magseis asa q4 2016
play

Magseis ASA Q4 2016 24 February 2017 Highlights Strong - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Magseis ASA Q4 2016 24 February 2017 Highlights Strong financial performance, Revenue of USD 20m and EBITDA of USD 5.5m Best quarter to date Very good technical performance in the Red Sea, completion mid -April 4D monitoring


  1. Magseis ASA Q4 2016 24 February 2017

  2. Highlights • Strong financial performance, Revenue of USD 20m and EBITDA of USD 5.5m Best quarter to date • Very good technical performance in the Red Sea, completion mid -April • 4D monitoring survey, three months duration, 3000 nodes, multi year option New contract won for ConocoPhillips • First Smart Operation, mobile handling system, no Magseis operated vessels • More than USD 600m of contracts already awarded for 2017 Marked increase • Several large projects announced/in pipeline for 2018 in tender activity • Need for new capacity to capture growth opportunities Accellerating growth plans • Appointment of financial advisors to evaluate financing options 2

  3. S Q4 4 2016 KEY F FIGURES 016 58.9 $ MILLION REVENUE 20.0 EBITDA 5.5 20.0 8.5 $ MILLION $ MILLION 5.5 NET INCOME 0.1 CASH BALANCE 19.0 REVENUE EBITDA REVENUE EBITDA Q4 Q4 YTD YTD 2016 2016 2016 2016 $ MILLION $ MILLION 3 Source: Magseis

  4. Fourth quarter 2016 results - Key figures • Solid underlying operational performance during Q4 (adjusted EBITDA of USD 8.5m) • USD 1.2m in capitalised mobilisation costs amortised • USD 2.2m in late start compensation included in COGS Net loss for FY 2016 significantly impacted by • • Impairment of USD 7.4m (G1 to G2 conversion) • Late start compensation • Low rates on Bokor project + long mobilisation for Red Sea • Closing cash position of USD 19.0m and robust Equity ratio • Net cash position of USD 2.7m • Strong cash flow from operations during Q4 • Negative FY 2016 cash flow from operations reflects extraordinary low receivables at YE 2015 • Expected EBITDA for 2017 of > USD 20 million based on current run-rate 4 Source: Magseis

  5. OBS provides superior image quality - gaining market share over high-end streamer seismic Streamer Seismic Ocean Bottom Seismic (OBS) 90%↓ 10%↑ Market share Market share 5

  6. Marine Autonomous Seismic System Miniaturised Handling system Applications node sensors Cable deployment ROV deployment Ultra deep water deployment 6

  7. Larger spread driving substantial cost reductions 2018 2015 2014 2016 >600km 150km 75km 350km Cable length Large spreads - 25K rolling operations Multiple patch deployment 100K $ per.km² $ per. km² 7 Source: Magseis

  8. Established as a leading OBS provider Proven track record Solid customer base Ongoing projects • Completed >1,300 aq.km 2 • Saudi Aramco’s S-78 project • More than 130,000 in the Red Sea nodes deployed • • Excellent reputation for Preparing for 4D survey for high quality data ConocoPhillips in North Sea • Strong QHSE culture 8 Source: Magseis

  9. Aramco Red Sea project Operational highlights • 9 months survey together with BGP for Saudi Aramco • Second survey in the Middle East • Complex survey design • Rolling spread across very challenging seabed conditions • Record amount of cable in operation (350 km) • Long-life node electronics introduced • Excellent cooperation with BGP and Aramco 9 Source: Magseis

  10. ConocoPhillips North Sea project MASS modular solution Contract highlights • 4D, full-azimuth survey over Eldfisk field • ROV and source vessels operated by ConocoPhillips • Magseis provides crew, nodes and handling • Potential for repeat work High capacity, mobile ROV operation • Unlimited capacity of nodes • Modular handling system • Very strong interest from clients • Smart operations 10 Source: Magseis

