governments aid agencies and insurance companies to
play

governments, aid agencies, and insurance companies to protect - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

What flood event map accuracy is required to enable governments, aid agencies, and insurance companies to protect vulnerable lives and livelihoods? Beth Tellman @cloud2street Sam Weber, Jeff Ho, Jon Sullivan, Bessie Schwarz, Colin Doyle


  1. What flood event map accuracy is required to enable governments, aid agencies, and insurance companies to protect vulnerable lives and livelihoods? Beth Tellman @cloud2street Sam Weber, Jeff Ho, Jon Sullivan, Bessie Schwarz, Colin Doyle @cloud2street

  2. Exponential increase in earth observing satellites Finer et al 2018 @cloud2street

  3. Microsats, drones and the imagery revolution ICEYE (1m, SAR) Drone capture: Houston, 2017 @cloud2street

  4. Urban Flooding- Sentinel-1 (10m) vs. Skysat (80cm) March 23, Biera @cloud2street

  5. Flood map science to decisions Map Cloud to Street + repository, other boundary orgs dashboard (ICIMOD, CEMADEN, UN-SPIDER, or volunteer ARC… etc .pdf and .tiff Algorithm Code Data to published available decision Flood protection pipeline decision from flood map @cloud2street

  6. Data to decision pipeline- Flood Monitoring in the Republic of Congo https://congo-flood-monitoring.cloudtostreet.info/recent-data Groundtruthing through field agents, the news, the community or social media Locally-optimized flood detection, with maps fused into one Automated AI and physics based algorithms in the cloud Interactive web portal + WhatsApp alerts @cloud2street

  7. Are the existing algorithms to extract surface water good enough to enable flood protection? For whom? Well...that depends... @cloud2street

  8. Agenda 1. How remote sensors measure accuracy and why it doesn’t work for making decisions from flood maps 2. For whom are we (or should be!) measuring accuracy? 3. A framework and proposed methods to make science usable for the people who make flood resilience decisions @cloud2street

  9. Typical Remote Sensing Accuracy Assessment - made for land change maps that Confusion Matrix don’t have clouds -random stratified sample overestimates accuracy -Critical Success Index biased towards overestimating flood models (Stephens et al 2015) -biased towards LARGE slow moving long duration floods @cloud2street

  10. Which satellite can enable affordable insurance products PlanetScope Sentinel-1 A&B @cloud2street

  11. Planetscope Sentinel-1 Low Flood High Backscatter @cloud2street

  12. Photos from field staff collecting ground control points @cloud2street

  13. 5-15% accuracy difference between ground points and random stratified sample method @cloud2street

  14. PlanetScope as high as 86%, Sentinel-1 80%, TerraSAR StripScan 81% CLOUDS, REVISIT TIME, IGNORED

  15. Why isn’t the accuracy of these maps (72% & 80%) as high as it is in the publication (89%- Chini et al 2017)? -publication bias towards good maps, low sample sizes -biased towards the biggest (EASIEST) floods to map -wide ranging regional variability...rarely tested @cloud2street

  16. Global Flood Database: 896 high quality floods at 250m resolution 2000-2017 (83% accuracy) @cloud2street

  17. Global Flood Database variance in event accuracy and “quality” Mapped ”well” at peak - Using MODIS DFO algorithm Failed quality control (Brakenridge and Anderson 2006) @cloud2street

  18. Remote Sensing to Flood Model Accuracy Assessment -CSI .4-.7 is that good enough for...? Bernhofen et al 2018 @cloud2street

  19. Comparing Events (Nile, 1998 flood) to Global Flood Models - CSI consistently low (.11) even when ranging flood return times from 25- 1000… -global flood models miss this flooding pattern in the Nile http://eastern-nile-flood-database.appspot.com/ @cloud2street

  20. Abidjan, Ivory Coast, 2016 https://abidjan.cloudtostreet.info @cloud2street

  21. Abidjan, Ivory Coast, 2016 https://abidjan.cloudtostreet.info @cloud2street

  22. They [Insert Development Agency Here] say the same thing each time...The maps have holes. Coverage- does the area we can’t see matter? Did we catch the peak flood? @cloud2street

  23. For whom are we (or should be!) measuring accuracy? Kettner, A.J., Schumann, G.J.-P., Tellman, B., 2019. The push toward local flood risk assessment at a global scale, Eos, 100, DOI:10.1029/2019EO113857. 2018 NASA Flood Risk Meeting @cloud2street

