 3 x 12 =0 7 x 6 =0 x 1 =1 7 7 x 18 =1 7 7 7 7 x 11 =1 x 2 =0 x 10 =0 x 3 =1 7 7 x 7 =1 7 x 18 =0 x 5 =0 6 x 13 =0 2 ( x 2 ∨ ¬ x 4 ∨ ¬ x 8 ∨ x 17 ∨ ¬ x 19 ) x 19 =1 second unique implication point Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 6 / 24

  21. Average Learned Clause Length Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 7 / 24

  22. Data-structures Data-structures Watch pointers Marijn J. H. Heule (UT) Mini-tutorial on CDCL solvers BIRS, January 2014 8 / 24

Recommend

Conflict-Driven Clause Learning Marijn J.H. Heule http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mheule/15816-f19/

Conflict-Driven Clause Learning Marijn J.H. Heule http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mheule/15816-f19/

Conflict-Driven Clause Learning Marijn J.H. Heule http://www.cs.cmu.edu/~mheule/15816-f19/ Automated Reasoning and Satisfiability, September 16, 2019 1/33 The Satisfiability (SAT) problem ( x 5 x 8 x 2 ) ( x 2 x 1 x

881 views • 74 slides
Conflict-Driven Clause Learning Current Trends in AI Bart Bogaerts March 13, 2020 1 THANKS

Conflict-Driven Clause Learning Current Trends in AI Bart Bogaerts March 13, 2020 1 THANKS

Conflict-Driven Clause Learning Current Trends in AI Bart Bogaerts March 13, 2020 1 THANKS Many slides provided by Joao Marques Silva Material of a SAT/SMT summer school http: //satsmt2013.ics.aalto.fi/slides/Marques-Silva.pdf

1.07k views • 106 slides
Conflict-Driven Clause Learning Armin Biere SAT/SMT/AR Summer School 2019 Lisbon, Portugal July

Conflict-Driven Clause Learning Armin Biere SAT/SMT/AR Summer School 2019 Lisbon, Portugal July

Conflict-Driven Clause Learning Armin Biere SAT/SMT/AR Summer School 2019 Lisbon, Portugal July 4, 2019 Dress Code Summer School Speaker as SAT Problem propositional logic: variables tie shirt negation (not) disjunction (or)

1.09k views • 82 slides
Proofs in Conflict-Driven Theory Combination Maria Paola Bonacina, Stphane Graham-Lengrand, and

Proofs in Conflict-Driven Theory Combination Maria Paola Bonacina, Stphane Graham-Lengrand, and

Proofs in Conflict-Driven Theory Combination Maria Paola Bonacina, Stphane Graham-Lengrand, and Natarajan Shankar CPP2018, 9th January 2018 1/30 Context: Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) CDCL (Conflict-Driven Clause Learning)

1.57k views • 122 slides
Introduction Clause exchange in parallel solvers Lazy clause exchange Experiments

Introduction Clause exchange in parallel solvers Lazy clause exchange Experiments

Introduction Clause exchange in parallel solvers Lazy clause exchange Experiments Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lazy clause exchange policy for parallel SAT solvers Gilles Audemard CRIL, Lens, France Laurent

980 views • 24 slides
Clause Size Reduction with all-UIP Learning Nick Feng and Fahiem Bacchus University of Toronto

Clause Size Reduction with all-UIP Learning Nick Feng and Fahiem Bacchus University of Toronto

Clause Size Reduction with all-UIP Learning Nick Feng and Fahiem Bacchus University of Toronto Introduction Clause Learning Clause Learning is an essential technique in SAT solvers (1996) u Clause Learning Clause Learning is an essential

664 views • 51 slides
? Results of CASC (2016) Very Sketchy Anatomy of Winning ATPs First/Higher-Order Theorem

? Results of CASC (2016) Very Sketchy Anatomy of Winning ATPs First/Higher-Order Theorem

Proof Search in Conflict Resolution Lifting CDCL (Conflict-Driven Clause Learning) to First-Order Logic Bruno Woltzenlogel Paleo joint work with: Daniyar Itegulov (ITMO, St. Petersburg, Russia) Ezequiel Postan (National University

911 views • 46 slides
Conflict Directed Clause Learning for the Maximum Weighted Clique Problem Emmanuel Hebrard 1 and

