h ampton r oads c rossing s tudy
play

H AMPTON R OADS C ROSSING S TUDY S UPPLEMENTAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Agenda Items #16B and #17 H AMPTON R OADS C ROSSING S TUDY S UPPLEMENTAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT S TATEMENT S TATUS R EPORT October 20, 2016 Presented to the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization: Robert Crum, HRTPO Executive Director


  1. Agenda Items #16B and #17 H AMPTON R OADS C ROSSING S TUDY S UPPLEMENTAL E NVIRONMENTAL I MPACT S TATEMENT S TATUS R EPORT October 20, 2016 Presented to the Hampton Roads Transportation Planning Organization: Robert Crum, HRTPO Executive Director Kevin Page, HRTAC Executive Director

  2. A LTERNATIVE A • Improvements to I-64 between I-664 (Hampton) and I-564 (Norfolk) • Widens existing facility to six- lanes • Improvements would be largely confined to existing right-of-way • Cost: $3.3 Billion (2016$) – includes a 40% Contingency 2

  3. A LTERNATIVE B Includes: • All Alternative A improvements • New bridge/tunnel across Elizabeth River • New highway along east side of Craney Island to Route 164 (Portsmouth) • Widen Route 164 to I-664 • Cost: $6.6 Billion (2016$) – includes a 40% Contingency 3

  4. A LTERNATIVE C Includes: • Widen I-664 from I-64 (Hampton) to I-264 (Chesapeake) • New connector between I-664 and I-564 • New highway along east side of Craney Island to Route 164 (Portsmouth) • Transit only lanes • Cost: $12.5 Billion (2016$) – includes a 40% Contingency 4

  5. A LTERNATIVE D Includes all components of • Alternatives B and C without transit only lanes Cost: $11.9 Billion (2016$) • includes a 40% Contingency – 5

  6. O BSERVATIONS • Alternatives C and D appear to have major challenges that could prevent them from being the Least Environmentally Damaging Practicable Alternative (LEDPA) • Alternatives C and D can not meet fiscal constraint within the Long Range Transportation Plan • Alternatives A and B seem to have the most potential to be the LEDPA 6

  7. S ELECTED A LTERNATIVE M UST BE : • Able to be constructed • Able to be Permitted and Funded in constrained plan 7

  8. NEPA P ROCESS : P HASED A PPROACH FOR I MPLEMENTATION HRCS SEIS I-64 Corridor Project: Hampton Roads to Richmond Preferred Richmond ROD requested – August 2016 Alternative Segment 3 ROD – August 2016 LEDPA Segment 1 ROD – Segment 2 ROD – April 2014 February 2016 FEIS FEIS Approved November 2013 Project Length: 75 Miles Phased ROD Estimated Total Project Cost: $4.7B - $7.3B (2017$) Map Source: Google 8

  9. I NPUT FROM LOCALITIES • Improvements needed to HRBT • Transit connections across water are important • Alternative D represents a long-term vision for the region 9

  10. LRTP V ISION P LAN • Alternative D represents the projects that will meet the Region’s long term needs • While there are permitting and financing challenges, we need to start advancing in segments • One approach: – Incorporate Alternative D projects into LRTP Vision Plan – Identify a LEDPA to begin construction of projects based on project readiness 10

  11. HRTAC A LTERNATIVE A NALYSIS O BSERVATIONS • The accelerated HRTF bonding and bi-furcated credit structure improves financial feasibility • Scenarios that do not work within the 2040 FCLRTP as Adopted by the HRTPO – SEIS Plan of Finance Alt B-1 & B-2 can be completed as well as HRB II by 2040 to keep constrained, other approved 2040 FCLRTP projects are impacted – SEIS Plan of Finance Alt C includes project components that are outside of HRTAC’s scope – SEIS Plan of Finance Alt D, the complete HCP can not be completed by 2040, but some segments can with impacts to the approved 2040 FCLRTP 11

  12. HRTAC A LTERNATIVE A NALYSIS O BSERVATIONS • Scenarios that work within the 2040 FCLRTP as Adopted by the HRTPO – SEIS Plan of Finance Alt A Modified as proposed delivers HRBT, HRB II and Bowers Hill (added), Ft. Eustis Boulevard Interchange, and 460/58/13. can be completed under the approved 2040 FCLRTP without impact to other projects – SEIS Plan of Finance Alt B-3 as proposed delivers HRBT, HRB II and Bowers Hill (added), Ft. Eustis Interchange, and 460/58/13. The second segment of Alternative B, I-564 Connector/VA 164 is delivered by 2048 (with HOT tolls) and 2052 (no HOT tolls) following further project development 12

  13. HRTAC A NALYSIS - SEIS A LTERNATIVE A M ODIFIED , 2040 FCLRTP WITH HRBT AS ‘H ARBOR C ROSSING P ROJECT P HASE I’ - B OWERS H ILL A DDED C ONCURRENT WITH H IGH R ISE B RIDGE P HASE II – S EPTEMBER 2016 A NALYSIS Funded by 2040 FCLRTP Approved HRBT Bower's Hill Ft. Eustis Total FV Funded by Funded by Funded by HRB II Rt 460/58/13 Other Pay- Projects (seg. 8&9) Interchange Interchange Cost HRTF Bonds Toll Bonds HRTF Pay-Go Go 2040 FCLRTP with HOT Inflated Costs (MM) $1,576 $4,031 $1,493 $568 $368 $297 $8,333 $4,912 $347 $2,324 $750 Fiscally Constrained 2022 2024 2031 2031 2035 2035 Construction End Year 2040 FCLRTP without HOT Inflated Costs (MM) $1,576 $4,131 $1,529 $583 $368 $297 $8,484 $5,500 $2,234 $750 Fiscally Constrained 2022 2025 2032 2032 2035 2035 Construction End Year • HRBT is the only Harbor Crossing component in Alternative A • Alt A can be completed under the approved 2040 FCLRTP without impact to other projects • HRBT, HRB II/Bowers Hill Interchange, the Rt 460/58/13 and the Ft. Eustis Boulevard Interchange can all be completed within 2040 FCLRTP 13

