interstate steering committee update
play

Interstate Steering Committee Update December 5, 2018 2 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Interstate Steering Committee Update December 5, 2018 2 Interstate Update Interstate Steering Committee Background Purpose Workgroup Current Conditions Pavement Bridges 2019 Interstate TYP Interstate Rides


  1. Interstate Steering Committee Update December 5, 2018 2

  2. Interstate Update • Interstate Steering Committee Background  Purpose  Workgroup • Current Conditions  Pavement  Bridges • 2019 Interstate TYP  Interstate Rides & Presentations  Priorities, Challenges, Best Practices 3

  3. Interstate Steering Committee Interstate Steering Committee (ISC) • DE’s, ADE’s, BOPD, BOMO, Planning • Evaluate the Interstate System as a single asset, not 11 separate Districts • Monthly Pre-PMC meetings • Quarterly ISC meetings to review Interstates 4

  4. Pennsylvania Interstate System • 21 interstates = 2,740 segment miles. • 2,201 PennDOT bridges. • Our interstate makes up 6% of the total state owned miles, and holds 24% of the traffic volumes. 5

  5. Lehigh Valley Interstate Data • Lehigh Valley’s total segment miles is 63 miles. – Making up 2% of the entire interstates segment miles. • Lehigh Valley consists of 60 bridges. – Making up 3% of the entire interstates bridges. • The average combined age of Lehigh Valley’s interstates highway is 34 years old. • The average combined age of Lehigh Valley’s interstates bridges is 31 years old. • The oldest underlying sections of roadway reside on I-78 in Lehigh County, District 5. About 13.5 miles, of both east and west bound lanes, of I-78 was built in 1958. 6

  6. Statewide 2017 IRI Pavement Condition Poor, 1 0 2 Fair, 4 2 7 Excellent, 1 3 7 3 Good, 8 1 4 I RI CONDI TI ON I N MI LES 7

  7. Lehigh Valley Interstates-2017 IRI Pavement Conditions Excellent, 8 Poor, 1 3 Good, 1 7 Fair, 2 6 I RI CONDI TI ON I N MI LES 8

  8. Statewide 2017 OPI Pavement Condition Poor, 3 5 Fair, 3 5 6 Excellent, 6 0 4 Good, 1 6 3 0 OPI CONDI TI ON I N MI LES 9

  9. Lehigh Valley Interstate–2017 OPI Pavement Conditions Poor, 4 Excellent, 9 Fair, 1 3 Good, 3 4 OPI CONDI TI ON I N MI LES 10

  10. Statewide Miles Constructed/ Reconstructed 1 0 0 0 9 3 1 9 0 0 8 0 0 7 0 0 5 7 9 6 0 0 5 0 0 4 0 0 3 3 4 3 0 3 3 0 0 2 5 3 2 4 6 2 0 0 7 3 1 0 0 1 5 0 1 9 4 0 1 9 5 0 1 9 6 0 1 9 7 0 1 9 8 0 1 9 9 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 11

  11. Statewide 2017 Bridge Condition Ratings 8 0 5 6 5 Good (NBI 6 or greater) Fair ( NBI 5 ) 1 5 5 6 Poor (NBI 4 or lower (SD)) 12

  12. Lehigh Valley Interstates-2017 Bridge Condition Ratings 5 Good (NBI 6 or greater) Fair (NBI 5) 5 5 13

  13. Statewide 2017 Poor Bridge Deck Area 1 ,5 5 3 ,8 4 0 Deck Area Poor Deck Area 2 9 ,4 0 7 ,1 5 2 14

  14. Statewide Bridges Constructed/ Reconstructed 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 3 1 0 0 0 8 0 0 6 0 0 4 0 0 3 3 7 2 9 7 1 6 9 2 0 0 1 2 4 9 3 5 8 8 2 0 1 9 2 0 1 9 4 0 1 9 5 0 1 9 6 0 1 9 7 0 1 9 8 0 1 9 9 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 15

  15. VEHICLE COUNT 5 6 ,3 5 6 1 3 ,4 9 3 2 1 4 ,5 8 1 Maximum AADT and Freight by Corridor 1 0 ,3 1 2 9 5 ,1 2 6 2 2 ,1 8 1 9 8 ,0 7 2 1 3 ,5 9 8 6 8 ,9 8 2 1 5 ,8 4 6 1 0 1 ,2 8 0 2 3 ,9 7 5 1 1 9 ,1 9 2 1 2 ,7 6 0 4 9 ,7 1 3 1 0 ,7 8 7 9 ,7 6 3 2 ,1 2 1 4 8 ,3 6 8 CORRIDOR 1 0 ,8 5 5 1 9 8 ,7 3 8 16 1 3 ,8 0 0 3 9 ,7 4 5 6 ,7 5 7 2 6 ,1 3 6 4 ,4 4 4 Max AADT 4 6 ,8 7 5 7 ,7 6 3 6 9 ,5 5 6 4 ,8 6 4 6 1 ,2 2 5 9 ,1 7 7 Max ADTT 9 6 ,8 7 5 8 ,3 5 1 3 0 ,0 9 2 9 ,1 8 0 1 4 9 ,9 4 4 1 2 ,1 4 3 4 4 ,6 5 2 3 ,7 9 2 1 4 8 ,5 6 9 1 0 ,4 6 7