Conflict Directed Clause Learning for the Maximum Weighted Clique Problem Emmanuel Hebrard 1 and

Conflict Directed Clause Learning for the Maximum Weighted Clique Problem Emmanuel Hebrard 1 and George Katsirelos 2 1 LAAS-CNRS, Universit 2 MIAT, INRA e de Toulouse The Maximum Weight Clique Problem 5 b d 9 Given a graph G with weight

915 views • 76 slides
Tutorial on SAT Solvers Combinatorial Problem Solving (CPS) Enric Rodr guez-Carbonell May

Tutorial on SAT Solvers Combinatorial Problem Solving (CPS) Enric Rodr guez-Carbonell May

Tutorial on SAT Solvers Combinatorial Problem Solving (CPS) Enric Rodr guez-Carbonell May 26, 2020 SAT Solvers SAT solvers take as input a CNF formula F and return: sat (+ model): if F is satisfiable unsat : if F is unsatisfiable

273 views • 5 slides
Tutorial on SMT Solvers Combinatorial Problem Solving (CPS) Enric Rodr guez-Carbonell April

Tutorial on SMT Solvers Combinatorial Problem Solving (CPS) Enric Rodr guez-Carbonell April

Tutorial on SMT Solvers Combinatorial Problem Solving (CPS) Enric Rodr guez-Carbonell April 23, 2019 SMT Solvers SMT solvers take as input a (quantifier-free) first-order logic formula F over a background theory T , and return: sat (+

207 views • 10 slides
X Schedule 4 Transactional Charges Clause 9 Clause 10 2 RWE npower

X Schedule 4 Transactional Charges Clause 9 Clause 10 2 RWE npower

RWE npower DUoSA Consolidation Group Payment Terms Sub-group 28 th July 2005 General Framework Existing Proposed Clause 6 Charges Clause 6 Clause 7 Billing & Payments Clause 7 Clause 8 Site

389 views • 4 slides
Equilibrium and Balayage A mini-tutorial A. Martnez-Finkelshtein (U. Almera) Optimal

Equilibrium and Balayage A mini-tutorial A. Martnez-Finkelshtein (U. Almera) Optimal

Equilibrium and Balayage A mini-tutorial A. Martnez-Finkelshtein (U. Almera) Optimal point configurations and orthogonal polynomials CIEM Castro Urdiales April 19, 2017 Equilibrium and Balayage A mini-tutorial A.

553 views • 34 slides
Motivation: conflict-driven reasoning from PL to FOL SGGS: model representation and FO clausal

Motivation: conflict-driven reasoning from PL to FOL SGGS: model representation and FO clausal

Outline Motivation: conflict-driven reasoning from PL to FOL SGGS: model representation and FO clausal propagation SGGS inferences: instance generation and conflict solving Discussion SGGS: conflict-driven first-order reasoning 1 Maria Paola

582 views • 42 slides
CDSAT: Conflict-Driven SATisfiability modulo theories and assignments 1 Maria Paola Bonacina

CDSAT: Conflict-Driven SATisfiability modulo theories and assignments 1 Maria Paola Bonacina

The conflict-driven reasoning paradigm Conflict-driven reasoning in theory combination The CDSAT transition system Discussion CDSAT: Conflict-Driven SATisfiability modulo theories and assignments 1 Maria Paola Bonacina Dipartimento di

610 views • 45 slides
Conflict-driven Reasoning Conflict-Driven SATisfiability 2 CDCL : propositional conflict-driven

Conflict-driven Reasoning Conflict-Driven SATisfiability 2 CDCL : propositional conflict-driven

The Eos SMT/SMA-Solver: A Preliminary Report 1 Giulio Mazzi Universit` a Degli Studi di Verona Lisbon, 7th July 2019 1 Joint work with Maria Paola Bonacina G. Mazzi (Universit` a di Verona) Eos SMT/SMA-solver Lisbon, 7th July 2019 1 / 31

430 views • 31 slides
Conflict Driven Learning and Non-chronological Backtracking x1 + x4 x1 + x3 + x8 x1 + x8

Conflict Driven Learning and Non-chronological Backtracking x1 + x4 x1 + x3 + x8 x1 + x8

Conflict Driven Learning and Non-chronological Backtracking x1 + x4 x1 + x3 + x8 x1 + x8 + x12 x2 + x11 x7 + x3 + x9 x7 + x8 + x9 x7 + x8 + x10 x7 + x10 + x12 Conflict Driven Learning and Non-chronological

