kinder morgan inc
play

KINDER MORGAN, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its - PDF document

Aug 21, 2022 •294 likes •1.41k views

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 F O R M 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016 or TRANSITION REPORT

  1. KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (In Millions) (Unaudited) Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 $ 375 $ 342 $ 689 $ 761 Net income Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax Change in fair value of hedge derivatives (net of tax benefit of $82, $34, $40 and $35, respectively) (142) (58) (69) (60) Reclassification of change in fair value of derivatives to net income (net of tax benefit of $6, $33, $69 and $74, respectively) (11) (57) (119) (129) Foreign currency translation adjustments (net of tax (expense) benefit of $(4), $(9), $(49) and $53, respectively) 7 17 85 (91) Benefit plan adjustments (net of tax expense of $(3), $-, $(6) and $(4), respectively) 6 — 10 6 Total other comprehensive loss (140) (98) (93) (274) Comprehensive income 235 244 596 487 Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (3) (9) (2) 1 Comprehensive income attributable to KMI $ 232 $ 235 $ 594 $ 488 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 5

  2. KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In Millions, Except Share and Per Share Amounts) June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 (Unaudited) ASSETS Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 180 $ 229 Accounts receivable, net 1,278 1,315 Fair value of derivative contracts 313 507 Inventories 361 407 Other current assets 338 366 Total current assets 2,470 2,824 Property, plant and equipment, net 41,199 40,547 Investments 6,202 6,040 Goodwill 23,802 23,790 Other intangibles, net 3,440 3,551 Deferred income taxes 4,975 5,323 Deferred charges and other assets 2,229 2,029 Total Assets $ 84,317 $ 84,104 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Current Liabilities Current portion of debt $ 3,419 $ 821 Accounts payable 1,087 1,324 Accrued interest 630 695 Accrued contingencies 405 298 Other current liabilities 1,025 927 Total current liabilities 6,566 4,065 Long-term liabilities and deferred credits Long-term debt Outstanding 38,113 40,632 Preferred interest in general partner of KMP 100 100 Debt fair value adjustments 1,988 1,674 Total long-term debt 40,201 42,406 Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits 2,077 2,230 Total long-term liabilities and deferred credits 42,278 44,636 Total Liabilities 48,844 48,701 Commitments and contingencies (Notes 3 and 9) Stockholders’ Equity Class P shares, $0.01 par value, 4,000,000,000 shares authorized, 2,229,330,134 and 22 22 2,229,223,864 shares, respectively, issued and outstanding Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 9.75% Series A Mandatory Convertible, $1,000 per share liquidation preference, 1,600,000 shares — — issued and outstanding Additional paid-in capital 41,696 41,661 Retained deficit (6,053) (6,103) Accumulated other comprehensive loss (554) (461) Total Kinder Morgan, Inc.’s stockholders’ equity 35,111 35,119 Noncontrolling interests 362 284 Total Stockholders’ Equity 35,473 35,403 Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $ 84,317 $ 84,104 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 6

  3. KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (In Millions) (Unaudited) Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 2015 Cash Flows From Operating Activities Net income $ 689 $ 761 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities Depreciation, depletion and amortization 1,103 1,108 Deferred income taxes 388 413 Amortization of excess cost of equity investments 30 26 Loss on impairments and disposals of long-lived assets, net 231 104 Earnings from equity investments (200) (190) Distributions from equity investment earnings 203 187 Noncash pension benefit credits — (23) Changes in components of working capital, net of the effects of acquisitions and dispositions Accounts receivable, net 81 366 Income tax receivable — 195 Inventories 49 (34) Other current assets 7 50 Accounts payable (144) (222) Accrued interest, net of interest rate swaps (49) 9 Accrued contingencies and other current liabilities 72 (7) Rate reparations, refunds and other litigation reserve adjustments 31 27 Other, net (147) (232) Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities 2,344 2,538 Cash Flows From Investing Activities Acquisitions of assets and investments, net of cash acquired (333) (1,919) Capital expenditures (1,470) (1,909) Sale of property, plant and equipment, investments, and other net assets, net of removal costs 220 4 Contributions to investments (363) (45) Distributions from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings 81 114 Other, net (15) 11 Net Cash Used in Investing Activities (1,880) (3,744) Cash Flows From Financing Activities Issuances of debt 6,847 9,485 Payments of debt (6,800) (8,941) Debt issue costs (6) (20) Issuances of common shares — 2,562 Cash dividends - common shares (559) (2,006) Cash dividends - preferred shares (76) — Repurchases of warrants — (5) Contributions from noncontrolling interests 87 — Distributions to noncontrolling interests (11) (16) Other, net — (1) Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities (518) 1,058 Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Cash and Cash Equivalents 5 (4) Net decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents (49) (152) Cash and Cash Equivalents, beginning of period 229 315 Cash and Cash Equivalents, end of period $ 180 $ 163 Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities Assets acquired by the assumption or incurrence of liabilities $ 43 $ 1,671 Net assets contributed to equity investment $ 37 $ 34 Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information Cash paid during the period for interest (net of capitalized interest) $ 1,047 $ 1,002 Cash paid (refunded) during the period for income taxes, net $ 5 $ (185) The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 7

  4. KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (In Millions) (Unaudited) Common stock Preferred stock Accumulated Stockholders’ Additional other equity Non- Issued Par Issued Par paid-in Retained comprehensive attributable controlling shares value shares value capital deficit loss to KMI interests Total Balance at December 31, 2015 2,229 $ 22 2 $ — $ 41,661 $ (6,103) $ (461) $ 35,119 $ 284 $35,403 Restricted shares 35 35 35 Net income 687 687 2 689 Distributions — (11) (11) Contributions — 87 87 Preferred stock dividends (78) (78) (78) Common stock dividends (559) (559) (559) Other comprehensive loss (93) (93) (93) Balance at June 30, 2016 2,229 $ 22 2 $ — $ 41,696 $ (6,053) $ (554) $ 35,111 $ 362 $35,473 Common stock Preferred stock Accumulated Stockholders’ Additional other equity Non- Issued Par Issued Par paid-in Retained comprehensive attributable controlling shares value shares value capital deficit loss to KMI interests Total Balance at December 31, 2014 2,125 $ 21 — $ — $ 36,178 $ (2,106) $ (17) $ 34,076 $ 350 $34,426 Issuances of common shares 62 1 2,561 2,562 2,562 Repurchase of warrants (5) (5) (5) EP Trust I Preferred security conversions 1 23 23 23 Warrants exercised 2 2 2 Restricted shares 32 32 32 Net income 762 762 (1) 761 Distributions — (16) (16) Common stock dividends (2,006) (2,006) (2,006) Other comprehensive loss (274) (274) (274) Balance at June 30, 2015 2,188 $ 22 — $ — $ 38,791 $ (3,350) $ (291) $ 35,172 $ 333 $35,505 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 8

  5. KINDER MORGAN, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited) 1. General Organization We are the largest energy infrastructure company in North America. We own an interest in or operate approximately 84,000 miles of pipelines and 180 terminals. Our pipelines transport natural gas, refined petroleum products, crude oil, condensate, CO 2 and other products, and our terminals transload and store petroleum products, ethanol and chemicals, and handle such products as coal, petroleum coke and steel. We are also the leading producer and transporter of CO 2 , which is utilized for enhanced oil recovery projects in North America. On November 26, 2014, we completed our acquisition, pursuant to three separate merger agreements, of all of the outstanding common units of KMP and EPB and all of the outstanding shares of KMR that we did not already own, which transactions are referred to collectively as the “Merger Transactions.” Basis of Presentation General Our reporting currency is U.S. dollars, and all references to dollars are U.S. dollars, unless stated otherwise. Our accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These rules and regulations conform to the accounting principles contained in the FASB’s Accounting Standards Codification, the single source of GAAP. Under such rules and regulations, all significant intercompany items have been eliminated in consolidation. In our opinion, all adjustments, which are of a normal and recurring nature, considered necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and operating results for the interim periods have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, and certain amounts from prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year; accordingly, you should read these consolidated financial statements in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our 2015 Form 10-K. Goodwill Goodwill is the cost of an acquisition in excess of the fair value of acquired assets and liabilities and is recorded as an asset on our balance sheet. Goodwill is not subject to amortization but must be tested for impairment at least annually. This test requires us to assign goodwill to an appropriate reporting unit and to determine if the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is less than its carrying amount. We evaluate goodwill for impairment on May 31 of each year. For this purpose, we have seven reporting units as follows: (i) Products Pipelines (excluding associated terminals); (ii) Products Pipelines Terminals (evaluated separately from Products Pipelines for goodwill purposes); (iii) Natural Gas Pipelines Regulated; (iv) Natural Gas Pipelines Non-Regulated; (v) CO 2 ; (vi) Terminals; and (vii) Kinder Morgan Canada. We also evaluate goodwill for impairment to the extent events or conditions indicate a risk of possible impairment during the interim periods subsequent to our annual impairment test. Generally, the evaluation of goodwill for impairment involves a two-step test, although under certain circumstance an initial qualitative evaluation may be sufficient to conclude that goodwill is not impaired without conducting the quantitative test. Step 1 involves comparing the estimated fair value of each respective reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the estimated fair value exceeds the carrying value, the reporting unit’s goodwill is not considered impaired. If the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value, step 2 must be performed to determine whether goodwill is impaired and, if so, the amount of the impairment. Step 2 involves calculating an implied fair value of goodwill by performing a hypothetical allocation of the estimated fair value of the reporting unit determined in step 1 to the respective tangible and intangible net assets of the reporting unit. The remaining implied goodwill is then compared to the actual carrying amount of the goodwill for the reporting unit. To the extent the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the implied goodwill, the difference is the amount of the goodwill impairment. A large portion of our goodwill is non-deductible for tax purposes, and as such, to the extent there are impairments, all or a portion of the impairment may not result in a corresponding tax benefit. 9

  6. In the fourth quarter 2015, we recorded a $1,150 million impairment of goodwill associated with our Natural Gas Pipeline - Non-Regulated reporting unit triggered by decreases in market valuations in our industry which were caused by the commodity price environment at that time. The results of our May 31, 2016 annual impairment test indicated that for each of our reporting units other than our Natural Gas Pipelines - Non-Regulated, the reporting unit fair value exceeded the carrying value. For our Natural Gas Pipelines - Non-Regulated, and similar to December 31, 2015, the fair value of the reporting unit continues to be slightly less than the carrying value of the reporting unit, thereby necessitating a step 2 evaluation. The hypothetical fair value allocation to the assets and liabilities of the reporting unit in the step 2 evaluation, resulted in an amount of implied goodwill exceeding the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill and, as a result, no adjustment to the reporting unit’s goodwill carrying value was warranted. The fair value estimates used in the step 1 and step 2 goodwill tests are based on Level 3 inputs of the fair value hierarchy. The methodologies and key inputs used by management were substantially consistent with those utilized in the fourth quarter 2015. We expect that the carrying value of our Natural Gas Pipelines - Non-Regulated reporting unit will continue to approximate fair value so long as our estimate of future cash flows and the market valuation remain consistent with current levels. A continued or prolonged period of lower commodity prices could result in further deterioration of market multiples, comparable sales transactions prices, weighted average costs of capital, and our cash flow estimates. Changes to any one or combination of these factors, particularly for our Natural Gas Pipelines - Non-Regulated reporting unit given that the carrying value slightly exceeds the current estimated fair value, would result in a change to the reporting unit fair values discussed above which could lead to further impairment charges. Such potential impairment could have a significant effect on our results of operations. Impairments and Disposals During the six months ended June 30, 2016, we had non-cash pre-tax impairment charges and losses on disposals of assets of $257 million substantially all of which was recorded in the first quarter of 2016 comprised of (i) $106 million of project write-offs on our Northeast Energy Direct (NED) Market project and $13 million related to an equity investment in a gas gathering entity within our Natural Gas Pipelines business segment; (ii) $33 million of project write-offs within our CO 2 business segment; (iii) $20 million related to certain terminals with significant coal operations within our Terminals business segment; (iv) $64 million of write-offs associated with our Palmetto project and an $8 million loss on a held-for-sale Transmix facility both within our Products Pipelines business segment; and (v) $13 million net losses on other disposals of assets. The project write-offs recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2016 were driven by management's assessment of the probability of those projects moving forward based on insufficient progress in obtaining contractual commitments from customers in the New England market, in the case of the NED Market project, and an unfavorable action by the Georgia legislature regarding permitting for refined products pipelines affecting the Palmetto project. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 we had non-cash pre-tax impairment charges and losses on disposals of assets of $50 million and $130 million, respectively. These amounts include (i) $48 million and $99 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, of impairments and project write-offs, related to certain gas gathering and processing assets within our midstream operations and $26 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015 primarily related to an equity investment in a gathering entity, both within our Natural Gas Pipelines business segment; (ii) $9 million for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 related to an impairment charge associated with the pending sale of excess construction pipe within our CO 2 business segment; and (iii) $7 million and $4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, of net gains on other disposals of assets. In addition, during the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 we recognized a $12 million gain on the sale of an equity investment, which is included in “Other, net” on the accompanying consolidated statements of income. As conditions warrant, we routinely evaluate our assets for potential triggering events that could impact the fair value of certain assets or our ability to recover the carrying value of long-lived assets. Such assets include accounts receivable, equity investments, goodwill, other intangibles and property plant and equipment, including oil and gas properties and in-process construction. Depending on the nature of the asset, these evaluations require the use of significant judgments including but not limited to judgments related to customer credit worthiness, future cash flow estimates, future volume expectations, current and future commodity prices, regulatory environment, management’s decisions to dispose of certain assets and estimates of the fair values of our reporting units, as well as general economic conditions and the related demand for products handled or transported by our assets. In the current commodity price environment and to the extent conditions further deteriorate, we may 10

  7. identify additional triggering events that may require future evaluations of the recoverability of the carrying value of our long- lived assets, investments and goodwill which could result in further impairment charges. Because certain of our assets, including our oil and gas producing properties have been written down to fair value, any deterioration in fair value that exceeds the rate of depletion of the related asset would result in further impairments. Such non-cash impairments could have a significant effect on our results of operations, which would be recognized in the period in which the carrying value is determined to not be recoverable. Certain of these impairments are based on Level 3 estimates of fair value using income approach valuation methodologies which include assumptions regarding future cash flows, terminal values and discount rates. We believe our methodologies are standard techniques and results would not vary materially using a reasonable range of assumptions. Earnings per Share We calculate earnings per share using the two-class method. Earnings were allocated to Class P shares of common stock and participating securities based on the amount of dividends paid in the current period plus an allocation of the undistributed earnings or excess distributions over earnings to the extent that each security participates in earnings or excess distributions over earnings. Our unvested restricted stock awards, which may be stock or stock units issued to management employees and include dividend equivalent payments, do not participate in excess distributions over earnings. The following tables set forth the allocation of net income available to shareholders of Class P shares and participating securities and the reconciliation of Basic Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding to Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding (in millions): Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Class P $ 332 $ 330 $ 607 $ 756 Participating securities: Restricted stock awards(a) 1 3 2 6 Net Income Available to Common Stockholders $ 333 $ 333 $ 609 $ 762 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Basic Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding 2,229 2,175 2,229 2,158 Effect of dilutive securities: Warrants — 12 — 11 Diluted Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding 2,229 2,187 2,229 2,169 ________ (a) As of June 30, 2016, there were approximately 8 million such restricted stock awards. 11

  8. The following maximum number of potential common stock equivalents are antidilutive and, accordingly, are excluded from the determination of diluted earnings per share (in millions on a weighted-average basis): Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Unvested restricted stock awards 8 7 8 7 Warrants to purchase our Class P shares(a) 293 287 293 288 Convertible trust preferred securities 8 8 8 9 Mandatory convertible preferred stock(b) 58 n/a 58 n/a _______ n/a - not applicable (a) Each warrant entitles the holder to purchase one share of our common stock for an exercise price of $40 per share, payable in cash or by cashless exercise, at any time until May 25, 2017. The potential dilutive effect of the warrants does not consider the assumed proceeds to KMI upon exercise. (b) Until our mandatory convertible preferred shares are converted to common shares, on or before the expected mandatory conversion date of October 26, 2018, the holder of each preferred share participates in our earnings by receiving preferred dividends. 2. Acquisitions and Divestitures Acquisition of Terminal Assets from and Joint Venture With BP Products North America Inc. (BP) On February 1, 2016, we completed the acquisition of 15 products terminals and associated infrastructure from BP for $349 million, including a transaction deposit paid in 2015 and working capital adjustments paid in 2016. In conjunction with this transaction, we and BP formed a joint venture, with an equity ownership interest of 75% and 25%, respectively. Subsequent to the acquisition, we contributed 14 of the acquired terminals to the joint venture, which we operate, and the remaining terminal is solely owned by us. BP acquired its 25% interest in the joint venture for $84 million, which we reported as “Contributions from noncontrolling interests” within our accompanying consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016. Of the acquired assets, 10 terminals are included in our Terminals business segment and 5 terminals are included in our Products Pipelines business segment based on synergies with each segment’s respective existing operations. Allocation of Purchase Price The evaluation of the assigned fair values for the BP terminals acquisition is ongoing and subject to adjustment. As of June 30, 2016, our preliminary allocation of the purchase price for the BP terminals acquisition and the adjusted purchase price allocations for the Hiland acquisition and Royal Vopak terminals acquisition, both completed in February 2015, are detailed below (in millions). Acquisitions Royal Vopak BP Terminal Terminal Assets Hiland Assets Purchase Price Allocation: Current assets $ 2 $ 79 $ 2 Property, plant and equipment 396 1,492 155 Goodwill — 310 6 Deferred charges and other assets(a) — 1,498 — Total assets acquired 398 3,379 163 Current liabilities — (253) (1) Debt — (1,413) — Other liabilities (49) (4) (4) Cash consideration $ 349 $ 1,709 $ 158 _______ (a) Primarily consists of customer contracts and relationships with a weighted average amortization period of 16.4 years. 12

  9. After measuring all of the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value on the acquisition date, goodwill is an intangible asset representing the future economic benefits expected to be derived from an acquisition that are not assigned to other identifiable, separately recognizable assets. We believe the primary items that generated our goodwill are both the value of the synergies created between the acquired assets and our pre-existing assets, and our expected ability to grow the business we acquired by leveraging our pre-existing business experience. We apply a look through method of recording deferred income taxes on the outside book-tax basis differences in our investments. As a result, no deferred income taxes are recorded associated with non-deductible goodwill recorded at the investee level. Subsequent Event—Sale of Equity Interest in SNG On July 10, 2016, we announced the anticipated sale of a 50% interest in our SNG natural gas pipeline system to The Southern Company (Southern Company) for an expected $1.47 billion and the formation of a joint venture, which will include our remaining 50% interest in SNG, which we will operate. Inclusive of existing SNG debt, the transaction equates to an SNG total enterprise value of $4.15 billion. Subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals, the transaction is expected to close in the third or early fourth quarter of 2016, at which time, any difference between the sales price and the proportionate carrying value of the interests in SNG being sold would be recognized. 3. Debt We classify our debt based on the contractual maturity dates of the underlying debt instruments. We defer costs associated with debt issuance over the applicable term. These costs are then amortized as interest expense in our accompanying consolidated statements of income. The following table provides detail on the principal amount of our outstanding debt balances. The table amounts exclude all debt fair value adjustments, including debt discounts, premiums and issuance costs (in millions): June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 KMI Unsecured term loan facility, variable rate, due January 26, 2019(a) $ 1,000 $ — Senior notes, 1.50% through 8.25%, due 2016 through 2098(b) 13,309 13,346 Credit facility due November 26, 2019(c) 700 — Commercial paper borrowings(c) 24 — KMP Senior notes, 2.65% through 9.00%, due 2016 through 2044 19,485 19,985 TGP senior notes, 7.00% through 8.375%, due 2016 through 2037(a) 1,540 1,790 EPNG senior notes, 5.95% through 8.625%, due 2017 through 2032 1,115 1,115 Copano senior notes, 7.125%, due April 1, 2021 332 332 CIG senior notes, 6.85%, due June 15, 2037 100 100 SNG notes, 4.40% through 8.00%, due 2017 through 2032 1,211 1,211 Other Subsidiary Borrowings (as obligor) Kinder Morgan Finance Company, LLC, senior notes, 5.70% through 6.40%, due 2016 through 2036(a) 786 1,636 Hiland Partners Holdings LLC, senior notes, 5.50% and 7.25%, due 2020 and 2022 974 974 EPC Building, LLC, promissory note, 3.967%, due 2016 through 2035 438 443 Trust I preferred securities, 4.75%, due March 31, 2028 221 221 KMGP, $1,000 Liquidation Value Series A Fixed-to-Floating Rate Term Cumulative Preferred Stock 100 100 Other miscellaneous debt 297 300 Total debt – KMI and Subsidiaries 41,632 41,553 Less: Current portion of debt(a)(d) 3,419 821 Total long-term debt – KMI and Subsidiaries(e) $ 38,213 $ 40,732 _______ (a) On January 26, 2016, we entered into a $1.0 billion three-year unsecured term loan facility with a variable interest rate, which is determined in the same manner as interest on our revolving credit facility borrowings. In January 2016, we repaid $850 million of maturing 5.70% senior notes, and in February 2016, we repaid $250 million of maturing 8.00% senior notes primarily using proceeds 13

  10. from the three-year term loan. Since we refinanced a portion of the maturing debt with proceeds from long-term debt, we classified $1 billion of the maturing debt within “Long-term debt” on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015. (b) Amount includes senior notes that are denominated in Euros and have been converted and are respectively reported above at the June 30, 2016 exchange rate of 1.1106 U.S. dollars per Euro and the December 31, 2015 exchange rate of 1.0862 U.S. dollars per Euro. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, our debt increased by $31 million as a result of the change in the exchange rate of U.S. dollars per Euro. At the time of issuance, we entered into cross-currency swap agreements associated with these senior notes, effectively converting these Euro-denominated senior notes to U.S. dollars (see Note 5 “Risk Management— Foreign Currency Risk Management ”). (c) As of June 30, 2016, the weighted average interest rate on our credit facility borrowings, including commercial paper borrowings, was 1.91%. (d) Amounts include outstanding credit facility borrowings, commercial paper borrowings and other debt maturing within 12 months (see “—Current Portion of Debt” below). (e) Excludes our “Debt fair value adjustments” which, as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, increased our combined debt balances by $1,988 million and $1,674 million, respectively. In addition to all unamortized debt discount/premium amounts, debt issuance costs and purchase accounting on our debt balances, our debt fair value adjustments also include amounts associated with the offsetting entry for hedged debt and any unamortized portion of proceeds received from the early termination of interest rate swap agreements. We and substantially all of our wholly owned domestic subsidiaries are a party to a cross guarantee agreement whereby each party to the agreement unconditionally guarantees, jointly and severally, the payment of specified indebtedness of each other party to the agreement. Also, see Note 11. Credit Facilities On January 26, 2016, in accordance with the terms of our revolving credit agreement, we increased the capacity of our revolving credit agreement from $4.0 billion to $5.0 billion. The other terms of the revolving credit agreement remain the same. Our availability under this facility as of June 30, 2016 was $4,102 million, which is net of borrowings, and $174 million in letters of credit. Borrowings under our revolving credit facility can be used for working capital and other general corporate purposes and as a backup to our commercial paper program. Borrowings under our commercial paper program reduce the borrowings allowed under our credit facility. Current Portion of Debt In addition to outstanding credit facility borrowings, commercial paper borrowings, and other debt maturing within 12 months, our current portion of debt includes the current portion of the following significant series of long-term notes: As of June 30, 2016 $600 million 6.00% notes due February 2017 $300 million 7.50% notes due April 2017 $355 million 5.95% notes due April 2017 $500 million 5.90% notes due April 2017 $786 million 7.00% notes due June 2017 As of December 31, 2015 $500 million 3.50% notes due March 2016 Long-term Debt Issuances and Repayments The following are significant long-term debt issuances and repayments made during the six months ended June 30, 2016: Issuances $1.0 billion unsecured term loan facility due 2019 Repayments $850 million 5.70% notes due 2016 $500 million 3.50% notes due 2016 $250 million 8.00% notes due 2016 $67 million 8.25% notes due 2016 4. Stockholders’ Equity Common Equity As of June 30, 2016, our common equity consisted of our Class P common stock. For additional information regarding our Class P common stock, see Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2015 Form 10-K. 14

  11. Common Dividends Holders of our common stock participate in any dividend declared by our board of directors, subject to the rights of the holders of any outstanding preferred stock. The following table provides information about our per share dividends: Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Per common share cash dividend declared for the period $ 0.125 $ 0.49 $ 0.250 $ 0.97 Per common share cash dividend paid in the period $ 0.125 $ 0.48 $ 0.250 $ 0.93 On July 20, 2016, our board of directors declared a cash dividend of $0.125 per common share for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2016, which is payable on August 15, 2016 to common shareholders of record as of August 1, 2016. Mandatory Convertible Preferred Stock On October 30, 2015, we completed an offering of 32,000,000 depositary shares, each of which represents a 1/20th interest in a share of our 1,600,000 shares of 9.750% Series A mandatory convertible preferred stock, with a liquidating preference of $1,000 per share (equal to a $50 liquidation preference per depositary share). For additional information regarding our mandatory convertible preferred stock, see Note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included in our 2015 Form 10-K. Preferred Dividends On April 20, 2016, our board of directors declared a cash dividend of $24.375 per share of our mandatory convertible preferred stock (equivalent of $1.21875 per depositary share) for the period from and including April 26, 2016 through and including July 25, 2016, which is payable on July 26, 2016 to mandatory convertible preferred shareholders of record as of July 11, 2016. 5. Risk Management Certain of our business activities expose us to risks associated with unfavorable changes in the market price of natural gas, NGL and crude oil. We also have exposure to interest rate and foreign currency risk as a result of the issuance of our debt obligations. Pursuant to our management’s approved risk management policy, we use derivative contracts to hedge or reduce our exposure to certain of these risks. In addition, prior to May 2016, we had power forward and swap contracts related to legacy operations of acquired businesses. Energy Commodity Price Risk Management As of June 30, 2016, we had the following outstanding commodity forward contracts to hedge our forecasted energy commodity purchases and sales: Net open position long/(short) Derivatives designated as hedging contracts Crude oil fixed price (21.2) MMBbl Crude oil basis (4.1) MMBbl Natural gas fixed price (31.9) Bcf Natural gas basis (21.8) Bcf Derivatives not designated as hedging contracts Crude oil fixed price (0.3) MMBbl Crude oil basis (0.4) MMBbl Natural gas fixed price (12.8) Bcf Natural gas basis (2.6) Bcf NGL and other fixed price (3.4) MMBbl 15

  12. As of June 30, 2016, the maximum length of time over which we have hedged, for accounting purposes, our exposure to the variability in future cash flows associated with energy commodity price risk is through December 2020. Interest Rate Risk Management As of June 30, 2016, we had a combined notional principal amount of $9,775 million of fixed-to-variable interest rate swap agreements, of which $8,475 million were designated as fair value hedges. As of December 31, 2015, we had a combined notional principal amount of $11,000 million of fixed-to-variable interest rate swap agreements, of which $9,700 million were designated as fair value hedges. All of our swap agreements effectively convert the interest expense associated with certain series of senior notes from fixed rates to variable rates based on an interest rate of London Interbank Offered Rate plus a spread and have termination dates that correspond to the maturity dates of the related series of senior notes. As of June 30, 2016, the maximum length of time over which we have hedged a portion of our exposure to the variability in the value of this debt due to interest rate risk is through March 15, 2035. Foreign Currency Risk Management In connection with the issuance of our Euro denominated senior notes in March 2015 (see Note 3), we entered into $1,358 million cross-currency swap agreements to manage the related foreign currency risk by effectively converting all of the fixed- rate Euro denominated debt, including annual interest payments and the payment of principal at maturity, to U.S. dollar denominated debt at fixed rates equivalent to approximately 3.79% and 4.67% for the 7-year and 12-year senior notes, respectively. These cross-currency swaps are accounted for as cash flow hedges. The terms of the cross-currency swap agreements correspond to the related hedged senior notes, and such agreements have the same maturities as the hedged senior notes. 16

  13. Fair Value of Derivative Contracts The following table summarizes the fair values of our derivative contracts included in our accompanying consolidated balance sheets (in millions): Fair Value of Derivative Contracts Asset derivatives Liability derivatives June 30, December 31, June 30, December 31, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Location Fair value Fair value Derivatives designated as hedging contracts Natural gas and crude derivative Fair value of derivative contracts/ contracts (Other current liabilities) $ 177 $ 359 $ (38) $ (13) Deferred charges and other assets/ (Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits) 139 244 (18) — Subtotal 316 603 (56) (13) Interest rate swap agreements Fair value of derivative contracts/ (Other current liabilities) 117 111 — — Deferred charges and other assets/ (Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits) 657 273 — (9) Subtotal 774 384 — (9) Cross-currency swap agreements Fair value of derivative contracts/ (Other current liabilities) — — (22) (6) Deferred charges and other assets/ (Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits) 13 — (12) (46) Subtotal 13 — (34) (52) Total 1,103 987 (90) (74) Derivatives not designated as hedging contracts Natural gas, crude, NGL and other Fair value of derivative contracts/ derivative contracts (Other current liabilities) 7 35 (10) (1) Subtotal 7 35 (10) (1) Interest rate swap agreements Fair value of derivative contracts/ (Other current liabilities) 12 1 — (11) Deferred charges and other assets/ (Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits) 50 — — (5) Subtotal 62 1 — (16) Power derivative contracts Fair value of derivative contracts/ (Other current liabilities) — 1 — (17) Subtotal — 1 — (17) Total 69 37 (10) (34) Total derivatives $ 1,172 $ 1,024 $ (100) $ (108) 17

  14. Effect of Derivative Contracts on the Income Statement The following tables summarize the impact of our derivative contracts on our accompanying consolidated statements of income (in millions): Derivatives in fair value hedging Gain/(loss) recognized in income relationships Location on derivatives and related hedged item Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 2015 2016 2016 Interest rate swap agreements Interest, net $ 119 $ (233) $ 399 $ (88) Hedged fixed rate debt Interest, net $ (120) $ 256 $ (404) $ 117 Gain/(loss) recognized in income Gain/(loss) on derivative Gain/(loss) reclassified from (ineffective portion Derivatives in recognized in OCI on Accumulated OCI and amount cash flow hedging derivative (effective into income excluded from Location Location relationships portion)(a) (effective portion)(b) effectiveness testing) Three Months Ended Three Months Ended Three Months Ended June 30, June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 Energy commodity Revenues—Natural Revenues—Natural $ (111) $ (82) $ 2 $ 1 $ — $ — derivative contracts gas sales gas sales Revenues—Product Revenues—Product 33 37 (6) 3 sales and other sales and other (2) (14) — — Costs of sales Costs of sales Interest rate swap (1) 1 — — — — agreements(c) Interest, net Interest, net Cross-currency (30) 23 (22) 33 — — swap Other, net Other, net $ (142) $ (58) $ 11 $ 57 $ (6) $ 3 Total Total Total Gain/(loss) recognized in income Gain/(loss) on derivative Gain/(loss) reclassified from (ineffective portion Derivatives in recognized in OCI on Accumulated OCI and amount cash flow hedging derivative (effective into income excluded from Location Location relationships portion)(a) (effective portion)(b) effectiveness testing) Six Months Ended Six Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 Energy commodity Revenues—Natural Revenues—Natural $ (84) $ (47) $ 23 $ 25 $ — $ — derivative contracts gas sales gas sales Revenues—Product Revenues—Product 90 101 (5) 10 sales and other sales and other (12) (19) — — Costs of sales Costs of sales Interest rate swap (5) (2) (1) (1) — — agreements(c) Interest, net Interest, net Cross-currency 23 20 (11) 19 — — swap Other, net Other, net $ (69) $ (60) $ 119 $ 129 $ (5) $ 10 Total Total Total _____ (a) We expect to reclassify an approximate $46 million gain associated with cash flow hedge price risk management activities included in our accumulated other comprehensive loss balances as of June 30, 2016 into earnings during the next twelve months (when the associated forecasted sales and purchases are also expected to occur), however, actual amounts reclassified into earnings could vary materially as a result of changes in market prices. (b) Amounts reclassified were the result of the hedged forecasted transactions actually affecting earnings (i.e., when the forecasted sales and purchases actually occurred). (c) Amounts represent our share of an equity investee’s accumulated other comprehensive loss. 18