  14. HRTAC A NALYSIS – A LTERNATIVE B-3 – 2040 FCLRTP WITH HRBT AS FIRST OF TWO C OMPONENTS OF ‘H ARBOR C ROSSING P ROJECT P HASE I’ - B OWERS H ILL A DDED C ONCURRENT WITH H IGH R ISE B RIDGE P HASE II – S EPTEMBER 2016 A NALYSIS I-564 Funded by Approved HRBT Bower's Hill Ft. Eustis VA 164 Total FV Funded by Funded by Funded by 2040 FCLRTP HRB II Rt 460/58/13 Connectors Other Pay- Projects (seg. 8&9) Interchange Interchange (seg. 13&14) Cost HRTF Bonds Toll Bonds HRTF Pay-Go (seg. 10&12) Go 2040 FCLRTP with HOT Inflated Costs (MM) $1,576 $4,031 $1,493 $568 $368 $297 $8,333 $4,912 $347 $2,324 $750 Fiscally Constrained 2022 2024 2031 2031 2035 2035 Construction End Year 2040 FCLRTP without HOT Inflated Costs (MM) $1,576 $4,131 $1,529 $583 $368 $297 $8,484 $5,500 $2,234 $750 Fiscally Constrained 2022 2025 2032 2032 2035 2035 Construction End Year 2040 Vision I-564 Funded by Approved HRBT Bower's Hill Ft. Eustis VA 164 Total FV Funded by Funded by Funded by HRB II Rt 460/58/13 Connectors Other Pay- Projects (seg. 8&9) Interchange Interchange (seg. 13&14) Cost HRTF Bonds Toll Bonds HRTF Pay-Go Plan (seg. 10&12) Go Post 2040 vision plan with HOT Inflated Costs (MM) $6,315 $1,214 Fiscally Constrained $7,529 $4,448 $1,716 $1,365 2048 2048 Construction End Year Post 2040 vision plan without HOT Inflated Costs (MM) $6,971 $1,341 $8,312 $5,356 $1,510 $1,447 Fiscally Constrained 2052 2052 Construction End Year • HRBT, HRB II/Bowers Hill Interchange, the Rt 460/58/13 and the Ft. Eustis Boulevard Interchange can all be completed within the 2040 FCLRTP. • In the HOT version, a cash injection of $2.9 billion in the 2033/34 time frame from federal grants, state grants, private equity, or other non-HRTAC sources could accelerate the I-564/VA164 project to a 2040 completion. Further study is needed to determine if excess project toll revenue (after TIFIA debt service) will support returns on private equity near the amount of cash injection needed. 14

  15. H AMPTON R OADS B ELTWAY PM P EAK H OUR C ONGESTION , J UNE 2016 Source: RITIS using INRIX data. 15

  16. Programmed for Construction HOV to HOT I-64/I-264 Interchange I-64 Southside/ High-Rise Bridge 16 Source: RITIS using INRIX data.

  17. Programmed for Construction Under Study HOV to HOT I-64/I-264 Interchange US 460/58/13 Connector I-64 Southside/ High-Rise Bridge HOV to HOT – Segment 2 17 Source: RITIS using INRIX data.

  18. HRCS SEIS Alternative A Programmed for Construction Under Study HRCS SEIS Alternative A and Bowers Hill HOV to HOT I-64/I-264 Bowers Hill Interchange US 460/58/13 Connector I-64 Southside/ High-Rise Bridge HOV to HOT – Segment 2 18 Source: RITIS using INRIX data.

  19. Alternative A Programmed for Construction Under Study Remaining Segments of HRCS SEIS Alternative D Alternative A and Bowers Hill Remaining Segments of Alternative D HOV to HOT I-64/I-264 Bowers Hill Interchange US 460/58/13 Connector I-64 Southside/ High-Rise Bridge HOV to HOT – Segment 2 19 Source: RITIS using INRIX data.

  20. R EGIONAL P ROJECTS : F ISCAL -C ONSTRAINT YEAR PROJECT YOE COST ($M) 2018-2022 I-64 Peninsula – Segments 1, 2, and 3 $624 2019-2021 I-64/I-264 Interchange – Phases I & II $347 2020 I-64 Southside/High-Rise Bridge – Phase I $600 2019 US 460/58/13 Connector – PE $5 2024 HRBT $4,031 2031 I-64 Southside/High-Rise Bridge – Phase II $1,493 2031 Bowers Hill Interchange $568 2035 US 460/58/13 Connector $368 2035 I-64/Fort Eustis Blvd Interchange $297 I-564/I-664 Connectors (Patriots) Vision Plan I-664/MMMBT VA 164/164 Connector 20

Recommend


More recommend