IP Telephony (iptel) IETF 56
Note Well • All statements related to the activities of the IETF and addressed to the IETF are subject to all provisions of Section 10 of RFC 2026, which grants to the IETF and its participants certain licenses and rights in such statements. Such statements include verbal statements in IETF meetings, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to – the IETF plenary session, – any IETF working group or portion thereof, – the IESG, or any member thereof on behalf of the IESG, – the IAB or any member thereof on behalf of the IAB, – any IETF mailing list, including the IETF list itself, any working group or design team list, or any other list functioning under IETF auspices, – the RFC Editor or the Internet-Drafts function • Statements made outside of an IETF meeting, mailing list or other function, that are clearly not intended to be input to an IETF activity, group or function, are not subject to these provisions.
Agenda • Status of the group • 2806bis open Issues • Other tel related drafts • Other URI Scheme • Discussion on charter update
Status Update • New AD • TRIP MIB • Disappointing progress since – Revised version submitted last meeting addressing MIB Experts – (blame the new co-chair) comments • 2806bis updated – Awaiting Response from experts • Few partially interoperable TRIP systems • TGREP • CPL – New version submitted – Soon to no longer be blocked – Expert reviews and on caller prefs discussion needed – Scheme/DTD issue • Due April 18th
2806bis • Semantic meaning – Relation to enum URI • Context issues – How do we close this? • Other issues – Extensions – Other open issues?
Other Tel related drafts • Number Portability and Free phone – draft-yu-tel-url-07 • Calling Party’s Category – draft-perterson-tel-cpc-01 • Trunk Group – draft-ietf-iptel-trunk-group • Service type parameter in tel URL – draft-brandner-tel-svc-00 – Is this a desirable feature or not?
Other URI schemes (Time Permitting) • enum – draft-brandner-enum-uri • Relation to tel URI • pros and cons of this approach
New Work Items • Which documents to adopt? – draft-peterson-tel-cpc – draft-brandner-enum-uri – draft-ietf-iptel-trunk-group • Once group decides which to adopt, we will propose dates and new charter
Charter Update • Deliverables – TRIP MIB • (WGLC start Monday) – TGREP • (to IESG in May) – (Proposed) Update to tel URL • (to IESG in June) – (Proposed) Extensions to tel URL • Free phone extensions (to IESG in June) • Other ones?
Recommend
More recommend
