master 1 iter 2013
play

Master 1 ITER 2013 Master Innovation et Territoire Park(ing) day - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Master 1 ITER 2013 Master Innovation et Territoire Park(ing) day International Event Reflexion about Public Space Playful city Car park council Intimately yours Garden made of boxes Students projects link


  1. Master 1 ITER 2013

  2.  Master « Innovation et Territoire »  Park(ing) day ◦ International Event ◦ Reflexion about Public Space

  3.  Playful city  Car park council  Intimately yours  Garden made of boxes Students ’ projects link

  4. Ville à Je(ux) - Playful city Mihai Andrei Bucur, Céline Crété, Thomas Didier-Vial Juliette Michel, Laëtitia Sommella

  5. Problematic Questionning the dominance of cars in cities. • • Understanding the use of public spaces Public spaces ludification • Lucerne Besançon Démocratie Créative

  6. Problematic Questionning the dominance of cars in cities. • • Understanding the use of public spaces Public spaces ludification • Objectives - Creation of a welcoming playground - Free and low-cost - Questionning the use of public space

  7. The installation  Project Concretisation 

  8. Methodology Qualitative Survey Idea cards

  9. Day’s Mood

  10. Day’s process

  11. Reactions « Nice concept , It’s great to allow people to express theirselves » “For me, the public space is a place where it is hard to be someone, you cross towards a goal without carrying about yourself or « If you can change their mind, others” you will change the world » « The ludic city, I thinks it forms the youth» « It is a nice idea, but it should not remove our parking spot »

  12. Reactions The Public Space? Instead of the parking? Place of transit Bike Parking Playground Open to all For everyone Garden / potager Library Commun space Free Golf course Friendly Street arts Cars Social links Homeless refuge Vegetation Relax zone Expression place

  13. Usable data According to the users, Public space is firstly perceived as … Meeting space Conflict space Transit space Space belonging to all Free space Paradoxal space Ludic space Green space other Survey of 51 peoples

  14. Usable data How the user would design this space ? Swimming pool Parking Friendly relaxing space Artistic space Ludic space Green space other Survey of 51 peoples

  15. If we had to re do it ? Establishment location map

  16. If we had to redo it ? To improve diagnosis of the aera visibility of the park Experience limits parking perceived as inadequate but adaptable rythm of the passers

  17. Balance of the day Response to the objectives  Welcoming playground  Free and low-cost  Questioning the use of public space What we have learned ? Perceived as meeting place and transit Consultation with users Users want art, vegetation and relaxation Ephemeral installations Accessible to all

  18. Proposition

  19. Proposition • Utilization of a street once a month to install a playground – game table, table football, basketball ... • objectives: – enjoy Sunday and decreased circulation to gave back the space to the users – Intergenerational – create a free event • advantages: – lightweight and low cost structure – not too disturbing traffic – potential partnership with the “ Maison des jeux ”.

  20. Sources Pictures : Mihai Andrei Bucur, Céline Crété, Thomas Didier-Vial, Juliette Michel, Laëtitia Sommella Google maps Démocratie Créative http://www.democratiecreative.com/ Park(ing) day http://parkingday.org/resources/ Mairie de Besançon http://www.besancon.fr/ Mairie de Lucerne http://www.luzern.com/fr/index.cfm Movie : Mihai Andrei Bucur Music : So Easy -Royksopp

  21. Thank you for your attention

  22. Mairie des parkings

  23. Intimement vôtre

  24. Garden made of boxes How to re-use the street? Marina GIMENO Nora BECK Antoine BESSIN Paul MARIN Pierre-Alexandre METRAL

  25. Introduction  From a car park to a friendly green space  Creating an exchange about “public area” and “citizenship” concepts  “Place Vaucanson ” managed by VINCI Action legitimized by using our partener’s parking space Cité Lib’

  26. How to re-use the street?  Description of our stand  Living room area

  27. How to re-use the street?  Description of our stand  Living room area  Green area

  28. How to re-use the street?  Description of our stand  Living room area  Green area  Visibility, connected elements C l i c k o n t h e p i c t u r e t o w a t c h t h e v i d e o

  29. How to re-use the street?  Description of our stand  Living room area  Green area  Visibility, connected elements C l i c k o n t h e p i c t u r e t o w a t c h t h e v i d e o  Montage and re-using

  30. How to re-use the street?  Description of our stand  Living room area  Green area  Visibility, connected elements  Montage and re-using => Re-appropriation of the car park

  31. How to re-use the street?  Methodology:  Qualitative survey -Do you like this place? Why? - What does … : - a car park - the public space - the public areas …mean to you? -Do you spend time in public space ? What for? -What do you think about naturalized areas in the city? -What do you know about urban agriculture? -How would you personalize a car park? -What does it mean to be a citizen?

  32. How to re-use the street?  Methodology:  Qualitative survey  Creating a dialogue  Observation/photos

  33. How to re-use the street?  Methodology:  Qualitative survey  Creating a dialogue  Observation/photos  People’s reactions  Anecdotes  Synthesis

  34. Meeting Pollution Racism Social link Bench Prohibitions Free/Costly Exchange Rules Expressions Cars NATURE Urban Privatization “The incredible agriculture Traffic-jam edible” Fear roofs Diverting « public space » « Maybe if there were more benches , that would create more interactions » « Car parks are « Public areas lead to the privatization of racketeering ! » the global public space » « The city is made to live in » « OXYGENE! » « Car park is a hyperfunctional area which reduces public space»

  35. Critics  Experiment interests  Experimental data H, H’ = Hypothesis THEORY H’ (reading grid) H Law INDUCTION EXPERTISE (generalization) (diagnosis) PHENOMENONS “the reality”

  36. Critics  Experiment interests  Experimental data  Political aspect

  37. Critics  Experiment interests  Experimental data  Political aspect  Experimental limits  The investigators’ subjectivity  Space saturation  Lack of debate

  38. If we had to re-do it?  Which improvements?  Workshops to make the people actors  Being less present on the stand/make the people discovering it themselves  Another technique to involve reserved people  What worked well  Visibility  Creating a ground border (inside/outisde)  The living-room / The green area

  39. Sustainable project  Project  Creation of the “Green Urban Saloon”  Maintenance by citizen sponsorship  Development of a micro-vegetable-garden  Kit / Dimension: 1,90m x 5m  Application field: Public area, events  Objectives  Re-discovering of social links by practices  Making the public areas attractive and interactive  Re-creating the link of human and Nature

  40. La cité des territoires (our University) A Nicaraguayen farm The incridable edible

  41. The Green Urban Saloon

  42. Pla layfu yful l cit ity (Parenthè enthèse se) ) Intim imatel tely y yours Gr Green Ur Urban Sa Salo loon Contact : masteriter1@gmail.com

Recommend


More recommend