loewner theory in annulus history and recent developments
play

Loewner Theory in Annulus: history and recent developments P avel G - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Univalent functions and control W orkshop dedicated to 65 th A nniversary of P rofessor D mitri V alentinovich P rokhorov Loewner Theory in Annulus: history and recent developments P avel G umenyuk Institut Mittag-Leffler Djursholm,


  1. «Univalent functions and control» W orkshop dedicated to 65 th A nniversary of P rofessor D mitri V alentinovich P rokhorov Loewner Theory in Annulus: history and recent developments P avel G umenyuk Institut Mittag-Leffler – Djursholm, Sweden, September 12 - 13, 2011 1/32

  2. University of Rome Outline TOR VERGATA Introduction Loewner Theory in the disk Loewner Theory in the annulus: history Main results Notions of Loewner chains and evolution families Relation between Loewner chains and evolution families Evolution families and ODEs Conformal classification 2/32

  3. University of Rome Collaborators TOR VERGATA New results in the talk are obtained in collaboration with Prof. Manuel D. Contreras and Prof. Santiago Díaz-Madrigal from Universidad de Sevilla, SPAIN. 3/32 Introduction

  4. University of Rome Loewner Theory in the disk TOR VERGATA The classical Loewner Theory in the unit disk is due to: K. Löwner (C. Loewner), 1923 ◮ P . P . Kufarev, 1943 ◮ C. Pommerenke, 1965 ◮ Modern viewpoint — three fundamental notions of Loewner Theory: Loewner chains ( f t ) ◮ Evolution families ( ϕ s , t ) ◮ Herglotz vector fields G ( w , t ) ◮ 4/32 Introduction

  5. University of Rome Loewner Theory in the disk TOR VERGATA Definition A Loewner chain is a one-parametric family of functions ( f t ) , t � 0, such that: LC1. each f t : D → C , D := { z : | z | < 1 } , is holomorphic and univalent ; LC2. Ω s := f s ( D ) ⊂ Ω t := f t ( D ) whenever t � s � 0; LC3. (the very classical case) t ( 0 ) = e t for all t � 0. f t ( 0 ) = 0 and f ′ 5/32 Introduction

  6. University of Rome Loewner Theory in the disk TOR VERGATA Definition A family ( ϕ s , t ) , t � s � 0, of holomorphic functions ϕ s , t : D → D is an evolution family if: EF1. ϕ s , s = id D ; EF2. ϕ s , t = ϕ u , t ◦ ϕ s , u whenever t � u � s � 0; EF3. (the very classical case) s , t ( 0 ) = e s − t whenever t � s � 0. ϕ s , t ( 0 ) = 0 and ϕ ′ 6/32 Introduction

  7. University of Rome Loewner Theory in the disk TOR VERGATA One definition form the theory of Carathéodory ODE: Definition Let d ∈ [ 1 , + ∞ ] . A function G : D × [ 0 , + ∞ ) → C is a weak holomorphic vector field of order d if: VF1. G ( z , t ) is holomorphic in z ∈ D for a.e. t � 0; VF2. G ( z , t ) is measurable in t ∈ [ 0 , + ∞ ) for all z ∈ D ; VF3. For any compact set K ⊂ D and any T > 0 there exists a non-negative function k K , T ∈ L d ([ 0 , T ] , R ) such that � � � G ( z , t ) � � k K , T ( t ) , for any z ∈ K and a.e. t ∈ [ 0 , T ] . (1) � � Under the above conditions ∃ ! solution to the Cauchy problem ˙ w = G ( w , t ) , (2) w ( s ) = z , s � 0 , z ∈ D . (3) 7/32 Introduction

  8. University of Rome Loewner Theory in the disk TOR VERGATA Definition (general case) Let d ∈ [ 1 , + ∞ ] . A function G : D × [ 0 , + ∞ ) → C is a Herglotz vector field of order d if: HVF1. G is a weak holomorphic vector field of order d ; HVF2. For a.e. t � 0, G ( · , t ) is an infinitesimal generator. Berkson – Porta, 1978 H ∈ Hol ( D , C ) is an infinitesimal generator if and only if H ( z ) = ( τ − z )( 1 − τ z ) p ( z ) , τ ∈ D , p ∈ Hol ( D , C ) , Re p � 0 . (4) 8/32 Introduction

  9. University of Rome Loewner Theory in the disk TOR VERGATA Berkson – Porta, 1978 H ∈ Hol ( D , C ) is an infinitesimal generator if and only if H ( z ) = ( τ − z )( 1 − τ z ) p ( z ) , τ ∈ D , p ∈ Hol ( D , C ) , Re p � 0 . (4) Fixing τ = 0 and normalizing p ( 0 ) = 1 in (4), we get Definition (the very classical case) A classical Herglotz vector field is G ( z , t ) = − zp ( z , t ) , z ∈ D , a.e. t � 0 , (5) where p ( z , t ) is holomorphic in z , measurable in t , Re p � 0, and p ( 0 , t ) = 1 for a.e. t � 0. 9/32 Introduction

  10. University of Rome L.Th. in D : main results in classical case TOR VERGATA There is 1-to-1 correspondence between classical Loewner chains ( f t ) , evolution families ( ϕ s , t ) and Herglotz vector fields G ( z , t ) , given via: ϕ s , t = f − 1 t → + ∞ e t ϕ s , t , ◦ f s , f s = lim (6) t Loewner – Kufarev ODE d � � � � dt ϕ s , t ( z ) = G ϕ s , t ( z ) , t = − ϕ s , t ( z ) p ϕ s , t ( z ) , t , t � s , ϕ s , t ( z ) | t = s = z , z ∈ D , (7) Loewner – Kufarev PDE ∂ ∂ t f t ( z ) = − f ′ t ( z ) G ( z , t ) = zf ′ t ( z ) p ( z , t ) , z ∈ D , t � 0 . (8) 10/32 Introduction

