measuring the angle at a super b factory
play

Measuring the angle at a Super B factory Katherine George Queen - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Measuring the angle at a Super B factory Katherine George Queen Mary, University of London Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 1 Overview o Measurements of sin2, cos2, and limits on from : o


  1. Measuring the angle ß at a Super B factory Katherine George Queen Mary, University of London Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 1

  2. Overview o Measurements of sin2ß, cos2ß, and limits on ß from : o ß from charmonium, o ‘Complementary measurements’ of ß from ‘open-charm’ and other charmonium, o ‘alternative measurements’ of ß from penguins. and extrapolation to higher luminosities. Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 2

  3. Many ways to measure sin2ß and cos2ß (More details in following slides …) Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 3

  4. Many ways to measure sin2ß and cos2ß b � cc s (More details in following slides …) charmonium Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 4

  5. Many ways to measure sin2ß and cos2ß b � cc s (More details in following slides …) charmonium Color-suppressed b � cu d D ( � )0 CP h 0 , D (*) h 0 , latter with D � K S � + � � Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 5

  6. Many ways to measure sin2ß and cos2ß b � cc s (More details in following slides …) charmonium charm b � cc d or charmonium Color-suppressed b � cu d D ( � )0 CP h 0 , D (*) h 0 , latter with D � K S � + � � Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 6

  7. Many ways to measure sin2ß and cos2ß b � cc s (More details in following slides …) charmonium charm b � cc d b � ss & s b � sd d or charmonium penguin dominated Color-suppressed b � cu d D ( � )0 CP h 0 , D (*) h 0 , latter with D � K S � + � � Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 7

  8. Many ways to measure sin2ß and cos2ß b � cc s (More details in following slides …) charmonium charm b � cc d b � ss & s b � sd d or charmonium penguin dominated Color-suppressed b � cu d D ( � )0 CP h 0 , D (*) h 0 , latter with D � K S � + � � Increasing sensitivity to new physics Increasing tree diagram contribution Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 8

  9. Sin2ß from b → ccs decays Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 9

  10. Sin2ß from b → ccs stat. syst. o BaBar, 383 M BB pairs. (cc)K 0 o hep-ex/0703021, submitted to PRL. S (CP odd) (cc)K 0 L (CP even) o Now with systematics for each golden mode separately, J/ ψ K 0 S and J/ ψ K 0 modes. o Also | λ | measurements - see backup slides. Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 10

  11. Sin2ß from b → ccs o Belle, 535 M BB pairs. PRL 98 (2007) 031802) J/ ψ K 0 J/ ψ K 0 S L (CP odd) (CP even) o J/ ψ K 0 S only o J/ ψ K 0 L only Sin2ø 1 = + 0.643 ± 0.038 total Sin2ø 1 = + 0.641 ± 0.057 total A = – 0.001 ± 0.028 total A = – 0.045 ± 0.033 total Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 11

  12. Sin2ß from b → ccs Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 12

  13. Sin2ß from b → ccs o 4 solutions for ß from the b → ccs sin2 ß measurement Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 13

  14. The 4-fold ambiguity in ß - resolved ? o Reduce 4-fold ambiguity to 2-fold ambiguity (ß → π /2 -ß) by measuring (the sign of) cos2ß. Negative cos2ß ruled out by: -ve solution, ß = φ 1 = (68.7 ± 1.0) 0 o Time-dependent Dalitz analysis of o B 0 → D *+ D *- K 0 S o BaBar: PRD 74, 091101 (2006), 94% CL. o B 0 → D 0 (K 0 S π + π - )h 0 o BaBar: hep-ex/060105, 87% CL. o Belle: PRL 97, 081801 (2006), 98.3% CL. o B 0 → K + K - K 0 o BaBar: 21 o favoured over 69 o at 4.6 σ level. o Time-dependent angular analysis of B 0 → J/ ψ K *0 o BaBar : PRD 71, 032005 (2005), 87% CL. o Belle : PRL 95, 091601 (2005). +ve solution, ß = φ 1 = (21.3 ± 1.0) 0 “Strongly favoured” Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 14