  15. Derivatives not designated as accounting hedges Location Gain/(loss) recognized in income on derivatives Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Energy commodity derivative contracts Revenues—Natural gas sales $ (11) $ (2) $ (5) $ 3 Revenues—Product sales and other (12) (40) (14) 4 (2) Costs of sales 3 3 — Interest rate swap agreements Interest, net 24 — 77 — Total(a) $ 4 $ (39) $ 56 $ 7 _______ (a) Three and six months ended June 30, 2016 includes an approximate gain of $20 million and $39 million, respectively, associated with natural gas, crude and NGL derivative contract settlements. Three and six months ended June 30, 2015 includes an approximate gain of $7 million and $2 million, respectively, associated with natural gas, crude and NGL derivative contract settlements. Credit Risks In conjunction with certain derivative contracts, we are required to provide collateral to our counterparties, which may include posting letters of credit or placing cash in margin accounts. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had no and $2 million of outstanding letters of credit supporting our commodity price risk management program. As of June 30, 2016, we had cash margins of $18 million posted by us as collateral and no amounts posted by our counterparties as collateral. As of December 31, 2015, we had no cash margins posted by us as collateral and cash margins of $37 million posted by our counterparties as collateral. We also use industry standard commercial agreements which allow for the netting of exposures associated with transactions executed under a single commercial agreement. Additionally, we generally utilize master netting agreements to offset credit exposure across multiple commercial agreements with a single counterparty. We also have agreements with certain counterparties to our derivative contracts that contain provisions requiring the posting of additional collateral upon a decrease in our credit rating. As of June 30, 2016, based on our current mark to market positions and posted collateral, we estimate that if our credit rating were downgraded one or two notches, we would not be required to post additional collateral. 19

  16. Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Cumulative revenues, expenses, gains and losses that under GAAP are included within our comprehensive income but excluded from our earnings are reported as “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” within “Stockholders’ Equity” in our consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the components of our “Accumulated other comprehensive loss” not including non- controlling interests are summarized as follows (in millions): Net unrealized Pension and Total gains/(losses) Foreign other accumulated on cash flow currency postretirement other hedge translation liability comprehensive derivatives adjustments adjustments loss Balance as of December 31, 2015 $ 219 $ (322) $ (358) $ (461) Other comprehensive (loss) gain before reclassifications (69) 85 10 26 Gains reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (119) — — (119) Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income (188) 85 10 (93) Balance as of June 30, 2016 $ 31 $ (237) $ (348) $ (554) Net unrealized Pension and Total gains/(losses) Foreign other accumulated on cash flow currency postretirement other hedge translation liability comprehensive derivatives adjustments adjustments loss Balance as of December 31, 2014 $ 327 $ (108) $ (236) $ (17) Other comprehensive (loss) gain before reclassifications (60) (91) 6 (145) Gains reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (129) — — (129) Net current-period other comprehensive (loss) income (189) (91) 6 (274) Balance as of June 30, 2015 $ 138 $ (199) $ (230) $ (291) 6. Fair Value The fair values of our financial instruments are separated into three broad levels (Levels 1, 2 and 3) based on our assessment of the availability of observable market data and the significance of non-observable data used to determine fair value. Each fair value measurement must be assigned to a level corresponding to the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The three broad levels of inputs defined by the fair value hierarchy are as follows: • Level 1 Inputs—quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date; • Level 2 Inputs—inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and • Level 3 Inputs—unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. These unobservable inputs reflect the entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (which might include the reporting entity’s own data). 20

  17. Fair Value of Derivative Contracts The following two tables summarize the fair value measurements of our (i) energy commodity derivative contracts; (ii) interest rate swap agreements; and (iii) cross-currency swap agreements, based on the three levels established by the Codification (in millions). The tables also identify the impact of derivative contracts which we have elected to present on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets on a gross basis that are eligible for netting under master netting agreements. Balance sheet asset fair value measurements by level Contracts Cash Gross available for collateral Net Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 amount netting held(b) amount As of June 30, 2016 Energy commodity derivative contracts(a) $ 6 $ 317 $ — $ 323 $ (32) $ — $ 291 Interest rate swap agreements $ — $ 836 $ — $ 836 $ — $ — $ 836 Cross-currency swap agreements $ — $ 13 $ — $ 13 $ (13) $ — $ — As of December 31, 2015 Energy commodity derivative contracts(a) $ 48 $ 589 $ 2 $ 639 $ (12) $ (37) $ 590 Interest rate swap agreements $ — $ 385 $ — $ 385 $ (8) $ — $ 377 Cross-currency swap agreements $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — Balance sheet liability fair value measurements by level Contracts Gross available for Collateral Net Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 amount netting posted(c) amount As of June 30, 2016 Energy commodity derivative contracts(a) $ (19) $ (47) $ — $ (66) $ 32 $ 18 $ (16) Interest rate swap agreements $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — Cross-currency swap agreements $ — $ (34) $ — $ (34) $ 13 $ — $ (21) As of December 31, 2015 Energy commodity derivative contracts(a) $ (4) $ (10) $ (17) $ (31) $ 12 $ — $ (19) Interest rate swap agreements $ — $ (25) $ — $ (25) $ 8 $ — $ (17) Cross-currency swap agreements $ — $ (52) $ — $ (52) $ — $ — $ (52) _______ (a) Level 1 consists primarily of New York Mercantile Exchange natural gas futures. Level 2 consists primarily of OTC West Texas Intermediate swaps and options. Level 3 consists primarily of power derivative contracts. (b) Cash margin deposits held by us associated with our energy commodity contract positions and OTC swap agreements and reported within “Other current liabilities” on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. (c) Cash margin deposits posted by us associated with our energy commodity contract positions and OTC swap agreements and reported within “Other current assets” on our accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The table below provides a summary of changes in the fair value of our Level 3 energy commodity derivative contracts (in millions): Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Derivatives-net asset (liability) Beginning of Period $ (2) $ (49) $ (15) $ (61) Total gains or (losses) included in earnings (3) — (9) — Settlements 5 12 24 24 End of Period $ — $ (37) $ — $ (37) The amount of total gains or (losses) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or (losses) relating to assets held at the reporting date $ — $ 1 $ — $ 3 21

  18. As of December 31, 2015, our Level 3 derivative assets and liabilities consisted primarily of power derivative contracts (which expired in April 2016), where a significant portion of fair value is calculated from underlying market data that is not readily observable. The derived values use industry standard methodologies that may consider the historical relationships among various commodities, modeled market prices, time value, volatility factors and other relevant economic measures. The use of these inputs results in management’s best estimate of fair value and management would not expect materially different valuation results were we to use different input amounts within reasonable ranges. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The estimated fair value of our outstanding debt balances is disclosed below (in millions): June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 Carrying Estimated Carrying Estimated value fair value value fair value Total debt $ 43,620 $ 43,061 $ 43,227 $ 37,481 We used Level 2 input values to measure the estimated fair value of our outstanding debt balances as of both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. 22

  19. 7. Reportable Segments Financial information by segment follows (in millions): Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Revenues Natural Gas Pipelines Revenues from external customers $ 1,882 $ 2,091 $ 3,852 $ 4,268 Intersegment revenues 1 5 2 8 CO 2 304 353 606 799 Terminals Revenues from external customers 487 469 952 926 Intersegment revenues 1 1 1 1 Products Pipelines Revenues from external customers 398 477 789 921 Intersegment revenues 3 1 8 1 Kinder Morgan Canada 63 65 122 125 Other 1 (1) 1 3 Total segment revenues 3,140 3,461 6,333 7,052 Other revenues 9 9 17 18 Less: Total intersegment revenues (5) (7) (11) (10) Total consolidated revenues $ 3,144 $ 3,463 $ 6,339 $ 7,060 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Segment EBDA(a) Natural Gas Pipelines $ 966 $ 928 $ 1,958 $ 1,943 CO 2 203 240 389 576 Terminals 292 279 545 549 Products Pipelines 293 277 472 523 Kinder Morgan Canada 40 37 80 78 Other (5) (40) (13) (46) Total Segment EBDA 1,789 1,721 3,431 3,623 Total segment DD&A (552) (570) (1,103) (1,108) Total segment amortization of excess cost of equity investments (16) (14) (30) (26) Other revenues 9 9 17 18 General and administrative expense (189) (164) (379) (380) Interest expense, net of unallocable interest income (470) (472) (912) (986) Unallocable income tax expense (196) (168) (335) (380) Total consolidated net income $ 375 $ 342 $ 689 $ 761 June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 Assets Natural Gas Pipelines $ 53,677 $ 53,704 CO 2 4,317 4,706 Terminals 9,673 9,083 Products Pipelines 8,360 8,464 Kinder Morgan Canada 1,586 1,434 Other 317 418 Total segment assets 77,930 77,809 Corporate assets(b) 6,360 6,276 Assets held for sale 27 19 Total consolidated assets $ 84,317 $ 84,104 _______ 23

  20. (a) We evaluate performance based on each segment’s EBDA. Segment EBDA includes revenues, earnings from equity investments, allocable interest income, and other, net, less operating expenses, allocable income taxes, and other expense (income), net, and losses on impairments and disposals of long-lived assets, net. Operating expenses include natural gas purchases and other costs of sales, operations and maintenance expenses, and taxes, other than income taxes. (b) Includes cash and cash equivalents, margin and restricted deposits, unallocable interest receivable, prepaid assets and deferred charges, deferred tax assets, risk management assets related to debt fair value adjustments and miscellaneous corporate assets (such as information technology and telecommunications equipment) not allocated to individual segments. 8. Income Taxes Income tax expense included in our accompanying consolidated statements of income were as follows (in millions, except percentages): Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Income tax expense $ 213 $ 189 $ 367 $ 413 Effective tax rate 36.2% 35.6% 34.8% 35.2% The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2016 is higher than the statutory federal rate of 35% primarily due to state and foreign income taxes, partially offset by dividend-received deductions from our investment in Florida Gas Pipeline (Citrus) and Plantation Pipe Line, and the change in the effective state tax rate. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2016 is slightly lower than the statutory federal rate of 35% primarily due to dividend-received deductions from our investment in Citrus and Plantation Pipe Line, and adjustments to our income tax reserve for uncertain tax positions, partially offset by state and foreign income taxes. The effective tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2015 is slightly higher than the statutory federal rate of 35% primarily due to state and foreign income taxes, partially offset by dividend-received deductions from our investment in Citrus. The effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2015 is marginally higher than the statutory federal rate of 35% primarily due to state and foreign income taxes, partially offset by dividend-received deductions from our investment in Citrus and the change in the effective state tax rate as a result of the Hiland acquisition. As of June 30, 2016, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits including interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions is $144 million, a decrease of $29 million from the December 31, 2015 balance of $173 million. This $29 million decrease in unrecognized tax benefits resulted primarily from the settlement of a state tax audit and a certain statute of limitations expiration on another matter. 9. Litigation, Environmental and Other Contingencies We and our subsidiaries are parties to various legal, regulatory and other matters arising from the day-to-day operations of our businesses or certain predecessor operations that may result in claims against the Company. Although no assurance can be given, we believe, based on our experiences to date and taking into account established reserves and insurance, that the ultimate resolution of such items will not have a material adverse impact on our business, financial position, results of operations or dividends to our shareholders. We believe we have meritorious defenses to the matters to which we are a party and intend to vigorously defend the Company. When we determine a loss is probable of occurring and is reasonably estimable, we accrue an undiscounted liability for such contingencies based on our best estimate using information available at that time. If the estimated loss is a range of potential outcomes and there is no better estimate within the range, we accrue the amount at the low end of the range. We disclose contingencies where an adverse outcome may be material, or in the judgment of management, we conclude the matter should otherwise be disclosed. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission Proceedings SFPP The tariffs and rates charged by SFPP are subject to a number of ongoing proceedings at the FERC, including the complaints and protests of various shippers the most recent of which was filed in late 2015 with the FERC (docketed at OR16-6) challenging SFPP’s filed East Line rates. In general, these complaints and protests allege the rates and tariffs charged 24

  21. by SFPP are not just and reasonable under the Interstate Commerce Act (ICA). In some of these proceedings shippers have challenged the overall rate being charged by SFPP, and in others the shippers have challenged SFPP’s index-based rate increases. If the shippers are successful in proving these claims or other of their claims, they are entitled to seek reparations (which may reach back up to two years prior to the filing of their complaints) or refunds of any excess rates paid, and SFPP may be required to reduce its rates going forward. These proceedings tend to be protracted, with decisions of the FERC often appealed to the federal courts. The issues involved in these proceedings include, among others, whether indexed rate increases are justified, and the appropriate level of return and income tax allowance SFPP may include in its rates. With respect to the various SFPP related complaints and protest proceedings at the FERC, we estimate that the shippers are seeking approximately $40 million in annual rate reductions and approximately $169 million in refunds. Management believes SFPP has meritorious arguments supporting SFPP’s rates and intends to vigorously defend SFPP against these complaints and protests. However, to the extent the shippers are successful in one or more of the complaints or protest proceedings, SFPP estimates that applying the principles of several recent FERC decisions in SFPP cases, as applicable, to pending cases would result in rate reductions and refunds substantially lower than those sought by the shippers. EPNG The tariffs and rates charged by EPNG are subject to two ongoing FERC proceedings (the “2008 rate case” and the “2010 rate case”). With respect to the 2008 rate case, the FERC issued its decision (Opinion 517-A) in July 2015. The FERC generally upheld its prior determinations, ordered refunds to be paid within 60 days, and stated that it will apply its findings in Opinion 517-A to the same issues in the 2010 rate case. EPNG has sought federal appellate review of Opinion 517-A. With respect to the 2010 rate case, the FERC issued its decision (Opinion 528-A) on February 18, 2016. The FERC generally upheld its prior determinations, affirmed prior findings of an Administrative Law Judge that certain shippers qualify for lower rates, and required EPNG to file revised pro forma recalculated rates consistent with the terms of Opinions 517-A and 528-A. EPNG and two intervenors sought rehearing of certain aspects of the decision, and certain intervenors sought judicial review. All refund obligations related to the 2008 rate case were satisfied during calendar year 2015. With respect to the 2010 rate case, EPNG believes it has an appropriate reserve related to the findings in Opinions 517-A and 528-A. Other Commercial Matters Union Pacific Railroad Company Easements & Related Litigation SFPP and Union Pacific Railroad Company (UPRR) are engaged in a proceeding to determine the extent, if any, to which the rent payable by SFPP for the use of pipeline easements on rights-of-way held by UPRR should be adjusted pursuant to existing contractual arrangements for the ten-year period beginning January 1, 2004 ( Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Santa Fe Pacific Pipelines, Inc., SFPP, L.P., Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. “D”, Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., et al., Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, filed July 28, 2004). In September 2011, the trial judge determined that the annual rent payable as of January 1, 2004 was $14 million, subject to annual consumer price index increases. SFPP appealed the judgment. By notice dated October 25, 2013, UPRR demanded the payment of $22.3 million in rent for the first year of the next ten- year period beginning January 1, 2014, which SFPP rejected. On November 5, 2014, the Court of Appeals issued an opinion which reversed the judgment, including the award of prejudgment interest, and remanded the matter to the trial court for a determination of UPRR’s property interest in its right-of- way, including whether UPRR has sufficient interest to grant SFPP’s easements. UPRR filed a petition for review to the California Supreme Court which was denied. The trial court has not set a date for the retrial. After the above-referenced decision by the California Court of Appeals which held that UPRR does not own the subsurface rights to grant certain easements and may not be able to collect rent from those easements, a purported class action lawsuit was filed in 2015 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California by private landowners in California who claim to be the lawful owners of subsurface real property allegedly used or occupied by UPRR or SFPP. Substantially similar follow-on lawsuits were filed and are pending in federal courts by landowners in Nevada, Arizona and New Mexico. These suits, which are brought purportedly as class actions on behalf of all landowners who own land in fee adjacent to and underlying the railroad easement under which the SFPP pipeline is located in those respective states, assert claims against UPRR, SFPP, KMGP, and Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. “D” for declaratory judgment, trespass, ejectment, quiet title, unjust enrichment, accounting, and alleged unlawful business acts and practices arising from defendants’ alleged improper use or occupation of subsurface real property. SFPP views these cases as primarily a dispute between UPRR and the plaintiffs. UPRR purported to grant SFPP a network of subsurface pipeline easements along UPRR’s railroad right-of-way. SFPP relied on the validity of those easements 25

  22. and paid rent to UPRR for the value of those easements. We believe we have recorded a right-of-way liability sufficient to cover our potential obligation, if any, for back rent. SFPP and UPRR have engaged in multiple disputes over the circumstances under which SFPP must pay for relocations of its pipeline within the UPRR right-of-way and the safety standards that govern relocations. In 2006, following a bench trial regarding the circumstances under which SFPP must pay for relocations, the judge determined that SFPP must pay for any relocations resulting from any legitimate business purpose of the UPRR. The decision was affirmed on appeal. In addition, UPRR contends that SFPP must comply with the more expensive American Railway Engineering and Maintenance-of-Way Association (AREMA) standards in determining when relocations are necessary and in completing relocations. Each party has sought declaratory relief with respect to its positions regarding the application of these standards with respect to relocations. In 2011, a jury verdict was reached that SFPP was obligated to comply with AREMA standards in connection with a railroad project in Beaumont Hills, California. In 2014, the trial court entered judgment against SFPP, consistent with the jury’s verdict. On June 29, 2015, the parties entered into a confidential settlement of all of the claims relating to the project in Beaumont Hills and the case was dismissed. Since SFPP does not know UPRR’s plans for projects or other activities that would cause pipeline relocations, it is difficult to quantify the effects of the outcome of these cases on SFPP. Even if SFPP is successful in advancing its positions, significant relocations for which SFPP must nonetheless bear the cost (i.e., for railroad purposes, with the standards in the federal Pipeline Safety Act applying) could have an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, cash flows, and our dividends to our shareholders. These effects could be even greater in the event SFPP is unsuccessful in one or more of these lawsuits. Gulf LNG Facility Arbitration On March 1, 2016, Gulf LNG Energy, LLC and Gulf LNG Pipeline, LLC (GLNG) received a Notice of Disagreement and Disputed Statements and a Notice of Arbitration from Eni USA Gas Marketing LLC (Eni USA), one of two companies that entered into a terminal use agreement for capacity of the Gulf LNG Facility in Mississippi for an initial term that is not scheduled to expire until the year 2031. Eni USA is an indirect subsidiary of Eni S.p.A., a multi-national integrated energy company headquartered in Milan, Italy. Pursuant to its Notice of Arbitration, Eni USA seeks declaratory and monetary relief based upon its assertion that (i) the terminal use agreement should be terminated because changes in the U.S. natural gas market since the execution of the agreement in December 2007 have “frustrated the essential purpose” of the agreement and (ii) activities allegedly undertaken by affiliates of Gulf LNG Holdings Group LLC “in connection with a plan to convert the LNG Facility into a liquefaction/export facility have given rise to a contractual right on the part of Eni USA to terminate” the agreement. As set forth in the terminal use agreement, disputes are meant to be resolved by final and binding arbitration. A three-member arbitration panel has been selected and the arbitration hearing is scheduled for January 2017. Eni USA has indicated that it will continue to pay the amounts claimed to be due pending resolution of the dispute. The successful assertion by Eni USA of its claim to terminate or amend its payment obligations under the agreement prior to the expiration of its initial term could have an adverse effect on the business, financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of GLNG and distributions to KMI, a 50% shareholder of GLNG. We view the allegations in the demand for arbitration to be without merit, and we intend to vigorously contest them in the arbitration. Plains Gas Solutions, LLC v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. et al. On October 16, 2013, Plains Gas Solutions, LLC (Plains) filed a petition in the 151 st Judicial District Court for Harris County, Texas (Case No. 62528) against TGP, Kinetica Partners, LLC and two other Kinetica entities. The suit arises from the sale by TGP of the Cameron System in Louisiana to Kinetica Partners, LLC on September 1, 2013. Plains alleges that defendants breached a straddle agreement requiring that gas on the Cameron System be committed to Plains’ Grand Chenier gas-processing facility, that requisite daily volume reports were not provided, that TGP improperly assigned its obligations under the straddle agreement to Kinetica, and that defendants interfered with Plains’ contracts with producers. The petition alleges damages of at least $100 million. Under the Amended and Restated Purchase and Sale Agreement with Kinetica, Kinetica is obligated to defend and indemnify TGP in connection with the gas commitment and reporting claims. After agreeing initially to defend and indemnify TGP against such claims, Kinetica withdrew its defense, disputed its indemnity obligation, and settled with Plains. Trial of the remaining claims against TGP is scheduled for January 2017. We intend to vigorously defend the suit and pursue Kinetica, if necessary, for indemnity and costs of defense. Brinckerhoff v. El Paso Pipeline GP Company, LLC., et al. In December 2011 ( Brinckerhoff I ), March 2012, ( Brinckerhoff II ), May 2013 ( Brinckerhoff III ) and June 2014 ( Brinckerhoff IV), derivative lawsuits were filed in Delaware Chancery Court against El Paso Corporation, El Paso Pipeline GP 26

  23. Company, L.L.C., the general partner of EPB, and the directors of the general partner at the time of the relevant transactions. EPB was named in these lawsuits as a “Nominal Defendant.” The lawsuits arise from the March 2010, November 2010, May 2012 and June 2011 drop-down transactions involving EPB’s purchase of SLNG, Elba Express, CPG and interests in SNG and CIG. The lawsuits allege various conflicts of interest and that the consideration paid by EPB was excessive. Brinckerhoff I and II were consolidated into one proceeding. Motions to dismiss were filed in Brinckerhoff III and Brinckerhoff IV, and such motions remain pending. On June 12, 2014, defendants’ motion for summary judgment was granted in Brinckerhoff I, dismissing the case in its entirety. Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in Brinckerhoff II was granted in part, dismissing certain claims and allowing the matter to go to trial in late 2014 on the remaining claims. On April 20, 2015, the Court issued a post-trial memorandum opinion (Memorandum Opinion) in Brinckerhoff II entering judgment in favor of all of the defendants other than the general partner of EPB, but finding the general partner liable for breach of contract in connection with EPB’s purchase of 49% interests in Elba and SLNG and a 15% interest in SNG in a $1.13 billion drop-down transaction that closed on November 19, 2010 (Fall Dropdown), prior to our acquisition of El Paso Corporation in 2012. In its Memorandum Opinion, the Court determined that EPB suffered damages of $171 million from the Fall Dropdown, which the Court determined to be the amount that EPB overpaid for Elba. We believe the claim is derivative in nature and was extinguished by our acquisition on November 26, 2014, pursuant to a merger agreement, of all of the outstanding common units of EPB that we did not already own. On December 2, 2015, the Court denied our motion to dismiss the remaining claims in Brinckerhoff II based upon our acquisition of all of the outstanding common units of EPB, and held that damages should be calculated by considering the unaffiliated unitholders’ ownership percentage as of the effective date of the merger. Based on this ruling, the Court entered judgment on February 4, 2016 in the amount of $100.2 million plus interest at the legal rate for the period from November 15, 2010 until the date of payment, if any payment is ultimately required. We filed an appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court and Brinckerhoff filed a cross-appeal challenging the dismissal of Brinckerhoff I. The appeal has been fully briefed. Execution on the judgment has been stayed until the appeal is decided. At the present time, we do not believe that an ultimate award, if any, will have a material financial impact on our Company. We continue to believe the transactions at issue were appropriate and in the best interests of EPB and we intend to continue to defend the lawsuits vigorously. Price Reporting Litigation Beginning in 2003, several lawsuits were filed by purchasers of natural gas against El Paso Corporation, El Paso Marketing L.P. and numerous other energy companies based on a claim under state antitrust law that such defendants conspired to manipulate the price of natural gas by providing false price information to industry trade publications that published gas indices. Several of the cases have been settled or dismissed. The remaining cases, which were pending in Nevada federal court, were dismissed, but the dismissal was reversed by the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals. The U.S. Supreme Court affirmed the 9 th Circuit Court of Appeals in a decision dated April 21, 2015, and the cases were then remanded to the Nevada federal court for further consideration and trial, if necessary, of numerous remaining issues. On May 24, 2016, the Court granted a motion for summary judgment dismissing one of the cases in which approximately $500 million in damages has been alleged. In the remaining cases, approximately $1.5 billion in damages have been alleged against all defendants. There remains significant uncertainty regarding the validity of the causes of action, the damages asserted and the level of damages, if any, which may be allocated to us. Therefore, our costs and legal exposure related to the remaining outstanding lawsuits and claims are not currently determinable. Kinder Morgan, Inc. Corporate Reorganization Litigation Certain unitholders of KMP and EPB filed five putative class action lawsuits in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in connection with the Merger Transactions, which the Court consolidated under the caption In re Kinder Morgan, Inc. Corporate Reorganization Litigation (Consolidated Case No. 10093-VCL). On December 12, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a Verified Second Consolidated Amended Class Action Complaint, which purported to assert claims on behalf of both the former EPB unitholders and the former KMP unitholders. The EPB plaintiff alleged that (i) El Paso Pipeline GP Company, L.L.C. ( EPGP ), the general partner of EPB, and the directors of EPGP breached duties under the EPB partnership agreement, including the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, by entering into the EPB Transaction; (ii) EPB, E Merger Sub LLC, KMI and individual defendants aided and abetted such breaches; and (iii) EPB, E Merger Sub LLC, KMI, and individual defendants tortiously interfered with the EPB partnership agreement by causing EPGP to breach its duties under the EPB partnership agreement. The KMP plaintiffs alleged that (i) KMR, KMGP, and individual defendants breached duties under the KMP partnership agreement, including the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing, by entering into the KMP Transaction and by failing to adequately disclose material facts related to the transaction; (ii) KMI aided and abetted such breach; and (iii) KMI, KMP, KMR, P Merger Sub LLC, and individual defendants tortiously interfered with the rights of the plaintiffs and the putative class under the KMP partnership agreement by causing KMGP to breach its duties under the KMP partnership agreement. The complaint sought declaratory relief that the transactions were unlawful and unenforceable, reformation, rescission, rescissory or 27

  24. compensatory damages, interest, and attorneys’ and experts’ fees and costs. On December 30, 2014, the defendants moved to dismiss the complaint. On April 2, 2015, the EPB plaintiff and the defendants submitted a stipulation and proposed order of dismissal, agreeing to dismiss all claims brought by the EPB plaintiff with prejudice as to the EPB lead plaintiff and without prejudice to all other members of the putative EPB class. The Court entered such order on April 2, 2015. On August 24, 2015, the Court issued an order granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss the remaining counts of the complaint for failure to state a claim. On September 21, 2015, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the Supreme Court of the State of Delaware, captioned Haynes Family Trust et al. v. Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc. et al. (Case No. 515). On March 10, 2016, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the dismissal of all claims on appeal and this matter is now concluded. Pipeline Integrity and Releases From time to time, despite our best efforts, our pipelines experience leaks and ruptures. These leaks and ruptures may cause explosions, fire, and damage to the environment, damage to property and/or personal injury or death. In connection with these incidents, we may be sued for damages caused by an alleged failure to properly mark the locations of our pipelines and/or to properly maintain our pipelines. Depending upon the facts and circumstances of a particular incident, state and federal regulatory authorities may seek civil and/or criminal fines and penalties. General As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, our total reserve for legal matters was $490 million and $463 million, respectively. The reserve primarily relates to various claims from regulatory proceedings arising in our products and natural gas pipeline segments and certain corporate matters. Environmental Matters We and our subsidiaries are subject to environmental cleanup and enforcement actions from time to time. In particular, CERCLA generally imposes joint and several liability for cleanup and enforcement costs on current and predecessor owners and operators of a site, among others, without regard to fault or the legality of the original conduct, subject to the right of a liable party to establish a “reasonable basis” for apportionment of costs. Our operations are also subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to protection of the environment. Although we believe our operations are in substantial compliance with applicable environmental law and regulations, risks of additional costs and liabilities are inherent in pipeline, terminal and CO 2 field and oil field operations, and there can be no assurance that we will not incur significant costs and liabilities. Moreover, it is possible that other developments, such as increasingly stringent environmental laws, regulations and enforcement policies under the terms of authority of those laws, and claims for damages to property or persons resulting from our operations, could result in substantial costs and liabilities to us. We are currently involved in several governmental proceedings involving alleged violations of environmental and safety regulations. As we receive notices of non-compliance, we attempt to negotiate and settle such matters where appropriate. We do not believe that these alleged violations will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or dividends to our shareholders. We are also currently involved in several governmental proceedings involving groundwater and soil remediation efforts under administrative orders or related state remediation programs. We have established a reserve to address the costs associated with the cleanup. In addition, we are involved with and have been identified as a potentially responsible party in several federal and state superfund sites. Environmental reserves have been established for those sites where our contribution is probable and reasonably estimable. In addition, we are from time to time involved in civil proceedings relating to damages alleged to have occurred as a result of accidental leaks or spills of refined petroleum products, NGL, natural gas and CO 2 . Portland Harbor Superfund Site, Willamette River, Portland, Oregon In December 2000, the EPA issued General Notice letters to potentially responsible parties including GATX Terminals Corporation (n/k/a KMLT). At that time, GATX owned two liquids terminals along the lower reach of the Willamette River, an industrialized area known as Portland Harbor. Portland Harbor is listed on the National Priorities List and is designated as a Superfund Site under CERCLA. A group of potentially responsible parties formed what is known as the Lower Willamette Group (LWG), of which KMLT is a non-voting member and pays a minimal fee to be part of the group. The LWG agreed to conduct the remedial investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS) leading to the proposed remedy for cleanup of the Portland 28

