microbiological and geochemical dynamics of the
play

Microbiological and Geochemical Dynamics of the Subsurface: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Microbiological and Geochemical Dynamics of the Subsurface: chemical oxidation and bioremediation of organic contaminants Nora Barbour Sutton Soil Contamination Sources of Contamination Types of Contamination Gas Stations Benzene,


  1. Microbiological and Geochemical Dynamics of the Subsurface: chemical oxidation and bioremediation of organic contaminants Nora Barbour Sutton

  2. Soil Contamination Sources of Contamination Types of Contamination  Gas Stations  Benzene, diesel, gas  Dry Cleaners  Solvents: PCE  Industrial Factories  Heavy Metals  Transport Infrastructure Pure Pollutant Pure Pollutant Groundwater Groundwater

  3. Soil Remediation Transfer of  PHYSICAL Remediation contaminant  Physically remove contaminant from the to second subsurface location  CHEMICAL Remediation (chemical oxidation)  Contaminants are chemically degraded Conversion of contaminant into harmless products  BIOLOGICAL Remediation (Bioremediation)  Microorganisms degrade contaminants through biological processes

  4. Conversion: In situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) In situ bioremediation (ISB) CHEMICAL Remediation Benzene + oxidant → CO 2 + H 2 O BIOLOGICAL Remediation (Bioremediation) Benzene + bacteria + O 2 → CO 2 + H 2 O + biomass

  5. Conversion: In situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) In situ bioremediation (ISB) Groundwater

  6. Conversion: Chemical oxidation followed by bioremediation In situ chemical oxidation (ISCO) In situ bioremediation (ISB) Amendments Oxidants Nutrients Fenton’s Reagent H 2 O 2 + Fe 2+ Oxygen Persulfate: S 2 O 8 2- Carbon Source Bacteria Ozone O 3 - Permanganate MnO 4 Groundwater

  7. Chemical oxidation + bioremediation  Technological Motivation Parameter Chemical Oxidation Bioremediation (ISCO) (ISB) Time Rapid Slow Cost High Low Pure Pollutant Yes No Thorough No Yes Sustainable No Yes

  8. Chemical oxidation + bioremediation  Scientific Reasoning  Scientific Challenge • Reduces toxicity • Oxidizing conditions • Improves biodegradability • pH change • Improves bioavailability • Soil organic matter degradation • Increases temperature and mixing Oxidants Optimal pH Oxidation Potential (V) H 2 O 2 + Fe 2+ 2.8 (OH - ·) Fenton’s Reagent 3-4 2- - ·) Persulfate: S 2 O 8 3-4 to >10.5 2.6 (SO 4 Ozone O 3 neutral 2.1 Permanganate MnO 4 - neutral 1.7

  9. Chemical oxidation + bioremediation  Scientifically Attractive: unique system to investigate → Fundamental Understanding of Entire System Groundwater  Soil  Contaminant  Microbial Community  Groundwater

  10. Dissertation Structure Motivation Chemical Oxidation and Bioremediation Part Three: Part One: Part Two: Review; Anaerobic ISB: Aerobic ISB: limitations to ISB TPH chlorinated ethenes Diesel PCE and TCE bioremediation bioremediation with with oxygen electron donor

  11. Dissertation Structure Motivation Chemical Oxidation and Bioremediation Part Three: Part One: Part Two: Review; Anaerobic ISB: Aerobic ISB: limitations to ISB TPH chlorinated ethenes Literature Laboratory Field

  12. Dissertation Structure Motivation Chemical Oxidation and Bioremediation Part Three: Part One: Part Two: Review; Anaerobic ISB: Aerobic ISB: limitations to ISB TPH chlorinated ethenes Chapter 2 Review of ISCO coupled Literature with ISB Chapter 5 Chapter 8 Chapter 3 Aqueous constituents Bioavailability limitations Development of OHRB impact bioremediation Laboratory to bioremediation Chapter 6 resilience to chemical Microbial community oxidation dynamics following oxidation Chapter 4 Chapter 7 Chapter 9 Field limitations to Geochemical and Changes to OHRB and Field bioavailability microbial community rdh abundance during ISCO changes during ISCO and ISB

  13. Dissertation Toolbox Chapter Aspects 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 soil type X X X System chemical oxidant type X nutrient amendment X X Microbiological microbial community X X X X X X groundwater X X X X soil characteristics X Geochemical contaminant characteristics X X X

  14. Major Conclusions  Technological:  Chemical oxidation plus bioremediation is very effective

  15. Major Conclusions  Technological:  Chemical oxidation plus bioremediation is very effective  Scientific:  Bacteria are very resilient

  16. Major Conclusions  Technological:  Chemical oxidation plus bioremediation is very effective  Scientific:  Bacteria are very resilient  Chemical oxidation impacts subsurface processes

  17. Major Conclusions  Technological:  Chemical oxidation plus bioremediation is very effective  Scientific:  Bacteria are very resilient  Chemical oxidation impacts subsurface processes  DNA-based tools are essential to understanding system

  18. Major Conclusions  Technological:  Chemical oxidation plus bioremediation is very effective  Scientific:  Bacteria are very resilient  Chemical oxidation impacts subsurface processes  DNA-based tools are essential to understanding system → Fundamental Understanding of Entire System

  19. Program  Defense:  13:30-13:45 Presentation  13:45-14:30 Examination by Committee  14:30-14:45 Committee withdraws  14:45-15:00 Announcement of decision  Reception:  15:00-15:45 in Aula  Dinner and Party:  17:30 Cafe Carre, Vijzelstraat 2

  20. Microbiological and Geochemical Dynamics of the Subsurface: chemical oxidation and bioremediation of organic contaminants Nora Barbour Sutton

Recommend


More recommend