maryland s sim state health
play

Marylands SIM State Health Innovation Plan Version 1.0 Population - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Marylands SIM State Health Innovation Plan Version 1.0 Population Health Improvement at All Levels of Health Need B super Hot Spotting Deploying utilizers A effective complementary community-based supports Secondary


  1. Maryland’s SIM State Health Innovation Plan Version 1.0

  2. Population Health Improvement at All Levels of Health Need B super “Hot Spotting” – Deploying utilizers A effective complementary community-based supports Secondary Prevention that “wrap around” the chronically ill and Effective Care primary care medical Coordination – Aim for & at risk of home; patient assessment 80% PCP participation in determines range of becoming medical home (currently services offered at 50%)--including a new super utilizer state-certified PCMH--to cover 80% of C Marylanders. Enhanced chronically ill but community-based Promoting and Maintaining preventive interventions under control Health through the Built in collaboration with Environment, Structured PCMH Choice & Effective Primary Prevention – Aim for 80% uptake of USPSTF grade A/B preventive services. Make the healthy healthy choice the easy choice by creating defaults through effective town planning and other behavioral economic 6 Million Marylanders 2 approaches.

  3. Community-Integrated Medical Home Care Manager Primary Care Community Health Community Local Health Departments Team Leader & Primary Care Physicians Community Community Organizations Nurse Practitioners Health Social Services Workers Allied Health Professionals Hospitals Community Pharmacists Other providers Shared data 3

  4. Community-Integrated Medical Home B A Care Manager Primary Care Community Health Community Local Health Departments Team Leader & Primary Care Physicians Community Community Organizations Nurse Practitioners Health Social Services Workers Allied Health Professionals Hospitals Community Pharmacists Other providers Shared data 4

  5. Community-Clinical Linkages to Advance Delivery and Payment Reform Cost savings  shared savings The Cost Continuum $ $$$ $$$$$ Inpatient/Acute Outpatient Community Settings Settings Settings  shared savings potential  upstream care 5

  6. The Value Proposition 1 : Savings that payers and clinical providers would have shared without a community- integrated intervention – “actuarial baseline” 2 : Additional cost savings 1 4 made possible through community-integrated 3 intervention 3: Total savings available to 2 share as result of community- integration 4 : Total savings to the health care system The value proposition: #3 > #1 and intervention cost < #2 6

  7. Community-Integrated Medical Home B A Care Manager Primary Care Community Health Community Local Health Departments Team Leader & Primary Care Physicians Community Community Organizations Nurse Practitioners Health Social Services Workers Allied Health Professionals Hospitals Community Pharmacists Other providers Shared data 7

  8. Community-Integrated Medical Home B A Care Manager Primary Care Community Health Community Local Health Departments Team Leader & Primary Care Physicians Community Community Organizations Nurse Practitioners Health Social Services Workers Allied Health Professionals Hospitals Community Pharmacists Other providers Shared data 8

  9. A 80% PCP & All-Payer Participation in PCMH Flexibility Standardized/Centralized • Multiple Entry Points/Inclusion Criteria • Performance reporting and bonuses • CIMH Core Measures Set with minimum shared standards • Provider performance reports based on entire • State-Certified PCMHs patient panel • Carrier-specific PCMHs • PCP receipt of bonus based on performance across • Multi-Payer PCMHs practices within an LHIC • Minimum standards for payers (including • Medicare ACOs State Health Plan), to include: • FQHCs • PCPs can participate in multiple PCMH programs • Medicaid Health Homes • Patient attribution results shared with public utility • Provider Contracting & Payment • Data sharing for care coordination and reporting • Payment methodology, amount, • Integrated evaluation of all PCMH models to learn from variation and frequency • Minimum standards for participating • Bonus amounts practices, to include: • Patient Attribution Methodology (rests • Enhanced access to care and care continuity with payer on the basis of claims) • Data sharing for care coordination and reporting • Care manager: office- and/or community- • Collaboration with community-health professionals • Metrics: core set consistently defined based • Integrated evaluation of all PCMH models to learn from variation • Roles and responsibilities of care manager and community health professionals 9