  25. Harbor site. After a dispute with the EPA concerning certain provision of the FS, the parties agreed that the EPA would complete the FS and that the LWG may dispute the FS within 14 days of the publication of the proposed remedy for cleanup. EPA issued the FS and the Proposed Plan on June 8, 2016. The EPA’s Proposed Plan includes a combination of dredging, capping, and enhanced natural recovery. It is expected to take approximately 7 years to implement at an estimated present cost of approximately $750 million. Comments on the FS and the Proposed Plan are due on September 7, 2016. We will submit comments with the LWG and on our own behalf. We anticipate the EPA will issue a Record of Decision (ROD) in mid-2017. KMLT and 90 other parties are involved in a non-judicial allocation process to determine each party’s respective share of the cleanup costs. We are participating in the allocation process on behalf of KMLT and KMBT in connection with their current or former ownership or operation of four facilities located in Portland Harbor. The allocation process will follow the issuance of the ROD with an expected completion date of 2018. Until the allocation process is completed, we are unable at this time to reasonably estimate the extent of our liability for the costs related to the design of the proposed remedy and cleanup of the site. Roosevelt Irrigation District v. Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. , U.S. District Court, Arizona The Roosevelt Irrigation District sued KMGP, KMEP and others under CERCLA for alleged contamination of the water purveyor’s wells. The First Amended Complaint sought $175 million in damages against approximately 70 defendants. On August 6, 2013 plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint seeking monetary damages in unspecified amounts and reducing the number of defendants to 26 including KMEP and SFPP. The claims now presented against KMEP and SFPP are related to alleged releases from a specific parcel within the SFPP Phoenix Terminal and the alleged impact of such releases on water wells owned by the plaintiffs and located in the vicinity of the Terminal. We have filed an answer, general denial, and affirmative defenses in response to the Second Amended Complaint and fact discovery is proceeding. Mission Valley Terminal Lawsuit In August 2007, the City of San Diego, on its own behalf and purporting to act on behalf of the People of the State of California, filed a lawsuit against us and several affiliates seeking injunctive relief and unspecified damages allegedly resulting from hydrocarbon and methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE) impacted soils and groundwater beneath the City’s stadium property in San Diego arising from historic operations at the Mission Valley terminal facility. The case was filed in the Superior Court of California, San Diego County and was removed in 2007 to the U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (Case No. 07CV1883WCAB). The City disclosed in discovery that it was seeking approximately $170 million in damages for alleged lost value/lost profit from the redevelopment of the City’s property and alleged lost use of the water resources underlying the property. Later, in 2010, the City amended its initial disclosures to add claims for restoration of the site as well as a number of other claims that increased its claim for damages to approximately $365 million. On November 29, 2012, the Court issued a Notice of Tentative Rulings on the parties’ summary adjudication motions. The Court tentatively granted our partial motions for summary judgment on the City’s claims for water and real estate damages and the State’s claims for violations of California Business and Professions Code § 17200, tentatively denied the City’s motion for summary judgment on its claims of liability for nuisance and trespass, and tentatively granted our cross motion for summary judgment on such claims. On January 25, 2013, the Court rendered judgment in favor of all defendants on all claims asserted by the City. On February 20, 2013, the City of San Diego filed a notice of appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. On May 21, 2015, the Court of Appeals issued a memorandum decision which affirmed the District Court’s summary judgment in our favor with respect to the City’s claim under California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act, but reversed both the District Court’s summary judgment decision in our favor on the City’s remaining claims and the District Court’s decision to exclude the City’s expert testimony. The Court of Appeals issued a mandate returning the case to the U.S. District Court. On January 25, 2016, the District Court heard oral argument on motions we previously filed to exclude certain expert testimony offered by the City and for partial summary judgment on the City’s claims. By its Order dated February 2, 2016, the Court granted in part and denied in part our motion to exclude certain expert testimony, granted in part and denied in part our motion for partial summary judgment, found that the City is limited to seeking alleged damages relating to the three year period immediately preceding the filing of the lawsuit, found that the City lacks expert opinions or testimony to support its claim for water damages, including the alleged loss of use of the Mission Valley aquifer as a source of both supply and storage of potable water, and denied our motion for partial summary judgment on the City’s alleged real estate and restoration damages. As a result of the Court’s Order, the City’s alleged damages were reduced from approximately $365 million to approximately $160 million. On May 10, 2016, the City filed another lawsuit seeking damages for the three year period immediately preceding the filing of the lawsuit. 29

  26. On June 17, 2016, the parties entered into a settlement resolving all claims related to the historic contamination at the City’s stadium property. The settlement provides for a $20 million payment to the City, a waiver and release by the City of all claims which were asserted or could have been asserted in the litigation, and an agreement by defendants to indemnify the City for additional, incremental costs, if any, incurred by the City in the redevelopment of the stadium property or the development of groundwater beneath the stadium property, that would not have been incurred but for the historical releases from the Mission Valley Terminal. By Order dated June 17, 2016, the District Court granted dismissal of the litigation. This site remains under the regulatory oversight and order of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB). SFPP completed the soil and groundwater remediation at the City of San Diego’s stadium property site and conducted quarterly sampling and monitoring through 2015 as part of the compliance evaluation required by the RWQCB. The RWQCB issued a notice of no further action with respect to the stadium property site on May 4, 2016. SFPP’s remediation effort is now focused on its adjacent Mission Valley Terminal site. Uranium Mines in Vicinity of Cameron, Arizona In the 1950s and 1960s, Rare Metals Inc., a historical subsidiary of EPNG, mined approximately twenty uranium mines in the vicinity of Cameron, Arizona, many of which are located on the Navajo Indian Reservation. The mining activities were in response to numerous incentives provided to industry by the U.S. to locate and produce domestic sources of uranium to support the Cold War-era nuclear weapons program. In May 2012, EPNG received a general notice letter from the EPA notifying EPNG of the EPA’s investigation of certain sites and its determination that the EPA considers EPNG to be a potentially responsible party within the meaning of CERCLA. In August 2013, EPNG and the EPA entered into an Administrative Order on Consent and Scope of Work pursuant to which EPNG is conducting a radiological assessment of the surface of the mines. On September 3, 2014, EPNG filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona (Case No. 3:14-08165- DGC) seeking cost recovery and contribution from the applicable federal government agencies toward the cost of environmental activities associated with the mines, given the pervasive control of such federal agencies over all aspects of the nuclear weapons program. Defendants filed an answer and counterclaims seeking contribution and recovery of response costs allegedly incurred by the federal agencies in investigating uranium impacts on the Navajo Reservation. The counterclaim of defendant EPA has been settled, and no viable claims for reimbursement by the other defendants are known to exist. Lower Passaic River Study Area of the Diamond Alkali Superfund Site, Essex, Hudson, Bergen and Passaic Counties, New Jersey EPEC Polymers, Inc. (EPEC Polymers) and EPEC Oil Company Liquidating Trust (EPEC Oil Trust), former El Paso Corporation entities now owned by KMI, are involved in an administrative action under CERCLA known as the Lower Passaic River Study Area Superfund Site (Site) concerning the lower 17-mile stretch of the Passaic River. It has been alleged that EPEC Polymers and EPEC Oil Trust may be potentially responsible parties (PRPs) under CERCLA based on prior ownership and/or operation of properties located along the relevant section of the Passaic River. EPEC Polymers and EPEC Oil Trust entered into two Administrative Orders on Consent (AOCs) which obligate them to investigate and characterize contamination at the Site. They are also part of a joint defense group (JDG) of approximately 70 cooperating parties which have entered into AOCs and are directing and funding the work required by the EPA. Under the first AOC, draft remedial investigation and feasibility studies (RI/FS) of the Site were submitted to the EPA in 2015, and comments from the EPA are expected by the end of 2016. Under the second AOC, the JDG members conducted a CERCLA removal action at the Passaic River Mile 10.9, and the group is currently conducting EPA-directed post-remedy monitoring in the removal area. We have established a reserve for the anticipated cost of compliance with the AOCs. On April 11, 2014, the EPA announced the issuance of its Focused Feasibility Study (FFS) for the lower eight miles of the Passaic River Study Area, and its proposed plan for remedial alternatives to address the dioxin sediment contamination from the mouth of Newark Bay to River Mile 8.3. The EPA estimates the cost for the alternatives will range from $365 million to $3.2 billion. The EPA’s preferred alternative would involve dredging the river bank-to-bank and installing an engineered cap at an estimated cost of $1.7 billion. On March 4, 2016, the EPA issued its ROD for the lower 8.3 miles of the Passaic River Study area. The final cleanup plan in the ROD is substantially similar to the EPA’s preferred alternative announced on April 11, 2014. On March 31, 2016, EPEC Polymers, EPEC Oil Trust, and over 80 other PRPs received a Notice of Potential Liability and Commencement of Negotiations for Remedial Design of the FFS (the Notice). The Notice informed the PRP group that the EPA intends to sign an AOC with one member of the PRP group for the remedial design of the cleanup in the ROD, and initiate negotiations over cash buyouts with parties whom the EPA does not consider “major PRPs.” The Notice also stated that the EPA expects to have the remedial design AOC signed by August 31, 2016. The Notice creates significant uncertainty as to the implementation and associated costs of the remedy set forth in the FFS and ROD, and provides no guidance as to the EPA’s definition of a “major PRP” or the potential amount or range of cash 30

  27. buyouts. There is also uncertainty as to the impact of the RI/FS that the CPG is currently preparing for portions of the Site. The draft RI/FS was submitted by the CPG earlier in 2015 and proposes a different remedy than the FFS announced by the EPA. Therefore, the scope of potential EPA claims for the lower eight miles of the Passaic River is not reasonably estimable at this time. Central Florida Pipeline Release, Tampa, Florida On July 22, 2011, our subsidiary Central Florida Pipeline LLC (CFPL) reported a refined petroleum products release on a section of its 10-inch diameter pipeline near Tampa, Florida. The pipeline carries jet fuel and diesel to Orlando and was carrying jet fuel at the time of the incident. There was no fire and no injuries associated with the incident. CFPL cleaned up the release in coordination with federal, state and local agencies. The cause of the incident was determined to be a third party line strike. In August 2015, the EPA requested that CFPL engage in settlement discussions regarding potential penalties sought by the EPA under the Clean Water Act. Although CFPL does not believe it caused the incident, we engaged in good faith settlement negotiations with the EPA. In June 2016, the parties filed a joint stipulation of settlement in federal court, resolving the matter for $0.5 million. Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Litigation On July 24, 2013, the Board of Commissioners of the Southeast Louisiana Flood Protection Authority - East (SLFPA) filed a petition for damages and injunctive relief in state district court for Orleans Parish, Louisiana (Case No. 13-6911) against TGP, SNG and approximately 100 other energy companies, alleging that defendants’ drilling, dredging, pipeline and industrial operations since the 1930’s have caused direct land loss and increased erosion and submergence resulting in alleged increased storm surge risk, increased flood protection costs and unspecified damages to the plaintiff. The SLFPA asserts claims for negligence, strict liability, public nuisance, private nuisance, and breach of contract. Among other relief, the petition seeks unspecified monetary damages, attorney fees, interest, and injunctive relief in the form of abatement and restoration of the alleged coastal land loss including but not limited to backfilling and re-vegetation of canals, wetlands and reef creation, land bridge construction, hydrologic restoration, shoreline protection, structural protection, and bank stabilization. On August 13, 2013, the suit was removed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana. On February 13, 2015, the Court granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the suit for failure to state a claim, and issued an order dismissing the SLFPA’s claims with prejudice. The SLFPA filed a notice of appeal on February 20, 2015. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit heard oral argument on February 29, 2016 and we await the Court’s decision. Plaquemines Parish Louisiana Coastal Zone Litigation On November 8, 2013, the Parish of Plaquemines, Louisiana filed a petition for damages in the state district court for Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana (Docket No. 60-999) against TGP and 17 other energy companies, alleging that defendants’ oil and gas exploration, production and transportation operations in the Bastian Bay, Buras, Empire and Fort Jackson oil and gas fields of Plaquemines Parish caused substantial damage to the coastal waters and nearby lands (Coastal Zone) within the Parish, including the erosion of marshes and the discharge of oil waste and other pollutants which detrimentally affected the quality of state waters and plant and animal life, in violation of the State and Local Coastal Resources Management Act of 1978 (Coastal Zone Management Act). As a result of such alleged violations of the Coastal Zone Management Act, Plaquemines Parish seeks, among other relief, unspecified monetary relief, attorney fees, interest, and payment of costs necessary to restore the allegedly affected Coastal Zone to its original condition, including costs to clear, vegetate and detoxify the Coastal Zone. In connection with this suit, TGP has made two tenders for defense and indemnity: (1) to Anadarko, as successor to the entity that purchased TGP’s oil and gas assets in Bastian Bay, and (2) to Kinetica, which purchased TGP’s pipeline assets in Bastian Bay in 2013. Anadarko has accepted TGP’s tender (limited to oil and gas assets), and Kinetica rejected TGP’s tender. TGP responded to Kinetica by reasserting TGP’s demand for defense and indemnity and reserving its rights. On November 12, 2015, the Plaquemines Parish Council adopted a resolution directing its legal counsel in all its Coastal Zone cases to take all actions necessary to cause the dismissal of all such cases. By the end of 2015, the Parish’s legal counsel had not taken any action to dismiss the cases, and the defendants in the cases, including TGP in the instant case, filed motions to dismiss on the basis of the Parish Council’s November 12, 2015 resolution. After the filing of the motions to dismiss, the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources and Attorney General filed petitions in intervention. On April 14, 2016, the Parish Council passed a resolution rescinding its November 12, 2015 resolution that had directed its counsel to dismiss the suit. This resolution renders moot our pending motion to dismiss. We intend to continue to vigorously defend the suit. 31

  28. General Although it is not possible to predict the ultimate outcomes, we believe that the resolution of the environmental matters set forth in this note, and other matters to which we and our subsidiaries are a party, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we have accrued a total reserve for environmental liabilities in the amount of $318 million and $284 million, respectively. In addition, as of both June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we have recorded a receivable of $13 million, for expected cost recoveries that have been deemed probable. 10. Recent Accounting Pronouncements ASU No. 2014-09 On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued ASU Nos. 2014-09, “ Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” This ASU is designed to create greater comparability for financial statement users across industries and jurisdictions. The provisions of ASU No. 2014-09 include a five-step process by which entities will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the payment to which an entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The standard also will require enhanced disclosures, provide more comprehensive guidance for transactions such as service revenue and contract modifications, and enhance guidance for multiple-element arrangements. ASU No. 2014-09 will be effective for us as of January 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for the interim periods within the adoption year. We are currently reviewing the effect of this ASU on our revenue recognition and assessing the timing of our adoption. ASU No. 2015-02 On February 18, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, “ Consolidation (Topic 810) - Amendments to the Consolidated Analysis. ” This ASU focuses on the consolidation evaluation for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. We adopted ASU No. 2015-02 effective January 1, 2016 with no material impact to our financial statements. ASU No. 2015-11 On July 22, 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11, “ Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory .” This ASU requires entities to subsequently measure inventory at the lower of cost and net realizable value, and defines net realizable value as the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. ASU No. 2015-11 will be effective for us as of January 1, 2017. We are currently reviewing the effect of ASU No. 2015-11. ASU No. 2016-02 On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “ Leases (Topic 842) .” This ASU requires that lessees will be required to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for the present value of the rights and obligations created by all leases with terms of more than 12 months. The ASU also will require disclosures designed to give financial statement users information on the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for us as of January 1, 2019. We are currently reviewing the effect of ASU No. 2016-02. ASU No. 2016-05 On March 10, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, “ Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships .” This ASU clarifies that for the purposes of applying the guidance in Topic 815, a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument in an existing hedging relationship would not, in and of itself, be considered a termination of the derivative instrument. We adopted ASU 2016-05 in the first quarter of 2016 with no material impact to our financial statements. ASU No. 2016-09 On March 30, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718).” This ASU was issued as part of the FASB’s simplification initiative and affects all entities that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. This ASU covers accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as 32

  29. classification in the statement of cash flows. ASU No. 2016-09 will be effective for us as of January 1, 2017. We are currently reviewing the effect of ASU No. 2016-09. ASU No. 2016-13 On June 16, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “ Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments .” This ASU modifies the impairment model to utilize an expected loss methodology in place of the currently used incurred loss methodology, which will result in the more timely recognition of losses. ASU No. 2016-13 will be effective for us as of January 1, 2020. We are currently reviewing the effect of ASU No. 2016-13. 11. Guarantee of Securities of Subsidiaries KMI, along with its direct and indirect subsidiaries KMP and Copano, are issuers of certain public debt securities. After the completion of the Merger Transactions, KMI, KMP, Copano and substantially all of KMI’s wholly owned domestic subsidiaries, entered into a cross guarantee agreement whereby each party to the agreement unconditionally guarantees, jointly and severally, the payment of specified indebtedness of each other party to the agreement. Accordingly, with the exception of certain subsidiaries identified as Subsidiary Non-Guarantors, the parent issuer, subsidiary issuers and other subsidiaries are all guarantors of each series of public debt. As a result of the cross guarantee agreement, a holder of any of the guaranteed public debt securities issued by KMI, KMP or Copano are in the same position with respect to the net assets, income and cash flows of KMI and the Subsidiary Issuers and Guarantors. The only amounts that are not available to the holders of each of the guaranteed public debt securities to satisfy the repayment of such securities are the net assets, income and cash flows of the Subsidiary Non-Guarantors. In lieu of providing separate financial statements for each subsidiary issuer and guarantor, we have included the accompanying condensed consolidating financial statements based on Rule 3-10 of the SEC’s Regulation S-X. We have presented each of the parent and subsidiary issuers in separate columns in this single set of condensed consolidating financial statements. Excluding fair value adjustments, as of June 30, 2016, Parent Issuer and Guarantor, Subsidiary Issuer and Guarantor-KMP, Subsidiary Issuer and Guarantor-Copano, and Subsidiary Guarantors had $15,032 million, $19,485 million, $332 million, and $5,783 million, respectively, of Guaranteed Notes outstanding. Included in the Subsidiary Guarantors debt balance as presented in the accompanying June 30, 2016 condensed consolidating balance sheets is approximately $173 million of capitalized lease debt that is not subject to the cross guarantee agreement. The accounts within the Parent Issuer and Guarantor, Subsidiary Issuer and Guarantor-KMP, Subsidiary Issuer and Guarantor-Copano, Subsidiary Guarantors and Subsidiary Non-Guarantors are presented using the equity method of accounting for investments in subsidiaries, including subsidiaries that are guarantors and non-guarantors, for purposes of these condensed consolidating financial statements only. These intercompany investments and related activity eliminate in consolidation and are presented separately in the accompanying balance sheets and statements of income and cash flows. A significant amount of each Issuers’ income and cash flow is generated by its respective subsidiaries. As a result, the funds necessary to meet its debt service and/or guarantee obligations are provided in large part by distributions or advances it receives from its respective subsidiaries. We utilize a centralized cash pooling program among our majority-owned and consolidated subsidiaries, including the Subsidiary Issuers and Guarantors and Subsidiary Non-Guarantors. The following Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows present the intercompany loan and distribution activity, as well as cash collection and payments made on behalf of our subsidiaries, as cash activities. Effective December 31, 2015, Kinder Morgan (Delaware), Inc. and Kinder Morgan Services LLC merged into KMI. As a result of such merger, both entities are no longer Subsidiary Guarantors, and for all periods presented, financial statement balances and activities for Kinder Morgan (Delaware), Inc. and Kinder Morgan Services LLC are reflected within the Parent Issuer and Guarantor column. 33

  30. Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 (In Millions) (Unaudited) Subsidiary Subsidiary Parent Issuer and Issuer and Subsidiary Issuer and Guarantor - Guarantor - Subsidiary Non- Consolidating Consolidated Guarantor KMP Copano Guarantors Guarantors Adjustments KMI Total Revenues $ 8 $ — $ — $ 2,777 $ 371 $ (12) $ 3,144 Operating Costs, Expenses and Other Costs of sales — — — 693 60 (1) 752 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 4 — — 462 86 — 552 Other operating expenses 30 2 — 681 198 (11) 900 Total Operating Costs, Expenses and Other 34 2 — 1,836 344 (12) 2,204 Operating (loss) income (26) (2) — 941 27 — 940 Other Income (Expense) Earnings (losses) from consolidated subsidiaries 752 734 (3) 41 17 (1,541) — Earnings from equity investments — — — 106 — — 106 Interest, net (176) 34 (12) (304) (13) — (471) Amortization of excess cost of equity investments and 1 — — 6 6 — 13 other, net Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes 551 766 (15) 790 37 (1,541) 588 Income Tax Expense (179) (1) — (16) (17) — (213) Net Income (Loss) 372 765 (15) 774 20 (1,541) 375 Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests — — — — — (3) (3) Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Controlling Interests 372 765 (15) 774 20 (1,544) 372 Preferred Stock Dividends (39) — — — — — (39) Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders $ 333 $ 765 $ (15) $ 774 $ 20 $ (1,544) $ 333 Net Income (loss) $ 372 $ 765 $ (15) $ 774 $ 20 $ (1,541) $ 375 Total other comprehensive (loss) income (140) (213) — (223) 8 428 (140) Comprehensive income (loss) 232 552 (15) 551 28 (1,113) 235 Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling — — — — — (3) (3) interests Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to controlling interests $ 232 $ 552 $ (15) $ 551 $ 28 $ (1,116) $ 232 34

  31. Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 (In Millions) (Unaudited) Subsidiary Subsidiary Parent Issuer and Issuer and Subsidiary Issuer and Guarantor - Guarantor - Subsidiary Non- Consolidating Consolidated Guarantor KMP Copano Guarantors Guarantors Adjustments KMI Total Revenues $ 10 $ — $ — $ 3,050 $ 414 $ (11) $ 3,463 Operating Costs, Expenses and Other Costs of sales — — — 989 95 1 1,085 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 5 — — 473 92 — 570 Other operating expenses 38 — — 767 123 (12) 916 Total Operating Costs, Expenses and Other 43 — — 2,229 310 (11) 2,571 Operating (loss) income (33) — — 821 104 — 892 Other Income (Expense) Earnings (losses) from consolidated subsidiaries 683 666 (5) 127 15 (1,486) — Earnings from equity investments — — — 114 — — 114 Interest, net (149) 34 (12) (345) — — (472) Amortization of excess cost of equity investments and — — — (5) 2 — (3) other, net Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes 501 700 (17) 712 121 (1,486) 531 Income Tax Expense (168) (2) — (11) (8) — (189) Net Income (Loss) 333 698 (17) 701 113 (1,486) 342 Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests — — — — — (9) (9) Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Controlling Interests $ 333 $ 698 $ (17) $ 701 $ 113 $ (1,495) $ 333 Net Income (loss) $ 333 $ 698 $ (17) $ 701 $ 113 $ (1,486) $ 342 Total other comprehensive (loss) income (98) (139) — (148) 23 264 (98) Comprehensive income (loss) 235 559 (17) 553 136 (1,222) 244 Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling — — — — — (9) (9) interests Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to controlling interests $ 235 $ 559 $ (17) $ 553 $ 136 $ (1,231) $ 235 35

  32. Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 (In Millions) (Unaudited) Subsidiary Subsidiary Parent Issuer and Issuer and Subsidiary Issuer and Guarantor - Guarantor - Subsidiary Non- Consolidating Consolidated Guarantor KMP Copano Guarantors Guarantors Adjustments KMI Total Revenues $ 17 $ — $ — $ 5,602 $ 741 $ (21) $ 6,339 Operating Costs, Expenses and Other Costs of sales — — — 1,345 136 2 1,483 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 9 — — 918 176 — 1,103 Other operating expenses 49 4 — 1,494 473 (23) 1,997 Total Operating Costs, Expenses and Other 58 4 — 3,757 785 (21) 4,583 Operating (loss) income (41) (4) — 1,845 (44) — 1,756 Other Income (Expense) Earnings from consolidated subsidiaries 1,410 1,331 4 54 31 (2,830) — Earnings from equity investments — — — 200 — — 200 Interest, net (346) 97 (24) (613) (26) — (912) Amortization of excess cost of equity investments and 1 — — 1 10 — 12 other, net Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes 1,024 1,424 (20) 1,487 (29) (2,830) 1,056 Income Tax Expense (337) (3) — (10) (17) — (367) Net Income (Loss) 687 1,421 (20) 1,477 (46) (2,830) 689 Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests — — — — — (2) (2) Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Controlling Interests 687 1,421 (20) 1,477 (46) (2,832) 687 Preferred Stock Dividends (78) — — — — — (78) Net Income (Loss) Available to Common Stockholders $ 609 $ 1,421 $ (20) $ 1,477 $ (46) $ (2,832) $ 609 Net Income (loss) $ 687 $ 1,421 $ (20) $ 1,477 $ (46) $ (2,830) $ 689 Total other comprehensive (loss) income (93) (161) — (229) 132 258 (93) Comprehensive income (loss) 594 1,260 (20) 1,248 86 (2,572) 596 Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling — — — — — (2) (2) interests Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to controlling interests $ 594 $ 1,260 $ (20) $ 1,248 $ 86 $ (2,574) $ 594 36

  33. Condensed Consolidating Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 (In Millions) (Unaudited) Subsidiary Subsidiary Parent Issuer and Issuer and Subsidiary Issuer and Guarantor - Guarantor - Subsidiary Non- Consolidating Consolidated Guarantor KMP Copano Guarantors Guarantors Adjustments KMI Total Revenues $ 19 $ — $ — $ 6,276 $ 789 $ (24) $ 7,060 Operating Costs, Expenses and Other Costs of sales — — — 1,990 184 1 2,175 Depreciation, depletion and amortization 10 — — 915 183 — 1,108 Other operating expenses 50 38 1 1,452 291 (25) 1,807 Total Operating Costs, Expenses and Other 60 38 1 4,357 658 (24) 5,090 Operating (loss) income (41) (38) (1) 1,919 131 — 1,970 Other Income (Expense) Earnings (loss) from consolidated subsidiaries 1,482 1,549 (28) 141 31 (3,175) — Earnings from equity investments — — — 190 — — 190 Interest, net (304) 7 (24) (649) (14) — (984) Amortization of excess cost of equity investments and — — — (8) 6 — (2) other, net Income (Loss) Before Income Taxes 1,137 1,518 (53) 1,593 154 (3,175) 1,174 Income Tax Expense (375) (4) — (25) (9) — (413) Net Income (Loss) 762 1,514 (53) 1,568 145 (3,175) 761 Net Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests — — — — — 1 1 Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Controlling Interests 762 1,514 (53) 1,568 145 (3,174) 762 Net Income (loss) $ 762 $ 1,514 $ (53) $ 1,568 $ 145 $ (3,175) $ 761 Total other comprehensive loss (274) (377) — (344) (141) 862 (274) Comprehensive income (loss) 488 1,137 (53) 1,224 4 (2,313) 487 Comprehensive loss attributable to noncontrolling — — — — — 1 1 interests Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to controlling interests $ 488 $ 1,137 $ (53) $ 1,224 $ 4 $ (2,312) $ 488 37

  34. Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2016 (In Millions) (Unaudited) Subsidiary Subsidiary Parent Issuer and Issuer and Subsidiary Issuer and Guarantor - Guarantor - Subsidiary Non- Consolidating Consolidated Guarantor KMP Copano Guarantors Guarantors Adjustments KMI ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 8 $ — $ — $ 11 $ 168 $ (7) $ 180 Other current assets - affiliates 5,859 6,192 115 13,171 745 (26,082) — All other current assets 141 186 — 1,787 184 (8) 2,290 Property, plant and equipment, net 270 — — 32,366 8,563 — 41,199 Investments 16 2 — 6,062 122 — 6,202 Investments in subsidiaries 25,221 25,762 2,345 4,926 3,973 (62,227) — Goodwill 15,089 22 287 5,220 3,184 — 23,802 Notes receivable from affiliates 1,024 21,741 — 1,239 319 (24,323) — Deferred income taxes 7,211 — — — — (2,236) 4,975 Other non-current assets 373 537 1 4,646 112 — 5,669 Total assets $ 55,212 $ 54,442 $ 2,748 $ 69,428 $ 17,370 $ (114,883) $ 84,317 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Liabilities Current portion of debt $ 1,510 $ 600 $ — $ 1,187 $ 122 $ — $ 3,419 Other current liabilities - affiliates 1,788 14,623 51 9,133 487 (26,082) — All other current liabilities 373 481 7 1,831 470 (15) 3,147 Long-term debt 14,226 19,662 374 5,260 679 — 40,201 Notes payable to affiliates 1,547 448 753 20,217 1,358 (24,323) — Deferred income taxes — — 2 625 1,609 (2,236) — All other long-term liabilities and deferred credits 657 70 — 889 461 — 2,077 Total liabilities 20,101 35,884 1,187 39,142 5,186 (52,656) 48,844 Stockholders’ equity Total KMI equity 35,111 18,558 1,561 30,286 12,184 (62,589) 35,111 Noncontrolling interests — — — — — 362 362 Total stockholders’ Equity 35,111 18,558 1,561 30,286 12,184 (62,227) 35,473 Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $ 55,212 $ 54,442 $ 2,748 $ 69,428 $ 17,370 $ (114,883) $ 84,317 38

  35. Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 (In Millions) Subsidiary Subsidiary Parent Issuer and Issuer and Subsidiary Issuer and Guarantor - Guarantor - Subsidiary Non- Consolidating Consolidated Guarantor KMP Copano Guarantors Guarantors Adjustments KMI ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 123 $ — $ — $ 12 $ 142 $ (48) $ 229 Other current assets - affiliates 2,233 1,600 — 9,451 695 (13,979) — All other current assets 126 119 — 2,163 195 (8) 2,595 Property, plant and equipment, net 252 — — 32,195 8,100 — 40,547 Investments 16 2 — 5,906 116 — 6,040 Investments in subsidiaries 27,401 28,038 2,341 4,361 3,320 (65,461) — Goodwill 15,089 22 287 5,221 3,171 — 23,790 Notes receivable from affiliates 850 21,319 — 2,070 380 (24,619) — Deferred income taxes 7,501 — — — — (2,178) 5,323 Other non-current assets 215 307 1 4,943 114 — 5,580 Total assets $ 53,806 $ 51,407 $ 2,629 $ 66,322 $ 16,233 $ (106,293) $ 84,104 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY Liabilities Current portion of debt $ 67 $ 500 $ — $ 132 $ 122 $ — $ 821 Other current liabilities - affiliates 1,328 8,682 39 3,216 714 (13,979) — All other current liabilities 321 458 7 1,987 527 (56) 3,244 Long-term debt 13,845 20,053 378 7,447 683 — 42,406 Notes payable to affiliates 2,404 448 622 19,840 1,305 (24,619) — Deferred income taxes — — 2 594 1,582 (2,178) — Other long-term liabilities and deferred credits 722 193 — 907 408 — 2,230 Total liabilities 18,687 30,334 1,048 34,123 5,341 (40,832) 48,701 Stockholders’ equity Total KMI equity 35,119 21,073 1,581 32,199 10,892 (65,745) 35,119 Noncontrolling interests — — — — — 284 284 Total stockholders’ Equity 35,119 21,073 1,581 32,199 10,892 (65,461) 35,403 Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity $ 53,806 $ 51,407 $ 2,629 $ 66,322 $ 16,233 $ (106,293) $ 84,104 39

