Integrated Development Plan Feedback Session October 2017 Theme: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Integrated Development Plan Feedback Session – October 2017 Theme: Service with pride and dignity IDP Community Presentation by MMC, Sifumba

PURPOSE • Give feedback on issues raised during the Constituency Consultations; • Outline the City’s strategies, outcomes and priorities towards development; • To give an overview of the region in terms of its demographic status and key development challenges; and • To report on the implementation of the Region’s CBP Projects 2

Contents • COJ’s Strategic Imperatives: 1. Vision and Mission 2. IDP Priorities and GDS Pillars • What is an IDP • Legislative underpinnings • About the Region: 1. Demographic Figures 2. Key Development Challenges • Overview of Community Submissions • Issues per Department/ Entity • Feedback on issues • CBP Projects Implemented/ to be implemented • Conclusion and way forward 3

Strategic direction: Vision and Mission  Vision: “A Joburg that works is a South Africa that works”  Mission: “To create an enabling economic environment by making Joburg more responsive in the delivery of quality services” Vision Mission Outcomes Priorities 6

Strategic direction: GDS Outcomes Outcome 1 A growing , diverse and competitive economy that creates jobs Outcome 2 Enhanced, quality services and sustainable environmental practices Outcome 3 An inclusive society with enhanced quality of life that provides meaningful redress through pro-poor development Outcome 4 Build caring , safe and secure communities Outcome 5 An honest , transparent and responsive local government that prides itself on service excellence 5

Strategic Imperatives Priorities of the Administration Promote economic development and attract investment towards achieving 5% COJ STRATEGIC PRIORITIES Priority 1 economic growth that reduces unemployment by 2021. Ensure pro-poor developmen t that addresses inequality and poverty and provides Priority 2 meaningful redress Priority 3 Create a culture of enhanced service delivery with pride Create a sense of security through improved public safety Priority 4 Create an honest and transparent City that fights corruption Priority 5 Create a City that responds to the needs of citizens , customers, stakeholders and Priority 6 businesses Priority 7 Enhance our financial stability Encourage innovation and efficiency through the Smart City programme; and Priority 8 Preserve our resources for future generations Priority 9 6

What is an IDP?  PROCESS: Through which the City prepares a strategic development plan which extends over a five year period- coinciding with the Council’s Term of Office (Section 25: MSA 32 of 2000);  DOCUMENT: The Integrated Development Plan (IDP Document) is a product of the Integrated Development Planning Process;  PLANNING INSTRUMENT: The IDP Document is a principle planning instrument that guides and informs all planning and budgeting in the City; • GUIDING TOOL: the IDP helps the City through community consultations and engagement with pertinent stakeholders to : 1. Identify Key Development Challenges; 2. Formulate its Vision, Mission and Priorities; 3. Develop Appropriate Strategies; 4. Develop relevant organisational structure and mechanisms to realise the vision; 5. Align the Budget with priorities. 7

Challenges facing the City  Population estimate: 4.94 million residents (8.9% of South Africa’s total population)  Youth Population: 33.2%, 40% of whom are unemployed  Total number of households: 1.85 million  Housing backlog of over 300,000 with 158,000 on the free housing list  Net in-migration of 3,000 people per month  Slow economic growth and high unemployment with a marginalised informal economy  Slow and unequal service delivery with an infrastructure backlog of R170 billion.  Inadequate provision for repairs and maintenance .  High rates of poverty and inequality  High levels of corruption  Severe safety concerns and inadequate police visibility 8

What we aimed to achieve  Infrastructure  60% of Capex to be spent in poor areas  Progressive allocations towards 10% on repairs and maintenance  Service with Pride a way of life  Declaration of corruption as Public Enemy Number 1  Establishment of Group Forensic Investigations Unit  Establishment of Professional Civil Service and acceleration of Skills Audit  Re-integration of entities and regionalisation of services  Improve safety and security  Measurable improvement in public safety – additional 1500 JMPD officers  Multi-Departmental approach to drug epidemic 9

What we aimed to achieve  Visible service delivery  Centralised grass cutting  Street Lights and Traffic Lights Working – 20% reduction in downtime  Clean up the city – A re sebetseng  War against potholes – more than 120,000 fixed over the past year  Better services for the poor  Upgrading of 51 informal settlements  Increased allocation to Pikitup to increase cleaning services in informal settlements  Extended hours at clinics and public libraries in poor communities 10

What we aimed to achieve  Addressing the Housing Crisis  Fast track completion of housing projects and issuing of title deeds  Completion of open and transparent housing list  Undertaking study to find a new model for housing provision noting that the RDP model has proven unsuccessful at addressing the crisis.  A focus on developing affordable housing in the Inner City . 11

