from hall algebras to legendrian skein algebras
play

From Hall algebras to legendrian skein algebras Fabian Haiden Leeds - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

From Hall algebras to legendrian skein algebras Fabian Haiden Leeds algebra seminar April 28th, 2020 Introduction Main point : There is a fruitful interplay between Knot theory (and topology more generally), and Representation theory


  1. From Hall algebras to legendrian skein algebras Fabian Haiden Leeds algebra seminar April 28th, 2020

  2. Introduction Main point : There is a fruitful interplay between • Knot theory (and topology more generally), and • Representation theory (e.g. quantum groups) However, it turns out legendrian knot theory also appears naturally, in particular when studying derived categories. Talk based on preprints arXiv:1908.10358 , arXiv:1910.04182 , and ongoing joint work with Ben Cooper.

  3. Outline (1) Local theory • Representation theory of GL ( n, F q ) and Core( D b ( F q )) • Braids and legendrian tangles (2) Global theory • Fukaya categories of surfaces and their Hall algebras • Legendrian skein algebras

  4. Representation theory of GL ( n, F q ) “Philosophy of cusp forms”, case G n := GL ( n, F q ) (1) Cuspidal representations of GL ( n, F q ) correspond to characters F × q n → C × not factoring through F × q n − 1 . (2) From cuspidals, get everything else by parabolic induction: partition n = n 1 + . . . + n k , V i representation of G n i , then pull-push along the span G n 1 ×· · ·× G n k ← − { block upper-triangular matrices } − → G n is representation V 1 ◦ · · · ◦ V k of G n .

  5. Unipotent representations Take trivial representation C of GL (1 , F q ) . . . simplest cuspidal representation Parabolic induction gives C ◦ · · · ◦ C = C G n /B where • B ⊂ G n subgroup of upper triangular matrices • G n /B = complete flags in F n q • C G n /B = functions G n /B → C Taking summands & direct sums − → unipotent representations

  6. Iwahori–Hecke algebra of type A n − 1 : Generators Endomorphisms of representation C G n /B : End G n ( C G n /B ) = C B \ G n /B Bruhat decomposition: B \ G n /B ∼ = S n Transposition ( i, i + 1) ∈ S n ↔ operator T i on C G/B mapping flag 0 = E 0 ⊂ E 1 ⊂ . . . ⊂ E i ⊂ . . . ⊂ E n = F n q to sum of q flags 0 = E 0 ⊂ E 1 ⊂ . . . ⊂ E i − 1 ⊂ E ′ i ⊂ E i +1 ⊂ . . . ⊂ E n = F n q with E ′ i � = E i .

  7. Iwahori–Hecke algebra of type A n − 1 : Relations Complete set of relations among T i : • Skein relation: T 2 i = ( q − 1) T i + q, 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 1 • Braid relations: T i T i +1 T i = T i +1 T i T i +1 , 1 ≤ i ≤ n − 2 T i T j = T j T i , 1 ≤ i, j ≤ n − 1 , | i − j | > 1 Relations polynomial in q = ⇒ ∃ generic Iwahori–Hecke algebra over C [ q ] Specialization q = 1 gives group algebra C [ S n ]

  8. Categorical reformulation Embedding of monoidal category of braids/skein relations: • Objects : finite subsets of R modulo isotopy = Z ≥ 0 • Morphisms n → n : C -linear combinations of braids of n strands modulo isotopy & skein relation • Composition : concatenation of braids • Monoidal product : stacking of braids into category of functors � � Vect fd → Vect fd − Core F q C from underlying groupoid of Vect fd F q , monoidal product = parabolic induction

  9. Categorical reformulation — remarks Functor from braids/skein relations to representations of � � Vect fd Core F q • Target category is semisimple (representations of finite groups) • Source category is C -linear, but does not have sums & summands • Closure of embedded image in target category is category of unipotent representations • Irreducible unipotent representations indexed by partitions (c.f. irreducible representations of symmetric group)

  10. Extension to complexes Replace Vect fd F q by its bounded derived category D := D b � � Vect fd F q and consider category of functors → Vect fd Core( D ) − C Monoidal product is pull-push along span of ∞ -groupoids (homotopy types): Core( D ) × Core( D ) ← − Core (Fun( • → • , D )) − → Core( D ) ( A, C ) ← − A → B → C → A [1] − → B

  11. Complexes and legendrian tangles For representations of Core( D b ( F q )) , turns out we need legendrian tangles! Vect fd braids F q D b ( F q ) graded legendrian tangles

  12. Local picture of legendrian curves Legendrian curve: 1-form dz − ydx vanishes along tangent direction ⇒ Under xz-projection (front) y = dz/dx = • downward branch over upward branch at crossing • slope never vertical • front of generic legendrian curve can have left & right cusps

  13. Legendrian Reidemeister moves (front projection) ← → ← → ← →

  14. Grading of legendrian curves Assignment of integer to each strand ending at cusps Condition at cusp: increase by 1 on lower strand n n n+1 n+1 Equivalently: choice of Arg( dx + idy ) along curve ( = ⇒ image in xy -plane should have total winding number 0) Generalizes to contact 3-fold M with given rank 1 subbundle of contact bundle ⊂ TM

