Law School, Shandong University Associate Professor, Tsung-Han Tai
I . Dispute Situation in the Barents Sea II. Fishery Conservation and Management in the Barents Sea III. Lessons from the Barents Sea IV. A Window of Opportunity for China and Philippine
Fishery Conservation and Management in the Barents Sea
1970 1.lack of EEZ 2.Overfishing 3. Fishery Exhaustion in the Barents Sea Too many vessels chasing too little fish Overfishing will cause the result of biosphere collapse
1975 Framework Agreement Article 3(a): Joint Norwegian-Russia Fisheries Commission 1.meets annually for TAC 2.cod, haddock, capelin
1976 Mutual Access Agreement 1.allow party’s vessels access to each EEZ 2.subject to coastal state’s rules and fishery licensing
Resolve overlapping Jurisdiction in the Barents Sea
October 15, 1976:1976 Mutual Access Agreement October 1976 : Norway December 1976: Soviet Union 2010 Agreement Boundary Line Loop Hole 6 5 Norwegian 200nm Outer Limit
What do they do on dispute settlement ? Provisional Agreement ： Grey Zone Agreement of 1978 Purpose: fishery cooperation Character:1. Annual renewal 2. parallel jurisdiction Establishment: mutual trust
Resolve overfishing in the High Sea: Loop Hole
1990 Temperature Salinity European union Greenland Faroes Island Iceland
What do coastal states do to resolve the problem? Measure1: Diplomatic Approach Purpose: Quota Card for TAC Greenland 1991 European union 1992 Faroes Island 1996
What do coastal states do to resolve the problem? Measure1: Diplomatic Approach Measure2: Economic Sanctions Added Iceland into “Black List” 1999 Loop Hole Agreement: exchange annual quota in their respective EEZs
Recommend
More recommend
