M.Osei-Kwarteng, I. Napp, D. P. Moualeu & H. Stutzel 1 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Institute of Horticultural Poduction Systems Vegetables Systems Modelling Quantifying Architectural Traits of Amaranths ( Amaranthus spp) by 3-Dimensional Digitisation M.Osei-Kwarteng, I. Napp, D. P. Moualeu & H. Stutzel 1 A.cruentus : Ex
Institute of Horticultural Poduction Systems Vegetables Systems Modelling Quantifying Architectural Traits of Amaranths ( Amaranthus spp) by 3-Dimensional Digitisation M.Osei-Kwarteng, I. Napp, D. P. Moualeu & H. Stutzel 1
A.cruentus : Ex Zim – Vegetable 2
A.hypochondriacus : TSM -102 (Grain ) 3
A.tricolor : Arkasuguna (Vegetable – Asian) 4
A. dubius (Mombo 2) 5
Management Environmental practices and factors Growth processes Productivity Structure/Architecture Function (Physiological process) 6
A.cruentus A.dubius A.hypochondriacus A.tricolor 7
8
Objective: Quantify architectural traits in four Amaranthus spp and relate them to their dry matter yield Architectural traits : leaf size (length and width) , leaf shape, leaf orientation angles ( inclination and azimuth) and internode length. 9
Materials and Methods • Grown under non limiting nutrient and water conditions • Spacing: 30 cm x 30 cm isometric • Duration: May-June 2015 on the field • Location: Institute of Horticultural Production Systems, Hannover (52 ° 2 ’ N) Germany • Experimental design: Randomized complete block (RCBD) • Statistical analysis: Analysis of variance procedure (SAS,2003) 10
Materials and Methods Digitising: Plants were digitised acropetally in a standardized sequence • Leaves were digitised with 9 points • A node was the point of attachment of a leaf petiole on the stem • Internode was the interval between two nodes • Four plants were digitised per genotype Electronic unit Transmitter Receiver/pointer Digitising plants 3-D Fastrak magnetic digitiser 11
Preliminary results A.tricolor . Mean : 49.2o. S.D : 16.4o A.dubius. Mean : 42.2o. S.D. : 8.2o A.hypochondriacus . Mean : 51.4o . S.D. : 10.4o A.cruentus. Mean : 43.8o. S.D. : 10.4o 0.5 0.4 Proportion of leaves 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.0 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 50-60 60-70 Leaf inclination angle (degrees) 12
Preliminary results 70 a SEM : 5.67 60 b 50 Leaf area (cm 2 ) 40 c cd cd 30 cd cd cd d cd d d 20 d d d de de 10 e de de de de de e 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Acropetal leaf rank 13
Preliminary results 70 a SEM : 5.67 60 b 50 Leaf area (cm 2 ) 40 c cd cd 30 cd cd cd d cd d d 20 d d d de de 10 e de de de de de e 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Acropetal leaf rank 14
12 SEM : 0.55 a 10 a a Petiole length (cm) 8 bab ab b ab b 6 b cb cb c c c c c 4 c c cd d cd d d 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 15 Acropetal leaf rank
Conclusion • Young plants of A. tricolor have leaves equally distributed from being fairly horizontal to vertical in orientation. • Young plants of A tricolor and A cruentus exhibit low leaf areas across existing leaf positions with A. tricolor displaying low petiole length. • The fifth acropetal leaves of A. hypochondriacus have large leaf area and longer petioles than the other genotypes • Significant interaction effects exist between leaf position and some leaf dimensions 16
Outlook • Analyse other architectural traits and construct a 3D static model plant from digitised data • Relate the angular distribution and projected leaf area of genotypes to light interception • Relate differences in architectural traits to dry matter yield 17
Thank You For Your Attention !!!! 18
Recommend
More recommend
Explore More Topics
Stay informed with curated content and fresh updates.