future neutrino beams at fermilab
play

Future Neutrino Beams at Fermilab Gina Rameika NNN10 Toyama, - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Future Neutrino Beams at Fermilab Gina Rameika NNN10 Toyama, Japan December 14-16, 2010 Outline Neutrinos and the Intensity Frontier Neutrino Beams at Fermilab Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB) : MiniBooNE NuMI : MINOS, MINERvA


  1. Future Neutrino Beams at Fermilab Gina Rameika NNN10 – Toyama, Japan December 14-16, 2010

  2. Outline • Neutrinos and the Intensity Frontier • Neutrino Beams at Fermilab  Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB) : MiniBooNE  NuMI : MINOS, MINERvA • Near-term upgrades and operations  NuMI for NOvA  Proton economics and the BNB : MicroBooNE, future expt. • Longer-term projects and prospects  LBNE  Project X Rameika - NNN10 2

  3. Three Frontiers for U.S. Particle Physics Rameika - NNN10 3

  4. Fermilab Intensity Frontier Experiments NOvA MINOS Project X+LBNE MicroBooNE MiniBooNE LBNE mu, K, nuclear, … g-2? MINERvA Mu2e � Factory ?? SeaQuest SeaQuest 2019 2022 2013 2016 Now Rameika - NNN10 4 4

  5. Present and Planned Accelerator Complex Rameika - NNN10 5

  6. Components of a conventional accelerator neutrino beam • High energy protons hit a target • Unstable pion and kaon charged particles are produced • The pions and kaons are “focused” by a magnetic field to go in the desired direction • The pions and kaons decay into muons and muon type neutrinos • The direction of the magnetic field determines whether neutrinos or anti-neutrinos are (predominantly) generated Rameika - NNN10 6

  7. Booster Neutrino Beam (BNB) Short baseline – Near surface Rameika - NNN10 7

  8. BNB flux � e Small intrinsic � e / � µ rate  event ratio ~6x10 -3 Rameika - NNN10 8

  9. Event spectra (for arbitrary POTs) Rameika - NNN10 9

  10. Depends on other Proton Delivery to BNB demands for the protons Rameika - NNN10 10

  11. Neutrinos at the Main Injector (NuMI) Constructed 2000-2004 to send Neutrinos to Soudan, Minnesota For the MINOS experiment Rameika - NNN10 11

  12. 100m 1200m Rameika - NNN10 12

  13. Components of the NuMI Beam Neutrino beam spectra is tunable by arrangement of target-horn separations Rameika - NNN10 13

  14. POT delivery to NuMI ~11x10 17 /day Rameika - NNN10 14

  15. Off-axis Neutrino Beams Rameika - NNN10 15

  16. NuMI to NOvA Need to upgrade the proton delivery rate to the NuMI target Rameika - NNN10 16

  17. Accelerator and NuMI Upgrades (ANU) for NOvA • Changes to the FNAL Accelerator complex to  Turn Recycler from pbar to proton ring  Injection and extraction lines  Associated kickers and instrumentation  53 MHz RF  Decommission/remove pbar devices  Shorten MI cycle to 1.33 seconds  RF upgrades  Power Supply upgrades  Decommission/remove pbar devices  NuMI target station to 700 kW  Target & Horns to handle power  Configuration to maximize neutrino flux (Medium Energy configuration) Rameika - NNN10 17

  18. Context of ANU • Collider Era operation: 11 booster batches (2 to pbar), 3.5e13 on target, 2.2 second cycle 5 Hz from Booster 7.8e16/hour • NO v A Era operation: 12 booster batches, 4.9e13 on target, 1.33 second cycle No cycles 9 Hz from Booster to the 1.4e17/hour BNB in this plan Rameika - NNN10 18 18

  19. NuMI NO v A† Design 400 700 Beam Power (kW) Low Medium Energy Spectrum Energy Energy Horn Power 1.87 1.33 Cycle time (s) Supply 4.0 × 10 13 4.9 × 10 13 Intensity (ppp) 1.0 1.3 Stripline Spot Size (mm) Morgue Primary Beamline Target Horn 1 Horn 2 Horn Work Cell Low Energy Med. Energy & Baffle (above shielding) Configuration Configuration Target Pile Air Cooling System (above shielding) Rameika - NNN10 Mike Martens, NOvA Target and Horns 19 19

  20. Baffle: Aperture Increased from 11 mm to 13 mm diameter Alternative Clamp Material Minor Changes Target: No Remote Longitudinal Motion Larger Target Casing New Design Same Graphite Material, but wider target fins Carrier: No Remote Longitudinal Motion Simpler Construction New Design Thinner Outer Conductor Horn 1: Modified Stripline Geometry Modifications Additional Spray Cooling for 700 kW Horn 2 : No Change Rameika - NNN10 20 20

  21. NOvA Numbers • “700 kW” peak  4.3e12 protons/batch from Booster  12 spills every 4/3 second = 9 Hz  13.9e16 p/hr.  95% efficiency in MI  Comes out to 707 kW  Booster has never provided this much • 6e20 Protons per year  44 weeks of running  61% total efficiency  Downtimes (accelerator and NuMI)  Average vs peak • Getting NOvA protons means that both the peak proton power and the efficiency need to be maximized Rameika - NNN10 21

