metro westside subway extension y station information
play

Metro Westside Subway Extension y Station Information Meetings - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro Westside Subway Extension y Station Information Meetings October 22 November 5, 2009 Build Alternatives Wilshire Subway Wilshire/West Wilshire/West Hollywood Subway


  1. Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority Metro Westside Subway Extension y Station Information Meetings October 22 – November 5, 2009

  2. Build Alternatives Wilshire Subway Wilshire/West Wilshire/West Hollywood Subway

  3. Alternatives Under Study in Draft EIS/EIR Extensions of Purple Line from Wilshire/Western: • Alt. 1: Westwood/UCLA Extension • Alt. 2: VA Hospital Extension Fundable with Measure R Minimum Operable Segments • MOS 1: Fairfax Extension • MOS 2: Century City Extension Beyond Measure R Funding: • Alt. 3: Santa Monica Extension • Alt. 4: Westwood/West Hollywood Extension • Alt. 5: Santa Monica/West Hollywood Extension

  4. Alt. 1: Westwood/UCLA Extension Completed in 2036 Under Current Measure R Projected Funding

  5. Alt. 2: Westwood/VA Hospital Extension Completed in 2036 Under Current Measure R Projected Funding

  6. MOS 1: Fairfax Extension Completed in 2019 Under Current Measure R Projected Funding

  7. MOS 2: Century City Extension Completed in 2026 Under Current Measure R Projected Funding

  8. Alt. 3: Santa Monica Extension Beyond Measure R Funding Abilities

  9. Alt. 4: Westwood/West Hollywood Extension Beyond Measure R Funding Abilities

  10. Alt. 5: Santa Monica/West Hollywood Extension Beyond Measure R Funding Abilities

  11. Where We Are In The Process Min. 6 Years to ? * 0 18 21 33 Months Months Final Design Draft EIS/EIR / Final EIS/EIR/PE Construction * Construction • Metro Board • Metro Board • Federal Selects LPA Approved Alternatives Approved Alternatives R Record of d f Analysis Study Decision (January 2009) (Certification) • Federal A Approval for l f • Full Funding Preliminary Grant Engineering Agreement (PE) We Are Here * Depends on Depends on Funding A unding Availabili ailability ty

  12. Where We’re Heading • Selection of the Locally Preferred Alternative (LPA) Alternative (LPA) – Project to seek final environmental clearance – Project to be engineered for construction Project to be engineered for construction – Meets FTA’s cost-effectiveness target – Fiscally constrained: Can be built & operated within Fiscally constrained: Can be built & operated within projected funding – Phasing plan

  13. Purpose of Tonight’s Meeting • Set station box & entrance locations for further study in the Draft EIS/EIR study in the Draft EIS/EIR • Overview: – The role of station & portal location p – How the locations were selected • Obtain feedback on station-related issues • Identify issues to be addressed: Id tif i t b dd d – By other agencies – Later in the process Later in the process

  14. Work to Locate Station Boxes So Far • Review of prior subway studies • Initial engineering of alignments g g g • Discussions with: – City staff y – Other key institutions: • LACMA, UCLA, VA, Cedars-Sinai • Previous rounds of P i d f community input • Soils drilling activity • Soils drilling activity

  15. Connecting the System & the Community Activity nodes: • Where people want to go • Where people want to meet • Where people want to meet • Gateways to the community Vermont/Santa Monica Hollywood Boulevard Wilshire/Vermont

  16. Other Criteria for Locating Stations & Portals • Engineering & technical for: – Construction – Construction – Operations • Adjacent property for: – Portals – Construction staging • Cost/Cost-effectiveness • Cost/Cost effectiveness • Public input • Other

  17. Station Decisions for Continuing Analysis During the Draft & Final EIS/EIR: • Station area access & circulation – Connections & flow for pedestrians – Connections & flow for pedestrians, bicyclists, bus riders, cars – Local jurisdiction partnership During the Final EIS/EIR & beyond: • Station art & architecture Outside the EIS/EIR Process • Development at & around stations Development at & around stations – Approved separately by the local jurisdiction

  18. Station Types • Standard station • Transfer station T f t ti • Over-under station • Typically 60’ x 600’ box • Longer where crossover Longer where crossover tracks needed • Typically 60’ below • Typically 60 below ground to rails