  24. @cloud2street

  25. Users want- daily data, but require different spatial resolutions @cloud2street

  26. Disaster cycle to decision horizon Insurers & Emergency Managers Development Agencies • Predict the size and • damage of a flood Risk mapping, affordable Prepare Forecast catastrophe insurance • Early warning and evacuation The Disaster Flood Cycle Humanitarians, Governments Insurers Recover Respond • Near-real time map of • Map of communities floods hardest hit Target recovery programs Release aid in 24 hours @cloud2street

  27. Disaster cycle to decision horizon Users: 5 qualities of flood maps Recovery personnel (respond) ● Event accuracy Land use planners, engineers (prepare) ● Temporal consistency Insurers (prepare, recovery) ● Spatial resolution Emergency managers (forecast) ● Spatial completeness ● Speed Citizens (respond, prepare, recover) Scientists (Model/calibrate) Forecast Recover Respond Respond Model/calibrate Prepare months days years TIME @cloud2street

  28. Forecast Recover Respond Respond Model/calibrate Prepare months days years TIME @cloud2street

  29. Forecast Recover Respond Respond Model/calibrate Prepare months days years TIME @cloud2street

  30. Forecast Recover Respond Respond Model/calibrate Prepare months days years TIME @cloud2street

  31. spatial completeness event accuracy prepare temporal consistency spatial resolution Forecast Recover Respond Respond Model/calibrate Prepare months days years TIME @cloud2street

  32. Forecast Recover Respond Respond Model/calibrate Prepare months days years TIME @cloud2street

  33. Two main types of accuracy mapped onto decision time horizon/users Events Consistency Forecast Recover Respond Respond Model/calibrate Prepare months days years TIME @cloud2street

  34. Single “event” accuracy 1.Go beyond weighted stratified random sample,CSI, 2. Focus on CRITICAL OBJECTS for users: (crops, assets, population centers, roads) and report their accuracy 3. Assess representativeness of “peak” flood uncertainty based on sensor visibility and known issues (e.g. flooded vegetation in SAR-blind spots) @cloud2street

  35. Assess if “peak event” is captured Flood map overlain on Flood confidence map MODIS image, Indonesia MODIS B C Willis Re- needs 80% accuracy or higher to calibrate their models @cloud2street

  36. Temporal Consistency insurers forecasters Land use planners citizens Insurers (recovery) responders modelers Single Map Accuracy @cloud2street

  37. consistency graph max 1. Select 50-100 Object correctness critical floodable objects 2. For each object, determine “ floodability ” Rainy season @cloud2street

  38. consistency graph max Object correctness Missed due to clouds Algorithm Error Correct Rainy season @cloud2street

  39. Spatial Completeness for Events Bigger Only small All events events map and only map well better big map completeness well completeness completeness Event magnitude Event magnitude Event magnitude @cloud2street

  40. Congo refugee relocation Sometimes there is no magic metric when expert opinion is the only option @cloud2street

  41. Flood risk concern at new refugee sites

  42. Makotipoko: Historical risk and modeled flood risk Where does it flood in the most common type of event? (1 in 25 years) Town outline There’s also high risk based on data we Areas of Makotipoko have have from six flood models(Trigg et al., tended to flood in the last 30 2016), and also high certainty of this risk years. (i.e., multiple models agree). congo-flood-monitoring.cloudtostreet.info/ 2/10

  43. Mopongo: Historical risk and modeled flood risk Where does it flood in the most common type of event? (1 in 25 years) Town outline However, the flood models indicate We did not observe historical medium risk and medium certainty of flooding in Mopongo. that risk. congo-flood-monitoring.cloudtostreet.info/ 3/10

  44. Relocating refugees with flood maps/models Risk Certainty 1. Makotipoko: we recommend moving the asylum High High seekers 2. Mopongo: consider moving the asylum seekers if Medium Medium possible 3. Mpouya: consider moving asylum seekers if Medium Medium possible Medium to Low Low 4. Bouemba: results are too uncertain to recommend moving the asylum-seekers The Global Flood models we are using may identify areas that are likely to flood, but they could miss other areas and so are not useful for identifying “safe” areas. Unfortunately, this problem is largest in places like Republic of the Congo where elevation data is poor and dense forest vegetation influences model results. Therefore, we cannot provide a recommendation as to which areas would be safe for them to move. Dr. Mark Trigg, who has worked on this reach of the Congo river, said local knowledge of past flooding will be most useful for determining safer zones for each location and that communities can usually identify those areas. congo-flood-monitoring.cloudtostreet.info 1/10

Recommend


More recommend