Organised by: Co-Sponsored: Malaysian Healthy Ageing Society
Chew Boon How 1* MMed (FamMed) , Sazlina Shariff-Ghazali 1 MMed (FamMed) , Zaiton Ahmad 1 MMed (FamMed) , Mastura Ismail 2 MMed (FamMed) , Jamaiyah Haniff 3 (MPH) , Mustapha Feisul Idzwan 4 (MPH) , Mohd Adam Bujang 3 (Bsc Statistic) 1 Department of Family Medicine, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 2 Klinik Kesihatan Seremban 2, Negeri Sembilan, 3 Clinical Research Centre, Hospital Kuala Lumpur, 4 Disease Control Division, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Putrajaya.
Age has long been recognised as a significant factor for health. 1 2 Many cardiovascular disease risk scoring systems give larger weightage or marks for the older age groups. 1. de Craen AJ et al. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 2009;40(6):237-43. 2. Jaakko T. Cardiovascular Risk Through The Ages, Proceedings of the Future Forum Conference held in Noordwijk, The Netherlands, October 2003 2004;5(2):9-17.
Children of long-living parents, suggesting that they had advantageous cardiovascular risk profiles (the Leiden research program on ageing and Framingham offspring study.) 1 6 The association of ageing and many cardiometabolic diseases were degenerative processes leading to cellular apoptosis beyond regeneration or repairs. 5 1. de Craen AJ et al. Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 2009;40(6):237-43. 5. Navarro A et al. American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology 2007;292(2):C670-C86. 6. Terry DF et al. Archives of Internal Medicine 2007;167(5):438-44.
Cardiometabolic diseases cause premature ageing and death. 7 Vascular ageing and remodelling 9 Many studies had reported positive relationship of disease control (glycaemic, blood pressure and lipid) in T2D and diabetes-related complications and death, but the evidence was inconclusive and even against intensive control in the older group of patients. 8 7. Girndt M et al. Biomarkers of Ageing: from Molecular Biology to Clinical Perspectives 2010;45(10):797-800. 8. Huang ES et al. Diabetes Care 2011;34(6):1329-36. 9. Bachschmid MM et al. Annals of Medicine 2012:1-20.
We examined the independent effect of age ≥ 60 years on disease control and its relationship with diabetes-related complications.
Adult Diabetes Control and Management ( ) public health centres (289 health clinics, hospitals) patients ( patients were from hospital) health clinics hospitals (8 states and 2 federal territories) of 15 states and federal territories in Malaysia. 8
The proportion of T2D patients notified in this database as compared to the estimated total T2D patients in these states and federal territories was . Only adult patients ( ). All patients were of the on-going registry and given the opportunity to . Participation in ADCM was non-mandatory for patients and health centres. 9
Registrations at local centers were generally performed by trained physicians, assistant physicians and nurses. , developed and maintained by Clinical Research Centre (CRC), Ministry of Health, Malaysia. 10
The was as when their case record fulfilled all these criteria: (i) either or (ii) those whose current . 14
Comparisons were performed regarding mean levels by use of the Student’s t test for unpaired samples and regarding proportions by use of the Chi square test/Fisher Exact’s Test. as dependent variables and with indentified significant registered variables as mentioned above as independent variables. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be significant 15
Result was female. Malay consisted of , Chinese and Indian .
≥ 60 years, n (%) χ 2 or t Statistic < 60 years, n (%) p Age , mean (SD) 50.22 (7.19) 68.12 (6.54) 343.50 <0.0001 Gender Male 15150 (39.0) 13789 (43.0) Female 23584 (60.8) 18257 (56.9) 112.76 <0.0001 Missing 66 (0.2) 43(0.1) Total 38800 (100.0) (54.7)* 32089 (100.0) (45.3)* Ethnicity Malay 25942 (66.9) 17960 (56.0) Chinese 4823 (12.4) 8628 (26.9) Indian 7555 (19.5) 5184 (16.2) 2397.60 <0.0001 Other Malaysians 351 (0.9) 237 (0.7) Foreigner 65 (0.2) 23 (0.1) Missing 64 (0.2) 57 (0.2) Total 38800 (100.0) (54.7)* 32089 (100.0) (45.3)* Diabetes Duration in year, mean (SD) 4.84 (4.53) 7.12 (6.39) 49.81 <0.0001 <5 18467 (47.6) 10717 (33.4) 5-9 9618 (24.8) 8896 (27.7) 2077.02 <0.0001 >=10 3693 (9.5) 6071 (18.9) Missing 7022 (18.1) 6405 (20.0) Total 38800 (100.0) (54.7)* 32089 (100.0) (45.3)*