  22. Current Booster Performance • ~7.5 Hz (6.7 Hz w/ beam) Hardware capable of ~9 Hz • 1e17/hour (pushing administrative operational limits): aperture improvements and loss reduction • 89% efficiency Rameika - NNN10 22

  23. Outlook for Booster Performance • The Booster appears presently able to produce about 13e16 protons/ hr at peak power  Within ~10% of NOvA peak demand  Recent Record week: 1.62e19 protons (9.6e16 p/hr)  Good operational efficiency  Limited by beam budget  Reliability becomes an increasing issue as rep rate increases  Not only a radiation problem  Magnitude of this effect is not understood • Another looming issue is additional users  mu2e @ 4.5 Hz (same or higher batch intensity)  MicroBooNE at up to 5 Hz  g-2 at up to 4 Hz • These can add up to easily 22e16 if Booster runs at 15 Hz  Not enough cycles to service all experiments simultaneously  Booster reliability is an issue Rameika - NNN10 23

  24. Prospects for Increased Intensity • Booster performance has been improving, but must remain an issue for future operation  Per batch intensity is at NOvA levels  Running rate is near the (present) operational limit  Extrapolating from the overhead in loss rates puts Booster performance near NOvA levels (at peak)  Reliability of running at higher rates is a significant question and is not accounted for in the extrapolation  Further experiments provide an additional risk • New study group formed  What needs to be done to make the Booster run for ~15 years?  What can be done to improve intensity reliability Rameika - NNN10 24

  25. Rameika - NNN10 25

  26. From Report Summary Rameika - NNN10 26

  27. Rameika - NNN10 27

  28. The Plan • To support program operation through 2025  Both the 8 GeV and the 120 GeV programs do need additional improvements  Booster Solid State Upgrade  Improved reliability of RF Power Amplifiers  Increase repetition rate to 15 Hz  Improved electrical infrastructure  Improved cooling for RF cavities  Requires solid state upgrade  New shielding assessment and associated shielding improvements  Operational limits  Additional shielding in tunnel  Office occupancy Rameika - NNN10 28

  29. NOvA Timeline 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Requires $$$ for collider ops When 700kW operation begins depends on if the Tevtron collider runs past 2011 Rameika - NNN10 29

  30. BNB/MicroBooNE Timeline Proton Intensity and running time depend on Collider schedule and NOvA readiness and run plan Rameika - NNN10 30

  31. Take Away • Intensity frontier neutrino program for the next decade puts demands on the accelerator complex  Improvements in both hardware and operational efficiency of the Booster complex will be required if the currently approved physics program is to be successful Rameika - NNN10 31

  32. 2008 P5 Report Rameika - NNN10 32

  33. Fermilab to Homestake Mine – 1300km Rameika - NNN10 33

  34. Why longer baseline is better 2 2 2 2 CC spectrum at 1300km, m = -2.5e-03 eV CC spectrum at 1300km, m = 2.5e-03 eV ! " ! " ! 31 ! 31 10000 0.1 10000 0.1 POT POT IH NH Appearance Probability 2 Appearance Probability 2 sin 2 % =0, $ = n/a sin 2 % =0, $ = n/a 13 cp 13 cp 9000 0.09 9000 0.09 21 21 2 2 sin 2 = 0.02, =- /2 sin 2 % = 0.02, $ =- # /2 % $ # CC evts/GeV/100kT/10 CC evts/GeV/100kT/10 13 cp 13 cp 8000 0.08 8000 0.08 2 2 sin 2 % = 0.02, $ =0 sin 2 = 0.02, =0 % $ 13 cp 13 cp 7000 0.07 7000 0.07 2 2 sin 2 = 0.02, = /2 sin 2 % = 0.02, $ = # /2 % $ # 13 cp 13 cp 6000 0.06 6000 0.06 5000 0.05 5000 0.05 4000 0.04 4000 0.04 ! ! 3000 0.03 3000 0.03 ! ! 2000 0.02 2000 0.02 1000 0.01 1000 0.01 0 0 0 0 1 10 1 10 E (GeV) E (GeV) ! ! � � � 1300km, 5yr , 5yr -bar, 700kW, 10kT =1. � � � 5yr , 5yr -bar, 700kW, 10kT =1. 200 -bars sin 2 2 θ 13 = 0.08,0.04,0.02,0.01 sin 2 2 θ 13 = 0.04 100 -bars 180 1300km e 90 � Number of 160 e � Number of 80 140 70 120 60 810km 100 50 80 40 60 30 40 20 10 20 0 0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 � Number of s � Number of s e e Rameika - NNN10 34

  35. NEW Rameika - NNN10 35

  36. Rameika - NNN10 36

  37. Rameika - NNN10 37

  38. Neutrino Beam Components Reference design for CDR Cost & Schedule Horn PS can switch polarity via control system Nu-nubar data in same time period Rameika - NNN10 38

  39. Rameika - NNN10 39

  40. This intensity implies that The Long Baseline Exp. will need to run for a LONG time Rameika - NNN10 40

  41. NEW Why 2.3 MW? Radiation exposures Need a plan to deal with the proton economics and ageing Accelerator complex Rameika - NNN10 41

Recommend


More recommend