  11. Strong market outlook $ MILLION 2 250 2 000 USD 1 575 >600m 1 500 OBS 1 250 MARKET 1 000 750 500 250 0 2005 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 11 Source: Magseis/Arkwright/RystadEnergy

  12. Growth strategy - Towards $25K/km² No observed OBS survey Historical OBS surveys • Key Goals – Expand use of OBS through reducing costs > 50% • Business model: – Operate large equipment spreads COMPLEXITY – Share pool of nodes across platforms – Build a flexible OPEX base • By 2020: Reduced costs and – Node pool of >30,000 nodes maturity of technology – 2-3 high capacity cable vessels – 2-3 modular ROV/Node Deployer systems FIELD SIZE (mmboe) 12 Source: Magseis/Rystad Energy

  13. Attractive economics for new, high-capacity vessel Efficiency Economics Current crew Cable vessel #2 Current crew Cable vessel #2 70 45 Cable length 150km 400km >30 30 Sensors 3,000 8,000 # of days 130 85 Efficiency 1.0 1.6 EBITDA contribution 1 CAPEX 1) Based on 2017 EBITDA guidance for current crew less 2016 SG&A 13 Source: Magseis

  14. Summary & Outlook • Strong operational and financial performance • Second crew will start operations June 2017 • Tender activity accelerating • Engaged advisors to secure growth financing 14

  15. Excellent operational performance Strong financial results Larger spread driving cost reductions Strong market outlook 2 250 Cable length 2 000 2015 2016 2018 2014 1 575 350km 75km 150km >600km 1 500 1 250 1 000 750 500 250 $ 100K $ 25K 0 per.km² per.km² 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2005 15

  16. Revenue • Fourth quarter 2016 results • USD 20.0m from production on the Aramco S-78 project - Comprehensive income Cost of sales • • Reflects full production in the quarter Q4 2016 YTD 2016 Q4 2015 YTD 2015 In USD thousands (unaudited) (unaudited) (unaudited) (audited) • Capitalised costs amortised based on expected duration of pilot of USD 1.2m • Late start compensation of USD 2.2m • Research and development • Capitalised all expenses related to the Deep water R&D project (USD 0.2m) and development of MASS III Depreciation • • Capitalised Depreciation from mobilisation amortised based on expected duration of pilot survey (USD 0.4m) Amortisation and Impairment • • USD 0.4m mainly related to improvement needed on nodes damaged during Red Sea survey Finance • • Primarily interest related to BGP pre -funding, GIEK and Innovation Norway Tax • • Relates to withholding tax and corporate in Saudi Arabia and corporate tax in Singapore and Malaysia 16

  17. Fourth quarter 2016 results - Balance sheet at 31 December • Trade receivables primarily Aramco • December production (paid in 2017) YE 2016 YE 2015 In USD thousands (unaudited) (audited) • Other current assets: • Primarily capitalised mobilisation costs • Equity ratio of 56.6% • Debt covenants at 30% • Non-current liabilities • Senior debt drawn down from Export Credit Norway and Innovation Norway • Shell Deep Water R&D funding: USD 6.2m (contingent liability) • Current tax liabilities – Withholding tax and corporate tax Saudi Arabia – Corporate tax in Singapore and Malaysia • Other current liabilities – Short-term debt BGP USD 5.2m – Current portion of long-term debt USD 2.6m – Accruals for vessel operational costs USD 5.4m 17

  18. Fourth quarter 2016 results - Cash flow • Cash flow from operations Q4 2016 YTD 2016 Q4 2015 YTD 2015 In USD thousands • Variance from EBITDA resulting from: (unaudited) (unaudited) (unaudited) (audited) • Favourable payment terms on receipts in Q4’16 • (less) 10% withheld & accrued compensations • Non-cash costs in OPEX (amortised transit costs & provisions) • (less) reduced AP creditor position • Cash from investments • Relates to investments for the Node Deepwater project • Cash flow from financing • Instalments of USD 3.8m • Financing from Shell under Deepwater R&D agreement of USD 1.5m 18

Recommend


More recommend