Introduction to Life Cycle Cost Prof. Rajkumar S. Pant Aerospace Engineering Department IIT Bombay AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Over the life cost Costs incurred from inception to disposal LCC components in Engg. Design Design & Development Production Support Equipment & Initial Spares Operation & Support (O&S) Disposal AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Importance of LCC in Engg. Design Reduction in system cost Social requirements, inflation, economic recession, .. Paradigm shift in Engg. Design ‘Performance at any cost’ ‘Design-to-cost’ ‘Design-to-LCC’ Helps in selection of competing solutions Helps in identification of cost reduction areas Most of LCC gets determined quite early AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Typical LCC breakup Modern Combat Aircraft Disposal RDT & E 1% 14% Operation & Support 50% Production Ground 30% Support Eqpt. & Initial Spares 5% Source: Woodford S, Recent Combat Aircraft Life Cycle Costing Developments within DERA, RTO AVT Specialists meeting on Design for Low Cost Operation and Support , Ottawa, Canada, October 1999. AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
LCC Determination Phases Majority Of LCC Costs Are Determined Early I n Design AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Estimation of LCC components Design & Development o CERs for factors, parameters and features that affect cost Production o Mostly activity based costing • Tooling, Material, Fabrication, Assembly, QC, …….. Support Equipment & Initial Spares o Can be reduced by careful design Operation & Support (O&S) o Usually the largest component; models available Disposal o Major issue of concern from environmental considerations AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Problems in Cost Estimation Largely statistical Based on actual costs of previous aircraft Difficult to determine the actual cost a/c procurement spread over many years Non-optimal production rate; higher costs Differences in Accounting procedure Then-Year Rupees o Actual Money spent in each year of the program Constant Year Rupees o Money spent ratioed by inflation to some specific year AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Then-Year v/s Constant Year Aircraft Then-Year (different years) Constant-Year (1978) F-15 USD 17.6 million USD 18.8 million F-16 USD 10.8 million USD 08.2 million % diff 60% 130% AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Production quantity & Rates a/c prodn. AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4 Source: Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, D R Raymer
Example of Cost Over-runs Light Combat Aircraft Sanctioned in 1983 : Rs. 560 Crores Amount spent till 2008: Rs. 5489.78 Crores Two TDs and 3 Prototypes developed o Max. speed of Mach 1.4 achieved IOC in 2010, FOC in 2012 IAF & IN wanted 220 a/c, Current Orders = 20 Kaveri Engine Initial Sanction: Rs. 382 Crores Expenditure till date: Rs. 2839 Crores AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
A Cost Comparison Name Country Cost (Crore Rs.) F/A-22 Raptor USA 480 Rafale France 270 JAS-Gripen Sweden 160 Mirage 2000 France 130 LCA India 110 AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Aircraft LCC Estimation AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Aircraft LCC components Size of Boxes proportional to magnitude of costs AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Estimation of Research Development Test & Evaluation (RDT&E) Cost AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
RDT&E Components Technology Research Design Engineering Prototype Fabrication Ground & Flight testing Evaluation of Operational Suitability Certification Airworthiness Mission Compliance Design Documentation AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Cost Estimation Methods Aircraft Cost (US $) =150-300* DCPR weight DCPR = Defense Contractor’s Planning Report W DCPR = Wt. of parts made by a/c manufacturer Empty Weight – Weight of Bought Out items Typical List of Bought Out Items: o Wheels, Brakes, Tires, Engines, Starter, Cooling Fluids, Instruments, Batteries, Power supplies, Fire-control systems, Air-conditioning systems, Avionics, Furnishings, APU,… Two-main approaches Activity Based o Detailed assessment of actual tasks, WBS creation CER based o Formula based on DCPR weight, Max. speed, Production rate, …. AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
CER based RDT&E Estimation RAND DAPCA IV Model Estimates hours required for RDT&E & Prodn. o Engineering, Tooling, Manufacturing, QC o Costs estimated by multiplying with MHRs Other costs estimated directly o Development Support o Manufacturing Material o Flight Test Additional Cost elements o Financing o Profit AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Engineering Hours Effort Hours Airframe Design & Analysis, Test Engineering Configuration control, Systems Engineering Support Hours Propulsion and avionics system integration Tooling & production Planning Mainly during RDT&E, but also during prodn. EE 500 = 3*EE 1 AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Tooling Tooling Hours Preparation for Production o Tools and Fixtures o Moulds and Dies o Programming of NC machines o Design & fabrication of production test apparatus Tooling support during production AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Manufacturing & QC Labor Manufacturing Forming, Machining & Fastening Sub assembly & Final assembly Routing o Hydraulics, Pneumatics, Electrics BO item installation o Engine, Avionics, Subsystems Effort by Airframe subcontractors Quality Control Inspection at receiving, production, assembly Tools, Fixtures, Components, sub-assemblies, Major assemblies, Final Assembly AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Development Support Costs Mock Up Structural test rigs LG Drop test System Integration test-Rigs Iron Bird Simulators AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Iron Bird Simulator for F-728 AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
CERs in DAPCA IV model AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Formula for RDT&E Cost AE-332M / 714 Aircraft Design Capsule-4
Recommend
More recommend