  36. Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 (In Millions) (Unaudited) Subsidiary Subsidiary Parent Issuer and Issuer and Subsidiary Issuer and Guarantor - Guarantor - Subsidiary Non- Consolidating Consolidated Guarantor KMP Copano Guarantors Guarantors Adjustments KMI Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities $ (1,950) $ 2,976 $ (143) $ 5,616 $ 221 $ (4,376) $ 2,344 Cash flows from investing activities Funding to affiliates (1,670) (770) (1) (2,455) (219) 5,115 — Capital expenditures (37) — — (929) (504) — (1,470) Contributions to investments (343) — — (13) (7) — (363) Acquisitions of assets and investments, net of cash acquired (2) — — (331) — — (333) Sale of property, plant and equipment, investments and other net assets, net of removal costs — — — 220 — — 220 Distributions from equity investments in excess of cumulative earnings 1,443 298 — 68 — (1,728) 81 Other, net — (54) — 37 2 — (15) Net cash used in investing activities (609) (526) (1) (3,403) (728) 3,387 (1,880) Cash flows from financing activities Issuances of debt 6,847 — — — — — 6,847 Payments of debt (5,191) (500) — (1,104) (5) — (6,800) Funding from affiliates 1,429 882 144 2,124 536 (5,115) — Debt issue costs (6) — — — — — (6) Cash dividends - common shares (559) — — — — — (559) Cash dividends - preferred shares (76) — — — — — (76) Contributions from parents — — — — 87 (87) — Contributions from noncontrolling interests — — — — — 87 87 Distributions to parents — (2,832) — (3,234) (90) 6,156 — Distributions to noncontrolling interests — — — — — (11) (11) Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 2,444 (2,450) 144 (2,214) 528 1,030 (518) Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents — — — — 5 — 5 Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (115) — — (1) 26 41 (49) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 123 — — 12 142 (48) 229 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 8 $ — $ — $ 11 $ 168 $ (7) $ 180 40

  37. Condensed Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015 (In Millions) (Unaudited) Subsidiary Subsidiary Parent Issuer and Issuer and Subsidiary Issuer and Guarantor - Guarantor - Subsidiary Non- Consolidating Consolidated Guarantor KMP Copano Guarantors Guarantors Adjustments KMI Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities $ (1,147) $ 5,190 $ 72 $ 3,755 $ (26) $ (5,306) $ 2,538 Cash flows from investing activities Funding to affiliates (2,118) (6,486) (1) (4,387) (351) 13,343 — Capital expenditures (23) — (3) (1,705) (183) 5 (1,909) Contributions to investments — — — (45) — — (45) Investment in KMP (159) — — — — 159 — Acquisitions of assets and investments, net of cash acquired (1,709) — — (210) — — (1,919) Sale of property, plant and equipment, investments and — — 5 4 — (5) 4 other net assets, net of removal costs Distributions from equity investments in excess of 292 — — 80 — (258) 114 cumulative earnings Other, net — (2) — 4 9 — 11 Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities (3,717) (6,488) 1 (6,259) (525) 13,244 (3,744) Cash flows from financing activities Issuances of debt 9,485 — — — — — 9,485 Payments of debt (8,598) (300) — (38) (5) — (8,941) Funding from (to) affiliates 3,471 3,906 (73) 5,546 493 (13,343) — Debt issue costs (20) — — — — — (20) Issuances of common shares 2,562 — — — — — 2,562 Cash dividends (2,006) — — — — — (2,006) Repurchases of warrants (5) — — — — — (5) Contributions from parents — 156 — 3 — (159) — Distributions to parents — (2,478) — (3,010) (92) 5,580 — Distributions to noncontrolling interests — — — — — (16) (16) Other, net — (1) — — — — (1) Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 4,889 1,283 (73) 2,501 396 (7,938) 1,058 Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents — — — — (4) — (4) Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 25 (15) — (3) (159) — (152) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 4 15 — 17 279 — 315 Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 29 $ — $ — $ 14 $ 120 $ — $ 163 41

  38. Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. General and Basis of Presentation The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our accompanying interim consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report, and in conjunction with (i) our consolidated financial statements and related notes and (ii) our management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations included in our 2015 Form 10-K. Results of Operations Overview Our management evaluates our performance primarily using the measures of Segment EBDA and, as discussed below under “—Non-GAAP Measures,” distributable cash flow, or DCF, and Segment EBDA before certain items. Segment EBDA is a useful measure of our operating performance because it measures the operating results of our segments before DD&A and certain expenses that are generally not controllable by our business segment operating managers, such as interest expense, general and administrative expenses, and unallocable interest income and income taxes, as well as net income attributable to noncontrolling interests. Our general and administrative expenses include such items as employee benefits, insurance, rentals, unallocated litigation and environmental expenses, and shared corporate services including accounting, information technology, human resources and legal services. Consolidated Earnings Results Three Months Ended June 30, Earnings 2016 2015 increase/(decrease) (In millions, except percentages) Segment EBDA(a) Natural Gas Pipelines $ 966 $ 928 $ 38 4 % CO 2 203 240 (37) (15)% Terminals 292 279 13 5 % Products Pipelines 293 277 16 6 % Kinder Morgan Canada 40 37 3 8 % Other (5) (40) 35 88 % Total Segment EBDA(b) 1,789 1,721 68 4 % DD&A expense (552) (570) 18 3 % Amortization of excess cost of equity investments (16) (14) (2) (14)% Other revenues 9 9 — — % General and administrative expense(c) (189) (164) (25) (15)% Interest expense, net of unallocable interest income(d) (470) (472) 2 — % Income before unallocable income taxes 571 510 61 12 % Unallocable income tax expense (196) (168) (28) (17)% Net income 375 342 33 10 % Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests (3) (9) 6 67 % Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. 372 333 39 12 % Preferred Stock Dividends (39) — (39) n/a Net income available to common stockholders $ 333 $ 333 $ — — % 42

  39. Six Months Ended June 30, Earnings 2016 2015 increase/(decrease) (In millions, except percentages) Segment EBDA(a) Natural Gas Pipelines $ 1,958 $ 1,943 $ 15 1 % CO 2 389 576 (187) (32)% Terminals 545 549 (4) (1)% Products Pipelines 472 523 (51) (10)% Kinder Morgan Canada 80 78 2 3 % Other (13) (46) 33 72 % Total Segment EBDA(b) 3,431 3,623 (192) (5)% DD&A expense (1,103) (1,108) 5 — % Amortization of excess cost of equity investments (30) (26) (4) (15)% Other revenues 17 18 (1) (6)% General and administrative expense(c) (379) (380) 1 — % Interest expense, net of unallocable interest income(d) (912) (986) 74 8 % Income before unallocable income taxes 1,024 1,141 (117) (10)% Unallocable income tax expense (335) (380) 45 12 % Net income 689 761 (72) (9)% Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (2) 1 (3) (300)% Net income attributable to Kinder Morgan, Inc. 687 762 (75) (10)% Preferred Stock Dividends (78) — (78) n/a Net income available to common stockholders $ 609 $ 762 $ (153) (20)% _______ n/a – not applicable (a) Includes revenues, earnings from equity investments, allocable interest income and other, net, less operating expenses, allocable income taxes, other expense (income), net, losses on impairments and disposals of long-lived assets, net. Operating expenses include natural gas purchases and other costs of sales, operations and maintenance expenses, and taxes, other than income taxes. Allocable income tax expenses included in Segment EBDA for the three months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were $17 million and $21 million, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were $32 million and $33 million, respectively. Certain items affecting Total Segment EBDA (see “—Non-GAAP Measures” below) (b) Three and six month 2016 amounts include net decreases in earnings of $7 million and $305 million, respectively, and three and six month 2015 amounts include decreases in earnings of $106 million and $116 million, respectively, related to the combined effect of the certain items impacting Total Segment EBDA. The extent to which these items affect each of our business segments is discussed below in the footnotes to the tables within “—Segment Earnings Results.” (c) Three and six month 2016 amounts include net increases in expense of $22 million and $28 million, respectively, and three and six month 2015 amounts include a decrease in expense of $9 million and an increase in expense of $29 million, respectively, related to the combined effect of the certain items related to general and administrative expense disclosed below in “—General and Administrative, Interest, and Noncontrolling Interests.” (d) Three and six month 2016 amounts include net decreases in expense of $40 million and $109 million, respectively, and three and six month 2015 amounts include decreases in expense of $55 million for both respective periods, related to the combined effect of the certain items related to interest expense, net of unallocable interest income disclosed below in “—General and Administrative, Interest, and Noncontrolling Interests.” The certain item totals reflected in footnotes (b), (c) and (d) to the tables above accounted for $53 million of the increase in income before unallocable income taxes for the second quarter of 2016, as compared to the same prior year period (representing the difference between increases of $11 million and decreases $42 million in income before unallocable income taxes for the second quarters of 2016 and 2015, respectively) and a decrease of $134 million in income before unallocable income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2016, when compared to the same prior year period (representing the difference between decreases of $224 million and $90 million in income before unallocable income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively). After giving effect to these certain items, the remaining increases in income before unallocable income taxes from the prior year quarter and year-to-date were $8 million (1%) and $17 million (1%), respectively. The quarter-to-date increase from 2015 reflects decreased interest expense, net of allocable interest income, DD&A expense and general and administrative expense increased results in our Products Pipelines and Terminals business segments, mostly offset by unfavorable commodity prices affecting our CO 2 business segment. The year-to-date increase from 2015 reflects decreased interest expense, net of allocable interest income by increased results in our Products Pipelines, Natural Gas Pipelines and Terminals business segments, mostly offset by unfavorable commodity prices affecting our CO 2 business segment. 43

  40. Non-GAAP Measures Our non-GAAP financial measures are DCF and Segment EBDA before certain items. Certain items are items that are required by GAAP to be reflected in net income, but typically either do not have a cash impact, or by their nature are separately identifiable from our normal business operations and, in our view, are likely to occur only sporadically. Our non-GAAP measures described below should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP net income available to common stockholders or any other GAAP measure. DCF and Segment EBDA before certain items are not financial measures in accordance with GAAP and have important limitations as analytical tools. You should not consider either of these non-GAAP measures in isolation or as a substitute for an analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because DCF excludes some but not all items that affect net income available to common stockholders and because DCF measures are defined differently by different companies in our industry, our DCF may not be comparable to DCF measures of other companies. Our computation of Segment EBDA before certain items has similar limitations. Management compensates for the limitations of these non- GAAP measures by reviewing our comparable GAAP measures, understanding the differences between the measures and taking this information into account in its analysis and its decision making processes. Distributable Cash Flow DCF is a significant performance measure used by us and by external users of our financial statements to evaluate our performance and to measure and estimate the ability of our assets to generate cash earnings after servicing our debt and preferred stock dividends, paying cash taxes and expending sustaining capital, that could be used for discretionary purposes, such as dividends, stock repurchases, retirement of debt or expansion capital expenditures. Management uses this measure and believes it provides users of our financial statements a measure that more accurately reflects our business’ ability to generate cash earnings than a comparable GAAP measure. For a discussion of our anticipated dividends for 2016, see “Liquidity and Capital Resources—Common Dividends.” Segment EBDA Before Certain Items We believe Segment EBDA before certain items is a significant performance metric because it enables us and external users of our financial statements to better understand the ability of our segments to generate cash earnings on an ongoing basis. We believe it is useful to investors because it is a measure that management uses to allocate resources to our segments and assess each segment’s performance. Intersegment sales accounted for at market prices, are eliminated in consolidation. In the tables for each of our business segments under “— Segment Earnings Results” below, Segment EBDA before certain items is calculated by adjusting the Segment EBDA for the applicable certain item amounts, which are totaled in the tables and described in the footnotes to those tables. 44

  41. Reconciliation of Net Income Available to Common Stockholders to DCF Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Net Income Available to Common Stockholders $ 333 $ 333 $ 609 $ 762 Add/(Subtract): Certain items before book tax(a) (9) 42 226 90 Book tax certain items(b) 1 (19) (102) (41) Certain items after book tax (8) 23 124 49 Noncontrolling interest certain items(c) (3) 1 (9) (14) Net income available to common stockholders before certain items 322 357 724 797 Add/(Subtract): DD&A expense(d) 656 662 1,308 1,296 Total book taxes(e) 236 227 515 489 Cash taxes(f) (37) (18) (39) (16) Other items(g) 10 8 20 16 Sustaining capital expenditures(h) (137) (141) (245) (245) DCF $ 1,050 $ 1,095 $ 2,283 $ 2,337 Weighted average common shares outstanding for dividends(i) 2,237 2,194 2,237 2,177 DCF per common share $ 0.47 $ 0.50 $ 1.02 $ 1.07 Declared dividend per common share $ 0.125 $ 0.490 $ 0.250 $ 0.970 _______ (a) Consists of certain items summarized in footnotes (b) through (d) to the “ — Consolidated Earnings Results — Results of Operations” table included below, and described in more detail below in the footnotes to tables included in both our management’s discussion and analysis of segment results and “ — General and Administrative, Interest, and Noncontrolling Interests.” (b) Represents income tax provision on certain items, plus discrete income tax items. (c) Represents noncontrolling interests share of certain items. (d) Includes DD&A and amortization of excess cost of equity investments. Three and six month 2016 amounts also include $88 million and $175 million, respectively, and three and six month 2015 amounts also include $78 million and $162 million, respectively, of our share of equity investees’ DD&A. (e) Excludes book tax certain items and includes income tax allocated to the segments. Three and six month 2016 amounts also include $24 million and $46 million, respectively, and three and six month 2015 amounts also include $19 million and $35 million, respectively, of our share of taxable equity investees’ book tax expense. (f) Three and six month 2016 amounts include $(30) million and $(34) million, respectively, and three and six month 2015 amounts include $(7) million and $(6) million, respectively, of our share of taxable equity investees’ cash taxes. (g) Consists primarily of non-cash compensation associated with our restricted stock program. (h) Three and six month 2016 amounts include $(20) million and $(42) million, respectively, and three and six month 2015 amounts include $(16) million and $(34) million, respectively, of our share of equity investees’ sustaining capital expenditures. (i) Includes restricted stock awards that participate in common share dividends and dilutive effect of warrants, as applicable. 45

  42. Segment Earnings Results Natural Gas Pipelines Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 (In millions, except operating statistics) Revenues(a) $ 1,883 $ 2,096 $ 3,854 $ 4,276 Operating expenses (1,004) (1,227) (1,943) (2,399) Loss on impairments and disposals of long-lived assets, net(b) (5) (39) (121) (92) Other income — 3 — 3 Earnings from equity investments(b) 84 92 156 147 Interest income and Other, net 9 5 15 12 Income tax expense (1) (2) (3) (4) Segment EBDA(b) 966 928 1,958 1,943 Certain items(b) (8) 37 130 109 Segment EBDA before certain items $ 958 $ 965 $ 2,088 $ 2,052 Change from prior period Increase/(Decrease) Revenues before certain items $ (228) (11)% $ (423) (10)% Segment EBDA before certain items $ (7) (1)% $ 36 2 % Natural gas transport volumes (BBtu/d)(c) 28,728 27,764 29,560 29,303 Natural gas sales volumes (BBtu/d)(d) 2,281 2,408 2,306 2,402 Natural gas gathering volumes (BBtu/d)(e) 2,993 3,573 3,100 3,560 Crude/condensate gathering volumes (MBbl/d)(f) 304 346 324 338 _______ Certain items affecting Segment EBDA (a) Three and six month 2016 amounts include decreases in revenue of $26 million and $32 million, respectively, and three and six month 2015 amounts include a decrease in revenue of $2 million and an increase in revenue of $6 million, respectively, related to non-cash mark-to-market derivative contracts used to hedge forecasted natural gas, NGL and crude oil sales. Three and six month 2016 amounts also include increases in revenue of $39 million for both periods associated with revenue collected on a customer’s early buyout of a long-term natural gas storage contract. (b) In addition to the revenue certain items described in footnote (a) above: three and six month 2016 amounts also include decreases in earnings of $5 million and $16 million, respectively, related to losses on impairments and disposals of other assets, and six month 2016 amount also includes decreases in earnings of (i) $106 million of project write-offs; (ii) $13 million related to an equity investment impairment; and (iii) $2 million from other certain items, and three and six month 2015 amounts also include (i) decreases in earnings of $49 million and $128 million, respectively, related to losses on impairments and disposals of long-lived assets and equity investments; (ii) increase in earnings of $10 million for both periods related to a gain on the sale of SNG’s Carthage Line; and (iii) increases in earnings of $4 million and $3 million, respectively, from other certain items. Other (c) Includes pipeline volumes for Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline LLC, Monterrey, TransColorado Gas Transmission Company LLC (TransColorado), Midcontinent Express Pipeline LLC, KMLP, Fayetteville Express Pipeline LLC, TGP, EPNG, South Texas Midstream, the Texas Intrastate Natural Gas Pipeline operations, CIG, Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C., CPG, SNG, Elba Express, Sierrita Gas Pipeline LLC, Natural Gas Pipeline Company of America LLC, Citrus and Ruby Pipeline, L.L.C. Joint venture throughput is reported at our ownership share. Volumes for acquired pipelines are included at our ownership share for the entire period, however, EBDA contributions from acquisitions are included only for the periods subsequent to their acquisition. (d) Represents volumes for the Texas Intrastate Natural Gas Pipeline operations and Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline LLC. (e) Includes Oklahoma Midstream, South Texas Midstream, Eagle Ford Gathering LLC, North Texas Midstream, Camino Real Gathering Company, L.L.C. (Camino Real), Kinder Morgan Altamont LLC, KinderHawk Field Services LLC (KinderHawk), Endeavor, Bighorn Gas Gathering L.L.C., Webb Duval Gatherers, Fort Union Gas Gathering L.L.C., EagleHawk Field Services LLC (EagleHawk), Red Cedar Gathering Company and Hiland Midstream throughput volumes. Joint venture throughput is reported at our ownership share. Volumes for acquired pipelines are included at our ownership share for the entire period. 46

  43. (f) Includes Hiland Midstream, EagleHawk and Camino Real. Joint Venture throughput is reported at our ownership share. Volumes for acquired pipelines are included at our ownership share for the entire period. Below are the changes in both Segment EBDA before certain items and revenues before certain items, in the comparable three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015: Three months ended June 30, 2016 versus Three months ended June 30, 2015 Segment EBDA before Revenues before certain items certain items increase/(decrease) increase/(decrease) (In millions, except percentages) South Texas Midstream $ (18) (21)% $ (58) (18)% KinderHawk (13) (36)% (14) (35)% KMLP (7) (140)% (8) (100)% CIG (7) (10)% (8) (9)% CPG (4) (31)% (5) (28)% TransColorado (4) (50)% (4) (40)% TGP 30 13 % 49 17 % Hiland Midstream 17 47 % (8) (5)% Texas Intrastate Natural Gas Pipeline Operations 5 8 % (161) (23)% All others (including eliminations) (6) (1)% (11) (2)% Total Natural Gas Pipelines $ (7) (1)% $ (228) (11)% Six months ended June 30, 2016 versus Six months ended June 30, 2015 Segment EBDA before Revenues before certain items certain items increase/(decrease) increase/(decrease) (In millions, except percentages) South Texas Midstream $ (29) (17)% $ (130) (21)% KinderHawk (29) (38)% (30) (35)% KMLP (15) (136)% (17) (100)% CIG (10) (6)% (11) (6)% CPG (12) (39)% (13) (32)% TransColorado (8) (50)% (8) (42)% TGP 106 22 % 137 23 % Hiland Midstream 40 69 % 34 16 % Texas Intrastate Natural Gas Pipeline Operations (1) (1)% (368) (24)% All others (including eliminations) (6) (1)% (17) (2)% Total Natural Gas Pipelines $ 36 2 % $ (423) (10)% The changes in Segment EBDA for our Natural Gas Pipelines business segment are further explained by the following discussion of the significant factors driving Segment EBDA before certain items in the comparable three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015: • decreases of $18 million (21%) and $29 million (17%), respectively, from South Texas Midstream primarily due to lower volumes and commodity prices, which resulted in decreases in revenue of approximately $58 million and $130 million, respectively, partially offset by decreases in costs of sales; • decreases of $13 million (36%) and $29 million (38%), respectively, from KinderHawk due to the expiration of a minimum volume contract in 2015 and lower volumes; • decreases of $7 million (140%) and $15 million (136%), respectively, from KMLP as a result of a customer contract buyout in the fourth quarter of 2015; 47

  44. • decreases of $7 million (10%) and $10 million (6%), respectively, from CIG primarily due to elimination of revenue surcharge mechanism in 2016 as a result of latest rate case settlement and lower firm reservation revenues due to contract expirations and contract renewals at lower rates; • decreases of $4 million (31%) and $12 million (39%), respectively, from CPG due primarily to lower transport revenues as a result of contract expirations; • decreases of $4 million (50%) and $8 million (50%), respectively, from TransColorado primarily due to lower transport revenues as a result of contract expirations; • increases of $30 million (13%) and $106 million (22%), respectively, from TGP primarily due to expansion projects placed in service during 2015 and favorable 2016 firm transport revenues; • increases of $17 million (47%) and $40 million (69%), respectively, from Hiland Midstream primarily due to higher transportation and gathering volumes and favorable margins on renegotiated contracts, along with results of a full six months from our February 2015 Hiland acquisition; and • increase of $5 million (8%) and a decrease of $1 million (1%), respectively, from our Texas intrastate natural gas pipeline operations (including the operations of its Kinder Morgan Tejas, Border, Kinder Morgan Texas, North Texas and Mier-Monterrey Mexico pipeline systems). The quarter-to-date increase was largely due to higher storage margins partially offset by lower transportation margins as a result of lower volumes. The decrease in revenues of $161 million and $368 million, respectively, resulted primarily from decreases in sales revenues due to lower commodity prices which was largely offset by a corresponding decreases in costs of sales. CO 2 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 (In millions, except operating statistics) Revenues(a) $ 304 $ 353 $ 606 $ 799 Operating expenses (102) (110) (200) (224) Gain (loss) on impairments and disposals of long-lived assets, net(b) 1 (9) (20) (9) Other expense (1) — — — Earnings from equity investments(b) 2 6 5 12 Income tax expense (1) — (2) (2) Segment EBDA(b) 203 240 389 576 Certain items(b) 24 46 61 (9) Segment EBDA before certain items $ 227 $ 286 $ 450 $ 567 Change from prior period Increase/(Decrease) Revenues before certain items $ (68) (17)% $ (147) (19)% Segment EBDA before certain items $ (59) (21)% $ (117) (21)% Southwest Colorado CO 2 production (gross)(Bcf/d)(c) 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2 Southwest Colorado CO 2 production (net)(Bcf/d)(c) 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 SACROC oil production (gross)(MBbl/d)(d) 29.7 35.1 30.1 35.4 SACROC oil production (net)(MBbl/d)(e) 24.8 29.3 25.1 29.5 Yates oil production (gross)(MBbl/d)(d) 18.7 19.1 18.9 19.0 Yates oil production (net)(MBbl/d)(e) 8.3 8.6 8.4 8.5 Katz, Goldsmith, and Tall Cotton oil production (gross)(MBbl/d)(d) 6.8 5.6 6.8 5.4 Katz, Goldsmith and Tall Cotton oil production (net)(MBbl/d)(e) 5.7 4.7 5.8 4.6 NGL sales volumes (net)(MBbl/d)(e) 10.3 10.5 10.1 10.2 Realized weighted-average oil price per Bbl(f) $ 62.17 $ 72.82 $ 60.85 $ 72.72 Realized weighted-average NGL price per Bbl(g) $ 17.73 $ 20.04 $ 15.57 $ 20.36 _______ 48

  45. Certain items affecting Segment EBDA (a) Three and six month 2016 amounts include unrealized losses of $18 million and $28 million, respectively, and three and six month 2015 amounts include unrealized losses of $37 million and unrealized gains of $8 million, respectively, related to derivative contracts used to hedge forecasted crude oil sales. Six month 2015 amount also includes a favorable adjustment of $10 million related to carried working interest at McElmo Dome. (b) In addition to the revenue certain items described in footnote (a) above: three and six month 2016 amounts also include decreases of $6 million and $12 million, respectively, in equity earnings for our share of a project write-off recorded by an equity investee, and six month 2016 amount also includes a $21 million increase in expense related to source and transportation project write-offs, and three and six month 2015 amounts also include decreases in earnings of $9 million for both periods related to an impairment charge associated with the pending sale of excess construction pipe. Other (c) Includes McElmo Dome and Doe Canyon sales volumes. (d) Represents 100% of the production from the field. We own approximately 97% working interest in the SACROC unit, an approximately 50% working interest in the Yates unit, an approximately 99% working interest in the Katz unit, a 100% interest in the Tall Cotton field and a 99% working interest in the Goldsmith Landreth unit. (e) Net after royalties and outside working interests. (f) Includes all crude oil production properties. (g) Includes production attributable to leasehold ownership and production attributable to our ownership in processing plants and third party processing agreements. Below are the changes in both Segment EBDA before certain items and revenues before certain items, in the comparable three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. Three months ended June 30, 2016 versus Three months ended June 30, 2015 Segment EBDA before Revenues before certain items certain items increase/(decrease) increase/(decrease) (In millions, except percentages) Source and Transportation Activities $ (5) (6)% $ (8) (9)% Oil and Gas Producing Activities (54) (26)% (65) (21)% Intrasegment eliminations — — % 5 42 % Total CO 2 $ (59) (21)% $ (68) (17)% Six months ended June 30, 2016 versus Six months ended June 30, 2015 Segment EBDA before Revenues before certain items certain items increase/(decrease) increase/(decrease) (In millions, except percentages) Source and Transportation Activities $ (14) (9)% $ (19) (10)% Oil and Gas Producing Activities (103) (25)% (136) (22)% Intrasegment eliminations — — % 8 32 % Total CO 2 $ (117) (21)% $ (147) (19)% The changes in Segment EBDA for our CO 2 business segment are further explained by the significant factors driving Segment EBDA before certain items in the comparable three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, which factors include lower revenues of $48 million and $117 million, respectively, from lower commodity prices and $25 million and $37 million, respectively, of decreased volumes, partially offset by $10 million and $30 million, respectively, in reduced operating costs, and severance and ad valorem tax expenses. 49

  46. Terminals Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 (In millions, except operating statistics) Revenues(a) $ 488 $ 470 $ 953 $ 927 Operating expenses (195) (189) (386) (378) Gain (Loss) on impairments and disposals of long-lived assets, net(b) 3 — (17) — Other expense — (2) — (2) Earnings from equity investments 5 4 11 9 Interest income and Other, net 1 5 1 6 Income tax expense (10) (9) (17) (13) Segment EBDA(b) 292 279 545 549 Certain items(b) (9) (8) 7 (14) Segment EBDA before certain items $ 283 $ 271 $ 552 $ 535 Change from prior period Increase/(Decrease) Revenues before certain items $ 14 3% $ 23 3% Segment EBDA before certain items $ 12 4% $ 17 3% Bulk transload tonnage (MMtons)(c) 15.5 15.9 29.2 32.1 Ethanol (MMBbl) 16.3 16.3 31.6 32.3 Liquids leasable capacity (MMBbl) 88.3 81.5 88.3 81.5 Liquids utilization %(d) 94.8% 93.2% 94.8% 93.2% Certain items affecting Segment EBDA (a) Three and six month 2016 amounts include increases in revenue of $11 million and $16 million, respectively, and three and six month 2015 amounts include increases in revenue of $7 million and $13 million, respectively, from the amortization of a fair value adjustment (associated with the below market contracts assumed upon acquisition) from our Jones Act tankers. (b) In addition to the revenue certain items described in footnote (a) above: three and six month 2016 amounts also include increases in expense of $2 million and $3 million, respectively, related to other certain items, and six month 2016 amount also includes $20 million related to losses on impairments and disposals of long-lived assets, and three and six month 2015 amounts also include increases in earnings of $1 million for each period related to other certain items. Other (c) Includes our proportionate share of joint venture tonnage. (d) The ratio of our actual leased capacity to our estimated potential capacity. Below are the changes in both Segment EBDA before certain items and revenues before certain items, in the comparable three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. Three months ended June 30, 2016 versus Three months ended June 30, 2015 Segment EBDA before Revenues before certain items certain items increase/(decrease) increase/(decrease) (In millions, except percentages) Marine Operations $ 13 54 % $ 17 46 % Gulf Liquids 11 19 % 9 11 % Northeast 5 22 % 6 15 % Alberta, Canada 1 4 % 5 15 % Gulf Bulk (9) (38)% (12) (29)% Lower River (7) (32)% (8) (22)% Gulf Central (7) (30)% (7) (25)% All others (including intrasegment eliminations and unallocated income tax expenses) 5 7 % 4 2 % Total Terminals $ 12 4 % $ 14 3 % 50

  47. Six months ended June 30, 2016 versus Six months ended June 30, 2015 Segment EBDA before Revenues before certain items certain items increase/(decrease) increase/(decrease) (In millions, except percentages) Marine Operations $ 22 47 % $ 31 42 % Gulf Liquids 14 12 % 15 9 % Northeast 7 15 % 9 11 % Alberta, Canada 7 15 % 19 33 % Gulf Bulk (23) (43)% (25) (29)% Lower River (11) (27)% (10) (15)% Gulf Central (7) (18)% (6) (13)% All others (including intrasegment eliminations and unallocated income tax expenses) 8 6 % (10) (3)% Total Terminals $ 17 3 % $ 23 3 % The changes in Segment EBDA for our Terminals business segment are further explained by the following discussion of the significant factors driving Segment EBDA before certain items in the comparable three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015: • increases of $13 million (54%) and $22 million (47%), respectively, from our Marine Operations related to the incremental earnings from the December 2015 and May 2016 deliveries of the Jones Act tankers, the “Lone Star State” and “Magnolia State,” respectively, and increased charter rates on the “Empire State” and “Evergreen State” Jones Act tankers; • increases of $11 million (19%) and $14 million (12%), respectively, from our Gulf Liquids terminals, primarily related to higher volumes as a result of various expansion projects, including marine infrastructure improvements at our Galena Park, Pasadena, and North Docks terminal, as well as higher rates and ancillary service activities on existing business; • increases of $5 million (22%) and $7 million (15%), respectively, from our Northeast terminals, primarily due to contributions from two terminals acquired as part of the BP Products North America Inc. acquisition which was completed in February 2016; • increases of $1 million (4%) and $7 million (15%), respectively, from our Alberta, Canada terminals, primarily related to a new joint venture rail terminal placed into service in April 2015; • decreases of $9 million (38%) and $23 million (43%), respectively, from our Gulf Bulk terminals, driven by decreased revenues and earnings of $11 million and $25 million, respectively, due to certain coal customer bankruptcies; • decreases of $7 million (32%) and $11 million (27%), respectively, from our Lower River terminals, driven by decreased revenues and earnings of $7 million and $14 million, respectively, due to certain coal customer bankruptcies; • decreases of $7 million (30%) and $7 million (18%), respectively, from our Gulf Central terminals, primarily as a result of a customer contract buyout in second quarter of 2015; and • decreases of $1 million and $7 million, respectively, due to certain coal customer bankruptcies which impacted our Mid Atlantic terminals included in “All others”. 51

