materials mechanical characterization manufacturing
play

Materials, Mechanical Characterization & Manufacturing Overview - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Materials, Mechanical Characterization & Manufacturing Materials, Mechanical Characterization & Manufacturing Overview David R. Veazie, Ph.D. P.E., Professor and Director Southern Polytechnic State University Center for Advanced


  1. Materials, Mechanical Characterization & Manufacturing Materials, Mechanical Characterization & Manufacturing Overview David R. Veazie, Ph.D. P.E., Professor and Director Southern Polytechnic State University Center for Advanced Materials Research and Education - SPSU Materials and Mechanical Testing Laboratories - CAU Test and Evaluation Research Opportunities Workshop July 26 -28, 2012

  2. Outline  Material & Manufacturing Infrastructure  Nanotechnology & Functional Materials  Novel Nanoscale Characterization Equipment  Full-Field Deformation and Structural Characterization AFOSR DURIP – Field Emission SEM   Energetic Materials  Advanced Material Development and Testing  Novel Structural Testing and Implementation Advanced Power & Energy Generation   Computational & Multi-Scale Modeling

  3. Materials & Manufacturing Infrastructure Equipment and Instrumentation – Center of excellence in composite manufacturing – Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope – Axial and axial-torsion servohydraulic test frames – Elevated temperature creep frames (composites) – Ultrasonic NDI and environmental chambers – Melt and capillary rheometry, extrusion and thermal imaging, compression molding, and thermoforming – RTM, VARTM, autoclave, walk-in oven, 30T press – Thermal analysis (TGA, DSC, TMA, DMA) – Chemical analysis (NMR, FT-IR, Raman, Wet Lab) – Microscopy (2 AFM's, TEM, X-Ray Diff) – Vibrational and florescence spectroscopy

  4. Materials & Manufacturing Infrastructure Faculty, Staff and Students (Last 3 Years) – 6 Faculty and 4 Full-Time Staff – 50 Supported Students (Engr. & Chemistry) – 18 Masters Graduates – 5 Ph.D. Graduates and 8 Ph.D. Candidates Productivity (Last 6 Years) – Over 100 Refereed Publications in Journals* – Over 250 Conference Proceedings and Presentations – 3/4 of Publications Co-Authored by Students – 5 National Publication Student Awards – Generated over $4 Million in External Research Funds – Over $2.5 Million in Equipment Purchased – Lab Maintains Upgrades & Calibrations * Some Government and Industry research restricts open literature publications

  5. (AFOSR DURIP) Thermal Field Emission SEM Veazie (FA9550-11-1-0323) - Southern Polytech Dr. David Veazie Dr. Eric Mintz A JOEL JSF-7600F Field Emission SEM was Copper Zinc Tin Sulfide (CZTS) installed in April 2012 at Southern Polytechnic State thin films were prepared by a University. This SEM currently supports several non-vacuum liquid-based coating method enabling fabrication of projects including: Characterization of Nanoparticle high-efficiency, low cost and Reinforced Resins for Readily Processable, High SEM of separated graphene sheets with wrinkling toxicity CZTS solar cell devices. Temperature, Low Density Composites (DoD A particle solution (slurry) was W911NF-12-1-0084) and Characterization of developed using the CZTS Copper Zinc Tin Sulfide (CZTS) for Photovoltaics constituents, varying the range of (NSF 1125775). composition ratios to achieve a stable stoichiometric kesterite Deidra Hodges CZTS crystal structure. SEM of 0.3 wt% graphite/PETI-298, clearly confirming the dispersed graphene. SEM of stoichiometric CZTS confirming the formation of a tetragonal crystal lattice structure.

  6. Novel Materials & Characterization Programs to Support Materials Research for Aerospace Industry • Multiple programs investigating the processing and properties of nano- composites • Self Healing Composites • Develop and characterize advanced composites which exhibit self-repairing properties • Thermal and mechanical analysis of nano-structured thermoset polymers • RTM composite process trials • Georgia Research Alliance Innovation Grants • Develop and deploy technologies that lead to growing state’s economy • LM Aero, AFRL and NASA sponsored developments

  7. Nanotechnology & Functional Materials Objective • Multiple programs investigating the processing and properties of nano- composites 10000000 eta* (P) G' (Pa) 1000000 G'' (Pa) 100000 Property 10000 1000 100 10 1 0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 Time (s)

  8. Novel Nanoscale Characterization Equipment Micro-Nano Test Frame (Patent-Pending) AFM Supporting Plate Exchangeable Sample Load Cell Micro-translator XY translation Stage -Better load cell resolution (0.001 N at full scale) with ultra-fine load stepping (1/1028 revolution) m m -More accurate gripping of thin structures (No sample twisting) -Micro/Nanoscale strain measurement with AFM (Atomic Force Microscope) -Scan length: 100 m m for use with microfabricated reference marks for nano-scale strain measurement -In-situ image monitoring of microstructure (characterize changes due to mechanical and thermal loading such as surface morphology, crack propagation, etc.