  16. Pennsylvania’s Interstate System “Pennsylvania’s Interstate Highway System is a mature system and, as such, is posing an increasingly severe financial burden on the Commonwealth.” - March 1982 17

  17. Asset Management – Funding Needs • Based on Interstate Cycle Needs, $1.1 Billion per year is required to maintain Interstate mainline and ramps. • The calculations do not include capacity expansion needs or Year of Expenditure (YOE). 18

  18. Interstate Update 19

  19. Interstate Update 20

  20. Interstate Update 21

  21. Interstate Update 22

  22. Interstate Update 23

  23. Interstate Update 24

  24. Interstate Update Statewide Concerns • Some Interstates have $0 on 12 Yr TYP • SD bridges unfunded • Critical Preservation is not funded • Preservation is not lasting as long  Reconstruction is what’s needed • Capacity/ Freight issues unfunded • Rest Areas 25

  25. Interstate Priority Needs (12 Years) • $13.8 Billion of Priority Projects (286 Projects) – $7.3 Billion Programmed (98 Projects) – $6.5 Billion Unfunded (188 Projects) • 2019 IM TYP Financial Guidance $5.5 Billion (approximately $458 Million per year) • The priority needs list address most of the needs but not all, especially the extensive capacity needs • Lehigh Valley - $259 Million of Priority Projects (7 Projects) – $7.9 Million Programmed (1 Project) – $251 Million Unfunded (6 projects) 26

  26. Interstate Priority Needs By Interstate Corridor $3.0 $2,670M $2.5 $2,376M $2,043M $2.0 Estimates in Billions $1.5 $1,269M $1,277M $1.0 $894M $764M $699M $636M $0.5 $380M $209M $156M $151M $119M $79M $28M $46M $0.0 70 76 78 79 80 81 83 84 86 90 95 99 176 180 279 283 376 380 476 579 676 Interstate Hwy Preservation Hwy Rehab Hwy Reconstruction Bridge Preservation Bridge Rehab Bridge Recon/Replace Safety Need Capacity Operational Other 27

  27. Lehigh Valley Interstate Priority Needs By Interstate Corridor $300 Total Costs, $259M Bridge Recon/Replace, $3M $250 Bridge Preservation, $5M $200 Estimates in Millions Hwy Reconstruction, $150 $210M $100 $50 Hwy Rehab, $15M Hwy Preservation, $27M $0 78 Interstate Hwy Preservation Hwy Rehab Hwy Reconstruction Bridge Preservation Bridge Rehab Bridge Recon/Replace Safety Need Capacity Operational Other 28

  28. Interstate Priority Needs By Project Type Operational Other 2% 2% Safety Need Capacity 3% 10% Hwy Preservation 15% Hwy Rehab 4% Bridge Recon/Replace 12% Bridge Rehab 1% Bridge Preservation Hwy Reconstruction 1% 50% 29

  29. Lehigh Valley Interstate Priority Needs By Project Type Bridge Preservation Bridge Recon/Replace 2% 1% Hwy Hwy Rehab Preservation 6% 10% Hwy Reconstruction 81% 30

  30. Interstate Priority Needs Programmed vs Unfunded by Corridor $3 $3 $1,511M $2 Billions $2 $1,358M $32M $2,376M $1 $1,201M $1,245M $1,159M $377M $652M $303M $306M $1 $685M $148M $68M $387M $396M $203M $330M $16M $119M $151M $232M $156M $243M $6M $12M $79M $46M $0 70 76 78 79 80 81 83 84 86 90 95 99 176 180 279 283 376 380 476 579 676 Cost of Project Programmed Cost of Unfunded Projects 31

  31. Lehigh Valley Interstate Priority Needs Programmed vs Unfunded by Corridor $300 $250 $200 $150 Millions $251M $100 $50 $8M $0 78 Cost of Project Programmed Cost of Unfunded Projects 32

  32. Interstate Priority Needs Programmed vs Unfunded by Project Type $7,000 $6,000 $2,838M $5,000 $4,000 Millions $3,000 $2,000 $4,048M $90M $603M $1,876M $1,000 $133M $1,235M $1,056M $72M $17M $51M $24M $64M $92M $519M $360M $243M $222M $253M $0 Programmed Unfunded 33

  33. Lehigh Valley Interstate Priority Needs Programmed vs Unfunded by Project Type $250 $200 $150 Millions $210M $100 $50 $20M $5M $15M $3M $8M $0 Hwy Preservation Hwy Rehab Hwy Reconstruction Bridge Preservation Bridge Recon/Replace Programmed Unfunded 34

  34. ISC Next Steps • Review Interstate needs – Priorities – Policies – Funding options – Develop Best Practices • Review and Prioritize Interstate Preservation projects for SPIKE Funding 35

  35. Questions 36

  36. PennDOT by the Numbers Melissa Batula. P.E. Highway Delivery Division Chief PA Department of Transportation 37 Bureau of Project Delivery mbatula@pa.gov

Recommend


More recommend