game theory with imprecise probabilities
play

Game Theory with Imprecise Probabilities Hailin Liu Department of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Introduction Robustness under Linear Tracing Procedure Game Theory with Imprecise Probabilities Hailin Liu Department of Philosophy Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA ISIPTA11, Innsbruck, July 25-28, 2011 Hailin Liu Game Theory


  1. Introduction Robustness under Linear Tracing Procedure Game Theory with Imprecise Probabilities Hailin Liu Department of Philosophy Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, USA ISIPTA’11, Innsbruck, July 25-28, 2011 Hailin Liu Game Theory with Imprecise Probabilities

  2. Introduction Robustness under Linear Tracing Procedure Overview We propose two game-theoretic solution concepts based on two preliminary investigations into the issue of introducing imprecise probabilities into games: Γ -maximin rationalizability : Just like rationalizability 1 assuming that all the players are commonly known as expected utility maximizers, it captures the idea that each player considers the other players as Γ -maximin decision makers under uncertainty. (Poster Session on Monday) Robustness under linear tracing procedure (LTP): to 2 modify LTP (Harsanyi and Selten, 1988) by using a set of probability distributions to represent players’ initial beliefs about her opponents’ strategy choices. Hailin Liu Game Theory with Imprecise Probabilities

  3. Introduction Linear Tracing Procedure Robustness under Linear Tracing Procedure Robust Equilibrium under LTP Linear Tracing Procedure LTP can be regarded as a rational deliberation process which selects a less risky equilibrium as outcome. Starting with a common prior distribution, which represents their initial uncertainty, all players gradually change their own tentative strategy plans, as well as their expectations about the other players’ possible strategies, until they arrive at a certain Nash equilibrium. s 21 s 22 Nash equilibria: A = ( s 11 , s 21 ) , s 11 1 , 1 0 , 0 C = ( s 12 , s 22 ) , and E = (( 3 4 , 1 4 ) , ( 3 4 , 1 4 )) . s 12 0 , 0 3 , 3 Table: Coordination Game Hailin Liu Game Theory with Imprecise Probabilities

  4. Introduction Linear Tracing Procedure Robustness under Linear Tracing Procedure Robust Equilibrium under LTP An Example of Linear Tracing Procedure LTP proposes to examine a family of auxiliary games closely related to the game, which are solved by considering Nash equilibrium as well. Note that there is only one feasible path (the blue line) continuously connecting all the auxiliary games, and thus the equilibrium C = ( s 12 , s 22 ) is selected as the outcome. original game s 21 s 22 D A p = (( 1 2 , 1 2 ) , ( 4 5 , 1 5 )) s 11 1 , 1 0 , 0 E 0 , 0 3 , 3 s 12 A ′ D ′ C B D F A A ′′ D ′′ a sequence of auxiliary games E A ′′′ p C ′ D ′′′ H B ′ C ′′ B ′′ C ′′′ B ′′′ Figure: LTP starting with p C B Prior Strategy Space Hailin Liu Game Theory with Imprecise Probabilities

  5. Introduction Linear Tracing Procedure Robustness under Linear Tracing Procedure Robust Equilibrium under LTP An Example of Linear Tracing Procedure LTP proposes to examine a family of auxiliary games closely related to the game, which are solved by considering Nash equilibrium as well. Note that there is only one feasible path (the blue line) continuously connecting all the auxiliary games, and thus the equilibrium C = ( s 12 , s 22 ) is selected as the outcome. original game s 21 s 22 D A p = (( 1 2 , 1 2 ) , ( 4 5 , 1 5 )) s 11 1 , 1 0 , 0 E 0 , 0 3 , 3 s 12 A ′ D ′ C B D F A A ′′ D ′′ a sequence of auxiliary games A ′′′ p C ′ E D ′′′ H B ′ C ′′ B ′′ C ′′′ B ′′′ Figure: LTP starting with p C B Prior Strategy Space Hailin Liu Game Theory with Imprecise Probabilities

  6. Introduction Linear Tracing Procedure Robustness under Linear Tracing Procedure Robust Equilibrium under LTP An Example of Linear Tracing Procedure LTP proposes to examine a family of auxiliary games closely related to the game, which are solved by considering Nash equilibrium as well. Note that there is only one feasible path (the blue line) continuously connecting all the auxiliary games, and thus the equilibrium C = ( s 12 , s 22 ) is selected as the outcome. original game s 21 s 22 D A p = (( 1 2 , 1 2 ) , ( 4 5 , 1 5 )) s 11 1 , 1 0 , 0 E 0 , 0 3 , 3 s 12 A ′ D ′ C B D F A A ′′ D ′′ a sequence of auxiliary games A ′′′ p C ′ E D ′′′ H B ′ C ′′ B ′′ C ′′′ B ′′′ Figure: LTP starting with p C B Prior Strategy Space Hailin Liu Game Theory with Imprecise Probabilities

  7. Introduction Linear Tracing Procedure Robustness under Linear Tracing Procedure Robust Equilibrium under LTP LTIP with IP We revise LTP by using a (common) set of prior distributions to describe the players’ initial beliefs about other players’ strategy choices. Suppose that the players’ initial belief is represented by a set of prior strategies P ′ as shown below (the red area). s 21 s 22 original game s 11 1 , 1 0 , 0 D A p = (( 1 2 , 1 2 ) , ( 4 5 , 1 5 )) s 12 0 , 0 3 , 3 E D ′ A ′ F A D C B D ′′ A ′′ a sequence of auxiliary games E p E A ′′′ H C ′ D ′′′ B ′ C ′′ B ′′ B ′′′ C ′′′ B C Hailin Liu Game Theory with Imprecise Probabilities

  8. Introduction Linear Tracing Procedure Robustness under Linear Tracing Procedure Robust Equilibrium under LTP Stability and Robustness The notion of stability captures the idea of the duration in which a prior leads to the same equilibrium when LTP is iteratively applied to those auxiliary games. Then we define a concept of robustness by using the maximin decision rule, which can be regarded as a measure for assessing the equilibria. s 21 s 22 original game s 11 1 , 1 0 , 0 D A p = (( 1 2 , 1 2 ) , ( 4 5 , 1 s 12 0 , 0 3 , 3 5 )) E F A A ′ D D ′ C B E p D ′′ A ′′ a sequence of auxiliary games E H A ′′′ C ′ D ′′′ B ′ C ′′ B ′′ B ′′′ C ′′′ B C Hailin Liu Game Theory with Imprecise Probabilities

  9. Introduction Linear Tracing Procedure Robustness under Linear Tracing Procedure Robust Equilibrium under LTP Example The most robust equilibrium is the one that maximizes the possible minimum stability of the prior strategies that lead to that equilibrium as outcome. In this case the equilibrium A has the largest robustness index, and thus distinguishes itself from the other two equilibria w.r.t. P ′ . s 21 s 22 original game s 11 1 , 1 0 , 0 D A p = (( 1 2 , 1 2 ) , ( 4 5 , 1 s 12 0 , 0 3 , 3 5 )) E D F A A ′ D ′ C B E p D ′′ A ′′ a sequence of auxiliary games E H A ′′′ C ′ D ′′′ B ′ C ′′ B ′′ B ′′′ C ′′′ C B Hailin Liu Game Theory with Imprecise Probabilities

Recommend


More recommend