  9. Advanced Material Development and Testing Metal Polymer Gap Filler Development -Successes on boot extrusion leads to study of innovative gap filler concept -Developed low cost, flexible and lightweight gap filler to replace conductive caulk -Highly successful IRAD sponsored program transitioned to production qualification -F/A-22 Door Edge Protection potential production supplier

  10. Energetic Materials - AFRL Strain Energy Rearranging Strain Energy Rearranging o Stiff particles in soft matrix Stiff particles in soft matrix o   2 2 1 1 1 1 o Different particle types Different particle types     o       2 U dV E dV or U dV E dV o Particle contact Particle contact o 2 2 2 2 E U V V V V o Particle chains Particle chains o o Particle clustering Particle clustering o Including Interparticle Interparticle Friction Energy Loss Friction Energy Loss Including  2 1   U DMA U E dV DMA   2 U U V DMA Friction 1    U dV Adapted from slide by B. White TMS 2010 DMA 2 V Test Material Test Method 5.0e+6 Preference Volume to Measure DMA Measured Stress DMA Measured Strain DMA Measured Strain 0.052 (mm 3 ) Order Elastic Modulus 4.5e+6 1 *49.1 Miniature SHPB 0.050 2 *175.9 SHPB 4.0e+6 Stress  (Pa) 3 190.0 Ultrasonic and Vibratory Strain (%) 0.048 4 520.2 Dynamic Mechanical Analysis 3.5e+6 5 *2782.9 Impact and Taylor Rod 0.046 3.0e+6 6 3217.6 Compression 7 3242.9 Hardness 0.044 2.5e+6 8 4129.0 Flexure Decreasing Volume Fraction 9 7258.1 Miniature Tension 0.042 Decreasing Volume Fraction 2.0e+6 10 18097.5 Tension ) ) ) ) ) ) ) m m m ) m m m m m ) m ) m m ) m ) m m m m m m m m m m) m m) m m) m m) m m) m m) m m m m   m m  m  m m m U Friction * * U U Friction Energy Tan Particles dF    Friction Friction Particle Damping V F Young's Modulus V 11 DMA Data Particle Friction Energy Average DMA Measured Tangential Compliance -1 10 DMA Friction Model 3.0e-6       Compression Data m     5 3    2 3 2   9 P T 5 T T (Averaged over Particle Volume Fractions, V f )              Tangential Stiffness  T  d  (Pa) E 1  1 1  1 1  1 1  7.0e+5 9 m m m          10 a P 6 P P 1 3          2.5e-6 d T    E (GPa)  1  Friction Energy (N-m) m dT 4 a  N  8 2.0e-6 6.0e+5 7 1.5e-6 5.0e+5 6 1.0e-6  2 1   E dV 5   2 V U U DMA Friction 4.0e+5 Decreasing 5.0e-7 Decreasing Volume Fraction 4 Volume Fraction Decreasing Volume Fraction 0.0 3.0e+5 40% Al (50 m m) 40% Al (5 m m) 40% Al (50 m m) 20% Al (50 m m) 20% Al (5 m m) 20% Al (50 m m) 40% Al (5 m m) 20% Al (5 m m) 40% Al (50 m m) 40% Al (5 m m) 40% Al (50 m m) 20% Al (50 m m) 20% Al (5 m m) 20% Al (50 m m) 10% Ni (44 m m) 10% Ni (44 m m) 10% Ni (44 m m) 10% Ni (44 m m) 40% Al (5 m m) 20% Al (5 m m) ) ) ) ) ) ) 10% Ni (44 m m) 10% Ni (44 m m) 10% Ni (44 m m) 10% Ni (44 m m) ) m m m ) m m m m m m ) m ) m m m ) m ) m m m m m m m m 5 0 m m 5 0 5 0 5 0 5 l ( 5 5 l ( 5 l ( 4 4 A l ( l ( 4 4 A l ( A A l ( A A A l ( A 4 4 4 4 i ( i ( i ( i ( N N % N N % % % % % % % 0 0 0 % % 0 % % 0 0 0 0 4 2 4 4 4 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1

  11. Advanced Power & Energy Generation Micro-Gas Turbine Engine Power MEMS Technology

  12. Computational & Multi-Scale Modeling Objective • Develop multi-scale technology to link molecular scale to structural scale Computational Computational Multi-Scale Model Chemistry Structural Mechanics Composite Polymer Meso-scale Randomness Structural Chemistry Stochastic Response Mechanics Experimental Micro-Level Parameters Modeling

Recommend


More recommend