giovanni gianelli istituto di geoscienze e georisorse
play

Giovanni Gianelli ISTITUTO DI GEOSCIENZE E GEORISORSE INSTITUTE OF - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Giovanni Gianelli ISTITUTO DI GEOSCIENZE E GEORISORSE INSTITUTE OF GEOSCIENCES AND EARTH RESOURCES DEEP SEATED UNCONVENTIONAL GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES IN TUSCANY More and m ore steam from Larderello Larderello/ Travale Steam production


  1. Giovanni Gianelli ISTITUTO DI GEOSCIENZE E GEORISORSE INSTITUTE OF GEOSCIENCES AND EARTH RESOURCES

  2. DEEP SEATED UNCONVENTIONAL GEOTHERMAL RESOURCES IN TUSCANY

  3. More and m ore steam from Larderello

  4. Larderello/ Travale Steam production history Total production history of the Larderello and Travale/Radicondoli fields 1200 1100 1000 900 800 Flow-rate [kg/s] 700 600 500 8 new units w ith a capacity 400 8 new units w ith a capacity in the range 1 0 - 6 0 MW in the range 1 0 - 6 0 MW 300 started up in the year 2 0 0 2 started up in the year 2 0 0 2 200 100 0 1919 1923 1927 1931 1935 1939 1943 1947 1951 1955 1959 1963 1967 1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 Years

  5. Larderello –Travale Geothermal Area

  6. Features of The Geothermal System High amplitude reflectors Granite (age 0.7 to 3.8 m.y.)

  7. GRANITE CAN BE A RESERVOIR Cataclastic granite with hydrothermal alteration Core sample of 3570 m depth

  8. Seismic Data

  9. Deep Reservoir (3-3.5 km depth) producing super-heated steam 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 500 -500 -1000 -1500 -2000 -2500 -3000 -3500 Sea level

  10. TEMPERATURE vs. DEPTH -3500 -3000 -2500 -2000 -1500 -1000 -500 Sea level 500 400 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0

  11. Same Fluid from the Shallow and Deep Reservoir Rocks The composition of the geothermal fluid is remarkably constant: isotopic imprint characteristic of a meteoric origin, same gas/steam ratio (5wt% of gas, mostly CO 2 ) in all drillholes and different reservoir composition (from Mesozoic dolostone to granite). This almost constant composition of the fluid, over a drilled area of approximately 400 km 2 , supports the hypothesis of the presence of a giant reservoir. Rock permeability is due to fracturing.

  12. Structural Setting 1

  13. Structural Setting 2

  14. Contact Metamorphism • At Larderello the deepest geologic units (approximately 4 km depth) consist of granite and metamorphic rocks • Evidence of hydrothermal alteration in granite and wall rocks indicates fluid circulation at high temperature and pressures

  15. a)-b) garnet micaschist c) amphibolite d) a Hydrothermal K-feldspar and epidote e) quartz- tourmaline vein b c e

  16. CONTACT METAMORPHIC AUREOLE Pressure conditions at the top of the granite: 80- 120 MPa, defined by the presence of late-Alpine andalusite, biotite and cordierite at 2.5-4 km depth and an uplift rate of 0.2 mm/y •Temperature conditions from 400 to more than 600°C, on the basis of mineral assemblages

  17. Examples of CMR-1

  18. Contact Metamorphism of Carbonates-1 Pyroxene, phlogopite anhydrite marble Selva 4A 3370 m

  19. Contact Metamorphism of Carbonates-2 Kink banding and deformation lamellae in a pyroxene Selva 4A 3370 m anhydrite-rich layer in a silicate marble

  20. P-T Fluid Evolution

  21. CONCLUSIONS • The fluid evolved from early magmatic- metamorphic conditions to a late-stage hydrothermal circulation characterised by fluid of meteoric origin (H horizon). • A deep-seated fluid, with magmatic to metamorphic connotations and supercritical characteristics likely exists within the K horizon.

  22. Amiata

  23. Depth of K horizon at Mt Amiata

  24. 0 m b.g.l. Volcanites Stratigraphy Neogenic Sediments Transgression Surface Ligurian flysch Tectonic Surface Tuscan Nappe 1000 m b.g.l. Verrucano Formation A Formation B Formation A 2000 m b.g.l. Formation C 3000 m b.g.l.

  25. Cross section Amiata

  26. 400 300 Measured Temperature (° C) PC30 200 PC30A 100 0 0 1000 2000 3000 4000 Depth (m b.g.l.)

