freight transportation advisory
play

Freight Transportation Advisory Committee (FTAC) November 14, 2012 - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Presentation To Miami-Dade County Freight Transportation Advisory Committee (FTAC) November 14, 2012 Dat Huynh, P.E., FDOT Project Manager Robert T. Carballo, P.E., C3TS Project Manager 1 PROJECT LOCATION Located in northern Miami-Dade County


  1. Presentation To Miami-Dade County Freight Transportation Advisory Committee (FTAC) November 14, 2012 Dat Huynh, P.E., FDOT Project Manager Robert T. Carballo, P.E., C3TS Project Manager 1

  2. PROJECT LOCATION Located in northern Miami-Dade County  Adjacent to City of Miami Gardens, North Miami  Beach, North Miami and the Golden Glades Community 2

  3. BACKGROUND THE GOLDEN GLADES INTERCHANGE Serves as a regional hub for transportation in northeast  Miami-Dade County Connects local and regional travel between three  south Florida counties: Miami-Dade, Broward and Palm Beach Provides access to:  Interstate 95 (I-95)  SR 826 (Palmetto Expressway)  Florida’s Turnpike  SR 9, and  SR 7/US 441  SR 826/NW 167 th Street  Connects to the Park & Ride and  provides access to regional transit 3

  4. NEED FOR PROJECT TRAVEL DEMAND & CAPACITY Golden Glades Interchange currently carries is over  400,000 vehicles per day with direct impacts on regional travel within the tri-county area Travel demand within the interchange is projected to  increase by approximately 50% by the 2040 year Critical movements experiencing heavy congestion with  insufficient capacity include: 1. SR 826 EB to I-95 NB 2. Turnpike SB to I-95 SB 4

  5. NEED FOR PROJECT SAFETY 3,239 total crashes  between 2006 to 2010 20 fatalities  1,496 injury crashes  Predominant Crashes  Rear End – 44%  Side Swipe – 18%  Fixed Object – 12%  Angle – 10%  Economic Loss  Estimated at approx. $93 million Fatal Crash Locations 5

  6. STUDY PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVES INTERIM IMPROVEMENTS (NEAR TERM CONSTRUCTION) Provide a direct connection for SR 826 (Palmetto Expressway)  eastbound to I-95 northbound Improve the Turnpike southbound to I-95 southbound  connection Develop interim improvements within the Golden Glades  Interchange to enhance safety, mobility and circulation ULTIMATE IMPROVEMENTS (CONSTRUCTED WITH SR 826 E-W PROJECT) Accommodate potential express lanes system and transit  enhancements connection to Golden Glades Interchange Addition of express lanes from SR 826 connecting to I-95 to and  from the north Enhance Turnpike Connector southbound to I-95 with possible  express lanes direct connection Establish an Ultimate Master Plan for the Golden Glades  Interchange 6

  7. EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING SR 826 EB TO I-95 NB MOVEMENT Legend SR-826 EB to I-95 NB (Signed Movement) SR-826 EB to I-95 NB (Alternative Route) Turnpike SB to I-95 SB Traffic Signal 7

  8. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS INTERIM SR 826 EB to I-95 NB direct connection ramp  Turnpike SB to I-95 SB at-grade widening  E . 8

  9. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS ULTIMATE SR 826 express lanes to and from I-95 North  Turnpike SB to I-95 SB express lane connection  E . 9

  10. ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED No-Build Alternative  Preliminary Interim Build Alternatives:  Presented at the initial Alternatives Public Workshop held on  May 03, 2012 Refined Interim Build Alternatives:  Presented at the Alternatives Public Workshop Update held  on August 21, 2012 Ultimate Build Alternatives:  Represents the Ultimate Master Plan for Golden Glades  Interchange Presented at both Alternatives Public Workshop  Documented as part of SR 826 PD&E Study  10

  11. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Interim Build Alternative 3A Key Features 1. Provide a direct connection from SR 826 EB to I-95 NB that consists of a reverse S-curve alignment 2. Widen the Turnpike Connector to provide two lanes from the Turnpike SB merging with the SR 826 EB to I-95 SB traffic 3. Replace the SR 826/NW 167th Street WB to I-95 SB ramp bridge to accommodate direct flyover connection ramp and SR7/US 441 NB lanes 4. Replace the SR 826 Connector Bridge over the direct flyover connection ramp and SR 7/US 441 NB lanes 5. Provide signalized dual left turn lanes from SR 826 EB to Turnpike NB 6. Widen I-95 SB from interchange to NW 151st Street to accommodate additional lane from Turnpike Connector 7. Provide connection from NW 163rd Street to NW 17th Avenue and widen NW 17th Avenue from NW 161st Street to SR 826. Access to SR 826 at NW 12th Avenue and NW 167th Street is removed 8. Right of way impacts to 2 commercial properties and 3 vacant parcels west of I-95 north of Biscayne Canal 11

  12. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS Interim Build Alternative 3A SR 826/Palmetto Expressway Mainline and Off-Ramp to I-95 NB & SB Turnpike Connector Between SR 826/Palmetto Expressway and I-95 12