  48. Products Pipelines Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 (In millions, except operating statistics) Revenues(a) $ 401 $ 478 $ 797 $ 922 Operating expenses(b) (141) (210) (294) (419) Gain (Loss) on impairments and disposals of long-lived assets, net(c) 5 — (73) (1) Earnings from equity investments 15 12 28 22 Interest income and Other, net(d) 12 — 12 3 Income tax benefit (expense) 1 (3) 2 (4) Segment EBDA(a)(b)(c)(d) 293 277 472 523 Certain items(a)(b)(c)(d) 3 (2) 111 (3) Segment EBDA before certain items $ 296 $ 275 $ 583 $ 520 Change from prior period Increase/(Decrease) Revenues before certain items $ (79) (17)% $ (126) (14)% Segment EBDA before certain items $ 21 8 % $ 63 12 % Gasoline (MMBbl)(e) 97.6 97.9 188.9 186.4 Diesel fuel (MMBbl) 32.7 33.1 63.0 63.9 Jet fuel (MMBbl) 26.0 26.6 51.1 51.0 Total refined product volumes (MMBbl)(f) 156.3 157.6 303.0 301.3 NGL (MMBbl)(g) 9.7 9.7 19.0 19.4 Crude and condensate (MMBbl)(h) 27.9 25.2 58.8 43.7 Total delivery volumes (MMBbl) 193.9 192.5 380.8 364.4 Ethanol (MMBbl)(i) 10.7 10.5 20.8 20.4 _______ Certain items affecting Segment EBDA (a) Three and six month 2015 amounts include decreases in revenue of $2 million and $1 million, respectively, related to an unrealized swap loss. (b) Three and six month 2016 amounts include increases in expense of $20 million for both periods related to a legal settlement. Six month 2016 amount also includes $31 million of rate case liability estimate adjustments associated with pre-2016 revenues. In addition to the revenue certain items described in footnote (a) above: three and six month 2015 amounts also include decreases in expense of $4 million for both periods related to a certain Pacific operations litigation matter. (c) Three and six month 2016 amounts include a decrease in expense of a $5 million and a increase in expense of a $8 million, respectively, of non-cash impairment charges related to the potential sale of a Transmix facility; and six month 2016 amount also includes an increase in expense of $64 million related to the Palmetto project write-off. (d) Three and six month 2016 amounts include $12 million of gains for both periods related to the sale of an equity investment. Other (e) Volumes include ethanol pipeline volumes. (f) Includes Pacific, Plantation Pipe Line Company, Calnev, Central Florida and Parkway pipeline volumes. Joint venture throughput is reported at our ownership share. (g) Includes Cochin and Cypress pipeline volumes. Joint venture throughput is reported at our ownership share. (h) Includes Kinder Morgan Crude & Condensate, Double Eagle Pipeline LLC and Double H pipeline volumes. Joint venture throughput is reported at our ownership share. (i) Represents total ethanol volumes, including ethanol pipeline volumes included in gasoline volumes above. 52

  49. Below are the changes in both Segment EBDA before certain items and revenues before certain items, in the comparable three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015. Three months ended June 30, 2016 versus Three months ended June 30, 2015 Segment EBDA before Revenues before certain items certain items increase/(decrease) increase/(decrease) (In millions, except percentages) Crude & Condensate Pipeline $ 8 19 % $ 6 13 % KMCC - Splitter 6 67 % 8 89 % Cochin 6 24 % 4 11 % Double H pipeline — 1 — % 6 % Transmix (1) (10)% (101) (66)% All others (including eliminations) 2 1 % 3 1 % Total Products Pipelines $ 21 8 % $ (79) (17)% Six months ended June 30, 2016 versus Six months ended June 30, 2015 Segment EBDA before Revenues before certain items certain items increase/(decrease) increase/(decrease) (In millions, except percentages) Crude & Condensate Pipeline $ 27 34% $ 28 33 % KMCC - Splitter 18 180% 25 250 % Cochin 1 2% 3 4 % Double H pipeline 8 12 44% 52 % Transmix — —% (202) (67)% All others (including eliminations) 9 3% 8 2 % Total Products Pipelines $ 63 12% $ (126) (14)% The changes in Segment EBDA for our Products Pipelines business segment are further explained by the following discussion of the significant factors driving Segment EBDA before certain items in the comparable three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and 2015: • increases of $8 million (19%) and $27 million (34%), respectively, from our Kinder Morgan Crude & Condensate Pipeline driven primarily by an increase in pipeline throughput volumes from existing customers and additional volumes from new customers associated with expansion projects; • increases of $6 million (67%) and $18 million (180%), respectively, from our KMCC - Splitter due to first and second phases in full operation for 2016. Start up of first phase was in March 2015 and second phase was in July 2015; • increases of $6 million (24%) and $1 million (2%), respectively, from Cochin due to third party operational constraints downstream of the pipeline which occurred during the second quarter of 2015; • flat and $8 million (44%), respectively, due to a full six months of results from our Double H pipeline, which began operations in March 2015; and • decrease of $1 million (10%) and flat, respectively, from our Transmix processing operations. The decreases in revenues of $101 million and $202 million, respectively, and associated decreases in costs of goods sold were driven by lower sales volumes. 53

  50. Kinder Morgan Canada Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 2016 2015 2016 2015 (In millions, except operating statistics) Revenues $ 63 $ 65 $ 122 $ 125 Operating expenses (21) (23) (39) (42) Interest income and Other, net 4 2 9 5 Income tax expense (6) (7) (12) (10) Segment EBDA $ 40 $ 37 $ 80 $ 78 Change from prior period Increase/(Decrease) Revenues $ (2) (3)% $ (3) (2)% Segment EBDA $ 3 8 % $ 2 3 % Transport volumes (MMBbl)(a) 28.7 29.7 57.3 57.3 _______ (a) Represents Trans Mountain pipeline system volumes. For the comparable three and six month periods of 2016 and 2015, the Kinder Morgan Canada business segment had increases in Segment EBDA of $3 million (8%) and $2 million (3%) primarily due to increased Washington State volumes partially offset by an unfavorable impact from foreign exchange rates. Other This segment contributed losses of $5 million and $13 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively, and contributed losses of $40 million and $46 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively. However, three and six months ended June 30, 2016 losses included certain items which increased Segment EBDA by $3 million and $4 million, respectively; and both three and six month 2015 losses included certain items of $33 million which decreased Segment EBDA and were primarily related to a certain litigation matter. After taking into effect the certain items, the losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 increased by $1 million and $4 million, respectively, when compared with the same prior year period. General and Administrative, Interest, and Noncontrolling Interests Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 2015 Increase/(decrease) (In millions, except percentages) General and administrative expense(a)(d) $ 189 $ 164 $ 25 15 % Certain items(a) (22) 9 (31) (344)% Management fee reimbursement(d) (9) (9) — — % General and administrative expense before certain items $ 158 $ 164 $ (6) (4)% Unallocable interest expense net of interest income and other, net(b) $ 470 $ 472 $ (2) — % Certain items(b) 40 55 (15) (27)% Unallocable interest expense net of interest income and other, net, before $ 510 $ 527 $ (17) (3)% certain items Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests $ 3 $ 9 $ (6) (67)% Noncontrolling interests associated with certain items(c) 3 (1) 4 400 % Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests before certain items $ 6 $ 8 $ (2) (25)% 54

  51. Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 2015 Increase/(decrease) (In millions, except percentages) (1) General and administrative expense(a)(d) $ 379 $ 380 $ — % (28) (29) Certain items(a) 1 3 % (17) (18) Management fee reimbursement(d) 1 6 % General and administrative expense before certain items $ 334 $ 333 $ 1 — % (74) Unallocable interest expense net of interest income and other, net(b) $ 912 $ 986 $ (8)% Certain items(b) 109 55 54 98 % Unallocable interest expense net of interest income and other, net, before $ 1,021 $ 1,041 $ (20) (2)% certain items (1) $ Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests $ 2 $ 3 300 % (5) Noncontrolling interests associated with certain items(c) 9 14 (36)% (2) Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests before certain items $ 11 $ 13 $ (15)% Certain items (a) Three and six month 2016 amounts include (i) increases in expense of $4 million and $8 million, respectively, related to certain corporate legal matters; (ii) increase in expense of $12 million for both periods related to severance costs; and (iii) increases in expense of $5 million and $8 million, respectively, related to acquisition costs. Three month 2016 amount also includes an increase in expense of $1 million related to pension credit income. Three and six month 2015 amounts include increases in expense of (i) $1 million and $40 million, respectively, related to certain corporate legal matters; and (ii) $1 million and $12 million, respectively, related to costs associated with our Hiland acquisition. Partially offsetting these three and six month 2015 increases are decreases in expense of $11 million and $23 million, respectively, related to pension credit income. (b) Three and six month 2016 amounts include decreases in interest expense of (i) $18 million and $37 million, respectively, related to debt fair value adjustments associated with acquisitions; and (ii) $22 million and $72 million, respectively, related to non-cash true-ups of our estimates of swap ineffectiveness. Three and six month 2015 amounts include decreases in interest expense of (i) $23 million and $30 million, respectively, related to non-cash true-ups of our estimates of swap ineffectiveness; (ii) $19 million and $35 million, respectively, related to debt fair value adjustments associated with acquisitions; and (iii) $13 million for both periods associated with a certain Pacific operations litigation matter. Six month 2015 amount also includes a $23 million increase in interest expense for a non-cash adjustment related to a litigation matter. (c) Three and six month 2016 amounts include losses of $3 million and $9 million, respectively, and three and six month 2015 amounts include a gain of $1 million and a loss of $14 million, respectively, associated with Natural Gas Pipelines segment certain items and disclosed above in “—Natural Gas Pipelines.” Other (d) Three and six month 2016 and 2015 amounts include general and administrative management fee revenues from an equity investee of $9 million, $9 million, $17 million and $18 million, respectively. These amounts were recorded to the “Product sales and other” caption with the offsetting expenses primarily included in the “General and administrative” expense caption in our accompanying consolidated statements of income. General and administrative expenses before certain items for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the respective prior periods decreased $6 million and increased $1 million, respectively. The quarter-to-date decrease from 2015 was primarily driven by lower legal costs, outside services and labor expenses partially offset by lower capitalized costs due to reduced capital expenditures. The year-to-date increase from 2015 was primarily driven by lower capitalized costs partially offset by lower outside services and labor expenses. In the table above, we report our interest expense as “net,” meaning that we have subtracted unallocated interest income and capitalized interest from our total interest expense to arrive at one interest amount. Our consolidated interest expense net of interest income and other, net before certain items for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to the respective prior periods decreased $17 million and $20 million, respectively. The decreases in interest expense were due to lower weighted average debt balances, partially offset by a slightly higher overall weighted average interest rate on our outstanding debt . We use interest rate swap agreements to convert a portion of the underlying cash flows related to our long-term fixed rate debt securities (senior notes) into variable rate debt in order to achieve our desired mix of fixed and variable rate debt. As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, approximately 28% and 27%, respectively, of our debt balances (excluding debt fair value adjustments) were subject to variable interest rates—either as short-term or long-term variable rate debt obligations or as 55

  52. fixed-rate debt converted to variable rates through the use of interest rate swaps. For more information on our interest rate swaps, see Note 5 “Risk Management—Interest Rate Risk Management” to our consolidated financial statements. Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests, represents the allocation of our consolidated net income attributable to all outstanding ownership interests in our consolidated subsidiaries that are not owned by us. The decreases in net income attributable to noncontrolling interests before certain items for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to the respective prior periods was $2 million for both periods. Income Taxes Our tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2016 was approximately $213 million as compared to $189 million for the same period of 2015. The $24 million increase in tax expense was primarily due to higher pre-tax earnings. Our tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was approximately $367 million as compared to $413 million for the same period of 2015. The $46 million decrease in tax expense was primarily due to lower 2016 year-to-date earnings as a result of asset impairments and project write-offs, and adjustments to our income tax reserve for uncertain tax positions. Liquidity and Capital Resources General As of June 30, 2016, we had $180 million of “Cash and cash equivalents” on our consolidated balance sheet, a decrease of $49 million (21%) from December 31, 2015. We believe our cash position, remaining borrowing capacity on our credit facility (discussed below in “—Short-term Liquidity”), and cash flows from operating activities are adequate to allow us to manage our day-to-day cash requirements and anticipated obligations as discussed further below. We have consistently generated strong cash flow from operations, providing a source of funds of $2,344 million and $2,538 million in the first six months of 2016 and 2015, respectively (the period-to-period decrease is discussed below in “Cash Flows —Operating Activities”). We have relied on cash provided from operations to fund our operations as well as our debt service, sustaining capital expenditures, and dividend payments, and during 2016, to fund our expansion capital expenditures. On July 10, 2016, we announced the anticipated sale of a 50% interest in our SNG natural gas pipeline system to Southern Company for an expected $1.47 billion and the formation of a joint venture, which will include our remaining 50% interest in SNG, which we will operate. Inclusive of existing SNG debt, the transaction equates to an SNG total enterprise value of $4.15 billion. We intend to use all of the proceeds from this transaction to reduce debt. As of June 30, 2016, SNG had $1,211 million of debt outstanding (including a current portion of $500 million) which we do not expect to consolidate subsequent to the close of the transaction. Subject to customary closing conditions and regulatory approvals, the transaction is expected to close in the third or early fourth quarter of 2016, at which time, any difference between the sales price and the proportionate carrying value of the interests in SNG being sold would be recognized. On January 26, 2016, we announced the issuance of a new $1.0 billion unsecured term loan facility and the expansion of our revolving credit facility from $4.0 billion to $5.0 billion. The proceeds of the three-year unsecured term loan facility were used to refinance maturing long-term debt. In general, we expect that our short-term liquidity needs will be met primarily through retained cash from operations or short-term borrowings. We also expect that our current common equity dividend level will allow us to use retained cash to fund our growth projects in 2016. Moreover, by continuing to focus on high-grading our growth project backlog to allocate capital to the highest return opportunities, we do not expect to need to access the capital markets to fund our growth projects for the foreseeable future beyond 2016. Short-term Liquidity As of June 30, 2016, our principal sources of short-term liquidity are (i) our $5.0 billion revolving credit facility and associated $4.0 billion commercial paper program and (ii) cash from operations. The loan commitments under our revolving credit facility can be used for working capital and other general corporate purposes and as a backup to our commercial paper program. Borrowings under our commercial paper program and letters of credit reduce borrowings allowed under our credit facility. We provide for liquidity by maintaining a sizable amount of excess borrowing capacity under our credit facility and, as previously discussed, have consistently generated strong cash flows from operations. 56

  53. Our short-term debt as of June 30, 2016 was $3,419 million, primarily consisting of (i) $700 million outstanding borrowings under our $5.0 billion revolving credit facility; (ii) $24 million outstanding borrowings under our $4.0 billion commercial paper program; and (iii) $2,541 million of senior notes that mature in the next year. We intend to refinance our short-term debt through additional credit facility borrowings, commercial paper borrowings, or by issuing new long-term debt or paying down short-term debt using cash retained from operations or received from asset sales. Our combined balance of short-term debt as of December 31, 2015 was $821 million. We had working capital (defined as current assets less current liabilities) deficits of $4,096 million and $1,241 million as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Our current liabilities include short-term borrowings used to finance our expansion capital expenditures, which we may periodically replace with long-term financing and/or partially pay down using retained cash from operations. The overall $2,855 million (230%) unfavorable change from year-end 2015 was primarily due to a net increase in our credit facility and commercial paper borrowings and an increase in our current portion of long term debt, offset partially by a favorable change in payables. Generally, our working capital balance varies due to factors such as the timing of scheduled debt payments, timing differences in the collection and payment of receivables and payables, the change in fair value of our derivative contracts, and changes in our cash and cash equivalent balances as a result of excess cash from operations after payments for investing and financing activities. Capital Expenditures We account for our capital expenditures in accordance with GAAP. We also distinguish between capital expenditures that are maintenance/sustaining capital expenditures and those that are expansion capital expenditures (which we also refer to as discretionary capital expenditures). Expansion capital expenditures are those expenditures which increase throughput or capacity from that which existed immediately prior to the addition or improvement, and are not deducted in calculating DCF (see “Results of Operations—Distributable Cash Flow”). With respect to our oil and gas producing activities, we classify a capital expenditure as an expansion capital expenditure if it is expected to increase capacity or throughput (i.e., production capacity) from the capacity or throughput immediately prior to the making or acquisition of such additions or improvements. Maintenance capital expenditures are those which maintain throughput or capacity. The distinction between maintenance and expansion capital expenditures is a physical determination rather than an economic one, irrespective of the amount by which the throughput or capacity is increased. Budgeting of maintenance capital expenditures is done annually on a bottom-up basis. For each of our assets, we budget for and make those maintenance capital expenditures that are necessary to maintain safe and efficient operations, meet customer needs and comply with our operating policies and applicable law. We may budget for and make additional maintenance capital expenditures that we expect to produce economic benefits such as increasing efficiency and/or lowering future expenses. Budgeting and approval of expansion capital expenditures are generally made periodically throughout the year on a project-by- project basis in response to specific investment opportunities identified by our business segments from which we generally expect to receive sufficient returns to justify the expenditures. Generally, the determination of whether a capital expenditure is classified as maintenance/sustaining or as expansion capital expenditures is made on a project level. The classification of our capital expenditures as expansion capital expenditures or as maintenance capital expenditures is made consistent with our accounting policies and is generally a straightforward process, but in certain circumstances can be a matter of management judgment and discretion. The classification has an impact on cash available to pay dividends because capital expenditures that are classified as expansion capital expenditures are not deducted from DCF, while those classified as maintenance capital expenditures are. See “—Common Dividends.” 57

  54. Our capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2016, and the amount we expect to spend for the remainder of 2016 to sustain and grow our businesses are as follows: Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 2016 Remaining Total (In millions) Sustaining capital expenditures(a) $ 245 $ 318 $ 563 Discretionary capital expenditures(b)(c) $ 1,581 $ 1,218 $ 2,799 _______ (a) Six-months 2016, 2016 Remaining, and Total 2016 amounts include $42 million, $54 million, and $96 million, respectively, for our proportionate share of sustaining capital expenditures of unconsolidated joint ventures. (b) Six-months 2016 amount includes an increase of $566 million of discretionary capital expenditures of unconsolidated joint ventures (including a NGPL Holdings LLC contribution) and acquisitions (primarily BP terminals acquisition) and divestitures and a decrease of a combined $252 million of net changes from accrued capital expenditures and contractor retainage. (c) 2016 Remaining amount includes our contributions to certain unconsolidated joint ventures and small acquisitions and divestitures, net of contributions estimated from unaffiliated joint venture members for consolidated investments. Off Balance Sheet Arrangements Other than commitments for the purchase of property, plant and equipment discussed below, there have been no material changes in our obligations with respect to other entities that are not consolidated in our financial statements that would affect the disclosures presented as of December 31, 2015 in our 2015 Form 10-K. Commitments for the purchase of property, plant and equipment as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were $1,773 million and $1,229 million, respectively. The $544 million increase is primarily the result of our increase in various capital commitments associated with our natural gas pipeline business segment. Cash Flows Operating Activities The net decrease of $194 million in cash provided by operating activities for the first six months of 2016 compared to the respective 2015 period was primarily attributable to: • a $213 million decrease associated with net changes in working capital items and non-current assets and liabilities. The decrease was driven, among other things, primarily by a non-recurring $195 million income tax refund and a $73 million payment under a take-or-pay contract that we received in 2015; and • a $19 million increase in cash from overall net income after adjusting our period-to-period $72 million decrease in net income for non-cash items primarily consisting of the following: (i) net losses on impairments and disposals of long- lived assets (see discussion above in “—Results of Operations”); (ii) changes in DD&A expenses (including amortization of excess cost of equity investments) and deferred income taxes; and (iii) change in earnings from equity investments. Investing Activities The $1,864 million net decrease in cash used in investing activities for the first six months of 2016 compared to the respective 2015 period was primarily attributable to: • a $1,586 million decrease in expenditures for acquisitions and investments in 2016 compared to the respective 2015 period. The overall decrease in acquisitions was primarily related to the $324 million portion of the purchase price we paid in 2016 for the BP terminals acquisition, versus $1,706 million (net of cash assumed) and $158 million we paid for the Hiland and Vopak acquisitions, respectively, in the 2015 period; • a $439 million reduction in capital expenditures resulting from the high-grading of our project backlog to focus on allocating capital to the highest return opportunities; and • a $216 million increase from proceeds of sales of property, plant and equipment, certain assets and investments; partially offset by, • a $318 million increase in contributions to equity investments in 2016 compared to the respective 2015 period, primarily due to a $312 million contribution to our 50% investment in NGPL Holdings LLC in 2016. 58

  55. Financing Activities The net decrease of $1,576 million in cash provided by financing activities for the first six months of 2016 compared to the respective 2015 period was primarily attributable to: • a $2,562 million decrease in cash resulting from the issuances of our Class P shares under our equity distribution agreement in 2015 and no activity in 2016; • a $483 million net decrease in net debt proceeds. See Note 3 “Debt” for further information regarding our debt activity; • a $76 million decrease in cash due to dividends paid to our mandatory convertible preferred shareholders in 2016; • a $1,447 million in reduced dividend payments paid to our common shareholders; and • an $87 million increase in contributions provided by noncontrolling interests, primarily reflecting the contributions received from BP for its 25% share of a newly formed joint venture. See Note 2 “Acquisitions and Divestitures” for further information regarding this joint venture. Common Dividends We expect to declare common dividends of $0.50 per share on our common stock for 2016 ($0.125/quarter). Total quarterly dividend per share Three months ended Date of declaration Date of record Date of dividend for the period December 31, 2015 $ 0.125 January 20, 2016 February 1, 2016 February 16, 2016 March 31, 2016 $ 0.125 April 20, 2016 May 2, 2016 May 16, 2016 June 30, 2016 $ 0.125 July 20, 2016 August 1, 2016 August 15, 2016 The actual amount of common dividends to be paid on our capital stock will depend on many factors, including our financial condition and results of operations, liquidity requirements, business prospects, capital requirements, legal, regulatory and contractual constraints, tax laws, Delaware laws and other factors. See Item 1A. “Risk Factors— The guidance we provide for our anticipated dividends is based on estimates. Circumstances may arise that lead to conflicts between using funds to pay anticipated dividends or to invest in our business.” of our 2015 Form 10-K. All of these matters will be taken into consideration by our board of directors in declaring dividends. Our common dividends are not cumulative. Consequently, if dividends on our common stock are not paid at the intended levels, our common stockholders are not entitled to receive those payments in the future. Our common dividends generally are expected to be paid on or about the 15th day of each February, May, August and November. Preferred Dividends Dividends on our mandatory convertible preferred stock are payable on a cumulative basis when, as and if declared by our board of directors (or an authorized committee thereof) at an annual rate of 9.750% of the liquidation preference of $1,000 per share on January 26, April 26, July 26 and October 26 of each year, commencing on January 26, 2016 to, and including, October 26, 2018. We may pay dividends in cash or, subject to certain limitations, in shares of common stock or any combination of cash and shares of common stock. The terms of the mandatory convertible preferred stock provide that, unless full cumulative dividends have been paid or set aside for payment on all outstanding mandatory convertible preferred stock for all prior dividend periods, no dividends may be declared or paid on common stock. Total dividend Date of Date of per share for Period declaration Date of record dividend the period October 30, 2015 through January 25, 2016 $ 23.291667 November 17, 2015 January 11, 2016 January 26, 2016 January 26, 2016 through April 25, 2016 $ 24.375000 January 20, 2016 April 11, 2016 April 26, 2016 April 26, 2016 through July 25, 2016 $ 24.375000 April 20, 2016 July 11, 2016 July 26, 2016 The cash dividend of $24.375 per share of our mandatory convertible preferred stock is equivalent to $1.21875 per depository share. 59

  56. Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. There have been no material changes in market risk exposures that would affect the quantitative and qualitative disclosures presented as of December 31, 2015, in Item 7A in our 2015 Form 10-K. For more information on our risk management activities, see Item 1, Note 5 “Risk Management” to our consolidated financial statements. Item 4. Controls and Procedures. As of June 30, 2016, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon and as of the date of the evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings. See Part I, Item 1, Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements entitled “Litigation, Environmental and Other Contingencies” which is incorporated in this item by reference. Item 1A. Risk Factors. There have been no material changes in the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A in our 2015 Form 10-K. Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds. None. Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. None. Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures. The information concerning mine safety violations or other regulatory matters required by Section 1503(a) of the Dodd- Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and Item 104 of Regulation S-K (17 CFR 229.104) is included in exhibit 95.1 to this quarterly report. Item 5. Other Information. On July 19, 2016, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors approved a revised form of restricted stock unit agreement under the KMI 2015 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan. The form agreement was revised to provide clarifying language regarding the applicability of Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) to an employee. 60

  57. Item 6. Exhibits. 3.1 * the three months ended June 30, 2015 (file No. 001-35081)). 3.2 * (File No. 001-35081)). 10.1 Cross Guarantee Agreement, dated as of November 26, 2014, among Kinder Morgan, Inc. and certain of its subsidiaries, with schedules updated as of June 30, 2016. 10.2 2016 Form of Employee Restricted Stock Unit Agreement. 31.1 Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2 Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.2 Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 95.1 Mine Safety Disclosures. 101 Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) our Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015; (ii) our Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015; (iii) our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015; (iv) our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015; (v) our Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015; and (vi) the notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements. * Asterisk indicates exhibit incorporated by reference as indicated; all other exhibits are filed herewith, except as noted otherwise. 61

  58. SIGNATURE Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. KINDER MORGAN, INC. Registrant Date: July 22, 2016 By: /s/ Kimberly A. Dang Kimberly A. Dang Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer) 62

  59. Exhibit 10.1 CROSS GUARANTEE AGREEMENT This CROSS GUARANTEE AGREEMENT is dated as of November 26, 2014 (as amended, restated, supplemented or otherwise modified from time to time, this “Agreement”), by each of the signatories listed on the signature pages hereto and each of the other entities that becomes a party hereto pursuant to Section 19 (the “Guarantors” and individually, a “Guarantor”), for the benefit of the Guaranteed Parties (as defined below). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, Kinder Morgan, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“KMI”), and certain of its direct and indirect Subsidiaries have outstanding senior, unsecured Indebtedness and may from time to time issue additional senior, unsecured Indebtedness; WHEREAS, each Guarantor, other than KMI, is a direct or indirect Subsidiary of KMI; WHEREAS, each Guarantor desires to provide the guarantee set forth herein with respect to the Indebtedness of such Guarantors that constitutes the Guaranteed Obligations; and WHEREAS, each Guarantor acknowledges that it will derive substantial direct and indirect benefit from the making of the guarantees hereby; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises, the Guarantors hereby agree with each other for the benefit of the Guaranteed Parties as follows: 1. Defined Terms. (a) As used in this Agreement, the following terms have the meanings specified below: “Agreement” has the meaning provided in the preamble hereto. “Bankruptcy Code” means Title 11 of the United States Code, as now or hereafter in effect, or any successor thereto. “Capital Stock” means, with respect to any Person, any and all shares, interests, rights to purchase, warrants, options, participations or other equivalents (however designated) of such Person’s equity, including (i) all common stock and preferred stock, any limited or general partnership interest and any limited liability company member interest, (ii) beneficial interests in trusts, and (iii) any other interest or participation that confers upon a Person the right to receive a share of the profits and losses of, or distribution of assets of, the issuing Person. “CFC” means a Person that is a “controlled foreign corporation” within the meaning of Section 957 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. “Commodity Exchange Act” means the Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. § 1 et seq.), as amended from time to time, and any successor statute. “Consolidated Assets” means, at the date of any determination thereof, the total assets of KMI and its Subsidiaries as set forth on a consolidated balance sheet of KMI and its Subsidiaries for their most recently completed fiscal quarter, prepared in accordance with GAAP. “Consolidated Tangible Assets” means, at the date of any determination thereof, Consolidated Assets after deducting therefrom the value, net of any applicable reserves and accumulated

  60. Exhibit 10.1 amortization, of all goodwill, trade names, trademarks, patents and other like intangible assets, all as set forth, or on a pro forma basis would be set forth, on a consolidated balance sheet of KMI and its Subsidiaries for their most recently completed fiscal quarter, prepared in accordance with GAAP. “Domestic Subsidiary” means any Subsidiary of KMI organized under the laws of any jurisdiction within the United States. “Excluded Subsidiary” means (i) any Subsidiary that is not a Wholly-owned Domestic Operating Subsidiary, (ii) any Domestic Subsidiary that is a Subsidiary of a CFC or any Domestic Subsidiary (including a disregarded entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes) substantially all of whose assets (held directly or through Subsidiaries) consist of Capital Stock of one or more CFCs or Indebtedness of such CFCs, (iii) any Immaterial Subsidiary, (iv) any Subsidiary listed on Schedule III, (v) each of Calnev Pipe Line LLC, SFPP, L.P., Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc. and EPEC Realty, Inc. and each of its Subsidiaries, (vi) any other Subsidiary that is not a Guarantor under the Revolving Credit Agreement Guarantee, (vii) any not-for-profit Subsidiary, (viii) any Subsidiary that is prohibited by a Requirement of Law from guaranteeing the Guaranteed Obligations, and (ix) any Subsidiary acquired by KMI or its Subsidiaries after the date of this Agreement to the extent, and so long as, the financing documentation governing any existing Indebtedness of such Subsidiary that survives such acquisition prohibits such Subsidiary from guaranteeing the Guaranteed Obligations; provided , that notwithstanding the foregoing, any Subsidiary that is party to the Revolving Credit Agreement Guarantee or that Guarantees any senior notes or senior debt securities issued by KMI (other than pursuant to this Agreement) shall not constitute an Excluded Subsidiary for so long as such Guarantee is in effect. “Excluded Swap Obligation” means, with respect to any Guarantor, any Swap Obligation if, and to the extent that, all or a portion of the Guarantee of such Guarantor of such Swap Obligation (or any Guarantee thereof) is or becomes illegal under the Commodity Exchange Act or any rule, regulation or order of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (or the application or official interpretation of any thereof) by virtue of such Guarantor’s failure for any reason to constitute an “eligible contract participant” as defined in the Commodity Exchange Act and the regulations thereunder at the time the Guarantee of such Guarantor becomes effective with respect to such Swap Obligation. If a Swap Obligation arises under a master agreement governing more than one swap, such exclusion shall apply only to the portion of such Swap Obligation that is attributable to swaps for which such Guarantee is or becomes illegal. “GAAP” means generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America from time to time, including as set forth in the opinions, statements and pronouncements of the Accounting Principles Board of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and the Financial Accounting Standards Board. “Governmental Authority” means the government of the United States of America or any other nation, or of any political subdivision thereof, whether state or local, and any agency, authority, instrumentality, regulatory body, court, central bank or other entity exercising executive, legislative, judicial, taxing, regulatory or administrative powers or functions of or pertaining to government (including any supra national bodies such as the European Union or the European Central Bank). “Guarantee” of or by any Person (the “guarantor”) means any obligation, contingent or otherwise, of the guarantor guaranteeing or having the economic effect of guaranteeing any Indebtedness or other obligation of any other Person (the “primary obligor”) in any manner, whether directly or indirectly, and including any obligation of the guarantor, direct or indirect, (i) to purchase or pay (or advance or supply funds for the purchase or payment of) such Indebtedness or other obligation or to purchase (or to advance or supply funds for the purchase of) any security for the payment thereof, (ii) to purchase or lease property, securities or services for the purpose of assuring the owner of such Indebtedness 2

