mesino oscillations
play

mesino oscillations AKSHAY GHALSASI, DAVE MCKEEN, ANN NELSON - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Baryogenesis via mesino oscillations AKSHAY GHALSASI, DAVE MCKEEN, ANN NELSON arxiv:1508.05392 The one minute summary 2 Mesino a bound state of colored scalar and quark Model analogous to Kaon system Mesinos form after the QCD


  1. Baryogenesis via mesino oscillations AKSHAY GHALSASI, DAVE MCKEEN, ANN NELSON arxiv:1508.05392

  2. The one minute summary 2  Mesino a bound state of colored scalar and quark  Model analogous to Kaon system  Mesinos form after the QCD hadronization temp  Oscillations analogous to Kaon system give CP violation  Baryon violating decays give baryogenesis

  3. Outline 3  Introduction and Motivation  The Model  Oscillations and CP Asymmetry  Experimental Constraints  Cosmology  Conclusion

  4. 4 Introduction and Motivation

  5. Evidence for baryogenesis 5  Universe is made up of baryons

  6. No baryogenesis in SM 6  Sakharov conditions • Baryon number violation ✓ (sphalerons) • C and CP Violation  (CKM phase not enough) • Departure from thermal equilibrium  (no first order PT )  Models of baryogenesis require high reheating temperature

  7. Reheating temperature can be low 7  No evidence of high reheating temperature  Many reasonable theories favor a low reheating scale • Gravitino production in SUSY extensions of SM (Moroi et al ‘83 ) • Isocurvature perturbations ( Fox et al ‘04 )  There do exist low scale baryogenesis models (Claudson et al ’84, Dimopolous et al ‘87 )

  8. 8 The Model

  9. Particle content 9 singlet colored majorana fermions scalars mass N 2,3 O(TeV) N 1

  10. Complex phases 10 all 9 phases real and remain diagonal two complex phases remain Oscillations and CP B violation violation

  11. Decay Modes 11 d i * d i Antibaryon Baryon +mesons +mesons u* j u j s* s N 1 N 1 N 1 N 1 +mesons +mesons d i * d i s* s

  12. 12 Oscillations and CP Asymmetry

  13. On-shell and off-shell oscillations 13 s* Off shell diagrams N 2 s N 2 O(TeV) N 1 s* On shell diagrams N 1 via common final states s

  14. Off-shell contribution 14 s*  Off shell oscillations 𝑁 12 : N 1,2 s Form factor N 2 Berger et al ‘13 N 1

  15. On-shell contribution 15  Contributions to Γ 12 : s* s  We want to be in the squeezed limit  In squeezed limit one can show

  16. Hamiltonian is not diagonal 16  Hamiltonian without oscillations With oscillations we get off diagonal terms

  17. Diagonalizing the Hamiltonian 17  Hamiltonian has off diagonal terms, new eigenstates are  Assuming a state starts as at t = 0 then  CP violation gives favoring one state over another

  18. CP asymmetry 18  Can show asymmetry per mesino-antimesino pair is given by branching ratio into baryons  Lets define and then we have  We expect generally  Can show

  19. 19 Experimental Constraints

  20. Experimental Signatures 20 d i 2 jets u j q soft quark, no jet d i 2 jets N 1 N 1 u j d k d i usually soft quark, no jet q soft quarks, no jet

  21. Constraints on mass 21  Constraints from squarks decaying into b and light quark: (CMS)  Effective constraints from squark decaying to light quarks: (CMS)  Constraints from 3 jet events:  We take as our benchmark value

  22. Couplings 22 upper bounds from Kaon oscillations, 𝑜ത 𝑜 oscillations and upper bounds from 𝑜ത 𝑜 oscillations diinucleon decays, lower and dinucleon decays bounds from displaced vertices upper bound from cosmology

  23. Constraints summary 23  Totally fine set of couplings for :  Constraints only get weaker with increasing mass

  24. 24 Cosmology

  25. Cosmic Story 25 T T = 200 MeV N 3 N 3 N 3 N 3 N s* s CP Violation Baryons Anti Baryons T = 1 MeV

  26. N 3 does not annihilate 26  Number density of N 3 at hadronization temp T c  For N 3 to last until T c we need  Small Yukawa imply N 3 annihilations are slower than expansion rate.  So most of the N 3 survives till T c

  27. Exact Solution 27  We can coevolve the radiation, N 3 and baryons produced from their decay to get the exact solution

  28. Sudden Decay Approximation 28  Baryon to entropy ratio in sudden decay approximation  Ratio of matter and radiation energy densities for ent. dil.  However and so

  29. Constraints on decay rate 29

  30. Asymmetry dependence on α 𝐶 30

  31. Possible signatures 31  Finding colored scalars at LHC (1 TeV at 1000 fb -1 ) • final states jets will have third generation quarks • mostly 2-jet decays but will have 3-jets sometimes • possible displaced vertices signature • same sign tops (Berger ‘13) • CP violation in same sign tops hard to see at LHC  Any signature needs to be consistent with neutron-antineutron oscillations and B meson and Kaon oscillations

  32. Conclusions and future work 32  If there is a scalar quark it can form mesinos  CP violation in mesino oscillations can be the source for baryogenesis  In order to get enough CP violation we need the singlets to be very close in mass with mesinos

  33. 33 THANK YOU! QUESTIONS?

  34. Constraints on couplings from 34 displaced vertices  Displaced vertices search give us 𝑑τ < 1 𝑛𝑛  Φ → quarks :  Φ → N 1 → quarks :  These constraints don’t apply if  Mass independent constraints from BBN are 𝑃 10 6 weaker

  35. Constraints from Rare Processes 35  ∆B = 2 , neutron-antineutron oscillation: For we get  Dinucleon to Kaon decay constraints for  Easily satisfied if

  36. Kaon oscillation constraints 36 s d N i N j d * s *  Constraints from K L and K S mass difference  Constraints from CP violation in Kaon system  B meson oscillations aren’t as constraining

Recommend


More recommend