  19. Standard Underground Station Existing Civic Center Station

  20. Transfer Station Existing 7 th /Metro Center Station Potentially at Hollywood & Highland

  21. Over-Under Station Existing Wilshire/Vermont Station Potentially at Beverly Center and Wilshire/La Cienega

  22. Typical Station Components Elevator/Escalators/Stairs Elevator/Escalators/Stairs Typical Cross Section Ticketing “Unseen” Elements: Power, Ventilation, Communications, Emergency Exits, Platform Maintenance, Other

  23. Center Mezzanine Entrance Retail Bank Retail Retail Office

  24. End Mezzanine Retail Retail Retail Entrance Entrance Office Entrance Entrance Can be single end or double end mezzanine depending on ridership demand

  25. Future Connections – Knock-Out Panels Union Station

  26. Future Connections – Knock-Out Panels Union Station

  27. Parking • Dedicated Parking at Existing Subway – Free parking only at North Hollywood & Uni ersal Cit Universal City – Paid parking at Union Station • Westside Extension to provide parking: – Where it’s needed & possible • EIS/EIR will evaluate: – Demand for new, dedicated station Demand for new, dedicated station parking – Availability of other area parking • Only Westwood/VA Hospital Station Only Westwood/VA Hospital Station contemplated for new, dedicated parking

  28. Other Station Entrance Issues Space is required for : • Stairs/escalators/elevators • Stairs/escalators/elevators • Circulation and queuing • Mechanical equipment • Bus interface • Bicycle parking • Drop-off/Pick-up

  29. Provide for Good Bus Connections Wilshire/Western Union Station Universal City Station North Hollywood Station

  30. Station Portal Types • Plaza with covered entry • Integrated with development − Existing buildings − Subsequent development − C Concurrent development t d l t

  31. Plaza with Covered Entry Vermont/Santa Monica

  32. Subsequent Development Wilshire/Western Station

  33. Concurrent Development Hollywood/Highland Station Hollywood/Highland Station

  34. Existing Building Figueroa Street Entrance Flower Street Entrance 7 th Street/Metro Station

  35. Stations Discussed at October 26, 2009 Meeting • Wilshire/Crenshaw / (Optional) • Wilshire/La Brea • Wilshire/La Brea • Wilshire/Fairfax These stations are within Measure R funding

  36. Wilshire/Crenshaw Station (Optional) • Station box located: – Under Wilshire Boulevard – Adjacent to Metro-owned property on SW corner of Wilshire/Crenshaw – East of Lorraine Blvd to avoid 81 inch storm drain under Lorraine storm drain under Lorraine • Portal on Metro-owned property • Single end-loaded mezzanine • Construction staging on Metro property

  37. Wilshire/Crenshaw Station (Optional)

  38. Wilshire/La Brea Station • Station box located: – Under Wilshire Boulevard – Adjacent to Metro-owned property on the Adjacent to Metro owned property on the NW corner of Wilshire/La Brea – West of intersection – Avoids utilities and impacts to La Brea • Portal on Metro-owned property • Single end-loaded mezzanine • Construction staging on Metro property g g p p y • Development on southeast corner asked to allow for future portal

  39. Wilshire/La Brea Station

  40. Wilshire/Fairfax Station • 2 station box location options – Both under Wilshire Boulevard & located for better soil conditions soil conditions – 1 completely on the west side of Fairfax – 1 crosses Fairfax slightly • • End of MOS 1 End of MOS 1 • Longer station box needed to accommodate crossover tracks west of station • • Single end-loaded mezzanine Single end loaded mezzanine • Potential portal at LACMA • Potential shared parking with LACMA

  41. Wilshire/Fairfax Station (West of Fairfax)

  42. Wilshire/Fairfax Station (Spanning Fairfax)

  43. Stations Discussed at November 4, 2009 Meeting • Wilshire/La Cienega • Wilshire/Beverly These stations are within Measure R funding

  44. Wilshire/La Cienega Station – 3 Options A. Station east side of La Cienega – Could still allow connection to future West Hollywood line B B. Station west of La Cienega with connection to future Station west of La Cienega with connection to future West Hollywood Line, no transfer C. Station west of La Cienega with connection to future West Hollywood Line, with transfer

  45. Wilshire/La Cienega Station: Option A • Station box located east of La Cienega to reduce impacts on La Cienega • Single end-loaded mezzanine • A separate “connection structure” could still be built further west to allow for a junction with a future West Hollywood line j ti ith f t W t H ll d li • West Hollywood passengers travel to Beverly/Rodeo station to transfer to head east

Recommend


More recommend