  15. We already have a 1 0 measurement of ß - so what next ? o Achille’s talk (yesterday), and the following talks on α and γ will talk about whether 1 o measurements of these angles are possible. o We (ß) are already there (expect <1 0 by the end of B- factory running) o Question: Why push further ? Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 15

  16. We already have a 1 0 measurement of ß - why push further ? o Answers. o (a) We can - we already know how to do these measurements. o If nothing else its ‘a really dumb (?) sanity check’. o (b) The constraints from indirect measurements will also be very stringent. o (c) Although systematics limited, improvements in detector- related systematics will benefit many other other analyses. o (d) It’s a ‘standard candle’ o (I) Comparison with complementary measurements of ß from b → ccd and b → cud. o (2)Comparison with penguin b → sqq modes - a ‘standard candle’ assumes increased importance as precision on penguin ß measurements increases. o There are others which I may have forgotten & opinion may vary as to the relative importance of the above answers. Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 16

  17. We already have a 1 0 measurement of ß - why push further ? o Answers. o (a) We can - we already know how to do these measurements. o If nothing else its ‘a really dumb (?) sanity check’. o (b) The constraints from indirect measurements will also be very stringent. o (c) Although systematics limited, improvements in detector- related systematics will benefit many other other analyses. o (d) It’s a ‘standard candle’ o (I) Comparison with complementary measurements of ß from b → ccd and b → cud. o (2)Comparison with penguin b → sqq modes - a ‘standard candle’ assumes increased importance as precision on penguin ß measurements increases. o There are others which I may have forgotten & opinion may vary as to the relative importance of the above answers. Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 17

  18. We already have a 1 0 measurement of ß - why push further ? o Answers. o (a) We can - we already know how to do these measurements. o If nothing else its ‘a really dumb (?) sanity check’. o (b) The constraints from indirect measurements will also be very stringent. o (c) Although systematics limited, improvements in detector- related systematics will benefit many other other analyses. o (d) It’s a ‘standard candle’ o (I) Comparison with complementary measurements of ß from b → ccd and Taken from Guy b → cud. Wilkinson’s talk at the January 2007 o (2)Comparison with penguin b → sqq modes - a ‘standard candle’ assumes LHCb Upgrade Workshop. increased importance as precision on penguin ß measurements increases. o There are others which I may have forgotten & opinion may vary as to the relative importance of the above answers. Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 18

  19. We already have a 1 0 measurement of ß - why push further ? o Answers. o (a) We can - we already know how to do these measurements. o If nothing else its ‘a really dumb (?) sanity check’. o (b) The constraints from indirect measurements will also be very stringent. o (c) Although systematics limited, improvements in detector- related systematics will benefit many other other analyses. o (d) It’s a ‘standard candle’ o (I) Comparison with complementary measurements of ß from b → ccd and Taken from Guy b → cud. Wilkinson’s talk at the January 2007 o (2)Comparison with penguin b → sqq modes - a ‘standard candle’ assumes LHCb Upgrade increased importance as precision on penguin ß measurements increases. Workshop. o There are others which I may have forgotten & opinion may vary as to the relative SuperB CDR importance of the above answers. Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 19

  20. We already have a 1 0 measurement of ß - why push further ? o Answers. o (a) We can - we already know how to do these measurements. o If nothing else its ‘a really dumb (?) sanity check’. o (b) The constraints from indirect measurements will also be very stringent. o (c) Although systematics limited, improvements in detector- related systematics will benefit many other analyses. o (d) It’s a ‘standard candle’ o (I) Comparison with complementary measurements of ß from b → ccd and b → cud. o (2)Comparison with penguin b → sqq modes - a ‘standard candle’ assumes increased importance as precision on penguin ß measurements increases. o There are others which I may have forgotten & opinion may vary as to the relative importance of the above answers. Katherine George. 5th Super B Workshop. Paris, May 9th -11th 2007. 20

Recommend


More recommend