  27. Hydrothermal alteration

  28. Hydrothermal and contact metamorphic minerals

  29. PERMEABILITY Hydraulic and tectonic fracturing can enhance permeability of rocks with very low porosity

  30. Fluid inclusions and present day fluid

  31. Model Mt. Amiata METAMORPHIC FLUIDS INTERACTION WITH SALINE Tmax 220 °C FLUIDS Tmax 160 °C (EVAPORITES DISSOLUTION?) ? T=300-330 °C T=300-360 °C METAMORPHIC COOLING FRAGMENTS FLUIDS SALINE TWO-MICA BOILING FLUIDS GRANITE T>500 °C HEAT SOURCE MAGMA CHAMBER ? GRANITIC BODY ? 5-6 KM T = 820 °C

  32. Future research work ? Prediction of the duration of the geothermal resource, and the extension at depth of the reservoir, are the most challenging scientific goals. It is important to characterise the deepest geological units and understand if fluid exists in rocks near a quasi-plastic state, and can be exploited.

  33. High strain rate values (10 -12 sec -1 ) for the geothermal areas, Fournier (1991). Such high values can derive from: 1) emplacement of shallow magmatic intrusions, Mt Amiata, Acocella, 2000); 2) fluid overpressures within pre-existing fractures and faults, whose orientation is favorable for their re- opening (Gianelli, 1994)

  34. At approximately 100 MPa and 600-650°C (the conditions of the K-horizon at Larderello), the fluid is a L+V saline brine or a supercritical fluid, depending on salinity

  35. CONCLUSIONS Laboratory experiments (Hashida et al., 2001; Tsuchiya et al., 2001) show that, at approximately 25-50 MPa at 400-600 °C, granite can still permit the circulation of a supercritical fluid through unhealed microfractures. The main problem is to understand the mechanical behaviour of the rocks at the high temperatures in correspondence of the deep seismic reflector (K). Geophysical data are so far supported by relatively scarce geological data. Collection and analysis of more core samples is necessary to assess the deep-seated, possibly supercritical, geothermal resource.

  36. WELL DESIGN FOR A DEEP SCIENTIFIC DRILLING AT LARDERELLO (June 1999) •A well of approximately 5 km to explore the deep seismic reflector “K”

  37. COST OF THE PROJECT ATTIVITA' COSTI (ML) ESEC ANN0 1° ANN0 2° ANN0 3° ANN0 4° ANN0 5° OGS T1 T2 T3 T4 T1 T2 T3 T4 T1 T2 T3 T4 T1 T2 T3 T4 T1 T2 T3 T4 TOTALE CNR ENEL GEOLOGIA/PETROGRAFIA/GEOCHIMICA 2727 2127 600 0 CNR/ ENEL RIELABORAZIONE DATI 1245 1045 200 0 CNR/ENEL MESSA A PUNTO METODOLOGIE DI ANALISI 1082 1082 0 0 CNR GEOLOGIA DI CANTIERE 0 0 280 0 ENEL ANALISI DI LABORATORIO 0 0 120 0 ENEL GEOFISICA 5908 772 1706 3020 CNR/ ENEL/ OGS RIELABORAZIONE DATI 923 240 513 170 CNR/ENEL/OGS ACQUISIZIONE NUOVI DATI (FASE PRE- DRILLING 4575 532 1193 2850 CNR/ENEL/OGS PETROFISICA 594 355 239 0 CNR/ ENEL MESSA A PUNTO METODOLOGIE MISURA 220 120 100 0 CNR/ENEL MISURE DI LABORATORIO(PRE-DRILLING) 54 0 54 0 ENEL MISURE DI LABORATORIO (WHILE-DRILLING) 320 235 85 0 CNR/ENEL MISURE IN POZZO 2422 0 2422 0 ENEL/ OGS RIELABORAZIONE DATI 50 0 50 0 ENEL/OGS APPLICAZIONI SPERIMENTALI(PRE-DRILLING) 200 0 200 0 ENEL/OGS MESSA A PUNTO NUOVI SISTEMI MISURA H.T. 300 0 300 0 ENEL/OGS ACQUISIZIONE&ELABORAZIONE LOGS 1872 0 1872 0 ENEL/OGS PERFORAZIONE 24000 0 24000 0 ENEL INDAGINI PRELIMINARI DEFINIZIONE ACCORDI DI COLLABORAZIONE RIPRISTINO POZZO DOLMI 4 COSTRUZIONE POZZO PROFONDO WELL TESTING 725 0 725 0 ENEL MODELLAZIONE DEL SERBATOIO 400 200 200 0 CNR/ ENEL INTERPRETAZIONE DATI 1583 723 450 410 CNR/ ENEL/ OGS TOTALE 38660 4177 30642 3840

Recommend


More recommend