≥ 60 years, n (%) χ 2 or t Statistic < 60 years, n (%) p BMI , mean (SD) 28.22 (5.69) 26.10 (6.07) -41.74 <0.0001 BMI < 23 12629 (32.5) 14072 (43.9) 955.88 <0.0001 BMI ≥ 23 26171 (67.5) 18017 (56.1) Total 38800 (100.0) (54.7)* 32089 (100.0) (45.3)* Systolic BP , mean (SD) 134.21 (18.46) 139.86 (20.35) 34.57 <0.0001 Diastolic BP , mean (SD) 80.36 (10.23) 76.78 (10.81) -40.38 <0.0001 BP ≥ 130/80 mmHg 23544 (75.2) 19679 (78.2) 70.60 <0.0001 BP < 130/80 mmHg 7784 (24.8) 5496 (21.8) Total 31328 (100.0) (55.4)* 25175 (100.0) (44.6)* HbA1c , mean (SD) 8.68 (2.28) 7.94 (2.02) -32.85 <0.0001 HbA1c ≥ 6.5% 17487 (85.5) 13022 (77.4) 410.04 <0.0001 HbA1c < 6.5% 2956 (14.5) 3798 (22.6) Total 20443 (100.0) (54.9)* 16820 (100.0) (45.1)* LDL-C , mean (SD) 3.24 (1.11) 3.12 (1.08) -11.10 <0.0001 LDL-C> 2.6 15462 (71.5) 11337 (65.8) 75.54 <0.0001 LDL- C≤ 2.6 6164 (28.5) 5885 (34.2) Total 21626 (100.0) (55.7)* 17222 (100.0) (44.3)* HDL-C , mean (SD) 1.28 (0.52) 1.32 (0.52) 7.05 <0.0001 HDL-C< 1.1 7527 (34.4) 5258 (30.2) 99.98 <0.0001 HDL- C≥ 1.1 14348 (65.6) 12144 (69.8) Total 21875 (100.0) (55.7)* 17402 (100.0) (44.3)* TG , mean (SD) 2.02 (1.33) 1.83 (1.12) -15.90 <0.0001 TG> 1.7 11940 (47.0) 8380 (41.2) 151.55 <0.0001 TG≤ 1.7 13461 (53.0) 11936 (58.8) Total 25401 (100.0) (55.6)* 20316 (100.0) (44.4)*
95% C.I. for OR Nagelkerke B SE Wald df p value OR* R 2 Lower Upper HbA1c ≤ 6.5% (1), n= 37263 ≥ 60 years 0.58 0.03 420.97 1 <0.0001 1.79 1.70 1.90 0.04 Blood Pressure < 130/80 mmHg (1), n= 56503 -0.24 0.02 126.41 1 <0.0001 0.76 0.82 ≥ 60 years 0.80 0.02 LDL- C ≤ 2.6 mmol/L (1), n= 38848 0.14 0.02 37.74 1 <0.0001 1.15 1.10 1.21 ≥ 60 years 0.03 HDL- C ≥ 1.1 mmol/L (1), n= 39277 0.19 0.02 64.60 1 <0.0001 1.21 1.15 1.26 ≥ 60 years 0.08 TG ≤ 1.7 mmol/L (1), n= 45717 0.18 0.02 83.56 1 <0.0001 1.20 1.15 1.25 ≥ 60 years 0.02
95% C.I. for OR Nagelker B SE Wald df p value OR* ke R 2 Lower Upper Any Diabetes Complications (1), n= 53393 ≥ 60 years 0.30 0.02 162.33 1 <0.0001 1.35 1.29 1.41 0.10 Macrovascular Complications (stroke or IHD) (1), n= 53393 ≥ 60 years 0.66 0.04 233.57 1 <0.0001 1.94 1.78 2.11 0.16 Stroke (1), n= 41421 ≥ 60 0.58 0.09 39.99 1 <0.0001 1.79 1.49 2.14 0.12 years IHD (1), n= 38768 ≥ 60 0.68 0.05 197.84 1 <0.0001 1.97 1.79 2.16 0.18 years
95% C.I. for OR Nagelker B SE Wald df p value OR* ke R 2 Lower Upper Microvascular Complications (retinopathy or nephropathy or foot problem) (1), n= 53393 ≥ 60 years 0.20 0.03 62.92 1 <0.0001 1.22 1.16 1.28 0.08 Retinopathy (1), n= 32663 ≥ 60 0.32 0.04 63.20 1 <0.0001 1.38 1.27 1.49 0.09 years Nephropathy (1), n= 39161 ≥ 60 0.11 0.03 11.41 1 0.001 1.12 1.05 1.19 0.10 years Diabetes Foot Problems (1), n= 42755 ≥ 60 0.26 0.04 35.27 1 <0.0001 1.30 1.19 1.41 0.04 years
Discussion- Risk Control & Age The proportion of our older patients achieving HbA1c and LDL-C targets were comparable to the Asian countries (Hong Kong, India, Korea, Philippines, Singapore, Taiwan, and Thailand) in the (Joint Asia Diabetes Evaluation) program (35.3% achieved HbA1c < 7% and 34% achieved LDL-C < 2.6 mmol/L). 26 26. So W-Y et al. Journal of Diabetes 2011;3(2):109-18.
Discussion- Age & Risk The attenuated association between cardiometabolic risk markers and older people was also reported in United States and these Asian countries. 25 26 Inverse relationship of glycaemic control (HbA1c ≤ 7.5%) and age among the T2D patients was also reported in a primary care setting in UK. 27 25. Janssen I. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2009;19(3):163-69. 26. So W-Y et al. Journal of Diabetes 2011;3(2):109-18. 27. Nagrebetsky A et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract . 2012 Jan 17.
Discussion-Risk & Complication Despite good control of most cardiovascular risk factors, the elderly patients with T2D were still suffering from all types of diabetes complications. Improving diseases control and increasing complications were observed in French elderly T2D. 30 In a 15-years follow-up Chinese Multi-provincial study, diabetes and older age (≥ 45 years) were predictors of coronary heart disease and ischaemic stroke despite well controlled LDL-C. 31 30. Pornet C et al. Diabetes Metab 2011;37(2):152-61. 31. Liu J et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2012 Jan 11. [Epub ahead of print]
Limitations Missing data/unknown status for many complications Representativeness Not generalizable to east Malaysia Could not ascertain the sequence of events between onset of the diabetes-related complications and diseases control Unobservable confounders may still exist and bias the results as evidenced by the modest effect of the models
Recommend
More recommend