  61. Exhibit 10.1 or other obligation of the payment thereof, (iii) to maintain working capital, equity capital or any other financial statement condition or liquidity of the primary obligor so as to enable the primary obligor to pay such Indebtedness or other obligation or (iv) as an account party in respect of any letter of credit or letter of guaranty issued to support such Indebtedness or obligation; provided that the term Guarantee shall not include endorsements for collection or deposit in the ordinary course of business. “Guarantee Termination Date” has the meaning set forth in Section 2(d). “Guaranteed Obligations” means the Indebtedness set forth on Schedule I hereto, as such schedule may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms of this Agreement; provided that the term “Guaranteed Obligations” shall exclude any Excluded Swap Obligations. “Guaranteed Parties” means, collectively, (i) in the case of Guaranteed Obligations that are governed by trust indentures, the holders (as that term is defined in the applicable trust indenture) of such Guaranteed Obligations, (ii) in the case of Guaranteed Obligations that are governed by loan agreements, credit agreements, or similar agreements, the lenders providing such loans or credit, and (iii) in the case of Guaranteed Obligations with respect to Hedging Agreements, the counterparties under such agreements. “Guarantor” has the meaning provided in the preamble hereto. Schedule II hereto, as such schedule may be amended from time to time in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, sets forth the name of each Guarantor. “Hedging Agreement” means a financial instrument, agreement or security which hedges or is used to hedge or manage the risk associated with a change in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates or commodity prices (but excluding any purchase, swap, derivative contract or similar agreement relating to power, electricity or any related commodity product). “Immaterial Subsidiary” means any Subsidiary that is not a Material Subsidiary. “Indebtedness” means, collectively, (i) any senior, unsecured obligation created or assumed by any Person for borrowed money, including all obligations of such Person evidenced by bonds, debentures, notes or similar instruments (other than surety, performance and guaranty bonds), and (ii) all payment obligations of any Person with respect to obligations under Hedging Agreements. “Investment Grade Rating” means a rating equal to or higher than Baa3 by Moody’s and BBB- by S&P; provided, however, that if (i) either of Moody’s or S&P changes its rating system, such ratings shall be the equivalent ratings after such changes or (ii) Moody’s or S&P shall not make a rating of a Guaranteed Obligation publicly available, the references above to Moody’s or S&P or both of them, as the case may be, shall be to a nationally recognized U.S. rating agency or agencies, as the case may be, selected by KMI and the references to the ratings categories above shall be to the corresponding rating categories of such rating agency or rating agencies, as the case may be. “Issuer” means the issuer, borrower, or other applicable primary obligor of a Guaranteed Obligation. “KMI” has the meaning provided in the recitals hereto. “Lien” means, with respect to any asset (i) any mortgage, deed of trust, lien, pledge, hypothecation, encumbrance, charge or security interest in, on or of such asset, and (ii) the interest of a vendor or a lessor under any conditional sale agreement, capital lease or title retention agreement (or any financing lease having substantially the same economic effect as any of the foregoing) relating to such asset. 3

  62. Exhibit 10.1 “Material Subsidiary” means, as at any date of determination, any Subsidiary of KMI whose total tangible assets (for purposes of the below, when combined with the tangible assets of such Subsidiary’s Subsidiaries, after eliminating intercompany obligations) as at such date of determination are greater than or equal to 5% of Consolidated Tangible Assets as of the last day of the fiscal quarter most recently ended for which financial statements of KMI have been filed with the SEC. “Moody’s” means Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and its successors. “Operating Subsidiary” means any operating company that is a Subsidiary of KMI. “Person” means any natural person, corporation, limited liability company, trust, joint venture, association, company, partnership, Governmental Authority or other entity. “Qualified ECP Guarantor” means, in respect of any Swap Obligation, each Guarantor that has total assets exceeding $10,000,000 at the time the relevant Guarantee becomes effective with respect to such Swap Obligation or such other person as constitutes an “eligible contract participant” under the Commodity Exchange Act or any regulations promulgated thereunder and can cause another person to qualify as an “eligible contract participant” at such time by entering into a keepwell under Section 1a(18)(A)(v)(II) of the Commodity Exchange Act. “Rating Agencies” means Moody’s and S&P; provided that, if at the relevant time neither Moody’s nor S&P shall be rating the relevant Guaranteed Obligation, then “Rating Agencies” shall mean another nationally recognized rating service that rates such Guaranteed Obligation. “Rating Date” means the date immediately prior to the earlier of (i) the occurrence of a Release Event and (ii) public notice of the intention to effect a Release Event. “Rating Decline” means, with respect to a Guaranteed Obligation, the occurrence of the following on, or within 90 days after, the date of the occurrence of a Release Event or of public notice of the intention to effect a Release Event (which period may be extended so long as the rating of such Guaranteed Obligation is under publicly announced consideration for possible downgrade by either of the Rating Agencies): (i) in the event such Guaranteed Obligation is assigned an Investment Grade Rating by both Rating Agencies on the Rating Date, the rating of such Guaranteed Obligation by one or both of the Rating Agencies shall be below an Investment Grade Rating; or (ii) in the event such Guaranteed Obligation is rated below an Investment Grade Rating by either of the Rating Agencies on the Rating Date, any such below- Investment Grade Rating of such Guaranteed Obligation shall be decreased by one or more gradations (including gradations within rating categories as well as between rating categories). “Release Event” has the meaning set forth in Section 6(b). “Requirement of Law” means any law, statute, code, ordinance, order, determination, rule, regulation, judgment, decree, injunction, franchise, permit, certificate, license, authorization or other directive or requirement (whether or not having the force of law), including environmental laws, energy regulations and occupational, safety and health standards or controls, of any Governmental Authority. 4

  63. Exhibit 10.1 “Revolving Credit Agreement” means the Revolving Credit Agreement, dated as of September 19, 2014, among KMI, the lenders party thereto and Barclays Bank PLC, as administrative agent, as such credit agreement may be amended, modified, supplemented or restated from time to time, or refunded, refinanced, restructured, replaced, renewed, repaid or extended from time to time (whether with the original agents and lenders or other agents or lenders or trustee or otherwise, and whether provided under the original credit agreement or other credit agreements or note indentures or otherwise), including, without limitation, increasing the amount of available borrowings or other Indebtedness thereunder. “Revolving Credit Agreement Guarantee” means the Guarantee Agreement, dated as of November 26, 2014, made by the Subsidiaries of KMI party thereto in favor of Barclays Bank PLC, as administrative agent, for the benefit of the lenders and the issuing banks under the Revolving Credit Agreement, as such guarantee agreement may be amended, modified, supplemented or restated from time to time, and as it may be replaced or renewed from time to time in connection with any amendment, modification, supplement, restatement, refunding, refinancing, restructuring, replacement, renewal, repayment, or extension of any Revolving Credit Agreement from time to time. “S&P” means Standard & Poor’s Rating Services, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., and its successors. “SEC” means the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. “Subsidiary” means, with respect to any Person (the “parent”) at any date, any corporation, limited liability company, partnership, association or other entity the accounts of which would be consolidated with those of the parent in the parent’s consolidated financial statements if such financial statements were prepared in accordance with GAAP as of such date, as well as any other corporation, limited liability company, partnership, association or other entity (a) of which securities or other ownership interests representing more than 50% of the equity or more than 50% of the ordinary voting power or, in the case of a partnership, more than 50% of the general partner interests are, as of such date, owned, controlled or held, or (b) that is, as of such date, otherwise controlled, by the parent or one or more Subsidiaries of the parent or by the parent and one or more Subsidiaries of the parent. Unless the context otherwise clearly requires, references in this Agreement to a “Subsidiary” or the “Subsidiaries” refer to a Subsidiary or the Subsidiaries of KMI. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Plantation Pipe Line Company, a Delaware and Virginia corporation, shall not be a Subsidiary of KMI until such time as its assets and liabilities, profit or loss and cash flow are required under GAAP to be consolidated with those of KMI. “Swap Obligation” means, with respect to any Guarantor, any obligation to pay or perform under any agreement, contract or transaction that constitutes a “swap” within the meaning of Section 1a(47) of the Commodity Exchange Act. “Wholly-owned Domestic Operating Subsidiary” means any Wholly-owned Subsidiary that constitutes (i) a Domestic Subsidiary and (ii) an Operating Subsidiary. “Wholly-owned Subsidiary” means a Subsidiary of which all issued and outstanding Capital Stock (excluding in the case of a corporation, directors’ qualifying shares) is directly or indirectly owned by KMI. (b) The words “hereof”, “herein” and “hereunder” and words of similar import when used in this Agreement shall refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular provision of this 5

  64. Exhibit 10.1 Agreement, and Section references are to Sections of this Agreement unless otherwise specified. The words “include”, “includes” and “including” shall be deemed to be followed by the phrase “without limitation”. (c) The meanings given to terms defined herein shall be equally applicable to both the singular and plural forms of such terms. 2. Guarantee. (a) Subject to the provisions of Section 2(b), each of the Guarantors hereby, jointly and severally, unconditionally and irrevocably, guarantees, as primary obligor and not merely as surety, for the benefit of the Guaranteed Parties, the prompt and complete payment when due (whether at the stated maturity, by acceleration or otherwise) of the Guaranteed Obligations; provided that each Guarantor shall be released from its respective guarantee obligations under this Agreement as provided in Section 6(b). Upon the failure of an Issuer to punctually pay any Guaranteed Obligation, each Guarantor shall, upon written demand by the applicable Guaranteed Party to such Guarantor, pay or cause to be paid such amounts. (b) Anything herein to the contrary notwithstanding, the maximum liability of each Guarantor hereunder shall in no event exceed the amount that can be guaranteed by such Guarantor under the Bankruptcy Code or any applicable laws relating to fraudulent conveyances, fraudulent transfers or the insolvency of debtors after giving full effect to the liability under this Agreement and its related contribution rights set forth in this Section 2, but before taking into account any liabilities under any other Guarantees. (c) Each Guarantor agrees that the Guaranteed Obligations may at any time and from time to time exceed the amount of the liability of such Guarantor hereunder (as a result of the limitations set forth in Section 2(b) or elsewhere in this Agreement) without impairing this Agreement or affecting the rights and remedies of any Guaranteed Party hereunder. (d) No payment or payments made by any Issuer, any of the Guarantors, any other guarantor or any other Person or received or collected by any Guaranteed Party from any Issuer, any of the Guarantors, any other guarantor or any other Person by virtue of any action or proceeding or any set-off or appropriation or application at any time or from time to time in reduction of or in payment of any Guaranteed Obligation shall be deemed to modify, reduce, release or otherwise affect the liability of any Guarantor hereunder, which shall, notwithstanding any such payment or payments, other than payments made by such Guarantor in respect of such Guaranteed Obligation or payments received or collected from such Guarantor in respect of such Guaranteed Obligation, remain liable for the Guaranteed Obligations up to the maximum liability of such Guarantor hereunder until all Guaranteed Obligations (other than any contingent indemnity obligations not then due and any letters of credit that remain outstanding which have been fully cash collateralized or otherwise back-stopped to the reasonable satisfaction of the applicable issuing bank) shall have been discharged by payment in full or shall have been deemed paid and discharged by defeasance pursuant to the terms of the instruments governing such Guaranteed Obligations (the “Guarantee Termination Date”). (e) If and to the extent required in order for the obligations of any Guarantor hereunder to be enforceable under applicable federal, state and other laws relating to the insolvency of debtors, the maximum liability of such Guarantor hereunder shall be limited to the greatest amount which can lawfully be guaranteed by such Guarantor under such laws, after giving effect to any rights of contribution, reimbursement and subrogation arising hereunder. Each Guarantor acknowledges and agrees 6

  65. Exhibit 10.1 that, to the extent not prohibited by applicable law, (i) such Guarantor (as opposed to its creditors, representatives of creditors or bankruptcy trustee, including such Guarantor in its capacity as debtor in possession exercising any powers of a bankruptcy trustee) has no personal right under such laws to reduce, or request any judicial relief that has the effect of reducing, the amount of its liability under this Agreement, (ii) such Guarantor (as opposed to its creditors, representatives of creditors or bankruptcy trustee, including such Guarantor in its capacity as debtor in possession exercising any powers of a bankruptcy trustee) has no personal right to enforce the limitation set forth in this Section 2(e) or to reduce, or request judicial relief reducing, the amount of its liability under this Agreement, and (iii) the limitation set forth in this Section 2 (e) may be enforced only to the extent required under such laws in order for the obligations of such Guarantor under this Agreement to be enforceable under such laws and only by or for the benefit of a creditor, representative of creditors or bankruptcy trustee of such Guarantor or other Person entitled, under such laws, to enforce the provisions hereof. 3. Right of Contribution. Each Guarantor hereby agrees that to the extent that a Guarantor shall have paid more than its proportionate share of any payment made hereunder (including by way of set- off rights being exercised against it), such Guarantor shall be entitled to seek and receive contribution from and against any other Guarantor hereunder who has not paid its proportionate share of such payment as set forth in this Section 3. To the extent that any Guarantor shall be required hereunder to pay any portion of any Guaranteed Obligation guaranteed hereunder exceeding the greater of (a) the amount of the value actually received by such Guarantor and its Subsidiaries from such Guaranteed Obligation and (b) the amount such Guarantor would otherwise have paid if such Guarantor had paid the aggregate amount of such Guaranteed Obligation guaranteed hereunder (excluding the amount thereof repaid by the Issuer of such Guaranteed Obligation) in the same proportion as such Guarantor’s net worth on the date enforcement is sought hereunder bears to the aggregate net worth of all the Guarantors on such date, then such Guarantor shall be reimbursed by such other Guarantors for the amount of such excess, pro rata, based on the respective net worth of such other Guarantors on such date; provided that any Guarantor’s right of reimbursement shall be subject to the terms and conditions of Section 5 hereof. For purposes of determining the net worth of any Guarantor in connection with the foregoing, all Guarantees of such Guarantor other than pursuant to this Agreement will be deemed to be enforceable and payable after its obligations pursuant to this Agreement. The provisions of this Section 3 shall in no respect limit the obligations and liabilities of any Guarantor to the Guaranteed Parties, and each Guarantor shall remain liable to the Guaranteed Parties for the full amount guaranteed by such Guarantor hereunder. 4. No Right of Set-off. No Guaranteed Party shall have, as a result of this Agreement, any right of set-off against any amount owing by such Guaranteed Party to or for the credit or the account of a Guarantor. 5. No Subrogation. Notwithstanding any payment or payments made by any of the Guarantors hereunder, no Guarantor shall be entitled to be subrogated to any of the rights (or if subrogated by operation of law, such Guarantor hereby waives such rights to the extent permitted by applicable law) of any Guaranteed Party against any Issuer or any other Guarantor or any collateral security or guarantee or right of offset held by any Guaranteed Party for the payment of any Guaranteed Obligation, nor shall any Guarantor seek or be entitled to seek any contribution or reimbursement from any Issuer or any other Guarantor in respect of payments made by such Guarantor hereunder, until the Guarantee Termination Date. If any amount shall be paid to any Guarantor on account of such subrogation, contribution or reimbursement rights at any time prior to the Guarantee Termination Date, such amount shall be held by such Guarantor in trust for the applicable Guaranteed Parties, segregated from other funds of such Guarantor, and shall, forthwith upon receipt by such Guarantor, be turned over to the applicable Guaranteed Parties in the exact form received by such Guarantor (duly indorsed by such 7

  66. Exhibit 10.1 Guarantor to the applicable Guaranteed Parties if required), to be applied against the applicable Guaranteed Obligation, whether due or to become due. 6. Amendments, etc. with Respect to the Guaranteed Obligations; Waiver of Rights; Release. (a) Each Guarantor shall remain obligated hereunder notwithstanding that, without any reservation of rights against any Guarantor and without notice to or further assent by any Guarantor, (i) any demand for payment of any Guaranteed Obligation made by any Guaranteed Party may be rescinded by such party and any Guaranteed Obligation continued, (ii) a Guaranteed Obligation, or the liability of any other party upon or for any part thereof, or any collateral security or guarantee therefor or right of offset with respect thereto, may, from time to time, in whole or in part, be renewed, extended, amended, modified, accelerated, compromised, waived, allowed to lapse, surrendered or released by any Guaranteed Party, (iii) the instruments governing any Guaranteed Obligation may be amended, modified, supplemented or terminated, in whole or in part, and (iv) any collateral security, guarantee or right of offset at any time held by any Guaranteed Party for the payment of any Guaranteed Obligation may be sold, exchanged, waived, allowed to lapse, surrendered or released. No Guaranteed Party shall have any obligation to protect, secure, perfect or insure any Lien at any time held by it as security for the Guaranteed Obligations or for this Agreement or any property subject thereto. When making any demand hereunder against any Guarantor, a Guaranteed Party may, but shall be under no obligation to, make a similar demand on the Issuer of the applicable Guaranteed Obligation or any other Guarantor or any other person, and any failure by a Guaranteed Party to make any such demand or to collect any payments from such Issuer or any other Guarantor or any other person or any release of such Issuer or any other Guarantor or any other person shall not relieve any Guarantor in respect of which a demand or collection is not made or any Guarantor not so released of its several obligations or liabilities hereunder, and shall not impair or affect the rights and remedies, express or implied, or as a matter of law, of any Guaranteed Party against any Guarantor. For the purposes hereof “demand” shall include the commencement and continuance of any legal proceedings. (b) A Guarantor shall be automatically released from its guarantee hereunder upon release of such Guarantor from the Revolving Credit Agreement Guarantee, including upon consummation of any transaction resulting in such Guarantor ceasing to constitute a Subsidiary or upon any Guarantor becoming an Excluded Subsidiary (such transaction or event, a “Release Event”). (c) Upon the occurrence of a Release Event, each Guaranteed Obligation for which such released Guarantor was the Issuer shall be automatically released from the provisions of this Agreement and shall cease to constitute a Guaranteed Obligation hereunder; provided that in the case of any Guaranteed Obligation that has been assigned an Investment Grade Rating by the Rating Agencies, such Guaranteed Obligation shall be so released, effective as of the 91 st day after the occurrence of the Release Event, if and only if a Rating Decline with respect to such Guaranteed Obligation does not occur. 7. Guarantee Absolute and Unconditional. (a) Each Guarantor waives any and all notice of the creation, contraction, incurrence, renewal, extension, amendment, waiver or accrual of any of the Guaranteed Obligations, and notice of or proof of reliance by any Guaranteed Party upon this Agreement or acceptance of this Agreement. To the fullest extent permitted by applicable law, each Guarantor waives diligence, promptness, presentment, protest and notice of protest, demand for payment or performance, notice of default or nonpayment, notice of acceptance and any other notice in respect of the Guaranteed Obligations or any part of them, and any defense arising by reason of any disability or other defense of any Issuer or any of the Guarantors 8

  67. Exhibit 10.1 with respect to the Guaranteed Obligations. Each Guarantor understands and agrees that this Agreement shall be construed as a continuing, absolute and unconditional guarantee of payment without regard to (i) the validity, regularity or enforceability of any of the Guaranteed Obligations, the indenture, loan agreement, note or other instrument evidencing or governing any of the Guaranteed Obligations or any collateral security therefor or guarantee or right of offset with respect thereto at any time or from time to time held by any Guaranteed Party, (ii) any defense, set-off or counterclaim (other than a defense of payment or performance) that may at any time be available to or be asserted by any Issuer against any Guaranteed Party or (iii) any other circumstance whatsoever (with or without notice to or knowledge of any Issuer or such Guarantor) that constitutes, or might be construed to constitute, an equitable or legal discharge of any Issuer for any of the Guaranteed Obligations, or of such Guarantor under this Agreement, in bankruptcy or in any other instance. When pursuing its rights and remedies hereunder against any Guarantor, any Guaranteed Party may, but shall be under no obligation to, pursue such rights and remedies as it may have against the Issuer or any other Person or against any collateral security or guarantee for the Guaranteed Obligations or any right of offset with respect thereto, and any failure by any Guaranteed Party to pursue such other rights or remedies or to collect any payments from the Issuer or any such other Person or to realize upon any such collateral security or guarantee or to exercise any such right of offset, or any release of the Issuer or any such other Person or any such collateral security, guarantee or right of offset, shall not relieve such Guarantor of any liability hereunder, and shall not impair or affect the rights and remedies, whether express, implied or available as a matter of law, of the other Guaranteed Parties against such Guarantor. (b) This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and be binding in accordance with and to the extent of its terms upon each Guarantor and the successors and assigns thereof and shall inure to the benefit of the Guaranteed Parties and their respective successors, indorsees, transferees and assigns until the Guarantee Termination Date. 8. Reinstatement. This Agreement shall continue to be effective, or be reinstated, as the case may be, if at any time payment, or any part thereof, of any of the Guaranteed Obligations is rescinded or must otherwise be restored or returned by any Guaranteed Party upon the insolvency, bankruptcy, dissolution, liquidation or reorganization of any Issuer or any Guarantor, or upon or as a result of the appointment of a receiver, intervenor or conservator of, or trustee or similar officer for, any Issuer or any Guarantor or any substantial part of its property, or otherwise, all as though such payments had not been made. 9. Payments. Each Guarantor hereby guarantees that payments hereunder will be paid to the applicable Guaranteed Parties without set-off or counterclaim in dollars. 10. Representations and Warranties. Each Guarantor hereby represents and warrants to each Guaranteed Party that the following representations and warranties are true and correct in all material respects as of the date of this Agreement or as of the date such Guarantor became a party to this Agreement, as applicable: (a) such Guarantor (i) is a corporation, partnership or limited liability company duly organized or formed, validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the state of its incorporation, organization or formation, (ii) has all requisite corporate, partnership, limited liability company or other power and all material governmental licenses, authorizations, consents and approvals required to carry on its business as now conducted and (iii) is duly qualified to do business and is in good standing in every jurisdiction in which the failure to be so qualified would have a material adverse effect on its ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement; 9

  68. Exhibit 10.1 (b) such Guarantor has all requisite corporate (or other organizational) power and authority to execute and deliver and to perform its obligations under this Agreement, and all such actions have been duly authorized by all necessary proceedings on its behalf; (c) this Agreement has been duly and validly executed and delivered by or on behalf of such Guarantor and constitutes the valid and legally binding agreement of such Guarantor, enforceable against such Guarantor in accordance with its terms, except (i) as may be limited by bankruptcy, insolvency, reorganization, moratorium, fraudulent transfer, fraudulent conveyance or other similar laws relating to or affecting the enforcement of creditors’ rights generally, and by general principles of equity (including principles of good faith, reasonableness, materiality and fair dealing) which may, among other things, limit the right to obtain equitable remedies (regardless of whether considered in a proceeding in equity or at law) and (ii) as to the enforceability of provisions for indemnification for violation of applicable securities laws, limitations thereon arising as a matter of law or public policy; (d) no authorization, consent, approval, license or exemption of or registration, declaration or filing with any Governmental Authority is necessary for the valid execution and delivery of, or the performance by such Guarantor of its obligations hereunder, except those that have been obtained and such matters relating to performance as would ordinarily be done in the ordinary course of business after the date of this Agreement or as of the date such Guarantor became a party to this Agreement, as applicable; and (e) neither the execution and delivery of, nor the performance by such Guarantor of its obligations under, this Agreement will (i) breach or violate any applicable Requirement of Law, (ii) result in any breach or violation of any of the terms, covenants, conditions or provisions of, or constitute a default under, or result in the creation or imposition of (or the obligation to create or impose) any Lien upon any of its property or assets (other than Liens created or contemplated by this Agreement) pursuant to the terms of, any indenture, mortgage, deed of trust, agreement or other instrument to which it or any of its Subsidiaries is party or by which any of its properties or assets, or those of any of its Subsidiaries is bound or to which it is subject, except for breaches, violations and defaults under clauses (i) and (ii) that neither individually nor in the aggregate could reasonably be expected to result in a material adverse effect on its ability to perform its obligations under this Agreement, or (iii) violate any provision of the organizational documents of such Guarantor. 11. Rights of Guaranteed Parties. Each Guarantor acknowledges and agrees that any changes in the identity of the Persons from time to time comprising the Guaranteed Parties gives rise to an equivalent change in the Guaranteed Parties, without any further act. Upon such an occurrence, the persons then comprising the Guaranteed Parties are vested with the rights, remedies and discretions of the Guaranteed Parties under this Agreement. 12. Notices. (a) All notices, requests, demands and other communications to any Guarantor pursuant hereto shall be in writing and mailed, telecopied or delivered to such Guarantor in care of KMI, 1001 Louisiana Street, Suite 1000, Houston, Texas 77002, Attention: Treasurer, Telecopy: (713) 445-8302. (b) KMI will provide a copy of this Agreement, including the most recently amended schedules and supplements hereto, to any Guaranteed Party upon written request to the address set forth in Section 12(a); provided, however , that KMI’s obligations under this Section 12(b) shall be deemed satisfied if KMI has filed a copy of this Agreement, including the most recently amended schedules and 10

  69. Exhibit 10.1 supplements hereto, with the SEC within three months preceding the date on which KMI receives such written request. 13. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed by one or more of the parties to this Agreement on any number of separate counterparts (including by facsimile or other electronic transmission), and all of said counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. A set of the copies of this Agreement signed by all the parties shall be lodged with KMI. 14. Severability. Any provision of this Agreement that is prohibited or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof, and any such prohibition or unenforceability in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate or render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction. The parties hereto shall endeavor in good-faith negotiations to replace the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provisions with valid provisions the economic effect of which comes as close as possible to that of the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provisions. 15. Integration. This Agreement represents the agreement of each Guarantor with respect to the subject matter hereof, and there are no promises, undertakings, representations or warranties by any Guaranteed Party relative to the subject matter hereof not expressly set forth or referred to herein. 16. Amendments; No Waiver; Cumulative Remedies. (a) None of the terms or provisions of this Agreement may be waived, amended, supplemented or otherwise modified except by a written instrument executed by the affected Guarantors and KMI. (b) The Guarantors may amend or supplement this Agreement by a written instrument executed by all Guarantors: (i) to cure any ambiguity, defect or inconsistency; (ii) to reflect a change in the Guarantors or the Guaranteed Obligations made in accordance with this Agreement; (iii) to make any change that would provide any additional rights or benefits to the Guaranteed Parties or that would not adversely affect the legal rights hereunder of any Guaranteed Party in any material respect; or (iv) to conform this Agreement to any change made to the Revolving Credit Agreement or to the Revolving Credit Agreement Guarantee. Except as set forth in this clause (b) or otherwise provided herein, the Guarantors may not amend, supplement or otherwise modify this Agreement prior to the Guarantee Termination Date without the prior written consent of the holders of the majority of the outstanding principal amount of the Guaranteed Obligations (excluding obligations with respect to Hedging Agreements). Notwithstanding the foregoing, in the case of an amendment that would reasonably be expected to adversely, materially and disproportionately affect Guaranteed Parties with Guaranteed Obligations existing under Hedging Agreements relative to the other Guaranteed Parties, the foregoing exclusion of obligations with respect to Hedging Agreements shall not apply, and the outstanding principal amount attributable to each such Guaranteed Party’s Guaranteed Obligations shall be deemed to be equal to the termination payment that 11

  70. Exhibit 10.1 would be due to such Guaranteed Party as if the valuation date were an “Early Termination Date” under and calculated in accordance with each applicable Hedging Agreement. (c) No Guaranteed Party shall by any act, delay, indulgence, omission or otherwise be deemed to have waived any right or remedy hereunder or to have acquiesced in any breach of any of the terms and conditions hereof. No failure to exercise, nor any delay in exercising, on the part of any Guaranteed Party, any right, power or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof. No single or partial exercise of any right, power or privilege hereunder shall preclude any other or further exercise thereof or the exercise of any other right, power or privilege. A waiver by a Guaranteed Party of any right or remedy hereunder on any one occasion shall not be construed as a bar to any right or remedy that such Guaranteed Party would otherwise have on any future occasion. (d) The rights, remedies, powers and privileges herein provided are cumulative, may be exercised singly or concurrently and are not exclusive of any other rights or remedies provided by law. 17. Section Headings. The Section headings used in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and are not to affect the construction hereof or be taken into consideration in the interpretation hereof. 18. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon the successors and assigns of each Guarantor and shall inure to the benefit of the Guaranteed Parties and their respective successors and permitted assigns, except that no Guarantor may assign, transfer or delegate any of its rights or obligations under this Agreement except pursuant to a transaction permitted by the Revolving Credit Agreement and in connection with a corresponding assignment under the Revolving Credit Agreement Guarantee. 19. Additional Guarantors. (a) KMI shall cause each Subsidiary (other than any Excluded Subsidiary) formed or otherwise purchased or acquired after the date of this Agreement (including each Subsidiary that ceases to constitute an Excluded Subsidiary after the date of this Agreement) to execute a supplement to this Agreement and become a Guarantor within 45 days of the occurrence of the applicable event specified in this Section 19(a). (b) Each Subsidiary of KMI that becomes, at the request of KMI, or that is required pursuant to Section 19(a) to become, a party to this Agreement shall become a Guarantor, with the same force and effect as if originally named as a Guarantor herein, for all purposes of this Agreement upon execution and delivery by such Subsidiary of a written supplement substantially in the form of Annex A hereto. The execution and delivery of any instrument adding an additional Guarantor as a party to this Agreement shall not require the consent of any other Guarantor hereunder. The rights and obligations of each Guarantor hereunder shall remain in full force and effect notwithstanding the addition of any new Guarantor as a party to this Agreement. 20. Additional Guaranteed Obligations. Any Indebtedness issued by a Guarantor or for which a Guarantor otherwise becomes obligated after the date of this Agreement shall become a Guaranteed Obligation upon the execution by all Guarantors of a notation of guarantee substantially in the form of Annex B hereto, which shall be affixed to the instrument or instruments evidencing such Indebtedness. Each such notation of guarantee shall be signed on behalf of each Guarantor by a duly authorized officer prior to the authentication or issuance of such Indebtedness. 12

  71. Exhibit 10.1 21. GOVERNING LAW. THIS AGREEMENT AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES HEREUNDER SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. 22. Keepwell. Each Qualified ECP Guarantor hereby jointly and severally absolutely, unconditionally and irrevocably undertakes to provide such funds or other support as may be needed from time to time by each other Guarantor to honor all of its obligations under this Agreement in respect of Swap Obligations (provided, however, that each Qualified ECP Guarantor shall only be liable under this Section 22 for the maximum amount of such liability that can be hereby incurred without rendering its obligations under this Section 22, or otherwise under this Agreement, voidable under applicable law relating to fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, and not for any greater amount). The obligations of each Qualified ECP Guarantor under this Section shall remain in full force and effect until the Guarantee Termination Date. Each Qualified ECP Guarantor intends that this Section 22 constitute, and this Section 22 shall be deemed to constitute, a “keepwell, support, or other agreement” for the benefit of each other Guarantor for all purposes of Section 1a(18)(A)(v)(II) of the Commodity Exchange Act. [Signature pages follow] 13