Corruption busting efforts  We have established the Group Forensic Investigations Unit under the leadership of General Shadrack Sibiya .  Since their establishment, corruption amounting to more than R15 billion in lost or misused funds has been uncovered.  There are over 2,000 cases under investigation .  The City has taken aggressive action against those implicated :  Over 500 people have been arrested , including employees of the City.  more than 100 City employees have been suspended  13 employees have resigned , and 12  7 have been dismissed

About Region D Demographic Profile (Brief Summary) • Overview  The region covers an area of 150 km2  The region has an estimated population of 1 189 536  It accounts for 43% of the total City-Wide population • Household breakdown overview:  405 000 number of Households  Average Household size of 4,2 individuals per dwelling unit 7

About Region D Socio-Economic Profile 14

Region D Joburg deprivation Discouraged Work- Other economically not Total number of Ward Rank 10 = most Population Density Working Age Employed Unemployed Seeker active households deprived 11 5 33 274 71.36% 44.58% 23.81% 4.79% 26.82% 8 810 12 4 27 307 72.83% 44.79% 21.93% 4.12% 29.16% 7 874 13 3 37 666 71.07% 53.99% 16.76% 3.52% 25.73% 10 629 14 3 31 068 73.35% 47.89% 16.18% 2.94% 32.99% 7 828 15 7 26 784 68.92% 33.99% 24.45% 6.03% 35.53% 6 757 16 6 26 984 71.96% 39.53% 22.83% 3.32% 34.32% 8 680 19 9 28 671 70.66% 39.62% 26.59% 5.05% 28.74% 8 155 20 5 31 997 69.04% 41.67% 24.88% 3.44% 30.01% 8 239 21 5 29 259 70.69% 41.86% 22.25% 4.03% 31.86% 8 481 22 5 31 693 70.32% 38.44% 19.70% 7.70% 34.16% 7 507 24 10 33 952 73.44% 43.17% 26.28% 6.02% 24.52% 9 896 25 6 35 598 71.96% 40.05% 24.12% 3.72% 32.12% 10 219 26 7 25 366 70.13% 39.37% 27.56% 6.00% 27.07% 6 012 27 6 24 888 70.31% 37.67% 25.40% 5.38% 31.55% 6 295 28 7 28 953 71.36% 37.46% 26.49% 5.06% 30.98% 6 885 29 6 30 347 72.18% 37.75% 22.69% 4.35% 35.21% 6 634 30 9 34 725 73.09% 34.83% 28.98% 6.31% 29.89% 12 339 31 9 27 689 72.72% 40.67% 29.96% 2.72% 26.65% 9 284 33 5 27 909 70.01% 39.29% 25.55% 3.98% 31.18% 7 091 34 6 28 493 72.84% 41.81% 26.48% 3.37% 28.34% 9 951 35 7 25 171 69.67% 33.81% 28.07% 3.94% 34.18% 6 398 36 5 24 481 69.30% 36.34% 21.80% 7.20% 34.66% 5 485 37 8 30 072 72.55% 35.68% 28.60% 6.22% 29.49% 7 707 38 7 21 716 73.25% 40.81% 27.05% 5.55% 26.59% 6 600 39 6 31 782 71.28% 39.03% 27.39% 3.96% 29.62% 8 145 40 8 25 000 71.81% 38.50% 22.76% 7.43% 31.31% 7 326 41 6 24 895 70.24% 37.92% 27.19% 4.52% 30.37% 5 568 42 7 23 974 71.26% 40.02% 25.39% 4.44% 30.15% 6 988 43 7 26 141 70.30% 35.17% 24.15% 5.38% 35.31% 7 034 45 5 27 811 69.34% 43.18% 22.33% 4.03% 30.46% 7 970 46 5 28 541 70.11% 42.45% 21.75% 5.71% 30.09% 8 470 47 6 29 408 70.31% 45.91% 23.37% 3.34% 27.38% 8 366 48 4 32 186 72.24% 45.02% 19.79% 2.41% 32.77% 8 816 51 7 28 409 69.34% 35.15% 21.59% 7.75% 35.50% 7 349 52 6 29 734 68.57% 37.21% 23.94% 7.14% 31.71% 6 974 15 53 4 63 286 71.35% 51.56% 18.30% 2.95% 27.19% 19 895 130 6 23 732 68.39% 37.07% 25.46% 3.86% 33.61% 5 520

About Region D Types of Dwelling 16