g randview h eights ncp a rea 3
play

G RANDVIEW H EIGHTS NCP A REA #3 CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Feb 26, 2024 •266 likes •573 views

WELCOME TO THE G RANDVIEW H EIGHTS NCP A REA #3 CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) MEETING #6 For more information visit the city of surrey webpage at: www.surrey.ca/gh3ncp GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS 1 Feb 1, 2018 CAC Meeting

  1. WELCOME TO THE G RANDVIEW H EIGHTS NCP A REA #3 CITIZEN ADVISORY COMMITTEE (CAC) MEETING #6 For more information visit the city of surrey webpage at: www.surrey.ca/gh3ncp GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS 1 Feb 1, 2018 CAC Meeting NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3 NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

  2. MEETING AGENDA Agenda Outline 1. What we’ve heard at Public Open House? 2. Questions & Comments about Survey 3. CAC & NCP Next Steps 4. Questions & Comments about next steps GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS 2 CAC Meeting NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3 NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

  3. PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE #2 - SURVEY RESULTS Grandview Heights NCP #3 – Community Survey Summary The results of this survey, conducted between November 27, 2017 and January 3 2018, are not weighted to the City of Surrey’s population. The results are based on 464 survey responses of which 242 where completed Surveys. GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

  4. Profile of Survey Participants Neighbourhood Area Age Range 28% In Study Area 9% 20% 19% 15% Other part of South Surrey 49% 12% Cloverdale 12% 3% 3% Fleetwood 10% 19-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+ Prefer Guildford 5% Not to Answer Newton 6% City Centre/Whalley 8% DEMOGRAPHICS Demographics are provided as background on Outside Surrey 2% the composition of survey respondents. Please note these results are not weighted to the City of Surrey’s population. GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

  5. Rating Priorities Provide For Community Amenities & Schools 58% 33% 6% 2% Provide Parks &Recreation Opportunities 55% 35% 7% 2% Ensure Healthy, Protected & Well-Maintained Ecosystems & Biodiversity 53% 31% 12% 2% 2% Ensure Appropriate Servicing, Financing and Infrastructure Improvements 43% 39% 14% 3% 2% Limit Urban Impacts on the Agricultural Land Reserve 52% 28% 11% 6% 3% Provide Appropriate Housing 40% 38% 17% 3% 2% Ensure Multimodal Road Design encouraging a Transit Oriented Community 41% 37% 15% 5% 2% Include opportunities for Neighbourhood Serving Commercial Uses 12% 38% 30% 13% 7% Consider Viewscape Opportunities 12% 32% 38% 12% 5% Very Important Important Neither Important Nor Unimportant Unimportant Very Unimportant Q: In early consultation with the Citizen Advisory Committee (CAC), nine draft planning priorities were developed to help guide the creation of future land use concepts for this neighbourhood. Help us rate these priorities in preparation for the next steps of the planning process. Total participants: 464 GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

  6. Other Priorities “Most importantly, Surrey needs to improve walkability of neighborhoods to amenities. Surrey has not done well with this creating a city that requires cars which is the most unhealthy. We need better transit to connect out of the way residential neighborhoods with other services.” “Create an appropriate mix of single family and townhouses with “A disc golf course in a park in this area.” sufficient density to ensure cost of providing community services can be justified.” “Any new development initiative that gets considered seems to always negate roadside parking space. Good example is Clayton Heights. Homes get built with suites (legal or illegal) but not enough consideration is ever given to where will people park or where will “Ensure developers pay for infrastructure service vehicles park.” upgrades required and not Surrey tax payers.” “No more housing developments until schools have been built, especially another high school….” “Plan the neighborhoods properly, too much housing, and not enough doctors, dentists, daycares, grocery stores: these need to be in walking distance!” “Incorporating public art in common public spaces.” Q: Are there any other planning priorities you would suggest? Total participants: 142 GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

  7. Habitat Corridor between Darts Hill Park and Redwood Park Q: We need to plan for a habitat corridor between Darts Hill Park and Redwood Park. Highlight on the map the best location for a wildlife corridor. Use your cursor to highlight the map. Based on CitySpeaks survey responses only. GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

  8. New Parkland Q: New parkland for people is also important. Highlight on the map the best locations for new parkland. Use your cursor to highlight the map. Based on CitySpeaks survey responses only. GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

  9. New Active Parkland Consolidate new parkland into one or two larger sites 44% Spread out several smaller sites across the plan area 56% Q: The amount of new active parkland will be based on the number of new residents in the area. Assuming a set amount of new parkland, how do you think it should be provided? Total participants: 291 GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

  10. Best Location for a Village Node and/or Commercial Area(s) Q: Highlight on the map the best location(s) for a village node and/or commercial area(s). Based on CitySpeaks survey responses only. GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

  11. Neighbourhood Village Highway Oriented Commercial 8% Neighbourhood Commercial 46% Mixed Use Commercial 37% No Commercial 9% Other 1% Q: A neighbourhood village or commercial areas can take a variety of forms and support different uses. Each contributes differently to a neighbourhood. Which form of commercial building do you feel is suitable for this area? Total participants: 279 GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

  12. Neighbourhood Village/Commercial Area by Age Range 5% 6% 9% 10% 11% 13% 29% 39% 37% 47% 53% 65% 57% Highway Oriented Commercial Neighbourhood Commercial Mixed Use Commercial 71% No Commercial 39% 43% 36% 34% 21% 24% 11% 11% 7% 8% 6% 5% 19-29* 30-39 40-49 50-59 60-69 70+ Overall *Caution: Low base n<10 GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

  13. Mix of Housing Appropriate to this Area 37 Mean Median 30 25 24 21 20 19 17 Detached Single Family Townhouse Semi-Detached Apartment Q: What mix of housing do you think should be provided is appropriate in this area (by percentage)? Note, some areas may not redevelop so this balance would apply only to those areas that do. 100% must be assigned to move to the next question. Total participants: 266 GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

  14. Residential Concepts “The area should be single family and some townhomes/rowhomes. The amount of density should be driven by only having to provide one school in the area. Getting two school sites in this area will be prohibitive. Also, services and transit are not in this area so density should remain low. Higher density areas exist near 24th and 160th and in Area 2. This should be urban single family and townhomes only.” “Need to keep more large lots, rather than all tiny lots. Leave some space and trees. The roads cannot support more density so close to the all the current development. We are already short on schools, transit in the area. Roads all need widening to support the existing growth. Add more trails and walkways. Safer biking areas on the streets.” ‘Homes that allow for wheelchair/universal access for aging population. The 3 level townhouse with 2 flights of stairs don't “Density is far too high. High density does not fit in suit seniors and people who have mobility challenges.” with the existing 1 acre lots surrounding the NCP.” “Do not forget lower cost rental housing and starter homes for young singles and married with young families. We cannot afford to continue to force them out of our communities as Vancouver has done.” “There are lots of semi-detached and townhouse along the 24th corridor. And plenty of commercial. There is little or no need for it here.” Q: Example locations of potential housing types are illustrated above in Concept A & B, for discussion purposes. Given the ideas about where housing could be provided, do you have any additional comments about the location and type of housing for this neighbourhood? Total participants: 118 GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

  15. School Locations Location A 31% Location B 26% Location C 26% Location D 11% Other 6% Q: Which one of the four proposed locations would you prefer? Or alternately select other and indicate with the highlighter tool the other location on the map below. Total participants: 259 Heat map is based on CitySpeaks survey responses only. GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBOURHOOD CONCEPT PLAN AREA #3

More recommend