  72. Exhibit 10.1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the undersigned has caused this Agreement to be duly executed and delivered by its duly authorized officer or other representative as of the day and year first above written. KINDER MORGAN, INC. By: /s/ Anthony B. Ashley Name: Anthony B. Ashley Title: Treasurer AGNES B CRANE, LLC AMERICAN PETROLEUM TANKERS II LLC AMERICAN PETROLEUM TANKERS III LLC AMERICAN PETROLEUM TANKERS IV LLC AMERICAN PETROLEUM TANKERS LLC AMERICAN PETROLEUM TANKERS PARENT LLC AMERICAN PETROLEUM TANKERS V LLC AMERICAN PETROLEUM TANKERS VI LLC AMERICAN PETROLEUM TANKERS VII LLC APT FLORIDA LLC APT INTERMEDIATE HOLDCO LLC APT NEW INTERMEDIATE HOLDCO LLC APT PENNSYLVANIA LLC APT SUNSHINE STATE LLC AUDREY TUG LLC BEAR CREEK STORAGE COMPANY, L.L.C. BETTY LOU LLC CAMINO REAL GATHERING COMPANY, L.L.C. CANTERA GAS COMPANY LLC CDE PIPELINE LLC CENTRAL FLORIDA PIPELINE LLC CHEYENNE PLAINS GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C. CIG GAS STORAGE COMPANY LLC CIG PIPELINE SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C. CIMMARRON GATHERING LLC COLORADO INTERSTATE GAS COMPANY, L.L.C. COLORADO INTERSTATE ISSUING CORPORATION COPANO DOUBLE EAGLE LLC COPANO ENERGY FINANCE CORPORATION COPANO ENERGY, L.L.C. COPANO ENERGY SERVICES/UPPER GULF COAST LLC COPANO FIELD SERVICES GP, L.L.C. COPANO FIELD SERVICES/NORTH TEXAS, L.L.C. COPANO FIELD SERVICES/SOUTH TEXAS LLC COPANO FIELD SERVICES/UPPER GULF COAST LLC COPANO LIBERTY, LLC COPANO NGL SERVICES (MARKHAM), L.L.C. COPANO NGL SERVICES LLC COPANO PIPELINES GROUP, L.L.C. [Signature Page to Cross Guarantee]

  73. Exhibit 10.1 COPANO PIPELINES/NORTH TEXAS, L.L.C. COPANO PIPELINES/ROCKY MOUNTAINS, LLC COPANO PIPELINES/SOUTH TEXAS LLC COPANO PIPELINES/UPPER GULF COAST LLC COPANO PROCESSING LLC COPANO RISK MANAGEMENT LLC COPANO/WEBB-DUVAL PIPELINE LLC CPNO SERVICES LLC DAKOTA BULK TERMINAL, INC. DELTA TERMINAL SERVICES LLC EAGLE FORD GATHERING LLC EL PASO CHEYENNE HOLDINGS, L.L.C. EL PASO CITRUS HOLDINGS, INC. EL PASO CNG COMPANY, L.L.C. EL PASO ENERGY SERVICE COMPANY, L.L.C. EL PASO LLC EL PASO MIDSTREAM GROUP LLC EL PASO NATURAL GAS COMPANY, L.L.C. EL PASO NORIC INVESTMENTS III, L.L.C. EL PASO PIPELINE CORPORATION EL PASO PIPELINE GP COMPANY, L.L.C. EL PASO PIPELINE HOLDING COMPANY, L.L.C. EL PASO PIPELINE LP HOLDINGS, L.L.C. EL PASO PIPELINE PARTNERS, L.P. By El Paso Pipeline GP Company, L.L.C., its general partner EL PASO PIPELINE PARTNERS OPERATING COMPANY, L.L.C. EL PASO RUBY HOLDING COMPANY, L.L.C. EL PASO TENNESSEE PIPELINE CO., L.L.C. ELBA EXPRESS COMPANY, L.L.C. ELIZABETH RIVER TERMINALS LLC EMORY B CRANE, LLC EPBGP CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC EP ENERGY HOLDING COMPANY EP RUBY LLC EPTP ISSUING CORPORATION FERNANDINA MARINE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT LLC FRANK L. CRANE, LLC GENERAL STEVEDORES GP, LLC GENERAL STEVEDORES HOLDINGS LLC GLOBAL AMERICAN TERMINALS LLC HAMPSHIRE LLC HARRAH MIDSTREAM LLC HBM ENVIRONMENTAL, INC. ICPT, L.L.C J.R. NICHOLLS LLC JAVELINA TUG LLC JEANNIE BREWER LLC JV TANKER CHARTERER LLC KINDER MORGAN (DELAWARE), INC. KINDER MORGAN 2-MILE LLC KINDER MORGAN ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES TAMPA LLC KINDER MORGAN ALTAMONT LLC [Signature Page to Cross Guarantee]

  74. Exhibit 10.1 KINDER MORGAN AMORY LLC KINDER MORGAN ARROW TERMINALS HOLDINGS, INC. KINDER MORGAN ARROW TERMINALS, L.P. By Kinder Morgan River Terminals, LLC, its general partner KINDER MORGAN BALTIMORE TRANSLOAD TERMINAL LLC KINDER MORGAN BATTLEGROUND OIL LLC KINDER MORGAN BORDER PIPELINE LLC KINDER MORGAN BULK TERMINALS, INC. KINDER MORGAN CARBON DIOXIDE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY KINDER MORGAN CO2 COMPANY, L.P. By Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., its general partner KINDER MORGAN COCHIN LLC KINDER MORGAN COLUMBUS LLC KINDER MORGAN COMMERCIAL SERVICES LLC KINDER MORGAN CRUDE & CONDENSATE LLC KINDER MORGAN CRUDE OIL PIPELINES LLC KINDER MORGAN CRUDE TO RAIL LLC KINDER MORGAN CUSHING LLC KINDER MORGAN DALLAS FORT WORTH RAIL TERMINAL LLC KINDER MORGAN ENDEAVOR LLC KINDER MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. By Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., its general partner KINDER MORGAN EP MIDSTREAM LLC KINDER MORGAN FINANCE COMPANY LLC KINDER MORGAN FLEETING LLC KINDER MORGAN FREEDOM PIPELINE LLC KINDER MORGAN KEYSTONE GAS STORAGE LLC KINDER MORGAN KMAP LLC KINDER MORGAN LAS VEGAS LLC KINDER MORGAN LINDEN TRANSLOAD TERMINAL LLC KINDER MORGAN LIQUIDS TERMINALS LLC KINDER MORGAN LIQUIDS TERMINALS ST. GABRIEL LLC KINDER MORGAN MARINE SERVICES LLC KINDER MORGAN MATERIALS SERVICES, LLC KINDER MORGAN MID ATLANTIC MARINE SERVICES LLC KINDER MORGAN NATGAS O&M LLC KINDER MORGAN NORTH TEXAS PIPELINE LLC KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. “A” By Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., its general partner KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. “B” By Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., its general partner KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. “C” By Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., its general partner KINDER MORGAN OPERATING L.P. “D” By Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc., its general partner KINDER MORGAN PECOS LLC KINDER MORGAN PECOS VALLEY LLC KINDER MORGAN PETCOKE GP LLC [Signature Page to Cross Guarantee]

  75. Exhibit 10.1 KINDER MORGAN PETCOKE, L.P. By Kinder Morgan Petcoke GP LLC, its general partner KINDER MORGAN PETCOKE LP LLC KINDER MORGAN PETROLEUM TANKERS LLC KINDER MORGAN PIPELINE LLC KINDER MORGAN PIPELINES (USA) INC. KINDER MORGAN PORT MANATEE TERMINAL LLC KINDER MORGAN PORT SUTTON TERMINAL LLC KINDER MORGAN PORT TERMINALS USA LLC KINDER MORGAN PRODUCTION COMPANY LLC KINDER MORGAN RAIL SERVICES LLC KINDER MORGAN RESOURCES II LLC KINDER MORGAN RESOURCES III LLC KINDER MORGAN RESOURCES LLC KINDER MORGAN RIVER TERMINALS LLC KINDER MORGAN SERVICES LLC KINDER MORGAN SEVEN OAKS LLC KINDER MORGAN SOUTHEAST TERMINALS LLC KINDER MORGAN TANK STORAGE TERMINALS LLC KINDER MORGAN TEJAS PIPELINE LLC KINDER MORGAN TERMINALS, INC. KINDER MORGAN TEXAS PIPELINE LLC KINDER MORGAN TEXAS TERMINALS, L.P. By General Stevedores GP, LLC, its general partner KINDER MORGAN TRANSMIX COMPANY, LLC KINDER MORGAN TREATING LP By KM Treating GP LLC, its general partner KINDER MORGAN URBAN RENEWAL, L.L.C. KINDER MORGAN UTICA LLC KINDER MORGAN VIRGINIA LIQUIDS TERMINALS LLC KINDER MORGAN WINK PIPELINE LLC KINDERHAWK FIELD SERVICES LLC KM CRANE LLC KM DECATUR, INC. KM EAGLE GATHERING LLC KM GATHERING LLC KM KASKASKIA DOCK LLC KM LIQUIDS TERMINALS LLC KM NORTH CAHOKIA LAND LLC KM NORTH CAHOKIA SPECIAL PROJECT LLC KM NORTH CAHOKIA TERMINAL PROJECT LLC KM SHIP CHANNEL SERVICES LLC KM TREATING GP LLC KM TREATING PRODUCTION LLC KMBT LLC KMGP CONTRACTING SERVICES LLC KMGP SERVICES COMPANY, INC. KN TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. KNIGHT POWER COMPANY LLC LOMITA RAIL TERMINAL LLC MILWAUKEE BULK TERMINALS LLC MJR OPERATING LLC MOJAVE PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C. MOJAVE PIPELINE OPERATING COMPANY, L.L.C. MR. BENNETT LLC [Signature Page to Cross Guarantee]

  76. Exhibit 10.1 MR. VANCE LLC NASSAU TERMINALS LLC NGPL HOLDCO INC. NS 307 HOLDINGS INC. PADDY RYAN CRANE, LLC PALMETTO PRODUCTS PIPE LINE LLC PI 2 PELICAN STATE LLC PINNEY DOCK & TRANSPORT LLC QUEEN CITY TERMINALS LLC RAHWAY RIVER LAND LLC RAZORBACK TUG LLC RCI HOLDINGS, INC. RIVER TERMINALS PROPERTIES GP LLC RIVER TERMINAL PROPERTIES, L.P. By River Terminals Properties GP LLC, its general partner SCISSORTAIL ENERGY, LLC SNG PIPELINE SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C. SOUTHERN GULF LNG COMPANY, L.L.C. SOUTHERN LIQUEFACTION COMPANY LLC SOUTHERN LNG COMPANY, L.L.C. SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, L.L.C. SOUTHERN NATURAL ISSUING CORPORATION SOUTHTEX TREATERS LLC SOUTHWEST FLORIDA PIPELINE LLC SRT VESSELS LLC STEVEDORE HOLDINGS, L.P. By Kinder Morgan Petcoke GP LLC, its general partner TAJON HOLDINGS, INC. TEJAS GAS, LLC TEJAS NATURAL GAS, LLC TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C. TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE ISSUING CORPORATION TEXAN TUG LLC TGP PIPELINE SERVICES COMPANY, L.L.C. TRANS MOUNTAIN PIPELINE (PUGET SOUND) LLC TRANSCOLORADO GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY LLC TRANSLOAD SERVICES, LLC UTICA MARCELLUS TEXAS PIPELINE LLC WESTERN PLANT SERVICES, INC. WYOMING INTERSTATE COMPANY, L.L.C. By: /s/ Anthony B. Ashley Anthony Ashley Vice President [Signature Page to Cross Guarantee]

  77. Exhibit 10.1 ANNEX A TO THE CROSS GUARANTEE AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT NO. [ ] dated as of [ ] to the CROSS GUARANTEE AGREEMENT dated as of [ ] (the “Agreement”), among each of the Guarantors listed on the signature pages thereto and each of the other entities that becomes a party thereto pursuant to Section 19 of the Agreement (each such entity individually, a “Guarantor” and, collectively, the “Guarantors”). Unless otherwise defined herein, terms defined in the Agreement and used herein shall have the meanings given to them in the Agreement. A. The Guarantors consist of Kinder Morgan, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“KMI”), and certain of its direct and indirect Subsidiaries, and the Guarantors have entered into the Agreement in order to provide guarantees of certain of the Guarantors’ senior, unsecured Indebtedness outstanding from time to time. B. Section 19 of the Agreement provides that additional Subsidiaries may become Guarantors under the Agreement by execution and delivery of an instrument in the form of this Supplement. Each undersigned Subsidiary (each a “New Guarantor”) is executing this Supplement at the request of KMI or in accordance with the requirements of the Agreement to become a Guarantor under the Agreement. Accordingly, each New Guarantor agrees as follows: SECTION 1. In accordance with Section 19 of the Agreement, each New Guarantor by its signature below becomes a Guarantor under the Agreement with the same force and effect as if originally named therein as a Guarantor and each New Guarantor hereby (a) agrees to all the terms and provisions of the Agreement applicable to it as a Guarantor thereunder and (b) represents and warrants that the representations and warranties made by it as a Guarantor thereunder are true and correct on and as of the date hereof. Each reference to a Guarantor in the Agreement shall be deemed to include each New Guarantor. The Agreement is hereby incorporated herein by reference. SECTION 2. Each New Guarantor represents and warrants to the Guaranteed Parties that this Supplement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by it and constitutes its legal, valid and binding obligation, enforceable against it in accordance with its terms. SECTION 3. This Supplement may be executed by one or more of the parties to this Supplement on any number of separate counterparts (including by facsimile or other electronic transmission), and all of said counterparts taken together shall be deemed to constitute one and the same instrument. A set of the copies of this Supplement signed by all the parties shall be lodged with KMI. This Supplement shall become effective as to each New Guarantor when KMI shall have received a counterpart of this Supplement that bears the signature of such New Guarantor. SECTION 4. Except as expressly supplemented hereby, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION 5. THIS SUPPLEMENT AND THE RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS OF THE PARTIES HEREUNDER SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED AND INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAW OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK.

  78. Exhibit 10.1 SECTION 6. Any provision of this Supplement that is prohibited or unenforceable in any jurisdiction shall, as to such jurisdiction, be ineffective to the extent of such prohibition or unenforceability without invalidating the remaining provisions hereof and in the Agreement, and any such prohibition or unenforceability in any jurisdiction shall not invalidate or render unenforceable such provision in any other jurisdiction. The parties hereto shall endeavor in good-faith negotiations to replace the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provisions with valid provisions the economic effect of which comes as close as possible to that of the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provisions. SECTION 7. All notices, requests and demands pursuant hereto shall be made in accordance with Section 12 of the Agreement. All communications and notices hereunder to each New Guarantor shall be given to it in care of KMI at the address set forth in Section 12 of the Agreement. [Signature Pages Follow]

  79. Exhibit 10.1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each New Guarantor has duly executed this Supplement to the Agreement as of the day and year first above written. _________________________________ as Guarantor By:______________________________ Name: Title:

  80. Exhibit 10.1 ANNEX B TO THE CROSS GUARANTEE AGREEMENT FORM OF NOTATION OF GUARANTEE Subject to the limitations set forth in the Cross Guarantee Agreement, dated as of [•] (the “Guarantee Agreement”), the undersigned Guarantors hereby certify that this [Indebtedness] constitutes a Guaranteed Obligation, entitled to all the rights as such set forth in the Guarantee Agreement. The Guarantors may be released from their guarantees upon the terms and subject to the conditions provided in the Guarantee Agreement. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this notation of guarantee have the meanings assigned such terms in the Guarantee Agreement, a copy of which will be provided to [a holder of this instrument] upon request to [Issuer]. Schedule I of the Guarantee Agreement is hereby deemed to be automatically updated to include this [Indebtedness] thereon as a Guaranteed Obligation. [GUARANTORS], as Guarantor By: ______________________________ Name: Title:

  81. Exhibit 10.1 SCHEDULE I Guaranteed Obligations Current as of: June 30, 2016 Issuer Indebtedness Maturity Kinder Morgan, Inc. 7.00% bonds June 15, 2017 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 2.00% notes December 1, 2017 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 6.00% notes January 15, 2018 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 7.00% bonds (Sonat) February 1, 2018 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 7.25% bonds June 1, 2018 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 3.05% notes December 1, 2019 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 6.50% bonds September 15, 2020 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 5.00% notes February 15, 2021 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 1.500% notes March 16, 2022 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 5.625% notes November 15, 2023 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 4.30% notes June 1, 2025 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 6.70% bonds (Coastal) February 15, 2027 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 2.250% notes March 16, 2027 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 6.67% debentures November 1, 2027 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 7.25% debentures March 1, 2028 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 6.95% bonds (Coastal) June 1, 2028 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 8.05% bonds October 15, 2030 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 7.80% bonds August 1, 2031 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 7.75% bonds January 15, 2032 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 5.30% notes December 1, 2034 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 7.75% bonds (Coastal) October 15, 2035 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 6.40% notes January 5, 2036 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 7.42% bonds (Coastal) February 15, 2037 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 5.55% notes June 1, 2045 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 5.050% notes February 15, 2046 Kinder Morgan, Inc. 7.45% debentures March 1, 2098 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 6.00% bonds February 1, 2017 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 5.95% bonds February 15, 2018 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 9.00% bonds February 1, 2019 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 2.65% bonds February 1, 2019 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 6.85% bonds February 15, 2020 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 5.30% bonds September 15, 2020 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 5.80% bonds March 1, 2021 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 3.50% bonds March 1, 2021 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 4.15% bonds March 1, 2022 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 3.95% bonds September 1, 2022 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 3.45% bonds February 15, 2023 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 3.50% bonds September 1, 2023 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 4.15% bonds February 1, 2024 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 4.25% bonds September 1, 2024 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 7.40% bonds March 15, 2031 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 7.75% bonds March 15, 2032 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 7.30% bonds August 15, 2033 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 5.80% bonds March 15, 2035 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 6.50% bonds February 1, 2037 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 6.95% bonds January 15, 2038

  82. Exhibit 10.1 Schedule I (Guaranteed Obligations) Current as of: June 30, 2016 Issuer Indebtedness Maturity Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 6.50% bonds September 1, 2039 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 6.55% bonds September 15, 2040 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 6.375% bonds March 1, 2041 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 5.625% bonds September 1, 2041 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 5.00% bonds August 15, 2042 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 5.00% bonds March 1, 2043 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 5.50% bonds March 1, 2044 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. 5.40% bonds September 1, 2044 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. (1) 6.50% bonds April 1, 2020 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. (1) 5.00% bonds October 1, 2021 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. (1) 4.30% bonds May 1, 2024 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. (1) 7.50% bonds November 15, 2040 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. (1) 4.70% bonds November 1, 2042 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. 7.50% bonds April 1, 2017 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. 7.00% bonds March 15, 2027 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. 7.00% bonds October 15, 2028 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. 8.375% bonds June 15, 2032 Tennessee Gas Pipeline Co. 7.625% bonds April 1, 2037 El Paso Natural Gas Co. 5.95% bonds April 15, 2017 El Paso Natural Gas Co. 8.625% bonds January 15, 2022 El Paso Natural Gas Co. 7.50% bonds November 15, 2026 El Paso Natural Gas Co. 8.375% bonds June 15, 2032 Colorado Interstate Gas Co. 6.85% bonds June 15, 2037 Southern Natural Gas Co. 5.90% bonds April 1, 2017 Southern Natural Gas Co. 4.40% bonds June 15, 2021 Southern Natural Gas Co. 7.35% bonds February 15, 2031 Southern Natural Gas Co. 8.00% bonds March 1, 2032 Copano Energy LLC 7.125% bonds April 1, 2021 El Paso Tennessee Pipeline Co. 7.25% bonds December 15, 2025 Other KM LQT IRBs-Stolt floating rate bonds January 15, 2018 Other 5.50% KM Columbus MBFC notes September 1, 2022 Other Cora industrial revenue bonds April 1, 2024 Hiland Partners Holdings LLC and 7.25% notes October 1, 2020 Hiland Partners Finance Corp. Hiland Partners Holdings LLC and 5.50% notes May 15, 2022 Hiland Partners Finance Corp. _________________________________________________ (1) The original issuer, El Paso Pipeline Partners, L.P. merged with and into Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. effective January 1, 2015. 2

  83. Exhibit 10.1 Schedule I (Guaranteed Obligations) Current as of: June 30, 2016 Hedging Agreements 1 Issuer Guaranteed Party Date Kinder Morgan, Inc. Bank of America, N.A. August 29, 2001 Kinder Morgan, Inc. Citibank, N.A. March 14, 2002 Kinder Morgan, Inc. J. Aron & Company December 23, 2011 Kinder Morgan, Inc. SunTrust Bank August 29, 2001 Kinder Morgan, Inc. Barclays Bank PLC November 26, 2014 Kinder Morgan, Inc. Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York November 26, 2014 Branch Kinder Morgan, Inc. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce November 26, 2014 Kinder Morgan, Inc. Compass Bank March 24, 2015 Kinder Morgan, Inc. Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment November 26, 2014 Bank Kinder Morgan, Inc. Credit Suisse International November 26, 2014 Kinder Morgan, Inc. Deutsche Bank AG November 26, 2014 Kinder Morgan, Inc. ING Capital Markets LLC November 26, 2014 Kinder Morgan, Inc. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. February 19, 2015 Kinder Morgan, Inc. Mizuho Capital Markets Corporation November 26, 2014 Kinder Morgan, Inc. Royal Bank of Canada November 26, 2014 Kinder Morgan, Inc. The Bank of Nova Scotia November 26, 2014 Kinder Morgan, Inc. The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC November 26, 2014 Kinder Morgan, Inc. Societe Generale November 26, 2014 Kinder Morgan, Inc. UBS AG November 26, 2014 Kinder Morgan, Inc. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. November 26, 2014 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Bank of America, N.A. April 14, 1999 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi, Ltd., New York November 23, 2004 Branch Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Barclays Bank PLC November 18, 2003 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce August 4, 2011 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Citibank, N.A. March 14, 2002 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Credit Agricole Corporate and Investment June 20, 2014 Bank Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Credit Suisse International May 14, 2010 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Deutsche Bank AG April 2, 2009 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. ING Capital Markets LLC September 21, 2011 _________________________________________________ 1 Guaranteed Obligations with respect to Hedging Agreements include International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreements (“ISDAs”) and all transactions entered into pursuant to any ISDA listed on this Schedule I. 3

  84. Exhibit 10.1 Schedule I (Guaranteed Obligations) Current as of: June 30, 2016 Hedging Agreements 1 Issuer Guaranteed Party Date Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. J. Aron & Company November 11, 2004 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. JPMorgan Chase Bank August 29, 2001 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Mizuho Capital Markets Corporation July 11, 2014 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Morgan Stanley Capital Services Inc. March 10, 2010 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Royal Bank of Canada March 12, 2009 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC March 20, 2009 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. The Bank of Nova Scotia August 14, 2003 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Societe Generale July 18, 2014 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. SunTrust Bank March 14, 2002 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. UBS AG February 23, 2011 Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. July 31, 2007 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Barclays Bank PLC January 10, 2003 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC BNP Paribas March 2, 2005 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce December 18, 2006 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Citibank, N.A. February 22, 2005 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Credit Suisse International August 31, 2012 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Deutsche Bank AG June 13, 2007 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC ING Capital Markets LLC April 17, 2014 Kinder Morgan Production Company J. Aron & Company June 12, 2006 LP Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC J. Aron & Company June 8, 2000 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. September 7, 2006 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Macquarie Bank Limited September 20, 2010 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Merrill Lynch Commodities, Inc. October 24, 2001 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. January 15, 2004 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Natixis June 13, 2011 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Phillips 66 Company March 30, 2015 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Royal Bank of Canada May 6, 2009 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC The Bank of Nova Scotia May 8, 2014 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Shell Trading (US) Company November 14, 2011 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Societe Generale January 14, 2003 Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. June 1, 2013 Copano Risk Management, L.P. Citibank, N.A. July 21, 2008 Copano Risk Management, L.P. J. Aron & Company December 12, 2005 Copano Risk Management, L.P. Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. May 4, 2007 Copano Risk Management, L.P. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. October 19, 2007 _________________________________________________ 1 Guaranteed Obligations with respect to Hedging Agreements include International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreements (“ISDAs”) and all transactions entered into pursuant to any ISDA listed on this Schedule I. 4

  85. Exhibit 10.1 SCHEDULE II Guarantors Current as of: June 30, 2016 Agnes B Crane, LLC Copano Processing LLC American Petroleum Tankers II LLC Copano Risk Management LLC American Petroleum Tankers III LLC Copano/Webb-Duval Pipeline LLC American Petroleum Tankers IV LLC CPNO Services LLC American Petroleum Tankers LLC Dakota Bulk Terminal, Inc. American Petroleum Tankers Parent LLC Delta Terminal Services LLC American Petroleum Tankers V LLC Eagle Ford Gathering LLC American Petroleum Tankers VI LLC El Paso Cheyenne Holdings, L.L.C. American Petroleum Tankers VII LLC El Paso Citrus Holdings, Inc. American Petroleum Tankers VIII LLC El Paso CNG Company, L.L.C. American Petroleum Tankers IX LLC El Paso Energy Service Company, L.L.C. American Petroleum Tankers X LLC El Paso LLC American Petroleum Tankers XI LLC El Paso Midstream Group LLC APT Florida LLC El Paso Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. APT Intermediate Holdco LLC El Paso Noric Investments III, L.L.C. APT New Intermediate Holdco LLC El Paso Ruby Holding Company, L.L.C. APT Pennsylvania LLC El Paso Tennessee Pipeline Co., L.L.C. APT Sunshine State LLC Elba Express Company, L.L.C. Audrey Tug LLC Elba Liquefaction Company, L.L.C. Bear Creek Storage Company, L.L.C. Elizabeth River Terminals LLC Betty Lou LLC Emory B Crane, LLC Camino Real Gathering Company, L.L.C. EP Energy Holding Company Cantera Gas Company LLC EP Ruby LLC CDE Pipeline LLC EPBGP Contracting Services LLC Central Florida Pipeline LLC EPTP Issuing Corporation Cheyenne Plains Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. Fernandina Marine Construction Management CIG Gas Storage Company LLC LLC CIG Pipeline Services Company, L.L.C. Frank L. Crane, LLC Colorado Interstate Gas Company, L.L.C. General Stevedores GP, LLC Colorado Interstate Issuing Corporation General Stevedores Holdings LLC Copano Double Eagle LLC Glenpool West Gathering LLC Copano Energy Finance Corporation Global American Terminals LLC Copano Energy Services/Upper Gulf Coast LLC Hampshire LLC Copano Energy, L.L.C. Harrah Midstream LLC Copano Field Services GP, L.L.C. HBM Environmental, Inc. Copano Field Services/North Texas, L.L.C. Hiland Crude, LLC Copano Field Services/South Texas LLC Hiland Partners Finance Corp. Copano Field Services/Upper Gulf Coast LLC Hiland Partners Holdings LLC Copano Liberty, LLC ICPT, L.L.C Copano NGL Services (Markham), L.L.C. Independent Trading & Transportation Copano NGL Services LLC Company I, L.L.C. Copano Pipelines Group, L.L.C. J.R. Nicholls LLC Copano Pipelines/North Texas, L.L.C. Javelina Tug LLC Copano Pipelines/Rocky Mountains, LLC Jeannie Brewer LLC Copano Pipelines/South Texas LLC JV Tanker Charterer LLC Copano Pipelines/Upper Gulf Coast LLC Kinder Morgan 2-Mile LLC

  86. Exhibit 10.1 Schedule II (Guarantors) Current as of: June 30, 2016 Kinder Morgan Administrative Services Tampa LLC Kinder Morgan Pecos LLC Kinder Morgan Altamont LLC Kinder Morgan Pecos Valley LLC Kinder Morgan Amory LLC Kinder Morgan Petcoke GP LLC Kinder Morgan Arrow Terminals Holdings, Inc. Kinder Morgan Petcoke LP LLC Kinder Morgan Arrow Terminals, L.P. Kinder Morgan Petcoke, L.P. Kinder Morgan Baltimore Transload Terminal Kinder Morgan Petroleum Tankers LLC LLC Kinder Morgan Pipeline LLC Kinder Morgan Battleground Oil LLC Kinder Morgan Port Manatee Terminal LLC Kinder Morgan Border Pipeline LLC Kinder Morgan Port Sutton Terminal LLC Kinder Morgan Bulk Terminals LLC Kinder Morgan Port Terminals USA LLC Kinder Morgan Carbon Dioxide Transportation Kinder Morgan Production Company LLC Kinder Morgan Rail Services LLC Company Kinder Morgan CO2 Company, L.P. Kinder Morgan Resources II LLC Kinder Morgan Cochin LLC Kinder Morgan Resources III LLC Kinder Morgan Columbus LLC Kinder Morgan Resources LLC Kinder Morgan Commercial Services LLC Kinder Morgan River Terminals LLC Kinder Morgan Contracting Services LLC Kinder Morgan Seven Oaks LLC Kinder Morgan Crude & Condensate LLC Kinder Morgan Southeast Terminals LLC Kinder Morgan Crude Oil Pipelines LLC Kinder Morgan Scurry Connector LLC Kinder Morgan Crude to Rail LLC Kinder Morgan Tank Storage Terminals LLC Kinder Morgan Cushing LLC Kinder Morgan Tejas Pipeline LLC Kinder Morgan Dallas Fort Worth Rail Terminal Kinder Morgan Terminals, Inc. LLC Kinder Morgan Terminals Wilmington LLC Kinder Morgan Endeavor LLC Kinder Morgan Texas Pipeline LLC Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Kinder Morgan Texas Terminals, L.P. Kinder Morgan EP Midstream LLC Kinder Morgan Transmix Company, LLC Kinder Morgan Finance Company LLC Kinder Morgan Treating LP Kinder Morgan Fleeting LLC Kinder Morgan Urban Renewal, L.L.C. Kinder Morgan Freedom Pipeline LLC Kinder Morgan Utica LLC Kinder Morgan Virginia Liquids Terminals LLC Kinder Morgan Galena Park West LLC Kinder Morgan, Inc. Kinder Morgan Wink Pipeline LLC Kinder Morgan Keystone Gas Storage LLC KinderHawk Field Services LLC Kinder Morgan KMAP LLC KM Crane LLC Kinder Morgan Las Vegas LLC KM Decatur, Inc. Kinder Morgan Linden Transload Terminal LLC KM Eagle Gathering LLC Kinder Morgan Liquids Terminals LLC KM Gathering LLC Kinder Morgan Liquids Terminals St. Gabriel KM Kaskaskia Dock LLC LLC KM Liquids Terminals LLC Kinder Morgan Marine Services LLC KM North Cahokia Land LLC Kinder Morgan Materials Services, LLC KM North Cahokia Special Project LLC Kinder Morgan Mid Atlantic Marine Services KM North Cahokia Terminal Project LLC LLC KM Ship Channel Services LLC Kinder Morgan NatGas O&M LLC KM Treating GP LLC Kinder Morgan NGL LLC KM Treating Production LLC Kinder Morgan NGPL Holdings LLC KMBT LLC Kinder Morgan North Texas Pipeline LLC KMGP Services Company, Inc. Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. “A” KN Telecommunications, Inc. Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. “B” Knight Power Company LLC Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. “C” Lomita Rail Terminal LLC Kinder Morgan Operating L.P. “D” Milwaukee Bulk Terminals LLC 2

  87. Exhibit 10.1 Schedule II (Guarantors) Current as of: June 30, 2016 MJR Operating LLC Mojave Pipeline Company, L.L.C. Mojave Pipeline Operating Company, L.L.C. Mr. Bennett LLC Mr. Vance LLC Nassau Terminals LLC NGPL Holdco Inc. Paddy Ryan Crane, LLC Palmetto Products Pipe Line LLC PI 2 Pelican State LLC Pinney Dock & Transport LLC Queen City Terminals LLC Rahway River Land LLC Razorback Tug LLC RCI Holdings, Inc. River Terminals Properties GP LLC River Terminal Properties, L.P. ScissorTail Energy, LLC SNG Pipeline Services Company, L.L.C. Southern Gulf LNG Company, L.L.C. Southern Liquefaction Company LLC Southern LNG Company, L.L.C. Southern Natural Gas Company, L.L.C. Southern Natural Issuing Corporation Southern Oklahoma Gathering LLC SouthTex Treaters LLC Southwest Florida Pipeline LLC SRT Vessels LLC Stevedore Holdings, L.P. Tajon Holdings, Inc. Tejas Gas, LLC Tejas Natural Gas, LLC Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, L.L.C. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Issuing Corporation Texan Tug LLC TGP Pipeline Services Company, L.L.C. Trans Mountain Pipeline (Puget Sound) LLC TransColorado Gas Transmission Company LLC Transload Services, LLC Utica Marcellus Texas Pipeline LLC Western Plant Services, Inc. Wyoming Interstate Company, L.L.C. 3

  88. Exhibit 10.1 SCHEDULE III Excluded Subsidiaries ANR Real Estate Corporation Coastal Eagle Point Oil Company Coastal Oil New England, Inc. Colton Processing Facility Coscol Petroleum Corporation El Paso CGP Company, L.L.C. El Paso Energy Capital Trust I El Paso Energy E.S.T. Company El Paso Energy International Company El Paso Marketing Company, L.L.C. El Paso Merchant Energy North America Company, L.L.C. El Paso Merchant Energy-Petroleum Company El Paso Reata Energy Company, L.L.C. El Paso Remediation Company El Paso Services Holding Company EPEC Corporation EPEC Oil Company Liquidating Trust EPEC Polymers, Inc. EPED Holding Company Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline Holding LLC Kinder Morgan Louisiana Pipeline LLC KN Capital Trust I KN Capital Trust III Mesquite Investors, L.L.C. Note: The Excluded Subsidiaries listed on this Schedule III may also be Excluded Subsidiaries pursuant to other exceptions set forth in the definition of “Excluded Subsidiary”.

