free energy calculation john chodera and
play

Free Energy Calculation (John Chodera) and AI Assisted Committor - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Selected talk at the Molecular Kinetics conference held in Berlin: Free Energy Calculation (John Chodera) and AI Assisted Committor Discovery (Gerhard Hummer) Siqin Cao Department of Chemistry The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology


  1. Selected talk at the Molecular Kinetics conference held in Berlin: Free Energy Calculation (John Chodera) and AI Assisted Committor Discovery (Gerhard Hummer) Siqin Cao Department of Chemistry The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology HKUST Deutschland ZIB of Freie U

  2. Molecular Kinetics and Free Energy Calculation John Chodera

  3. Drug discovery usually ends in failure R&D model yielding costs to successfully discover and develop a single new molecular entity: p(TS): probability to next stage WIP: work in progress 4.5 years and NME: new molecule entity $219M Unit of money: million USD S. Paul, D. Mytelka, ..., A. Schacht, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery 9 , 203 (2010)

  4. AMBER/GAFF for Relative Free Energy Calculations OPLS2.1 + REST2 : MUE = 0.9 kcal/mol, RMSE = 1.14 kcal/mol AMBER99SB/GAFF +MD for 330 mutations: MUE = 1.15 kcal/mol, RMSE = 1.5 kcal/mol Lin Frank Songa, Tai-Sung Leeb, Chun-Zhua, Darrin M. Yorkb, and Kenneth M. Merz Jr, ChemRxiv 7653434 (2019)

  5. SMIRNOFF: SMIRks Native Open Force Field FF frustrations: FF optimization: Rely on expert intuition; Auomated through Bayesian Poor choice for data structure; approach. Massive reduction in parameters. SMARTS: direct chemical perception Atom types: indirect chemical perception

  6. Machine learning will have a large impact on physical modeling We can learn: • more accurate potential functions • optimal alchemical protocols for each transformation • “difficulty” of transformations • estimates of Δ G and ΔΔ G directly • estimates of conformational reorganization energies

  7. AI-Assisted Discovery of Molecular Mechanisms from Simulations Gerhard Hummer Challenges in MD of biological systems: 1. Sampling problem 2. Interpretation problem Transition Path Sampling Peter G. Bolhuis, David Chandler, Christoph Dellago, and Phillip L. Geissler, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 53 , 291 (2002)

  8. Transition path “shooting from the top” Hendrik Jung , Kei-ichi Okazaki, and Gerhard Hummer, JCP 147 , 152716 (2017)

  9. Machine learning of committor P. G. Bolhuis, D. Chandler, C. Dellago, & P. L. Geissler, Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 53 , 291 (2002); H. Jung , K. Okazaki, & G. Hummer, JCP 147 , 152716 (2017); H. Jung, R. Covino, & G. Hummer, arxiv 1901.04595 (2019)

  10. AI assisted discovery of reaction coordinates Committor (p) vs reaction coordinate (q): Transition state ensumble: Committor modeled with self-normalizing ANN Total likelihood: Loss function to minimize: Metropolis-Hastings criterion of path acceptance: Hendrik Jung, Roberto Covino, and Gerhard Hummer, arxiv 1901.04595 (2019)

  11. AI assisted discovery of reaction coordinates Hendrik Jung, Roberto Covino, and Gerhard Hummer, arxiv 1901.04595 (2019)

Recommend


More recommend