607 views • 29 slides
Extensive Games with Perfect Information A Mini Tutorial Krzysztof R. Apt (so not Krzystof and

Extensive Games with Perfect Information A Mini Tutorial Krzysztof R. Apt (so not Krzystof and

Extensive Games with Perfect Information A Mini Tutorial Krzysztof R. Apt (so not Krzystof and definitely not Krystof) CWI, Amsterdam, the Netherlands , University of Amsterdam Extensive Games withPerfect InformationA Mini Tutorial p. 1/29

614 views • 29 slides
On Clause Learning Algorithms for Satisfiability Sam Buss SDF@60 Kurt G odel Research Center

On Clause Learning Algorithms for Satisfiability Sam Buss SDF@60 Kurt G odel Research Center

Clause Learning On Clause Learning Algorithms for Satisfiability Sam Buss SDF@60 Kurt G odel Research Center Vienna July 13, 2013 Clause Learning Satisfiability Satisfiability ( Sat ) An instance of Satisfiability ( Sat ) is a set of

483 views • 23 slides
CoPAn - Exploring recurring patterns in conflict analysis of CDCL SAT-Solvers (Tool Presentation)

CoPAn - Exploring recurring patterns in conflict analysis of CDCL SAT-Solvers (Tool Presentation)

CoPAn - Exploring recurring patterns in conflict analysis of CDCL SAT-Solvers (Tool Presentation) Stephan Kottler, Christian Zielke, Paul Seitz and Michael Kaufmann Algorithmics Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Tbingen

562 views • 41 slides
CHAMBERS OF TAX CONSULTANTS Clause by Clause Analysis and Reporting Requirements in Tax Audit

CHAMBERS OF TAX CONSULTANTS Clause by Clause Analysis and Reporting Requirements in Tax Audit

CHAMBERS OF TAX CONSULTANTS Clause by Clause Analysis and Reporting Requirements in Tax Audit Report Presentation by August 18, 2018 Yogesh Thar 1 CONTENTS Clause Number Particulars of the Clause 30A* Impact of Primay adjustments 30B*

1.31k views • 115 slides
Learning is a never-ending process Tasks come and go, but learning is forever Learn more e ff

Learning is a never-ending process Tasks come and go, but learning is forever Learn more e ff

NeurIPS 2018 Tutorial on Automatic Machine Learning Learning to Learn Learning Learning Learning Learning Learning automl.org/events -> AutoML Tutorial -> Slides Frank Hutter Joaquin Vanschoren Eindhoven University of Technology

1.36k views • 40 slides
From DPLL to CDCL SAT solvers Combinatorial Problem Solving (CPS) Albert Oliveras Enric Rodr

From DPLL to CDCL SAT solvers Combinatorial Problem Solving (CPS) Albert Oliveras Enric Rodr

From DPLL to CDCL SAT solvers Combinatorial Problem Solving (CPS) Albert Oliveras Enric Rodr guez-Carbonell May 17, 2019 Overview of the session Conflict Analysis Motivating example Backjumping Conflict graph Lemma

1.65k views • 102 slides
PETSc Tutorial Profiling, Nonlinear Solvers, Unstructured Grids, Threads and GPUs Karl Rupp

PETSc Tutorial Profiling, Nonlinear Solvers, Unstructured Grids, Threads and GPUs Karl Rupp

PETSc Tutorial Profiling, Nonlinear Solvers, Unstructured Grids, Threads and GPUs Karl Rupp me@karlrupp.net Freelance Computational Scientist Seminarzentrum-Hotel Am Spiegeln, Vienna, Austria June 28-30, 2016 Table of Contents Table of

971 views • 42 slides
Exact General-Purpose Solvers for Mixed-Integer Bilevel Linear Programs Tutorial I. Ljubi c

Exact General-Purpose Solvers for Mixed-Integer Bilevel Linear Programs Tutorial I. Ljubi c

Exact General-Purpose Solvers for Mixed-Integer Bilevel Linear Programs Tutorial I. Ljubi c ESSEC Business School of Paris, France JFRO 2018, March 26, Paris Based on the papers: Part I: M. Fischetti, I. Ljubi c, M. Monaci, M. Sinnl:

1.36k views • 90 slides

More recommend