london lo cul cultural cul cultural ural ural profile pr
play

LONDON LO CUL CULTURAL CUL CULTURAL URAL URAL PROFILE PR - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

LONDON LO CUL CULTURAL CUL CULTURAL URAL URAL PROFILE PR PROFILE PR OFILE OFILE REPOR REPORT REPOR REPORT January, 2013 1 Presentation Ov Presentation Over ervie view Key messages Key messages London Cultural


  1. LONDON LO CUL CULTURAL CUL CULTURAL URAL URAL PROFILE PR PROFILE PR OFILE OFILE REPOR REPORT REPOR REPORT January, 2013 1

  2. Presentation Ov Presentation Over ervie view  Key messages  Key messages  London Cultural Resource Database (LCRD)  Web map demonstration  Web map demonstration  Economic Impact Analysis  Cultural Facilities and Infrastructure  Cultural Facilities and Infrastructure  Recommendations 2

  3. Economic Im Economic Impact pact $540 $540 million per year in direct contribution $1 475 per capita $1,475 per capita $60 per capita City contribution $ p p y 1,298 cultural industries 7,703 cultural jobs in the city contributes to 3,100 additional jobs outside of the city 3

  4. Cultural F Cultural Facilities & cilities & Infrastructure Infrastructure Culture creates identity Culture creates identity. Culture attracts and retains talent. London is a greater city than it appears to be London is a greater city than it appears to be but it is losing its national profile. There is a gap between what the City claims There is a gap between what the City claims to believe about the value of culture and how it actually behaves and how it actually behaves. The City should immediately develop a vision and plan for cultural facilities as an important investment for cultural facilities as an important investment in city ‐ building. 4

  5. London Cultural London Cultural Resour esource Database ce Database 1 central inventory – a ‘made in London’ LCRD 9000 entries identify London’s cultural resources 9000 t i id tif L d ’ lt l 40 datasets from Planning Division LAC LHC 40 datasets from Planning Division, LAC, LHC Creates a baseline from which the City can assess performance and economic impact going forward. f d i i t i f d Built by CUI, Culture Office & GIS Technology Services. Fully compatible with the City’s ArcGIS system. 5

  6. London Cultural London Cultural Resour esource Database ce Database A powerful information source & analytical tool A powerful information source & analytical tool. Provides a lens for all City staff to view London’s unique cultural landscape unique cultural landscape. Provides standard concepts, definitions and categories to ensure comprehensive consistent & categories to ensure comprehensive, consistent & comparable statistics on culture. Provides the basis for evidence based decision Provides the basis for evidence based decision making. Culture Maps are powerful learning tools Culture Maps are powerful learning tools. Without the LCRD there can be no Culture Maps. 6

  7. London Cultural London Cultural Resour esource Database ce Database The LCRD can only be useful if it contains up to date information information. The responsibility for managing the maintenance process – ensuring timely updates that meet the process – ensuring timely updates that meet the LCRD’s standards – will be the City’s. Contributing updated data to the LCRD will be the Contributing updated data to the LCRD will be the responsibility of the data sharing partners (LAC LHC and any future data partners) (LAC, LHC and any future data partners). 7

  8. LCRD Building Blocks RD Building Blocks Cultural Resource Framework l l k used to organize and categorize London’s broad & unique range of cultural resources cultural resources. Canadian Framework for Culture Statistics used to select the NAICS and NOC ‐ S codes to guide the collection of data that would be used to populate the LCRD & be the source for cultural mapping. NAICS and NOC S Codes NAICS and NOC ‐ S Codes used to classify cultural resources in the LCRD Data Sources Data Sources Statistics Canada ‐ to allow us to compare London to other cities in Ontario and Canada Th Cit The City of London f L d The London Arts Council & the London Heritage Council 8

  9. Cultural R Cultural Resour esource F ce Frame amework ork Cultural Industries Intangible Cultural Additional Resources Culture Occupations Restaurants Hotels and B&Bs Agriculture Cultural Cultural Places of Worship Places of Worship Cultural Cultural Festivals Festivals Resources Organizations Sports Venues & Events Bikeways & Routes Sports Organizations Cultural Cultural Spaces & Heritage Facilities Natural Natural Heritage 9

