geometry to contemporary architecture
play

Geometry to Contemporary Architecture Helmut Pottmann Vienna - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

GEOMETRIE The Contribution of Discrete Differential Geometry to Contemporary Architecture Helmut Pottmann Vienna University of Technology, Austria 1 Project in Seoul, Hadid Architects GEOMETRIE 2 Lilium Tower Warsaw, Hadid Architects


  1. GEOMETRIE The Contribution of Discrete Differential Geometry to Contemporary Architecture Helmut Pottmann Vienna University of Technology, Austria 1

  2. Project in Seoul, Hadid Architects GEOMETRIE 2

  3. Lilium Tower Warsaw, Hadid Architects GEOMETRIE 3

  4. Project in Baku, Hadid Architects GEOMETRIE 4

  5. Discrete Surfaces in Architecture GEOMETRIE triangle meshes 5

  6. Zlote Tarasy, Warsaw GEOMETRIE Waagner-Biro Stahlbau AG 6 Chapter 19 - Discrete Freeform Structures 6

  7. Visible mesh quality GEOMETRIE 7

  8. Geometry in architecture GEOMETRIE  The underlying geometry representation may greatly contribute to the aesthetics and has to meet manufacturing constraints  Different from typical graphics applications 8

  9. GEOMETRIE 9

  10. nodes in the support structure GEOMETRIE  triangle mesh: generically nodes of valence 6; `torsion´: central planes of beams not co-axial torsion-free node 10

  11. quad meshes in architecture GEOMETRIE Schlaich Bergermann  hippo house, Berlin Zoo  quad meshes with planar faces (PQ meshes) are preferable over triangle meshes (cost, weight, node complexity,…) 11

  12. GEOMETRIE Discrete Surfaces in Architecture Helmut Pottmann 1 , Johannes Wallner 2 , Alexander Bobenko 3 Yang Liu 4 , Wenping Wang 4 1 TU Wien 2 TU Graz 3 TU Berlin 4 University of Hong Kong 12

  13. Previous work 13

  14. Previous work GEOMETRIE  Difference geometry (Sauer, 1970)  Quad meshes with planar faces (PQ meshes) discretize conjugate curve networks. Example 2: principal Example 1: translational net curvature lines 14

  15. PQ meshes GEOMETRIE  A PQ strip in a PQ mesh is a discrete model of a tangent developable surface.  Differential geometry tells us: PQ meshes are discrete versions of conjugate curve networks 15

  16. Previous work GEOMETRIE  Discrete Differential Geometry:  Bobenko & Suris, 2005: integrable systems  circular meshes: discretization of the network of principal curvature lines (R. Martin et al. 1986) 16

  17. Computing PQ meshes 17

  18. Computational Approach GEOMETRIE  Computation of a PQ mesh is based on a nonlinear optimization algorithm:  Optimization criteria  planarity of faces  aesthetics (fairness of mesh polygons)  proximity to a given reference surface  Requires initial mesh: ideal if taken from a conjugate curve network. 18

  19. subdivision & optimization GEOMETRIE  Refine a coarse PQ mesh by repeated application of subdivision and PQ optimization PQ meshes via Catmull-Clark subdivision and PQ optimization 19

  20. Opus (Hadid Architects) GEOMETRIE 20

  21. Opus (Hadid Architects) GEOMETRIE 21

  22. OPUS (Hadid Architects) GEOMETRIE 22

  23. Conical Meshes 23

  24. Conical meshes GEOMETRIE  Liu et al. 06  Another discrete counterpart of network of principal curvature lines  PQ mesh is conical if all vertices of valence 4 are conical: incident oriented face planes are tangent to a right circular cone 24

  25. Conical meshes GEOMETRIE  Cone axis: discrete surface normal  Offsetting all face planes by constant distance yields conical mesh with the same set of discrete normals 25

  26. Offset meshes GEOMETRIE 26

  27. Offset meshes GEOMETRIE 27

  28. Offset meshes GEOMETRIE 28

  29. Offset meshes GEOMETRIE 29

  30. normals of a conical mesh GEOMETRIE  neighboring discrete normals are coplanar  conical mesh has a discretely orthogonal support structure 30

  31. Multilayer constructions GEOMETRIE 31

  32. Computing conical meshes GEOMETRIE  angle criterion  add angle criterion to PQ optimization  alternation with subdivision as design tool 32

  33. subdivision-based design GEOMETRIE combination of Catmull-Clark subdivision and conical optimization; design: Benjamin Schneider 33

  34. design by Benjamin Schneider GEOMETRIE 34

  35. Mesh Parallelism and Nodes 35

  36. supporting beam layout GEOMETRIE  beams : prismatic, symmetric with respect to a plane  optimal node (i.e. without torsion): central planes of beams pass through node axis  Existence of a parallel mesh whose vertices lie on the node axes geometric support structure 36