  89. Exhibit 10.2 FORM OF KINDER MORGAN, INC. RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AGREEMENT This Restricted Stock Unit Agreement ("Agreement") is made and entered into effective _______________, 20___ ("Date of Grant"), by and between Kinder Morgan, Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Company"), and ___________________ ("Employee"). The defined term "Employer" shall include, where applicable, the Company and affiliates and entities in which the Company has an ownership interest, directly or indirectly. Capitalized terms that are used but not defined herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Kinder Morgan, Inc. 2015 Amended and Restated Stock Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). WHEREAS, the Company has adopted the Plan, pursuant to which Awards of Restricted Stock Units may be granted; and WHEREAS, the Committee has determined that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to grant the Award of Restricted Stock Units provided for herein. 1. Award . The Company hereby grants to the Employee on the Date of Grant an Award consisting of, in the aggregate, __________ Restricted Stock Units (the "Restricted Stock Units"). Each Restricted Stock Unit represents the right to receive one share of Stock, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Agreement and the Plan. (a) Account. The Restricted Stock Units shall be credited to a separate account maintained for the Employee on the books and records of the Company (the "Account"). All amounts credited to the Account shall continue for all purposes to be part of the general assets of the Company. (b) Plan Incorporated. The Employee acknowledges receipt of a copy of the Plan and agrees that this Award of Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to all of the terms and conditions set forth in the Plan, including future amendments thereto, if any, pursuant to the terms thereof, which Plan is incorporated herein by reference as a part of this Agreement. (c) Consideration. The grant of the Restricted Stock Units is made in consideration of the services to be rendered by the Employee to the Employer and the Employee's compliance with the covenants set forth herein. 2. Vesting. (a) Vesting Schedule. Except as otherwise provided herein, provided that the Employee's employment with the Employer has not terminated prior to the applicable vesting date, [and provided, further, that the Performance Goals set forth in Exhibit I have _________________ 1 Additional or alternative provisions applicable to Covered Employees under Section 162(m) of the Code are indicated with brackets throughout this form. -1-

  90. Exhibit 10.2 been achieved and certified by the Committee,] the Restricted Stock Units will vest in accordance with the following schedule (with the period prior to vesting, during which the restrictions set forth in Section 3 apply, referred to as the "Restricted Period"): Number of Restricted Vesting Date Stock Units Vesting Except as otherwise provided herein, if the Employee's employment with the Employer terminates for any reason at any time before all of the Employee's Restricted Stock Units have vested, [or if the Performance Goals set forth in Exhibit I are not achieved prior to the end of the applicable Performance Period,] the Employee's unvested Restricted Stock Units shall be automatically forfeited upon such termination of employment [or the end of such Performance Period, as applicable], and neither the Company nor any Affiliate shall have any further obligations to the Employee under this Agreement. (b) Death. Notwithstanding the vesting schedule [and Performance Goals] provided in paragraph (a), if the Employee's employment with the Employer terminates as a result of the Employee's death [prior to the end of the applicable Performance Period], 100% of the unvested Restricted Stock Units shall vest as of the date of the Employee's death. (c) Disability. Notwithstanding the vesting schedule [and Performance Goals] provided in paragraph (a), upon the earlier of (i) the termination of the Employee's employment with the Employer [prior to the end of the applicable Performance Period] by reason of disability that results in the Employer determining that the Employee cannot perform the essential functions of his or her job, with or without a reasonable accommodation, or (ii) the Employee becoming disabled for purposes of receiving benefits under the Employer's long-term disability plan [prior to the end of the applicable Performance Period], 100% of the unvested Restricted Stock Units shall vest. (d) Change in Control. Notwithstanding the vesting schedule [and Performance Goals] provided in paragraph (a), if the Employee remains continuously employed by the Employer from the Date of Grant through the date immediately preceding the occurrence[, prior to the end of the applicable Performance Period,] of a Change in Control, 100% of the unvested Restricted Stock Units shall vest as of the date of the Change in Control. -2-

  91. Exhibit 10.2 (e) Involuntary Termination. Notwithstanding the vesting schedule provided in paragraph (a), upon the involuntary termination of the Employee's employment with the Employer, other than for Cause (as defined below) and due to (i) a reorganization or reduction in force for which the Employee would be eligible for pay under the Kinder Morgan, Inc. Severance Plan, or (ii) a termination where the Employer agrees to vest the unvested Restricted Stock Units as full or partial consideration for the Employee’s satisfaction of the requirements under Section 2(g), or (iii) a sale, transfer or discontinuation of any part of the operations or any business unit of the Employer, 100% of the unvested Restricted Stock Units shall vest [as of the date of such termination of the Employee's employment], provided that the Employee satisfies the requirements of Section 2(g)[.] [; and provided, further, that the Performance Goals set forth in Exhibit I are achieved, either (i) prior to the date of such termination (with the Committee having certified such achievement), in which case vesting shall occur as of the date of such termination, or (ii) after the date of such termination and prior to the end of the applicable Performance Period, in which case vesting shall occur as of the date the Committee certifies such achievement. If the Performance Goals set forth in Exhibit I are not achieved prior to the end of the applicable Performance Period, the Employee's unvested Restricted Stock Units shall be automatically forfeited, and neither the Company nor any Affiliate shall have any further obligations to the Employee under this Agreement.] For purposes of this Agreement, “Cause” is defined as the Employee’s (i) grand jury indictment or prosecutorial information charging the Employee with illegal or fraudulent acts; (ii) conviction of a crime which, in the opinion of the Employer, would adversely affect the Employer’s reputation or business; (iii) willful refusal, without proper legal or medical cause, to perform the Employee’s duties and responsibilities; (iv) willfully engaging in conduct that the Employee has reason to know is injurious to the Employer; or (v) willful and material violation of any of the Employer’s written policies and procedures. (f) Retirement. For purposes of this Agreement, "Retirement" is defined as a voluntary termination of the Employee's employment with the Employer on or after attaining age 62, provided that the Employee has delivered to the Company written notice of the Employee's intent to retire at least 15 days prior to the date of termination. Notwithstanding the vesting schedule provided in paragraph (a), a pro-rata portion of the unvested Restricted Stock Units based on the number of full years from the Date of Grant to the date of Retirement (the “Retirement Vesting Portion”) may vest in connection with a termination of the Employee's employment with the Employer by reason of Retirement. On the date of such Employee’s Retirement, the Employee's unvested Restricted Stock Units other than the Retirement Vesting Portion shall be automatically forfeited, and neither the Company nor any Affiliate shall have any further obligations to the Employee under this Agreement in respect of such forfeited Restricted Stock Units. If, for the calendar quarter immediately following the calendar quarter in which the Employee's Retirement occurs, the Company pays a per-share cash dividend on Stock equal to 90% or more of the per-share cash dividend _________________ 2 Delete bracketed language for Covered Employees under Section 162(m). -3-

  92. Exhibit 10.2 paid for the same calendar quarter during the immediately preceding calendar year, the Retirement Vesting Portion will vest, provided that the Employee satisfies the requirements of Section 2(g)[.] [; and provided, further, that the Performance Goals set forth in Exhibit I have been achieved, either (i) prior to the date of such Retirement (with the Committee having certified such achievement), in which case vesting shall occur upon payment of such dividend, or (ii) after the date of such Retirement and prior to the end of the applicable Performance Period, in which case vesting shall occur upon payment of such dividend or, if later, on the date the Committee certifies such achievement]. If the dividend performance goal is not satisfied for the calendar quarter immediately following the calendar quarter in which the Employee's Retirement occurs, [or the Performance Goals set forth in Exhibit I are not achieved prior to the end of the applicable Performance Period,] the Employee's Retirement Vesting Portion shall be automatically forfeited, and neither the Company nor any Affiliate shall have any further obligations to the Employee under this Agreement. As an example solely for purposes of clarity, if the terms of the grant provide that 100% of the Restricted Stock Units will vest on the third anniversary of the Date of Grant, and the Employee's date of Retirement is more than one full year, but less than two full years, after the Date of Grant, then 33-1/3% of the Employee’s Restricted Stock Units constitute the Employee’s Retirement Vesting Portion and will vest if [(i)] the dividend performance goal set forth above is satisfied for the calendar quarter immediately following the calendar quarter in which the Employee's Retirement occurs[, and (ii) the Performance Goals set forth in Exhibit I have been achieved (and certified by the Committee), or, if the Performance Goals set forth in Exhibit I have not been achieved, the Retirement Vesting Portion will vest only if such Performance Goals are achieved prior to the end of the applicable Performance Period (and certified by the Committee)]. (g) Release. The requirements of this Section 2(g) shall be satisfied only if, prior to the sixtieth (60 th ) day following the date of termination of the Employee's employment under Section 2(e) or 2(f), (i) the Employee executes a release ("Release") by the Employee of all claims, known or unknown, arising on or before the date of the Release against the Company and its officers, directors and employees in the form and manner prescribed by the Company and provided to the Employee (which Release may include cooperation, nondisclosure and confidentiality covenants), and (ii) any applicable period during which the Employee can revoke his or her execution of the Release expires without the Employee revoking such execution. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the requirements of this Section 2(g) shall be satisfied only if the Employee executes the Release within any time period required under the terms of the Release. 3. Restrictions. Subject to any exceptions set forth in this Agreement or the Plan, during the Restricted Period and until such time as the Restricted Stock Units are settled in accordance with Section 5, the Restricted Stock Units or the rights relating thereto may not be sold, assigned, alienated, attached, exchanged, pledged, hypothecated or otherwise transferred or encumbered by the Employee, and any attempt to sell, assign, alienate, attach, exchange, -4-

  93. Exhibit 10.2 pledge, hypothecate or otherwise transfer or encumber, whether made or created by voluntary act of the Employee or any agent of the Employee or by operation of law, shall be wholly ineffective and shall not be recognized by, or be binding upon, and shall not in any manner affect the rights of, the Company or any agent, and if any such attempt is made, the Restricted Stock Units will be forfeited by the Employee and all of the Employee's rights to such units shall immediately terminate without any payment or consideration by the Company. 4. Rights as Stockholder; Dividend Equivalents . (a) The Employee shall not have any rights of a stockholder with respect to the shares of Stock underlying the Restricted Stock Units unless and until the Restricted Stock Units vest and are settled by the issuance of such shares of Stock. Upon and following the settlement of any Restricted Stock Units, such Restricted Stock Units shall expire and the Employee shall be the record owner of the shares of Stock underlying such Restricted Stock Units unless and until such shares are sold or otherwise disposed of, and as record owner shall be entitled to all rights of a stockholder of the Company (including voting rights). (b) If, prior to the settlement date, the Company declares a cash or stock dividend on the shares of Stock, then, as soon as administratively practicable after the payment date of the dividend (and in no case later than the end of the calendar year in which the dividend is paid to the holders of Stock or, if later, the 15th day of the third month following the date the dividend is paid to holders of Stock), the Company shall pay the Employee, in cash, Dividend Equivalents in an amount equal to the dividends that would have been paid to the Employee if one share of Stock had been issued on the Date of Grant for each Restricted Stock Unit held by the Employee. [Notwithstanding the foregoing, if Employee is, or in the Company's opinion may be, a "covered employee" under Section 162(m) of the Code Employee shall be entitled to receive such Dividend Equivalent only if the per-share amount of such dividend equals or exceeds 90% of the per-share cash dividend paid by the Company for the same calendar quarter during the immediately preceding calendar year, excluding any one-time, special dividends paid by the Company for such quarter. In addition, to the extent required under Section 162(m) of the Code, no Dividend Equivalent shall be paid to the Employee unless and until the Committee certifies in writing that the dividend performance goal has been achieved. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, if the Employee's employment with the Employer is terminated under Section 2(e) or 2(f) at a time when the Performance Goals set forth in Exhibit I have not been achieved, Dividend Equivalents relating to the Employee's unvested Restricted Stock Units shall be paid to the Employee (in the case of Retirement, on the Employee’s Retirement Vesting Portion only) with respect to the period after the date of such termination of employment until such unvested Restricted Stock Units either vest or are forfeited, provided that the dividend performance goal set forth in this paragraph is met with respect to each dividend paid during such period.] -5-

  94. Exhibit 10.2 5. Settlement of Restricted Stock Units. (a) Once vested, each Restricted Stock Unit becomes a "Vested Unit." Subject to Section 6 hereof, settlement of this Award or any portion thereof shall occur by the Company issuing and delivering to the Employee the number of shares of Stock equal to the number of Vested Units. Except in the event of the Employee's Retirement, settlement shall occur promptly following the vesting date and the satisfaction of any requirement under Section 2 for a Release, and in any event no later than March 15 of the calendar year immediately following the calendar year in which such vesting occurs. In the event of the Employee's Retirement, settlement shall occur during the second month of the second calendar quarter following the date of the Employee's Retirement, [or, if later, on the date the Committee certifies the achievement of the Performance Goals set forth in Exhibit I,] or as soon as reasonably practicable thereafter. If the Employee is deemed a "specified employee" within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, as determined by the Committee, at a time when the Employee becomes eligible for settlement of the Restricted Stock Units upon his "separation from service" within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code, then to the extent necessary to prevent any accelerated or additional tax under Section 409A of the Code, such settlement will be delayed until the earlier of: (a) the date that is six months following the Employee's separation from service or (b) the Employee's death. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, the issuance or delivery of any Stock may be postponed for such period as may be required to comply with applicable requirements of any national securities exchange or any requirements of any law or regulation applicable to the issuance or delivery of such Stock. The Company shall not be obligated to issue or deliver any Stock if the issuance or delivery thereof shall constitute a violation of any provision of any law or of any regulation of any governmental authority or any national securities exchange. (b) If the employment of the Employee with the Employer terminates prior to the vesting date, and there exists a dispute between the Employee and the Employer or the Committee as to the satisfaction of the conditions to the vesting of some or all of the Restricted Stock Units or the terms and conditions of the grant, the Restricted Stock Units shall remain unvested until the resolution of such dispute, except that any Dividend Equivalents relating to dividends that may be payable to the holders of record of Stock as of a date during the period from termination of the Employee's employment to the resolution of such dispute shall: (1) to the extent to which such Dividend Equivalents would have been payable to the Employee under the terms hereof, be held by the Company as part of its general funds, and shall be paid to or for the account of the Employee only upon, and in the event of, a resolution of such dispute in a manner favorable to the Employee, and then only with respect to such of the Restricted Stock Units as to which such resolution shall be so favorable, and -6-

  95. Exhibit 10.2 (2) be retained by the Company in the event of a resolution of such dispute in a manner unfavorable to the Employee only with respect to such of the Restricted Stock Units as to which such resolution shall be so unfavorable. 6. Withholding of Tax. To the extent that the Restricted Stock Units or vesting thereof results in income to the Employee for federal, state, provincial or local income tax purposes, the Company shall have the right to take all such action as the Committee deems necessary to satisfy all obligations for the payment of such withholding taxes, including, but not limited to, withholding shares of Stock out of Stock otherwise issuable or deliverable to the Employee as a result of the vesting of the Restricted Stock Units (provided, however, that no shares of Stock shall be withheld with a value exceeding the minimum amount of tax required to be withheld by law). The Company shall, to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any such taxes from any payment of any kind otherwise due to the Employee. Notwithstanding any action the Company takes with respect to any or all income tax, social insurance, payroll tax, or other tax-related withholding ("Tax-Related Items"), the ultimate liability for all Tax- Related Items is and remains the Employee's responsibility and the Company (a) makes no representation or undertakings regarding the treatment of any Tax-Related Items in connection with the grant, vesting or settlement of the Restricted Stock Units or the subsequent sale of any shares; and (b) does not commit to structure the Restricted Stock Units to reduce or eliminate the Employee's liability for Tax-Related Items. 7. Status of Shares. The Employee agrees that, notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, any shares of Stock issued to the Employee in settlement of the Restricted Stock Units may not be sold or otherwise disposed of in any manner that would constitute a violation of any applicable federal or state securities laws. 8. Changes in Capital Structure. In the event that the outstanding shares of Stock shall be changed in number or class or the capital structure of the Company shall be changed by reason of stock splits, reverse stock splits, split-ups, spin-offs, combinations, mergers, consolidations or recapitalizations, or by reason of Stock dividends or other relevant changes in capitalization, the number or class of securities underlying the Restricted Stock Units, and any performance goal affected by such change, shall be adjusted to reflect such change to the extent necessary to preserve the economic intent of this Award, as determined by the Committee in accordance with the terms of the Plan. 9. Employment Relationship. For purposes of this Agreement, the Employee shall be considered to be in the employment of the Employer as long as the Employee remains an employee of the Employer, or any successor, whether a corporation or other Entity; provided that, for purposes of this Agreement, the Employee shall be deemed terminated on the later of the date on which the Employee delivers or receives notice of termination or the last date on which the Employee provides services to the Employer as an employee (excluding where the Employee is not providing services to the Employer because the Employee is on a leave of absence permitted by law or has been granted a leave of absence by the Employer under the Employer's policies respecting leaves of absence). Any question as to whether and when there has been a termination of such employment, and the nature or cause of such termination, shall be determined by the Committee in its sole discretion, and its -7-

Recommend

City of Burnaby Opposition to the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Expansion Project City Staff

City of Burnaby Opposition to the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Expansion Project City Staff

City of Burnaby Opposition to the Kinder Morgan Trans Mountain Expansion Project City Staff Presentation Public Information Events 2014 April 9 + 15 Trans Mountain Expansion Project Summary of Kinder Morgan Project Scope Existing TMPL System

849 views • 56 slides
M C I NTIRE I NVESTMENT I NSTITUTE A T THE U NIVERSITY OF V IRGINIA Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI)

M C I NTIRE I NVESTMENT I NSTITUTE A T THE U NIVERSITY OF V IRGINIA Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI)

M C I NTIRE I NVESTMENT I NSTITUTE A T THE U NIVERSITY OF V IRGINIA Kinder Morgan (NYSE: KMI) Long Shreyas Hariharan | Adam Rathgaber | Naveed Mostaghimi | Nick Galdos | 10/28/2014 M c I n t i r e I n v e s t m e n t I n s t i t u t e

675 views • 32 slides
CO 2 EOR Carbon Balance Charles E. Fox Kinder Morgan CO 2 Company, LP 1 Tip WSJ 11/25/2009 2

CO 2 EOR Carbon Balance Charles E. Fox Kinder Morgan CO 2 Company, LP 1 Tip WSJ 11/25/2009 2

CO 2 EOR Carbon Balance Charles E. Fox Kinder Morgan CO 2 Company, LP 1 Tip WSJ 11/25/2009 2 EOR Carbon Balance Calculate carbon emissions for SACROC in 2007 using CA Registry methods (mostly) Compare various emission sources

311 views • 27 slides
Pembina Pipeline Corporation TSX: PPL | NYSE: PBA Acquisition of Kinder Morgan Canada and

Pembina Pipeline Corporation TSX: PPL | NYSE: PBA Acquisition of Kinder Morgan Canada and

Pembina Pipeline Corporation TSX: PPL | NYSE: PBA Acquisition of Kinder Morgan Canada and Cochin Pipeline August 21, 2019 Forward-looking statements and information This presentation contains certain forward-looking statements and

349 views • 16 slides
City of Burnaby Presentation Kinder Morgan National Energy Board (NEB) Application for the Trans

City of Burnaby Presentation Kinder Morgan National Energy Board (NEB) Application for the Trans

City of Burnaby Presentation Kinder Morgan National Energy Board (NEB) Application for the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMEP) 2014 March Presentation Outline Scope of Project Overview of the Trans Mountain Expansion Project (TMEP)

707 views • 68 slides
KINDER MORGAN, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 80-0682103

KINDER MORGAN, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 80-0682103

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 F O R M 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017 or TRANSITION

1.5k views • 124 slides
KINDER MORGAN, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 80-0682103

KINDER MORGAN, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 80-0682103

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 F O R M 10-Q QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2017 or TRANSITION REPORT

1.09k views • 88 slides
National HIV/AIDS Strategy WHERE CAN Y AN YOU F FIT I T INT NTO T THIS? S? ANNA KINDER,

National HIV/AIDS Strategy WHERE CAN Y AN YOU F FIT I T INT NTO T THIS? S? ANNA KINDER,

National HIV/AIDS Strategy WHERE CAN Y AN YOU F FIT I T INT NTO T THIS? S? ANNA KINDER, M.S.OTR/L Definition THE NATIONAL HIV/AIDS STRATEGY IS A FIVE-YEAR PLAN THAT DETAILS PRINCIPLES, PRIORITIES, AND ACTIONS TO GUIDE OUR COLLECTIVE

293 views • 28 slides
WordRake WordRake WordRake founder Gary Kinder Lawyer WordRake is my favorite

WordRake WordRake WordRake founder Gary Kinder Lawyer WordRake is my favorite

10/19/2018 WordRake WordRake WordRake founder Gary Kinder Lawyer WordRake is my favorite software Taught over 1,000 writing programs of all time. WilmerHale, Sidley, Skadden, Latham, Jones Day VISA, KPMG, Microsoft

75 views • 3 slides
CHRISTIAN RADIOS ON -AIR TONE: How A Kinder Sound Is Your Difference Maker

CHRISTIAN RADIOS ON -AIR TONE: How A Kinder Sound Is Your Difference Maker

jointhekindnesschallenge.com CHRISTIAN RADIOS ON -AIR TONE: How A Kinder Sound Is Your Difference Maker jointhekindnesschallenge.com YOU WANT TO. REACH YOUR AUDIENCE FOR JESUS ENCOURAGE AND EQUIP YOUR LISTENERS; GIVE PRACTICAL

804 views • 44 slides
Netzwerk Kinder- und Jugendrzte fr klinische Studien in der Ambulanten Pdiatrie (network

Netzwerk Kinder- und Jugendrzte fr klinische Studien in der Ambulanten Pdiatrie (network

NE T ST AP e .V. Netzwerk Kinder- und Jugendrzte fr klinische Studien in der Ambulanten Pdiatrie (network of pediatricians for clinical studies in ambulant treatment) www.netstap.de boar d and offic e Board: Office: NETSTAP e.V.

286 views • 12 slides
Practical Dynamic Symbolic Execution of Standalone JavaScript Johannes Kinder Royal Holloway,

Practical Dynamic Symbolic Execution of Standalone JavaScript Johannes Kinder Royal Holloway,

Practical Dynamic Symbolic Execution of Standalone JavaScript Johannes Kinder Royal Holloway, University of London Joint work with Blake Loring and Duncan Mitchell Mission Statement Help find bugs in Node.js applications and libraries

360 views • 19 slides
A Kinder, Gentler Place for Osler's Marines: How Litigation, Legislation, and Regulation Are

A Kinder, Gentler Place for Osler's Marines: How Litigation, Legislation, and Regulation Are

A Kinder, Gentler Place for Osler's Marines: How Litigation, Legislation, and Regulation Are Changing the American Medical Residency System - Lea Carol Owen Presented at the TBA Health Law Symposium, 2003 A typical American medical education --

267 views • 22 slides
Creating a kinder, more social Scotland Who we are VHS is the national network and intermediary

Creating a kinder, more social Scotland Who we are VHS is the national network and intermediary

Voluntary Health Scotland Mansfield Traquair Centre 15 Mansfield Place Edinburgh EH3 6BB 0131 474 6189 mail@vhscotland.org.uk Creating a kinder, more social Scotland Who we are VHS is the national network and intermediary for voluntary

356 views • 7 slides
WaterS ense & Retrofits Frank Kinder Colorado S prings Utilities Colorado S prings, CO

WaterS ense & Retrofits Frank Kinder Colorado S prings Utilities Colorado S prings, CO

WaterS ense & Retrofits Frank Kinder Colorado S prings Utilities Colorado S prings, CO Fkinder@ Csu.org 719 337 5522 Products and Partners Requires testing for performance. Must work! Gets EPA Approval, just like Energy Star

281 views • 9 slides
Efficient Symbolic Execution for Software Testing Johannes Kinder Royal Holloway, University of

Efficient Symbolic Execution for Software Testing Johannes Kinder Royal Holloway, University of

Efficient Symbolic Execution for Software Testing Johannes Kinder Royal Holloway, University of London Joint work with: Stefan Bucur, George Candea, Volodymyr Kuznetsov @ EPFL Symbolic Execution Automatically explore program paths

2.34k views • 200 slides
D Morgan PLC A Culture of making excellence a habit D Morgan PLC Introduction Adam

D Morgan PLC A Culture of making excellence a habit D Morgan PLC Introduction Adam

Our People.. Our Culture knowledge experience innovation D Morgan PLC A Culture of making excellence a habit D Morgan PLC Introduction Adam Onyett SHEQ & Pre Construction Director Vice Chair CECA NW North West

807 views • 22 slides
Sound DSE Semantics for JavaScript Regular Expressions Johannes Kinder, Research Institute CODE,

Sound DSE Semantics for JavaScript Regular Expressions Johannes Kinder, Research Institute CODE,

Sound DSE Semantics for JavaScript Regular Expressions Johannes Kinder, Research Institute CODE, Bundeswehr University Munich joint work with Blake Loring and Duncan Mitchell, Royal Holloway, University of London JavaScript The language of

691 views • 25 slides
Kinder Surprises Debut in Discrete Optimisation A Real-World Toy Problem that can be

Kinder Surprises Debut in Discrete Optimisation A Real-World Toy Problem that can be

Markus Wagner Kinder Surprises Debut in Discrete Optimisation A Real-World Toy Problem that can be Subadditive https://github.com/markuswagnergithub/TOYlib Aus Australi alia Austr tralia markus.wagner@adelaide.edu.au Markus Wagner

711 views • 21 slides
Sesame Workshops mission is to help kids grow smarter, stronger, and kinder. WASH challenges

Sesame Workshops mission is to help kids grow smarter, stronger, and kinder. WASH challenges

Sesame Workshops mission is to help kids grow smarter, stronger, and kinder. WASH challenges & young children Around the world 2.4 billion people do not use improved sanitation 663 million people do not have access to

475 views • 20 slides
December 1, 2015 Dear Contractor, As part of our overall commitment to safety, Colonial Pipeline

December 1, 2015 Dear Contractor, As part of our overall commitment to safety, Colonial Pipeline

December 1, 2015 Dear Contractor, As part of our overall commitment to safety, Colonial Pipeline and Kinder Morgan are enhancing our contractor data management processes. Effective today , December 1, 2015 , your company is required to submit

588 views • 44 slides
Approaches to Package Management Bioconductor Martin Morgan (Martin.Morgan@RoswellPark.org)

Approaches to Package Management Bioconductor Martin Morgan (Martin.Morgan@RoswellPark.org)

Approaches to Package Management Bioconductor Martin Morgan (Martin.Morgan@RoswellPark.org) Roswell Park Cancer Institute Buffalo, NY, USA 3 July, 2017 Bioconductor Analysis and comprehension of high-throughput genomic data

233 views • 10 slides
Soil Conditioner Design Proposal Jared Kinder Colin Lowe Jacob Huff Paula Smithheisler Jace

Soil Conditioner Design Proposal Jared Kinder Colin Lowe Jacob Huff Paula Smithheisler Jace

Soil Conditioner Design Proposal Jared Kinder Colin Lowe Jacob Huff Paula Smithheisler Jace Reed Diller Designs 2 The Vassar Company Perkins, Oklahoma Established in 1940 Produces farm equipment 6 Distributors including one

402 views • 27 slides
Garrett Morgan G a r r e t t i n v e n t e d t h e p r o t e c t i o n

Garrett Morgan G a r r e t t i n v e n t e d t h e p r o t e c t i o n

Garrett Morgan G a r r e t t i n v e n t e d t h e p r o t e c t i o n h o o d B y K o n n o r M . When Garrett Morgan was born Garrett Morgan was born in 1863 in Paris, Kentucky Garrett's wife's He

133 views • 9 slides

More recommend