  10. Canadian F Canadian Frame amework f ork for r Culture Statistics Culture Statistics Provides standard concepts, definitions and Provides standard concepts, definitions and categories. Used to select the NAICS and NOC ‐ S groups used to Used to select the NAICS and NOC S groups used to guide the collection of data to populate the LCRD.   Heritage Written and Published  Libraries Works   Heritage and Libraries Heritage and Libraries Audio visual and Audio ‐ visual and Unallocated Interactive Media   Live Performance Sound Recording  Vi Visual and Applied Arts l d A li d A t 10

  11. NAICS & NOC-S Codes NAICS & NOC-S Codes Ensures standard definitions and consistent, Ensures standard definitions and consistent, reliable, comparable data analysis. Used to classify cultural resources in the LCRD. Used to classify cultural resources in the LCRD. Each resource in the database has a NAICS or NOC ‐ S code. NAICS or NOC S code. NAICS: North American Industrial Classification System (unit of observation is the establishment or producing unit) b h bl h d ) NOC ‐ S: National Occupational Classification for Statistics (unit of observation is the kind of work performed ) of observation is the kind of work performed ) 11

  12. Data Sour Data Sources ces St ti ti Statistics Canada data C d d t  Canadian Business Patterns, 2011  Census, 2006: Place of Work; Place of Residence C 2006 Pl f W k Pl f R id Allows us to compare London to other cities in O t Ontario and Canada. i d C d Provides information at the census tract level. Local data  City of London (Planning Division, Culture Office) City of London (Planning Division, Culture Office)  London Arts Council & London Heritage Council Creates a “made in London” database. Creates a made in London database. Provides detailed, site ‐ specific information. 12

  13. Using the L Using the LCRD RD Strengthen culture to build economic prosperity through the identification of cultural talent, occupations and businesses in London. id tifi ti f lt l t l t ti d b i i L d Create a strong base of information that supports evidence ‐ based decision making decision making. Illustrate the presence of cultural resources in the community. Establish a cultural lens with which to view other policies and plans. Establish a cultural lens with which to view other policies and plans. Present information visually in ways that are easy to understand and have a strong impact. Establish a group of partners in government and civil society committed to planning for cultural vitality. Present the opportunity to support the cultural sector by giving residents and visitors access to information about cultural activity. 13

  14. Web Map Demonstration b Map Demonstration 14

  15. Cultural F Cultural Facilities and cilities and Infrastructure Infrastructure 15

  16. Int Intervie iew Questions w Questions  Wh t  What are the challenges facing London’s cultural th h ll f i L d ’ lt l facilities today?  What are London’s c lt ral facilit priorities?  What are London’s cultural facility priorities?  How important is facility location?  What kind of leadership role should the City be  What kind of leadership role should the City be taking?  What role should the City take in capital  What role should the City take in capital development?  What role should the City take in operations?  What role should the City take in operations?  What is the strategic importance of cultural facilities to London as a city? facilities to London as a city?  What should be the goals for the next 5 years? 16

  17. Par Participants icipants Judy Amoils, CBRE Real Estate Consultants Maryse Leitch, Palace Theatre Heather Blackwell, Western Fair Janette MacDonald, Downtown London BIA Clark Bryan, Aeolian Hall Cl k li ll Grant Maltman, Banting Museum G l i Bill Campbell, City of London Brian Meehan, Museum London Lori Da Silva, London Convention Centre Sarah Merrit, Old East BIA Sandra De Salvo, The Arts Project , j Margaret Mitchell, London Public Library g , y John Devito, City of London Kathy Navakas, London Fringe Festival Harvey Filger, City of London Brian Ohl, John Labatt/Bud Centre Deb Harvey, Grand Theatre James Patten, McIntosh Gallery Andrea Hallam London Heritage Co ncil Andrea Hallam, London Heritage Council Joe Swan, Executive Director of Orchestra Joe S an E ec ti e Director of Orchestra Andrea Halwa, London Arts Council London Bernice Hull, Fanshawe College Janet Tufts, Canadian Medical Hall of Fame Sheila Johnson, Fanshawe Pioneer Village Bill Warner, City of London Tom Johnson, City of London Margaret Wilkinson, London Public Library Greg Jones, Centennial Hall John Winston, Tourism London Joan Kanigan, Museum of Ontario Archaeology Archaeology 17

Recommend


More recommend