section 2 1
play

Section 2.1 Material in these slides is taken from the following - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Section 2.1 Material in these slides is taken from the following text: Contemporary Mathematics: Contemporary Mathematics at Nebraska by Michelle Homp, Alyssa Seideman, and Sean Gravelle It is available online at


  1. Section 2.1 Material in these slides is taken from the following text: Contemporary Mathematics: Contemporary Mathematics at Nebraska by Michelle Homp, Alyssa Seideman, and Sean Gravelle It is available online at https://mathbooks.unl.edu/Contemporary/index.html

  2. [ do questions 1,2 in the workbook ]

  3. Observational Study ● So far, we have primarily discussed observational studies: studies in which conclusions would be drawn from observations of a sample or the population.

  4. Experiments ● In contrast, it is common to use experiments when exploring how subjects react to an outside influence. In an experiment, some kind of treatment is applied to the subjects and the results are measured and recorded. By applying some treatment to the subjects, the researchers are controlling one of the variables, which does not occur in an observational study.

  5. Example Experiments ● A pharmaceutical company tests a new medicine for treating Alzheimers disease by administering the drug to 50 elderly patients with recent diagnoses. The treatment here is the new drug. ● A gym tests out a new weight loss program by enlisting 30 volunteers to try out the program. The treatment here is the new program. ● You test a new kitchen cleaner by buying a bottle and cleaning your kitchen. The new cleaner is the treatment. ● A psychology researcher explores the effect of music on temperament by measuring peoples temperament while listening to different types of music. The music is the treatment.

  6. Which is Which? ● The weights of 30 randomly selected people are measured. ● Subjects are asked to do 20 jumping jacks, and then their heart rates are measured. ● Twenty people are told to drink coffee and twenty are told to drink tea. They are then given a concentration test. ● Researchers survey 100 students, asking whether they drink coffee or tea. They then give these 100 people a concentration test.

  7. Which is Which? ● The weights of 30 randomly selected people are measured. [Observational study] ● Subjects are asked to do 20 jumping jacks, and then their heart rates are measured. [Experiment; the treatment is the jumping jacks] ● Twenty people are told to drink coffee and twenty are told to drink tea. They are then given a concentration test. [Experiment; the treatments are coffee and tea] ● Researchers survey 100 students, asking whether they drink coffee or tea. They then give these 100 people a concentration test. [Observational study]

  8. Experiments vs Observational Studies ● Experiments can often yield more robust results than observational studies. ● Observational studies are sometimes necessary for ethical or logistical reasons. – For example, suppose researches are studying the effects of smoking. They could not ethically ask an experimental group to start smoking, so they would have to perform an observational study instead. ● Cause and effect conclusions can only be drawn from experiments!

  9. Experiments vs Observational Studies ● Consider the previous example and suppose that people who smoked were more likely to have lung cancer. The researchers CANNOT conclude that smoking causes lung cancer. Smoking Lung Cancer

  10. Experiments vs Observational Studies ● Consider the previous example and suppose that people who smoked were more likely to have lung cancer. The researchers CANNOT conclude that smoking causes lung cancer. Genetics Maybe there was a genetic reason that people were both prone to smoking and to getting Smoking Lung Cancer lung cancer

  11. Correlation ● The tendency for two values or variables to change together, in either the same or opposite way. (Definition from wordnik.com) ● Not the same as causation! – In the previous example, (where we said that for sake of example, genetics cause both a tendency to smoke and a risk for lung cancer) smoking was correlated with lung cancer, but was not the cause of lung cancer. (Note this is an example and we are not making any real genetic or medical claims.) ● There are a number of reasons that variables can be correlated, causation is just one...

  12. Correlation: Coincidence Image from http://tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations

  13. Correlation: Confounding ● Confounding occurs when there are two potential variables that could have caused the outcome, and it is not possible to determine which actually caused the result. – Researchers conduct an experiment to determine whether students will perform better on an arithmetic test if they listen to music during the test. They first give the student a test without music, then give a similar test while the student listens to music. In this case, the student might perform better on the second test, regardless of the music, simply because it was the second test and they were warmed up.

  14. Example of Confounding ● Consider a researcher attempting to assess the effectiveness of drug X, from population data in which drug usage was a patient's choice. The data shows that gender (Z) differences influence a patient's choice of drug as well as their chances of recovery (Y). In this scenario, gender Z confounds the relation between X and Y since Z is a cause of both X and Y: Example from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confounding

  15. Example of Confounding ● Data shows that gender (Z) differences influence a patient's choice of drug as well as their chances of recovery (Y). In this scenario, gender Z confounds the relation between X and Y since Z is a cause of both X and Y: Example from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confounding

  16. Experiments: Control and Treatment Groups ● In some experiments the participants are divided into two or more groups, typically a control group and a treatment group . The treatment group receives the treatment being tested; the control group does not receive the treatment. ● This allows for the possibility of drawing the conclusion that the treatment caused an observed difference between the groups. – If the participants were randomized between the groups, variables other than the treatment should be consistent between the groups.

  17. [ back to workbook ]

  18. [ extra slides ]

  19. Correlation: Coincidence Image from http://tylervigen.com/spurious-correlations

  20. Correlation: Causation (?) Image from xkcd.com/523/

  21. Correlation: Causation (?) Image from xkcd.com/523/

  22. Correlation: Causation (?) Image from xkcd.com/523/

  23. Correlation: Causation (?) Image from xkcd.com/552/

  24. Correlation: Causation (?) Image from xkcd.com/552/

  25. Correlation: Causation (?) Image from xkcd.com/552/

  26. Correlation: Causation (?) Image from xkcd.com/552/

  27. Correlation: Causation (?) Image from xkcd.com/552/

Recommend


More recommend