  13. ENVIRONMENTAL MINIMAL IMPACTS  Contamination 9 High Risk and 6 Medium Risk sites  Anodyne Superfund Site   Socio-Economic Resources Land Use  Relocation   Natural Resources Visual & Aesthetics  Water Quality   Wildlife & Habitat Woodstork  Eastern Indigo Snake  West Indian Manatee  Burrowing Owl   Wetlands & Other Surface Waters Biscayne Canal  Noise measurement tool NW17th Avenue Canal   Traffic Noise Reconstruct Noise Wall  NO IMPACTS  Air Quality  Historical Resources 13

  14. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT This study will provide several opportunities for the public to provide comments and input:  Agency Kick-Off Meeting August 25, 2011  Public Kick-Off Meeting August 25, 2011  MPO Meetings April 2012  Alternatives Public Workshop #1 May 3, 2012  Alternatives Public Workshop #2 August 21, 2012  MPO Meetings Fall 2012  Public Hearing February 2013 (tentative) 14

  15. PRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE Cost Component Recommended Alternative Construction Cost $85,850,000 Preliminary Engineering $14,083,000 Right of Way Cost $5,634,000 Total Project Cost $105,567,000 15

  16. PROJECT SCHEDULE 2011 2012 2013 ACTIVITY Winter Spring Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer Fall Winter Spring Summer Fall Notice to Proceed Data Collection . Agency and Public Kick-Off Develop and Analyze Alternatives Environmental Studies Alternatives Public Workshop #1 Interchange Modification Report Alternatives Public Workshop #2 Develop Preferred Alternative Public Hearing Develop Final PD&E and 3 Environmental Documents Location and Design Concept Acceptance Public Involvement 16

  17. CONTACTS Florida Department of Transportation – District Six 1000 NW 111 Avenue, Room 6251 Miami, Florida 33172 Dat Huynh, P.E. – FDOT Project Manager Email: dat.huynh@dot.state.fl.us Telephone: (305) 470-5217 Project Website: www.fdotmiamidade.com/goldengladesstudy Questions? 17

  18. THANK YOU 18

  19. ACCESS & ROW IMPACTS Interim Build Provide 3 lane exit for SR 826 EB to I-95 NB & SB NW NW 10 AVE Connection of NW 12 th Avenue On-ramp under Evaluation Provide signalized dual left turns to Turnpike NB 19

  20. ACCESS & ROW IMPACTS Interim Build Provide Texas U- turn at NW 17th Ave NW 2 AVE Convert from two-way to one- Remove SB way EB road NW lane along NW 2nd Ave Widen NW 17 AVE NW 17th Ave at NW 167 ST NW ST Intersections NW Provide connection from NW 163rd St to NW 17th Ave NW NW 163 ST ST 20

  21. ACCESS & ROW IMPACTS Interim Build NW NW 159 ST ST Potential Right of Way Impact NW NW 157 ST ST (FDOT Property) Potential Right Golden Glad Go Glades of Way Impact Park Pa rk & & Ride (2 Commercial 3 Vacant) Potential Impact to Canopy and BISC SCAYNE NE CANA NAL Parking Spaces NW 7 AVE NW Park and Ride East Lot Along Southbound I-95 21

  22. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Travel Time Results Travel Time Comparison (AM Peak Period)  Travel Time (Minutes) No-Build Interim Build Ultimate Build # Location % % 2030 2040 2030 2040 Change Change 1 SR 826 EB to I-95 NB 1 5.9 3.7 2 1.85 1.3 69% 65% SR 826 EB to NW 2nd 2 6.1 6.6 4.0 34% 3.1 53% Avenue Turnpike SB Connector to 3 16.6 17.3 7.0 58% 4.3 75% I-95 SB Turnpike SB to NW 2nd 4 21.1 22.5 7.6 64% 4.4 80% Avenue Turnpike SB to I-95 SB 5 - - - - 3.0 83% (Express Ramp) Notes: 1. The No-Build route refers to the existing signed route while the Build Alternatives route refers to the new flyover ramp connection 2. Constrained condition with traffic held at the entry node causing the operation to appear more favorable 22

  23. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS Travel Time Results Travel Time Comparison (PM Peak Period)  Travel Time (Minutes) No-Build Interim Build Ultimate Build # Location % % 2030 2040 2030 2040 Change Change 1 SR 826 EB to I-95 NB 1 3.7 7.9 1.7 1.4 54% 82% SR 826 EB to NW 2nd 2 7.1 7.9 3.5 51% 3.7 53% Avenue Turnpike SB Connector to 3 18.4 20.4 4.0 78% 3.8 81% I-95 SB Turnpike SB to NW 2nd 4 24.2 26.5 3.7 85% 3.4 87% Avenue Turnpike SB to I-95 SB 5 - - - - 2.7 87% (Express Ramp) Notes: 1. The No-Build route refers to the existing signed route while the Build Alternatives route refers to the new flyover ramp connection 23

Recommend


More recommend