in geomagnetic activity
play

in geomagnetic activity Lauri Holappa and Kalevi Mursula ReSoLVE - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Explicit IMF By-effect in geomagnetic activity Lauri Holappa and Kalevi Mursula ReSoLVE Centre of Excellence University of Oulu, Finland Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling IMF B z -component is the main driver of magnetic reconnection at


  1. Explicit IMF By-effect in geomagnetic activity Lauri Holappa and Kalevi Mursula ReSoLVE Centre of Excellence University of Oulu, Finland

  2. Solar wind-magnetosphere coupling β€’ IMF B z -component is the main driver of magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause β€’ IMF B y is included in coupling functions, but its effect does not depend on its sign 8/3 𝑒Φ 𝑁𝑄 πœ„ 2/3 sin = 𝑀 4/3 𝐢 π‘ˆ , 𝑒𝑒 2 2 + 𝐢 𝑧 2 𝐢 π‘ˆ = 𝐢 𝑨 πœ„ = arctan 𝐢 𝑧 𝐢 𝑨 Does the sign of B y matter? β€’ β€’ Stronger auroral electrojets for B y >0 than for B y < 0 in winter! [Friis-Christensen et al., 2017; Smith et al., 2017]

  3. Russell-McPherron effect Spring Fall [Zhao et al., 2012] β€’ Negative IMF B z in GSM coordinate system for IMF B y > 0 in fall and for B y < 0 in spring.

  4. Russell-McPherron effect => Solar wind driving of the magnetosphere is enhanced for IMF B y > 0 in fall, and for B y < 0 in spring. Superposed monthly means and standard errors of the Newell function d Ξ¦ MP /dt in 1966-2015

  5. Seasonal variation of AL index β€’ Deep minimum in AL index during winter for B y < 0 β€’ Cannot be explained by the Russell-McPherron effect. => Explicit B y -effect All data in 1966-2015

  6. Explicit B y -effect in AL index |AL|, summer solstice Β± 15 days |AL|, winter solstice Β± 15 days β€’ In NH winter, for the same value of β€’ Opposite B y -dependence d Ξ¦ MP /dt, B y > 0 produces a in NH summer stronger AL-index than B y < 0.

  7. Explicit B y -effect in AL index |AL|, spring equinox Β± 15 days |AL|, fall equinox Β± 15 days β€’ Explicit B y -dependence is very weak around spring and fall equinoxes.

  8. Removing Russell-McPherron effect a) We calculate measured and predicted polarity ratios includes the RMP-effect b) The ratio of these two ratios quantifies the explicit B y -effect AL index is about 40-50% stronger for B y >0 than for B y <0 around the winter solstice. [Holappa and Mursula, JGR, 2018]

  9. Latitudinal dependence Ratio R +/- for local β€’ geomagnetic indices (Ah-indices) at different latitudes for all seasons in 1995-2017 [Holappa et al., JGR, 2019] β€’ For strong driving (B z < -5 nT), the By-effectis about 40% at subauroral latitudes (55Β°-60Β°) even when averaging over all seasons. => Substorms are stronger and latitudinally more extensive for B y > 0 than for B y < 0 .

  10. Latitudinal dependence YOU ARE HERE Ratio R +/- for local β€’ geomagnetic indices (Ah-indices) at different latitudes for all seasons in 1995-2017 [Holappa et al., JGR, 2019] β€’ For strong driving (B z < -5 nT), the By-effectis about 40% at subauroral latitudes (55Β°-60Β°) even when averaging over all seasons. => Substorms are stronger and latitudinally more extensive for B y > 0 than for B y < 0 .

  11. Summary β€’ IMF B y is an explicit driver of high-latitude geomagnetic activity β€’ Geomagnetic activity is significantly stronger for B y > 0 than for B y < 0 in winter β€’ The B y -effect is strongest at subauroral latitudes at about 55 Β° -60 Β° geomagnetic latitude β€’ IMF B y is important for space weather predictions β€’ No physical explanation yet! References: β€’ L. Holappa and K. Mursula, J. Geophys. Res . (Space) , 123, 2018. β€’ L. Holappa, N. Gopalswamy and K. Mursula, J. Geophys. Res . (Space) , 124, 2019.

  12. B y -effect in Southern Hemisphere β€’ K-index of Syowa station in Antarctica β€’ During SH winter, for the same value of d Ξ¦ MP /dt, B y < 0 produces stronger K-index than B y > 0. β€’ B y -dependence in SH is opposite to that in NH

  13. B y -effect in Southern Hemisphere β€’ During SH summer, for the same value of d Ξ¦ MP /dt, B y > 0 produces stronger K-index than B y < 0.

  14. No explicit B y -effect in AU index β€’ B y -dependence in the AU index (eastward electrojet) is solely due to Russell- McPherron effect

  15. UT-variation β€’ The explicit B y -effect (in NH) maximizes around 5 UT, i.e., when the Earth’s dipole axis points away from the Sun οƒž The explicit B y -effect maximizes when the auroral region is maximally in darkness οƒž B y -effect is efficient under low ionospheric +/βˆ’ (AL) for different UT hours and Left: Ratio 𝑆 π‘“π‘¦π‘žπ‘š conductivity? months. +/βˆ’ (AL) averaged over months. Right: 𝑆 π‘“π‘¦π‘žπ‘š

  16. No explicit B x effect β€’ There is a correlation between B y and B x . Which of the two components is the driver? β€’ Limiting the amplitude of B x has almost no effect to the results => B x has only little, if any, explicit effect on high latitude geomagnetic activity

Recommend


More recommend