magnetic fields
play

Magnetic Fields Wei Pan Sandia National Labs Sandia is a - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Quantum Hall Effect in Vanishing Magnetic Fields Wei Pan Sandia National Labs Sandia is a multi-mission laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energys National Nuclear Sandia


  1. Quantum Hall Effect in Vanishing Magnetic Fields Wei Pan Sandia National Labs Sandia is a multi-mission laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a Lockheed Martin Company, for the United States Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Security Administration under contract DE-AC04-94AL85000. Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration under contract DE -AC04-94AL85000. SAND NO. 2011-XXXXP

  2. Part I: Anti-levitation of Landau levels in vanishing magnetic fields (Pan et al, PRB (2016)) Part II: Collapse of spin splitting in the quantum Hall regime (Pan et al, PRB (2011))

  3. part I outline • Background • Sample – HIGFET ( H eterojunction I nsulated- G ate F ield- E ffect T ransistor) • Results – Anti-levitation is observed at low Landau level fillings n =4,5,6 . – This observation is in good agreement with a recent theoretical prediction (C. Wang et al, PRB 89 , 045314 (2014)).

  4. B = 0 dN  E d  ħ w c B  0 E = ( N +1/2) ħ w c E

  5. Integer quantum Hall effect R xy quantized h R xy = n e 2 R xx zero n – Landau level filling n = nh/eB (n density)

  6. So ugly and yet so precise So ugly and yet so precise Resistance quantized to a few parts in 10 9 Resistance quantized to a few parts in 10 8

  7. (source: www.nobelprize.org)

  8. C m =1 1 1 (by Kwon Park)

  9. Chern number never disappears by itself E = ( N +1/2) ħ w c 0

  10. Floating of Landau levels in vanishing B field E (or electron density) Laughlin, PRL 52, 2304 (1984). Khmelnitskii, Phys. Lett. A 106, 182 (1984).

  11. Glozman, Johnson, and Jiang PRL 74, 594 (1995)

  12. arXiv:1602.08198

  13. Only insulator to N = 1 transition allowed N=2 N=3 N=1 E F

  14. Global phase diagram S.A. Kivelson, D.H. Lee, and S.C. Zhang, PRB (1992)

  15. However, transition from insulator to high order quantum Hall states has been observed in experiments … Insulator to N=3 transition Insulator to N=4 transition C.H. Lee, Y.H. Chang, Y.W. Suen, S.T. Lo, et al, C.-T. Liang, Solid State and H.H. Lin, PRB (1998) Commun. (2010)

  16. non-floating behavior Liu et al, PRL 76, 975 (1996) Sheng et al, PRL 78, 318 (1997) Yang et al, PRL 76, 1316 (1996)

  17. Anti-levitation of Landau levels Wang, Avishai, Meir, and Wang, PRB 89, 045314 (2014)

  18. HIGFET ( H eterojunction I nsulated- G ate F ield- E ffect T ransistor) Vg n+ GaAs (60 nm) AlGaAs (600 nm) 2DEG n+ GaAs GaAs (2 m m) AlGaAs AlGaAs/GaAs superlattice GaAs GaAs overgrowth layer GaAs substrate 2DES Kane, Pfeiffer, West, and Harnett, APL,1993

  19. Straight sidewall is important Vg n+ GaAs AlGaAs GaAs 2DES

  20. Mesa gate contact 2DEG

  21. Mesa Annealed Ni/Ge/Au contact device works!

  22. Very large density range ~ 1x10 9 to ~ 7.5x10 11 cm -2

  23. Linear I -V at very low densities

  24. s xx = r xx /( r xx 2 + r xy 2 ) s xy = r xy /( r xx 2 + r xy 2 )

  25. n = nh/eB n = n e/h × B B = 500 mT

  26. n = nh/eB n =nh/eB n =16 n = n e/h × B

  27. < d n>  -4×10 7 cm -2

  28. Wang et al, PRB 89, 045314 (2014)

  29. Wang et al, PRB 89, 045314 (2014)

  30. Observation of anti-floating in vanishing B field 0 n =6 n =5 n =4 -1 -2 ) 8 cm -2  n (10 -3 -4 0.00 0.05 0.10 0.15 0.20 0.25 0.30 Magnetc Field (T)

  31. part I conclusion In a high-quality HIGFET, anti-levitation of Landau levels is observed in vanishing magnetic fields. This observation is in a good agreement with the theoretical prediction (C. Wang et al, PRB 2014).

  32. part II outline (Collapse of spin splitting in the quantum Hall regime) • Background • Sample – HIGFET ( H eterojunction I nsulated- G ate F ield- E ffect T ransistor) • Result – Landau level number N displays a power-law dependence on 2DEG density n, where the spin splitting collapses. • N = 11.47 × n 0 . 64±0 . 01 (n is in units of 10 11 cm −2 ). – This power-law dependence is in good agreement with the theoretical prediction in the low-density regime.

  33. dN ħ w c d  B  0 E

  34. Spin degeneracy lifted h w c g m B B DOS E

  35. h w c g m B B DOS E odd Landau level filling states –  ~ g m B B g = 0.44, m B = 0.67K/Tesla, B = 5Tesla,  ~ 1.5K

  36. However, odd Landau level filling states –  >> g m B B g m B B Huang et al, Physica E 12 (2002) 424 – 427

  37. g factor enhancement E ex is the exchange parameter n↑, n↓ are the occupation factors of the spin levels. n = 3 n = 2 n ↑ > n↓ n ↑ = n↓

  38. disorder-induced destruction of exchange enhancement Fogler and Shklovskii [PRB 52 , 17366 (1995)] n =2N+3/2 n =2N+1/2 width of Landau level <<  s width of Landau level ~  s n = 1 n  0 n = the Landau level filling between spin-up and spin-down bands

  39. a second-order phase transition r (0) = E 0  ħ w c r (0)E 0  ( m B) 1/2 0

  40. theoretical prediction Fogler and Shklovskii [PRB 52 , 17366 (1995)] In high mobility GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures: low density regime: N c  n 2/3

  41. previous experimental work Wong, Jiang, Palm, and Schaff, PRB 55 , R7343 (1997). sample peak mobility < 10 6 cm 2 /Vs

  42. HIGFET high mobility down to low densities n+ GaAs (60 nm) Vg AlGaAs (600 nm) 2DEG GaAs (2 m m) n+ GaAs AlGaAs/GaAs superlattice AlGaAs GaAs overgrowth layer GaAs GaAs substrate 2DES Kane, Pfeiffer, West, and Harnett, APL,1993

  43. B = 0.197T T ~ 15 mK 5 7 32

  44. n =2N+1 (theoretical prediction) Pan et al, PRB (2011)

  45. n+ GaAs (60 nm) n i AlGaAs (600 nm) GaAs (2 m m) AlGaAs/GaAs superlattice GaAs overgrowth layer GaAs substrate

  46. Fogler and Shklovskii [PRB 52 , 17366 (1995)]

  47. part II conclusion In a high-quality HIGFET, the Landau level number N follows a power-law dependence on the 2DEG electron density n, where the spin splitting collapses. N = 11.47 × n 0 . 64±0 . 01 This power-law dependence is in a good agreement with the theoretical prediction in the low-density regime.

  48. Thank you for your attention

Recommend


More recommend