july 21 2020
play

July 21, 2020 2 Outline Study Overview What Weve Heard - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 BOCC July 21, 2020 2 Outline Study Overview What Weve Heard Recommendations Next Steps 3 Study Overview Understand vision for future development and obtain community input Evaluate and recommend changes to


  1. 1 BOCC July 21, 2020

  2. 2 Outline • Study Overview • What We’ve Heard • Recommendations • Next Steps

  3. 3 Study Overview • Understand vision for future development and obtain community input • Evaluate and recommend changes to current RP-2 policies and regulations • Review infrastructure needs in Balm

  4. 4 Schedule (S (Subject to Change) Develop Initial Recommendations March – April 2020 - Infrastructure Needs (Transportation, Public Utilities, Environmental) Public Outreach March – July 2020 - Community Open House #1 March 11, 2020 - Online Survey March 11 – April 2, 2020 - Community Work Session April 7, 2020 - Stakeholder Work Session June 18, 2020 - Community Open House #2 Fall Policy Recommendations & Updates Summer/Fall - Policy updates Summer - PC Hearing and BOCC Transmittal Fall - Moratorium Deadline May 2020

  5. Focus Area 5 RP-2 South Sub- Plan Area RP-2 North Sub-Plan Area

  6. Land Analysis Summary La Approved Developments 6 Approved Developments 19% of Focus area • 19% of the Focus area 30% Focus area + Other • 31% of RP-2 Outside USA RP-2 Outside USA Vacant Developable • 47% of the Focus area • 34% of RP-2 Outside USA

  7. 7 What We’ve Heard – Community Outreach

  8. 8 Community Open House

  9. 9 80% Online Survey 72% 71% 70% 64% What could be improved in the community? 60% 56% (Select all that apply) 50% 40% 32% 30% 20% 15% 9% 7% 10% 0% Protection of Discourage Infrastructure to Encourage Add grocery Other (please Add more Add affordable wildlife habitats suburban support new farming stores, local retail, specify) suburban housing development in a developments restaurants, etc. development in a rural area (roads, utilities rural area etc.)

  10. 10 Stakeholder In Interviews Development community • Current commercial requirements don’t work • Little developable land left in the RP-2 areas • Would like to see design guidelines • Not in favor of planned villages, make it more about mobility

  11. 11 Stakeholder In Interviews Community • Supporting infrastructure before development • Density – no more than 2 dwelling units per acre, ½ acre lots (not in favor of clustering, TDR) • Preserve green and natural spaces • 250’ setbacks • Minimize light pollution • Include local commercial opportunities

  12. 12 Recommendations

  13. 13 Establish dif ifferent development areas • Recategorize Planned Villages • Encourage different levels of development • South Sub-Planning Area/Village • North Sub-Planning Area/Village

  14. 14 Red text indicates Density (TB (TBD ba based on on dis discussio ions wit ith com ommunit ity) proposed updates DENSITY CURRENT NORTH SOUTH Overall Density 2 du/gross acre 2 du/gross acre 2 du/gross acre (50 – 160 acres) (50 – 160 acres) Design Rules (Buffering, lighting, Design Rules (Buffering, lighting, connectivity, timing connectivity, timing improvements improvements with with development) development) Added Community Not included 3 du/gross acre with added 3 du/gross acre with added community benefits community benefits Benefits (would require review in PD) 3.5-4 du/net acre 3.5-4 du/net acre and at least 3.5-4 du/net acre and at least 50% With Clustering 50% open space open space With TDR 4 du/ gross acre 6 du/net acre 4 du/gross acre 6 du/net acre “Sending area”

  15. 15 Update Commercial Poli licies Community benefit options: • Land dedication for town center • Multimodal connections to commercial • Other infrastructure improvements in nearby commercial nodes (Balm downtown, other nodes, etc.) • Land dedication for community uses and office uses

  16. 16 Community Benefits Density bonuses for (requirements vary based on size of project): • Different housing types and sizes • Different lot sizes • Additional open space and preservation • Utilize Conservation subdivision standards • Additional optional infrastructure improvements • Land dedication: schools, daycares, civic or community uses etc. • Green/sustainable building patterns • Rural architectural style for buildings

  17. 17 More Specific Desig ign Standards • Buffering • 250’ with minimum landscape standards on the periphery • If Less than 250’ greater buffering & screening requirements • Varying lot sizes/setbacks • Encourage a range of housing types/sizes • Discourage cookie cutter development • Multimodal access/circulation • Green and open space • Conservation measures • Water conservation, lighting, etc.