  10. Reporting Requirements: CIMH Core A Measure Set • Minimum measure set upon which CIMH performance (and performance bonuses) are based • Criteria for Selection • Widely used in multiple national and statewide programs to reduce administrative burden and facilitate state-federal alignment • Medicare ACO • Meaningful Use • Million Hearts • CHIPRA • Health Choice • HEDIS/UDS • Maryland PCMH initiatives • Endorsed by national consensus organization (e.g. NCQA, NQF) • Linked to evidence tying metrics to improvements in health outcomes and lower cost, particularly for those conditions that carry highest mortality and morbidity in Maryland 10

  11. A CIMH Core Measure Set: Adults Use of Imaging for Low Back Pain utilization Preventable Hospitalizations – AHRQ PQI Composite Measure Body Mass Index (BMI) Screening and Follow-Up Influenza Immunization Pneumococcal Vaccination for Patients 65 Years and Older screening & prevention Breast Cancer Screening Colorectal Cancer Screening Tobacco Use Assessment & Tobacco Cessation Intervention Coronary Artery Disease Composite: ACE Inhibitor or ARB Therapy - Diabetes or Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Coronary Artery Disease: Oral Antiplatelet Therapy Prescribed for Patients with CAD cardiovascular Coronary Artery Disease Composite: Lipid Control conditions Heart Failure: ACE Inhibitor or ARB Therapy for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction Heart Failure: Beta-Blocker Therapy for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction ischemic vascular Ischemic Vascular Disease: Use of Aspirin or Another Antithrombotic disease Ischemic Vascular Disease: Complete Lipid Panel and LDL Control Diabetes: Eye Exam Diabetes: Foot Exam diabetes Diabetes: Blood Pressure Management Diabetes: LDL Management Diabetes: HbA1c Control hypertension Hypertension: Controlling High Blood Pressure asthma Use of Appropriate Medications for People with Asthma Antidepressant Medication Management mental health and Screening for Clinical Depression and Follow-Up Plan substance abuse Initiation and engagement of alcohol and other drug dependence treatment 11

  12. A CIMH Core Measure Set: Children Appropriate Treatment of Children with Upper Respiratory Infection (URI) Utilization Preventable Hospitalizations: AHRQ PDI Appropriate Testing for Children with Pharyngitis Weight Assessment and Counseling for Nutrition and Physical Activity for Children/Adolescents Childhood Immunization Status prevention and screening 6+ Well Child Visits, 0-15 months Preventive Care & Screening: Tobacco Use Assessment Preventive Care & Screening: Tobacco Cessation Intervention Asthma Assessment asthma Use of Appropriate Medications for People with Asthma mental health ADHD: Follow-up Care for Children Prescribed ADHD Medication 12

  13. Reporting Requirements: Performance A Reports and Bonuses • Performance reports will be provided by the Public Utility to participating PCMHs at the practice and individual physician levels on a quarterly basis NQF #18 denominator numerator Blood Pressure BP <140/90 HTN patients Control 40 20 50% Practice/ 40 30 PCMH 75% 50% 60 20 33% 140 70 13

  14. Reporting Requirements: Performance A Reports and Bonuses • Performance information will be provided for the entire patient population as well as disaggregated by payer 150 NQF #18 denominator numerator 100 Blood 50% 50% 42% 67% Pressure BP <140/90 HTN patients Control 50 140 70 0 total payer 1 payer 2 payer 3 14

  15. Reporting Requirements: Performance A Reports and Bonuses Example : target = >50% of hypertensives in LHIC have • Practices will be eligible for BP <140/90 annual performance bonuses based on some blend of practice-level performance Scenario 1 25% 50% 17% 8% and their collective performance at the LHIC level over time, to support community-wide health improvement and to improve LHIC PCMH 1 PCMH 2 PCMH 3 sample sizes • Practices will be assigned to an LHIC based on zip code Scenario 2 50% 42% 50% 67% • Bonus amounts will be set by the payer and can be provided upfront with the possibility of take-back for unsatisfactory LHIC PCMH 1 PCMH 2 PCMH 3 performance 15 $$ $$ $$

  16. A Minimum Standards for Payers • PCPs can participate in multiple PCMH programs: exclusivity provisions will no longer be allowed • Patient attribution results shared with public utility so that all patients can be accounted for; however, patient attribution methodology need not be shared • Data sharing for care coordination and reporting (e.g. provision of claims to all- payer claims database) • Participation in integrated evaluation of all PCMH models to learn from variation 16

Recommend


More recommend