  11. University of Rome L.Th. in D : main results in classical case TOR VERGATA Theorem (Gutljanski˘ ı, 1970; Pommerenke, 1973) � � f ∈ Hol ( D , C ) : f ( 0 ) = 0 , f ′ ( 0 ) = 1, and f is 1-to-1 For any f ∈ S := there exists a classical Loewner chain ( f t ) s.t. f 0 = f . Parametric Representation This theorem provides a Parametric Representation of the class S and therefore has important applications in the theory of univalent functions, especially in Extremal Problems. p ( w , t ) �→ ϕ s , t �→ { f t } �→ f 0 ∈ S onto convex cone of driving terms p ( w , t ) −→ the class S �→ extremal problem problem of optimal control 11/32 Introduction

  12. University of Rome Application to Extremal Problems TOR VERGATA Extremal problems in S and S M New and classical extremal problems for coefficient functionals for normalized univalent functions (class S ) and bounded normalized univalent functions ( S M := { f ∈ S : | f ( z ) | < M for all z ∈ D } ): Dmitri Valentinovich Prokhorov and his students 1984, 1986, 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1997, . . . Parametric Representation ◮ Pontryagin’s Maximum Principle ◮ Variational technique ◮ Classical L. Th. also gives a representation of the semigroup ◮ U 0 := { ϕ ∈ Hol ( D , D ) : ϕ is 1-to-1 , ϕ ( 0 ) = 0 , ϕ ′ ( 0 ) > 0 } . Other sub-semigroups of U := { ϕ ∈ Hol ( D , D ) : ϕ is 1-to-1 } can ◮ be represented by constructing corresponding versions of Loewner Evolution (V. V. Goryainov, 1987, 1991, 1992, 1996). 12/32 Introduction

  13. University of Rome On Chordal Loewner Evolutions and SLE TOR VERGATA Chordal Loewner Evolution ◮ (P . P . Kufarev, V. V. Sobolev and L. V. Sporysheva, 1968) — the semigroup U 1 ⊂ U := { ϕ ∈ Hol ( D , D ) : ϕ is 1-to-1 } of self-mappings with hydrodynamic normalization (parabolic DW-point on the boundary + extra regularity). dw dt = p ( w , t ) , w ∈ U := { w : Im w > 0 } , � 1 p ( w , t ) := x − w d µ t ( x ) , R where µ t is a finite positive Borel measure. Chordal Loewner Evolution → SLE (O. Schramm, 2000): ◮ √ d µ t ( x ) := δ ( x − κ B t ) dx , where κ > 0 and ( B t ) is a standard Brownian motion . SLE: applications in lattice models of Statistical Physics. ◮ 13/32 Introduction

  14. University of Rome General Loewner Theory in D TOR VERGATA New approach F . Bracci, M. D. Contreras and S. Díaz-Madrigal, 2008 ◮ a general construction unifying all versions of Loewner Evolution. In contrast to the classical theory the whole semigroup ◮ U := { ϕ ∈ Hol ( D , D ) : ϕ is 1-to-1 } is involved (no normalization). Arbitrary Hergltoz vector fields are considered. ◮ M. D. Contreras and S. Díaz-Madrigal, and P .G., 2010 ◮ general Loewner chains. Definition A (time-dependent) vector field G defined in a set D ⊂ C × R is said to be semicomplete if any solution to the equation w = G ( w , t ) ˙ (9) can be extended unrestrictedly to the right (to the future). 14/32 Introduction

  15. University of Rome General Loewner Theory in D TOR VERGATA Theorem (F . Bracci, M. D. Contreras, S. Díaz-Madrigal) A weak holomorphic vector field G is semicomplete if and only if G is a Herglotz vector field, i.e. if for a.e. t � 0, G ( · , t ) is an infinitesimal generator. This allows us to regard the approach proposed by Bracci et al as the most general type of Loewner Evolution in D . Our aim is to construct analogous general Loewner Theory for doubly connected domains. 15/32 Introduction

  16. University of Rome Loewner Theory in annulus: history TOR VERGATA New feature of Loewner Evolution in the doubly setting is that instead of static canonical domain (the unit disk D ) one has to consider an extending family ( D t ) of canonical domains (annuli). Indeed, a continuous monotonic family (Ω t ) of doubly connected domains cannot consist of conformally equivalent domains. Y. Komatu, 1943; G. M. Goluzin, 1950 16/32 Introduction

  17. University of Rome Loewner Theory in annulus: history TOR VERGATA Evolution families in the Komatu – Goluzin case EF1. ϕ s , s = id D s ; EF2. ϕ s , t = ϕ u , t ◦ ϕ s , u whenever t � u � s � 0; EF3. ϕ s , t ( D s ) is D t minus a slit landing on | w | = e t R 0 and ϕ s , t ( 1 ) = 1 whenever t � s � 0. 17/32 Introduction

  18. University of Rome Loewner Theory in annulus: history TOR VERGATA Li En Pir, 1953; N. A. Lebedev, 1955 The function t �→ r t is defined by a differential equation. 18/32 Introduction

  19. University of Rome Loewner Theory in annulus: history TOR VERGATA Evolution families in the Li – Lebedev case 19/32 Introduction

Recommend


More recommend