  18. Amend the Comprehensive Pla lan Timing Defined: • Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption) • Short-term (Within 4 years) (Deliverables as part of this study) • Mid/Long-term (4+ years) Timing DRAFT Action Responsible Party Mid/ Immediate Short-term Long-term Amend the Comprehensive Plan Consolidate and reorganize policies County, Planning Commission Add clear references/linkages (to Comp Plan and LDC) County, Planning Commission Recategorize Planned Villages (2 areas - south/north) County, Planning Commission Update clustering: Add different lot sizes, home types, etc., clearly define density/intensity County, Planning Commission and what counts as open space Update/replace commercial standards with community benefits County, Planning Commission Include/update design rules County, Planning Commission County, Development Community, Develop a mobility and commercial node map Market professionals TDRs: Coordinate TDR efforts (consider Balm as "sending area" and others as County, Planning Commission "receiving area") 18

  19. Amend th the Comprehensive Pla lan Update Land Development Code Timing Defined: • Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption) • Short-term (Within 4 years) (Deliverables as part of this study) • Mid/Long-term (4+ years) Timing DRAFT Action Responsible Party Mid/ Immediate Short-term Long-term Update Land Development Code Add corresponding regulations from Comprehensive Plan updates County Allow certain community benefits to replace commercial component County Add design standards - include neighborhood centers, walkability, buffering, conservation, County, Planning Commission drainage, etc. Landscape/buffering standards, menu of options for 250' setback County, Planning Commission Create checklist with required/optional design standards County, Planning Commission Remove planned village graphic County 19

  20. Other Potential Foll llow-up Actio ions Timing Defined: • Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption) (Outside of this study) (O • Short-term (Within 4 years) • Mid/Long-term (4+ years) Timing DRAFT Action Responsible Party Mid/ Immediate Short-term Long-term Schools/Civic uses: Site in neighborhoods, design for biking/walking and provide connections Development community, County, (on-going) School Board Further discuss public safety concerns with borrow pits County, Planning Commission Water/Sewer Infrastructure: Coordinate with future development County Clarify Planned Development Process for the area for new regulations County, Planning Commission TDRs: further discuss and explore TDR framework County, Planning Commission TDRs: Stakeholder Coordination: Convene residents/farmers, development community to County, Planning Commission discuss TDR process further. County, Planning Commission, ELAPP: Coordinate possibility of connecting ELAPP north/south of focus area Development Community 20

  21. Other Potential Foll llow-up Actio ions Timing Defined: • Immediate (Immediate action prior or upon adoption) (Outside of this study) (O • Short-term (Within 4 years) • Mid/Long-term (4+ years) Timing DRAFT Action Responsible Party Mid/ Immediate Short-term Long-term Mobility: Develop a mobility master plan (local connectivity, substandard roads, multimodal) County, MPO, Planning Commission Mobility: Explore using TECO easements for trail network County, MPO, Planning Commission Mobility: Construct roadway improvements in CIP and LRTP (Big Bend, CR 672, etc.) County, MPO, Planning Commission Mobility: Construct improvements on substandard roadways, intersection improvements, County, MPO, Planning Commission sidewalks Revenue: Explore additional revenue sources (i.e. TIF, MSTU/MSBU) County County, Community & Stakeholders, Affordable Housing: Continue to discuss affordable housing and transit options Planning Commission Coordinate additional rural architectural standards/overlay County, Planning Commission 21

  22. 22 Foll llow-up Activ ivities • Update the Comprehensive Plan (FLU) based on comments • Update the Land Development Code • Community Open House (Summer/Fall) • County staff to work on follow-up actions as directed by the BOCC

  23. 23 Questions and Answers 23

Recommend


More recommend