  15. Legendrian skein relations (front projection) m-1 m-1 m-1 n − = δ m,n z − δ m,n +1 z m-1 m n n n m m m = z − 1 = 0 1 2 − q − 1 2 , z := q δ m,n = Kronecker delta

  16. Category of graded legendrian tangles • Objects: finite Z -graded subsets X of R up to isotopy (grading = function deg : X → Z ) • Morphisms: Hom( X, Y ) = vector space / C generated by isotopy classes of tangles L with left boundary ∂ 0 L = Y and right boundary ∂ 1 L = X modulo the skein relations ( q = prime power). • Composition: horizontal composition (concatenation) of tangles • Monoidal product: vertical composition (stacking) of tangles

  17. Mapping graded subsets of R to representations Notation: C G = trivial 1-dim representation of G Mapping a singleton: n • �→ C Aut( F q [ − n ]) For larger graded X ⊂ R determined by compatibility with ⊗ : � X �→ C Aut( H • ( F q X,δ )) δ where sum is over combinatorial differentials: injective maps X ⊃ Dom( δ ) δ − → X \ Dom( δ ) of degree 1, decreasing with respect to order induced from R

  18. Mapping graded legendrian tangles to intertwiners n 2 T : C P 1 ( F q ) → C P 1 ( F q ) q − 1 �→ n n �→ projection to C Aut( F q [ − n ] ⊕ F q [ − n − 1]) n+1 n+1 �→ inclusion of C Aut( F q [ − n ] ⊕ F q [ − n − 1]) n m �→ identity on C Aut( F q [ − m ] ⊕ F q [ − n ]) , | m − n | > 1 n n z − 1 · projection to C Aut(0) �→ n+1 n �→ inclusion of C Aut(0) n+1

  19. Main theorem of local theory Theorem: The mapping defined above gives a well defined fully faithful functor from the category of graded legendrian tangles modulo skein relations to the category of representations of the underlying groupoid of D b ( F q ) . • This was proven, in a somewhat different formulation, in Flags and Tangles [arXiv:1910.04182]. • The functor extends the prototypical functor from braids (in degree 0) to representations of the underlying groupoid of Vect fd F q discussed before, the same remarks apply.

  20. From local to global • Disk with two marked points on the boundary (implicitly the setting above) � surface with marked points • Goal: Show graded legendrian skein algebra appears as subalgebra of Hall algebra of Fukaya category • Strategy: Glue (form coend) along categories considered in local theory

  21. Hall correspondence C — triangulated DG-category Core( C A 2 ) Core( C ) × Core( C ) A → B → C → Core( C ) ( A, C ) B Various versions of Hall algebra obtained by applying pull-push functors to this span of ∞ -groupoids (point of view advocated by Dyckerhoff–Kapranov in Higher Segal Spaces )

  22. Homotopy cardinality π -finite space: π i ( X ) finite for i ≥ 0 and vanishes for i ≫ 0 , has homotopy cardinality (Baez–Dolan): ∞ � � | π i ( X, x ) | ( − 1) i | X | h := i =1 x ∈ π 0 ( X ) Given map φ : X → Y of π -finite spaces get φ ! Q π 0 ( X ) c Q π 0 ( Y ) c φ ∗ � φ ∗ f := f ◦ π 0 ( φ ) , ( φ ! f )( y ) := | hofib( φ | x ) | h f ( x ) x ∈ π 0 ( X ) φ ( x )= y where Q π 0 ( X ) c := functions f : π 0 ( X ) → Q with finite support

  23. Hall algebra of triangulated DG-category (Toen) Apply homotopy cardinality formalism to Hall correspondence of triangulated DG-category C (satisfying finiteness conditions): Hall( C ) = finite Q -linear combinations of isomorphism classes of objects of C Explicit formula for structure constants: � � ( − 1) i � A,C = | Ext 0 ( A, B ) C | · � ∞ � Ext − i ( A, B ) g B i =1 � � � ( − 1) i | Aut( A ) | · � ∞ � Ext − i ( A, A ) i =1 where Ext 0 ( A, B ) C := morphisms A → B with cone C

  24. Surfaces with Liouville and grading structure (1) S — compact surface with boundary (2) N ⊂ ∂S — finite set of marked points (3) θ — Liouville 1-form on S : • dθ nowhere vanishing (area form) • vector field Z with i Z dθ = θ points outwards along ∂S (4) η ∈ Γ( S, P ( TS )) — grading structure on S (foliation) From this data construct: • Fukaya category F ( S, N, θ, η ; F ) — linear A ∞ /DG-category over field F , triangulated • Contact 3-fold S × R with contact form dz + θ and its (graded, legendrian) skein algebra

  25. Fukaya category of a disk F ( disk with n + 1 marked points on boundary ) ∼ = A n where A n := D b ( • → • → . . . → • ) � �� � n vertices is the bounded derived category of representations of A n -type quiver over F (independent of orientation of arrows) Equivalently, an object of A n can be described as filtered acyclic complex 0 = F 0 C ⊂ F 1 C ⊂ . . . ⊂ F n C ⊂ F n +1 C = C ∼ 0 and the i -th boundary functor A n → A 1 sends this to the chain complex F i C/F i − 1 C , 1 ≤ i ≤ n + 1 .

Recommend


More recommend