manabu hashimoto and yo fukushima dpri kyoto university
play

Manabu Hashimoto and Yo Fukushima, (DPRI, Kyoto University) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Manabu Hashimoto and Yo Fukushima, (DPRI, Kyoto University) Acknowledgments PALSAR level 1.0 data are shared among PIXEL (coordinator: Dr. Taku Ozawa), Earthquake WG (Geographical Survey Inst.) and provided from JAXA under cooperative research


  1. Manabu Hashimoto and Yo Fukushima, (DPRI, Kyoto University)

  2. Acknowledgments � PALSAR level 1.0 data are shared among PIXEL (coordinator: Dr. Taku Ozawa), Earthquake WG (Geographical Survey Inst.) and provided from JAXA under cooperative research contract with ERI, Univ. Tokyo. � The ownership of PALSAR data belongs to METI (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) and JAXA.

  3. Motivation � Examples of InSAR time series anayses � Ground subsidence � Creep along active faults � Volcanic deformation � Frontier � Secular deformation in subduction zones � One example with ERS ← low spatial density � Long wave ‐ length ~ orbital error � Small deformation

  4. InSAR Analyses of ALOS/PALSAR Data in Kii Peninsula and Shikoku � Large deformation due to the subduction of the PHL plate � Strike of island arc perpendicular to path of ALOS � Gradient of deformation is parallel to the path � InSAR and stacking of data from May, 2006 to July, 2008

  5. Synthetic Interferogram from GEONET Velocities (Ascending Path)

  6. Synthetic Interferogram from GEONET Velocities (Descending Path)

  7. Shikoku Area (Path 417) � 19 acquisitions during 2006~2008 � Pt. Muroto ~ Okayama

  8. 16~8 11 12~4 15 9 10 5 6 21 7 25 8 20 19 24 2 22 23 1 3,4

  9. Selected Interferograms w.r.t. 2008/07/18 No Coherence in Mountains

  10. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Orbit Error/ Ionosphere? 9 10 11 12 Fringes proportional to topography

  11. 13 14 15 16 Gravity wave? 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Orbit Error/ Ionospheere?

  12. Unwrapped Interferograms � Branch ‐ cut � Deformation profile using grdtrack in GMT

  13. ③ ④ ⑥ ⑨ ⑦ ⑧ ⑩ ⑪ ⑫ ⑬ Processed with Branch ‐ cut Red line indicates the sampling line .

  14. Stacked Interferogram s � With Stacking in Gamma � Stacking of 15 interferograms � More than 5 obs. at each pixel � Larger than GPS

  15. SAR Acquisition: Path 414

  16. Interferograms along path 414

  17. Summary � Bperp < 500m is necessary � <300m is good for mountains � >300m causes unwrapping problems � Fraction of residue < 1% for smooth unwrapping � >500m is no use in mountains � Disturbances in interferograms with small Bperp � Bad orbits or large ionospheric effect on 2006/08/28 and 2009/07/21 acquistion � Short spatial baseline with long temporal baseline � Spatial pattern of stacked interferogram � Fair(?) agreement with GPS � A bit larger than GPS

  18. Can Time Series Analyses Be Applied to ALOS/PALSAR Data? � So far it is not easy! � Problems � Accuracy of orbit � Fringes due to orbit error � Difficulty in unwrapping � Irregular Recurrence � Accumulation of interferograms with long B temp � Tropospheric/ionospheric disturbances � Fringe proportional to topography � Irregular fringes

Recommend


More recommend