may we ask for your opinion
play

May we ask for your opinion? HELCOM MORE project Manuel Frias - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

May we ask for your opinion? HELCOM MORE project Manuel Frias MONAS 20/2014 Oslo 8 April 2014 1 Overview of monitoring activities 2 Monitoring and assessment STRATEGY 3 Monitoring manual 2012 2013 2014 2015 HELCOM monitoring data


  1. May we ask for your opinion? HELCOM MORE project Manuel Frias MONAS 20/2014 Oslo 8 April 2014

  2. 1 Overview of monitoring activities 2 Monitoring and assessment STRATEGY 3 Monitoring manual 2012 2013 2014 2015

  3. HELCOM monitoring data David.Asch

  4. Structure Monitoring manual Monitoring and Assessment Strategy Framework General description of HELCOM monitoring Summaries of the monitoring programmes Biodiversity Eutrophication Etc... Programme topics Species Contaminants in Hydrography Hydrochemistry Birds seafood distribution … Technical guidelines (guidelines, methods, QA...) Data and map services Indicator-related assessment products

  5. question

  6. MONAS review of the informaton before posted on-line Information on All Review info monitoring templates received so far available on-line filled-in MORE meeting July April May June 23-24 2 20 30 MORE work plan

  7. Next steps

  8. Coordinated monitoring programme 1 Coordinated monitoring network 2

  9. Coordinated monitoring programme 1 ”To achieve a coherent monitoring and sampling strategy”

  10. ”Review regional coherence and adequacy of spatial/temporal resolution of existing monitoring” 2 nd Ambition level? question Expert judgment? Statistical analysis? Coordinated monitoring programme 1

  11. ”Review, and as required revise, existing monitoring strategies” 3 rd Who could do it? question ”...by MONAS and its experts groups” (according to MORE workplan) Coastal fish - FISH-PRO II Zooplankton - ZEN-QAI Phytoplankton - PEG Coordinated monitoring programme 1

  12. Seals Birds BALSAM Benthic habitats They are analyzing existing monitoring and surveys Non ind. species Coordinated monitoring programme 1

  13. Hazardous Subs. ? Hydrography ? Hydrochemistry ? 4 th Is it necessary to review them? question Who? Coordinated monitoring programme 1

  14. ”Identify needs for collective use of data products from other observation platforms ” EUTRO-OPER project Coordinated monitoring programme 1

  15. ”Develop new monitoring strategies” Coordinated monitoring programme 1

  16. Seals Birds BALSAM Benthic habitats they will develop proposals Non ind. species Coordinated monitoring programme 1

  17. Regional Marine litter Action Plan Noise BIAS project Coordinated monitoring programme 1

  18. Coordinated monitoring network 2 ”Integrate new monitoring requirements in the existing network”

  19. MORE will provide background information i.e. station information BALSAM is developing tools for optimizing research vessels for monitoring activities Coordinated monitoring network 2

  20. Summing up!

  21. Review of monitoring 2nd – 20th June 1 st information before posting on-line Review coherence and adequacy of 2 nd What level? spatial/temporal resolution of monitoring MONAS and its expert Review of existing 3 rd groups? monitoring strategies Should HS, hydrography Review of existing 4 th and hydrochemistry be monitoring strategies reviewed? Who?

  22. Review of monitoring 2nd – 20th June 1 st information before posting on-line Review coherence and adequacy of 2 nd What level? spatial/temporal resolution of monitoring MONAS and its expert Review of existing 3 rd groups? monitoring strategies Should HS, hydrography Review of existing 4 th and hydrochemistry be monitoring strategies reviewed? Who?

  23. Review of monitoring 2nd – 20th June 1 st information before posting on-line Review coherence and adequacy of 2 nd What level? spatial/temporal resolution of monitoring MONAS and its expert Review of existing 3 rd groups? monitoring strategies Should HS, hydrography Review of existing 4 th and hydrochemistry be monitoring strategies reviewed? Who?

  24. Review of monitoring 2nd – 20th June 1 st information before posting on-line Review coherence and adequacy of 2 nd What level? spatial/temporal resolution of monitoring MONAS and its expert Review of existing 3 rd groups? monitoring strategies Should HS, hydrography Review of existing 4 th and hydrochemistry be monitoring strategies reviewed? Who?

  25. Review of monitoring 2nd – 20th June 1 st information before posting on-line Review coherence and adequacy of 2 nd What level? spatial/temporal resolution of monitoring MONAS and its expert Review of existing 3 rd groups? monitoring strategies Should HS, hydrography Review of existing 4 th and hydrochemistry be monitoring strategies reviewed? Who?

Recommend


More recommend