  37. Parallel meshes GEOMETRIE M M*  meshes M , M* with planar faces are parallel if they are combinatorially equivalent and corresponding edges are parallel 37

  38. Geometric support structure GEOMETRIE  Connects two parallel meshes M, M* 38

  39. Computing a supporting beam layout GEOMETRIE  given M , construct a beam layout  find parallel mesh S which approximates a sphere  solution of a linear system  initialization not required 39

  40. Triangle meshes GEOMETRIE  Parallel triangle meshes are scaled versions of each other  Triangle meshes possess a support structure with torsion free nodes only if they represent a nearly spherical shape 40

  41. Triangle Meshes – beam layout with optimized nodes • We can minimize torsion in the supporting beam layout for triangle meshes 41

  42. Mesh optimization • Project YAS island (Asymptote, Gehry Technologies, Schlaich Bergermann, Waagner Biro, …) 42

  43. Mesh smoothing • Project YAS island (quad mesh with nonplanar faces) 43

  44. Mesh smoothing • Project YAS island (quad mesh with nonplanar faces) 44

  45. Optimized nodes • Torsion minimization also works for quadrilateral meshes with nonplanar faces 45

  46. Optimized nodes • Torsion minimization also works for quadrilateral meshes with nonplanar faces 46

  47. YAS project, mockup 47

  48. Offset meshes 48

  49. node geometry GEOMETRIE Employing beams of constant height: misalignment on one side 49

  50. Cleanest nodes GEOMETRIE  Perfect alignment on both sides if a mesh with edge offsets is used 50

  51. Cleanest nodes GEOMETRIE 51

  52. Offset meshes GEOMETRIE at constant distance d from M is  called an offset of M .  different types, depending on the definition of  vertex offsets :  edge offsets : distance of corresponding (parallel) edges is constant = d  face offsets : distance of corresponding faces (parallel planes) is constant = d 52

  53. Exact offsets GEOMETRIE  For offset pair define Gauss image  Then:  vertex offsets vertices of S lie in S 2 (if M quad mesh, then circular mesh )  edge offsets edges of S are tangent to S 2  face offsets face planes of S are tangent to S 2 ( M is a conical mesh ) 53

  54. Meshes with edge offsets 54

  55. Edge offset meshes GEOMETRIE  M has edge offsets iff it is parallel to a mesh S whose edges are tangent to S 2 55

  56. Koebe polyhedra GEOMETRIE  Meshes with planar faces and edges tangent to S 2 have a beautiful geometry; known as Koebe polyhedra . Closed Koebe polyhedra defined by their combinatorics up to a Möbius transform  computable as minimum of a convex function (Bobenko and Springborn) 56

  57. vertex cones GEOMETRIE  Edges emanating from a vertex in an EO mesh are contained in a cone of revolution whose axis serves as node axis.  Simplifies the construction of the support structure 57

  58. Laguerre geometry GEOMETRIE  Laguerre geometry is the geometry of oriented planes and oriented spheres in Euclidean 3- space.  L-trafo preserves or. planes, or. spheres and contact; simple example: offsetting operation  or. cones of revolution are objects of Laguerre geometry (envelope of planes tangent to two spheres)  If we view an EO mesh as collection of vertex cones, an L-trafo maps an EO mesh M to an EO mesh . 58

  59. Example: discrete CMC surface M (hexagonal EO mesh) and Laguerre transform M ´ GEOMETRIE 59

  60. Hexagonal EO mesh GEOMETRIE 60

  61. Planar hexagonal panels GEOMETRIE Planar hexagons  non-convex in negatively curved areas  Phex mesh layout largely unsolved  initial results by Y. Liu and W. Wang 61

  62. Single curved panels, ruled panels and semi-discrete representations 62

  63. developable surfaces in architecture GEOMETRIE  (nearly) developable surfaces F. Gehry, Guggenheim Museum, Bilbao 63

  64. surfaces in architecture GEOMETRIE single curved panels 64

  65. D-strip models GEOMETRIE One-directional limit of a PQ mesh: developable strip model (D-strip model) semi-discrete surface representation 65

  66. Principal strip models I GEOMETRIE Circular strip model as limit of a circular mesh 66

  67. Principal strip models II GEOMETRIE Conical strip model as limit of a conical mesh 67

  68. Principal strip models III GEOMETRIE Conversion: conical model to circular model 68

  69. Conical strip model GEOMETRIE 69

  70. Conical strip model GEOMETRIE 70

  71. Multi-layer structure GEOMETRIE D-strip model on top of a PQ mesh 71

  72. Project in Cagliari, Hadid Architects

  73. Approximation by ruled surface strips 73

  74. Semi-discrete model: smooth union of ruled strips 74

  75. Circle packings on surfaces M. Höbinger 75

  76. Project in Budapest, Hadid Architects GEOMETRIE 76

  77. Selfridges, Birmingham GEOMETRIE Architects: Future Systems 77

  78. Optimization based on triangulation GEOMETRIE 78

Recommend


More recommend